Advertisement

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Risk of Branch Occlusion and Ischemic Complications with the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms

N. Adeeb, C.J. Griessenauer, A.A. Dmytriw, H. Shallwani, R. Gupta, P.M. Foreman, H. Shakir, J. Moore, N. Limbucci, S. Mangiafico, A. Kumar, C. Michelozzi, Y. Zhang, V.M. Pereira, C.C. Matouk, M.R. Harrigan, A.H. Siddiqui, E.I. Levy, L. Renieri, T.R. Marotta, C. Cognard, C.S. Ogilvy and A.J. Thomas
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5696

References

  1. 1.↵
    2. Szikora I,
    3. Turányi E,
    4. Marosfoi M
    . Evolution of flow-diverter endothelialization and thrombus organization in giant fusiform aneurysms after flow diversion: a histopathologic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1716–20 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4336 pmid:26251428
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    2. Nelson PK,
    3. Lylyk P,
    4. Szikora I, et al
    . The Pipeline Embolization Device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris S,
    4. Dumont AS, et al
    . Treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. Neurosurgery 2013;72:883–89 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31828ba984 pmid:23407289
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    2. Albuquerque FC,
    3. Park MS,
    4. Abla AA, et al
    . A reappraisal of the Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. J Neurointerventional Surg 2015;7:641–45 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011340 pmid:25092926
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    2. Ducruet AF,
    3. Crowley RW,
    4. Albuquerque FC, et al
    . Reconstructive endovascular treatment of a ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm using the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:e20 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010358 pmid:22717921
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    2. Mazur MD,
    3. Kilburg C,
    4. Wang V, et al
    . Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of vertebral artery aneurysms: the fate of covered branch vessels. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:1041–47 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012040 pmid:26491041
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    2. Phillips TJ,
    3. Wenderoth JD,
    4. Phatouros CC, et al
    . Safety of the Pipeline Embolization Device in treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1225–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3166 pmid:22678845
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    2. Siddiqui AH,
    3. Abla AA,
    4. Kan P, et al
    . Panacea or problem: flow diverters in the treatment of symptomatic large or giant fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;116:1258–66 doi:10.3171/2012.2.JNS111942 pmid:22404673
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    2. Dmytriw AA,
    3. Adeeb N,
    4. Kumar A, et al
    . Flow diversion for basilar apex aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2018 Feb 26. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx628 pmid:29529233
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    2. Flemming KD,
    3. Wiebers DO,
    4. Brown RD Jr., et al
    . The natural history of radiographically defined vertebrobasilar nonsaccular intracranial aneurysms. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;20:270–79 doi:10.1159/000087710 pmid:16123548
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    2. Wiebers DO,
    3. Whisnant JP,
    4. Huston J, et al
    ; International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3 pmid:12867109
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Lopes D, et al
    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline Embolization Device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al
    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576 pmid:17615366
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    2. Rangel-Castilla L,
    3. Munich SA,
    4. Jaleel N, et al
    . Patency of anterior circulation branch vessels after Pipeline embolization: longer-term results from 82 aneurysm cases. J Neurosurg 2017;126:1064–69 doi:10.3171/2016.4.JNS16147 pmid:27285547
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    2. Puffer RC,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al
    . Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;116:892–96 doi:10.3171/2011.11.JNS111612 pmid:22224787
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    2. Szikora I,
    3. Berentei Z,
    4. Kulcsar Z, et al
    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2023 pmid:20150304
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    2. Griessenauer CJ,
    3. Ogilvy CS,
    4. Foreman PM, et al
    . Pipeline Embolization Device for small intracranial aneurysms: evaluation of safety and efficacy in a multicenter cohort. Neurosurgery 2017;80:579–87 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001377 pmid:27489165
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    2. Griessenauer CJ,
    3. Ogilvy CS,
    4. Foreman PM, et al
    . Pipeline Embolization Device for small paraophthalmic artery aneurysms with an emphasis on the anatomical relationship of ophthalmic artery origin and aneurysm. J Neurosurg 2016;125:1352–59 doi:10.3171/2015.12.JNS152499 pmid:26943842
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    2. Vedantam A,
    3. Rao VY,
    4. Shaltoni HM, et al
    . Incidence and clinical implications of carotid branch occlusion following treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. Neurosurgery 2015;76:173–78; discussion 178 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000595 pmid:25549190
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al
    . Patency of the anterior choroidal artery after flow-diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:537–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4139 pmid:25339646
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al
    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:84–88 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.02.018 pmid:24731582
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    2. Gawlitza M,
    3. Januel AC,
    4. Tall P, et al
    . Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis: a single-center series with special emphasis on covered cortical branches and perforating arteries. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:481–87 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011682 pmid:25878068
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Cite this article
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Bookmark this article
Risk of Branch Occlusion and Ischemic Complications with the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms
N. Adeeb, C.J. Griessenauer, A.A. Dmytriw, H. Shallwani, R. Gupta, P.M. Foreman, H. Shakir, J. Moore, N. Limbucci, S. Mangiafico, A. Kumar, C. Michelozzi, Y. Zhang, V.M. Pereira, C.C. Matouk, M.R. Harrigan, A.H. Siddiqui, E.I. Levy, L. Renieri, T.R. Marotta, C. Cognard, C.S. Ogilvy, A.J. Thomas
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2018, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5696
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Purchase

Jump to section

Advertisement