Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric Neck CT

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Broder J,
   3. Fordham LA,
   4. Warshauer DM

   . Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000–2006. Emerg Radiol 2007;14:227–32 doi:10.1007/s10140-007-0618-9 pmid:17505849

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Markel TA,
   3. Kumar R,
   4. Koontz NA, et al

   . The utility of computed tomography as a screening tool for the evaluation of pediatric blunt chest trauma. J Trauma 2009;67:23–28 doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e318184ba9a pmid:19590303

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Blackwell CD,
   3. Gorelick M,
   4. Holmes JF, et al

   . Pediatric head trauma: changes in use of computed tomography in emergency departments in the United States over time. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49:320–24 doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.09.025 pmid:17145113

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Brenner DJ,
   3. Hall EJ

   . Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277–84 doi:10.1056/NEJMra072149 pmid:18046031

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Shahi V,
   3. Brinjikji W,
   4. Cloft HJ, et al

   . Trends in CT utilization for pediatric fall patients in US emergency departments. Acad Radiol 2015;22:898–903 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2015.02.016 pmid:25957501

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Brenner D,
   3. Elliston C,
   4. Hall E, et al

   . Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289–96 doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 pmid:11159059

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   UNSCEAR 2013 Report. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. 2013. http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2013/13-85418_Report_2013_Annex_A.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2017
8. 8.↵
   2. Brenner DJ

   . Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:228–31; discussion 242–44 doi:10.1007/s00247-002-0671-1 pmid:11956700

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Mettler FA Jr.,
   3. Wiest PW,
   4. Locken JA, et al

   . CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 2000;20:353–59 doi:10.1088/0952-4746/20/4/301 pmid:11140709

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Zacharias C,
    3. Alessio AM,
    4. Otto RK, et al

    . Pediatric CT: strategies to lower radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:950–56 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9026 pmid:23617474

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Berrington de Gonzalez A,
    3. Mahesh M,
    4. Kim KP, et al

    . Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2071–77 doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440 pmid:20008689

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Miglioretti DL,
    3. Johnson E,
    4. Williams A, et al

    . The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 2013;167:700–07 doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.311 pmid:23754213

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Spampinato MV,
    3. Tipnis S,
    4. Tavernier J, et al

    . Thyroid doses and risk to paediatric patients undergoing neck CT examinations. Eur Radiol 2015;25:1883–90 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3590-x pmid:25638220

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Yamauchi-Kawaura C,
    3. Fujii K,
    4. Aoyama T, et al

    . Radiation dose evaluation in head and neck MDCT examinations with a 6-year-old child anthropomorphic phantom. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:1206–14 doi:10.1007/s00247-009-1495-z pmid:20066408

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Huda W,
    3. Spampinato MV,
    4. Tipnis SV, et al

    . Computation of thyroid doses and carcinogenic radiation risks to patients undergoing neck CT examinations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2013;156:436–44 doi:10.1093/rpd/nct090 pmid:23579263

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Paolicchi F,
    3. Faggioni L,
    4. Bastiani L, et al

    . Optimizing the balance between radiation dose and image quality in pediatric head CT: findings before and after intensive radiologic staff training. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:1309–15 doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11741 pmid:24848830

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Scholtz JE,
    3. Kaup M,
    4. Kraft J, et al

    . Objective and subjective image quality of primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma on head and neck low-tube-voltage 80-kVp computed tomography. Neuroradiology 2015;57:645–51 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1512-x pmid:25808122

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Gaddikeri S,
    3. Andre JB,
    4. Benjert J, et al

    . Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction on image quality of contrast-enhanced neck CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:391–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4123 pmid:25300982

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Deak PD,
    3. Smal Y,
    4. Kalender WA

    . Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 2010;257:158–66 doi:10.1148/radiol.10100047 pmid:20851940

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Kalra MK,
    3. Maher MM,
    4. Toth TL, et al

    . Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 2004;233:649–57 doi:10.1148/radiol.2333031150 pmid:15498896

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Yu L,
    3. Bruesewitz MR,
    4. Thomas KB, et al

    . Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. Radiographics 2011;31:835–48 doi:10.1148/rg.313105079 pmid:21571660

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1–332 doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003 pmid:18082557

    CrossRefPubMed