Widening the Indications for Intrasaccular Flow Disruption: WEB 17 in the Treatment of Aneurysm Locations Different from Those in the Good Clinical Practice Trials

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Moret J,
   3. Barreau X, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:553–62 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013448 pmid:28965106

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Arthur AS,
   2. Molyneux A,
   3. Coon AL, et al

   ; WEB-IT Study investigators. The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results in the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) Study. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:924–30 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014815 pmid:30992395

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Spelle L,
   3. Molyneux A, et al

   ; WEBCAST and French Observatory Investigators. Clinical and anatomical follow-up in patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB device: 1-year follow-up report in the cumulated population of 2 prospective, multicenter series (WEBCAST and French Observatory). Neurosurgery 2016;78:133–41 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001106 pmid:26552042

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Lv X,
   2. Zhang Y,
   3. Jiang W, et al

   . Systematic review of Woven EndoBridge for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: complications, adequate occlusion rate, morbidity, and mortality. World Neurosurg 2018;110:20–25 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.113 pmid:29107726

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. van Rooij S,
   2. Sprengers ME,
   3. Peluso JP, et al

   . A systematic review and meta-analysis of Woven EndoBridge single layer for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2020 Feb 6 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/1591019920904421 pmid:32028824

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Ding YH,
   2. Lewis DA,
   3. Kadirvel R, et al

   . The Woven EndoBridge: a new aneurysm occlusion device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:607–11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2399 pmid:21330397

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. van Rooij S,
   2. Peluso JP,
   3. Sluzewski M, et al

   . The new low-profile WEB 17 system for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: first clinical experiences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:859–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5608 pmid:29567650

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Maurer C,
   2. König I,
   3. Berlis A, et al

   . Two-center experience in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge 17 device including midterm follow-up results: a retrospective analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:517–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6177] pmid:1467237

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Mihalea C,
   2. Caroff J,
   3. Pagiola I, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of the fifth generation Woven EndoBridge device: technical note. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;0:1–5 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014343 pmid:30655358

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Molyneux A,
    3. Coon A, et al

    ; WEB-IT Study Investigators. Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB Intra-saccular Therapy Study (WEB-IT). J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:1191–96 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012841 pmid:28096478

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Biondi A,
    3. Narata AP, et al

    . Should indications for WEB aneurysm treatment be enlarged? Report of a series of 20 patients in “atypical” locations for WEB treatment. J Neuroradiol 2017;44:203–09 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2016.12.011 pmid:28262374

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Tuilier T, et al

    . Occlusion assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. Neuroradiology 2016;58:887–91doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1715-9 pmid:27312475

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Roy D,
    2. Milot G,
    3. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    CLEVER. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03844334. Accessed May 15, 2020
15. 15.↵
    1. Popielski J,
    2. Berlis A,
    3. Weber W, et al

    . Two-center experience in the endovascular treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms using the WEB device: a retrospective analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:111–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5413 pmid:29051205

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Goertz L,
    2. Liebig T,
    3. Siebert E, et al

    . Extending the indication of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) embolization to internal carotid artery aneurysms: a multicenter safety and feasibility study. World Neurosurg 2019;126:e965–74 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.198 pmid:30876989

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Zanaty M,
    2. Roa JA,
    3. Tjoumakaris SI, et al

    . Off label use of the WEB device. World Neurosurg 2020;134:e1047–52 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.076 pmid:31759154

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. König I,
    2. Maurer C,
    3. Berlis A, et al

    . Treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms with WEB 17 versus WEB 21 systems: comparison of indications and early angiographic outcomes. Clin Neuroradiol 2020 Sep 3 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00062-020-00946-7 pmid:2880656

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Goertz L,
    2. Liebig T,
    3. Siebert E, et al

    . Low-profile intra-aneurysmal flow disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB predecessor systems for treatment of small intracranial aneurysms: comparative analysis of procedural safety and feasibility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1766–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6183] pmid:31488499

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Van Rooij WJ,
    2. Keeren GI,
    3. Peluso JP, et al

    . Clinical and angiographic results of coiling of 196 very small (< or = 3 mm) intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:835–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1429 pmid:19131407

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Yamaki VN,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of very small intracaranial aneurysms: meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:862–67 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4651 pmid:26721770

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Barbe C,
    3. Spelle L

    ; ATENA investigators. Endovascular treatment of very small unruptured aneurysms: rate of procedural complications, clinical outcome, and anatomical results. Stroke 2010;41:2855–59 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588830 pmid:21030707

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Nguyen TN,
    2. Raymond I,
    3. Guilbert F, et al

    . Association of endovascular therapy of very small ruptured aneurysms with higher rates of procedure-related rupture. J Neurosurg 2008;108:1088–92 doi:10.3171/JNS/2008/108/6/1088 pmid:18518708

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Lanzino G,
    2. Kallmes DF

    . Endovascular treatment of very small ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2008;108:1087 doi:10.3171/JNS/2008/108/6/1087 pmid:18518707

    CrossRefPubMed