Brain Diffusion Abnormalities in Children with Tension-Type and Migraine-Type Headaches

References

1. 1.↵
   Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013:33:629–808 doi:10.1177/0333102413485658 pmid:23771276

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Lewis DW,
   3. Dorbad D

   . The utility of neuroimaging in the evaluation of children with migraine or chronic daily headache who have normal neurologic examinations. Headache 2000;40:629–32 doi:10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.040008629.x pmid:10971658

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Schwedt TJ,
   3. Guo Y,
   4. Rothner AD

   . “Benign” imaging abnormalities in children and adolescents with headache. Headache 2006;46:387–98 doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00371.x pmid:16618255

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Fazekas F,
   3. Koch M,
   4. Schmidt R, et al

   . The prevalence of cerebral damage varies with migraine type: a MRI study. Headache 1992;32:287–91 pmid:1399549

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Jäger HR,
   3. Griffin NJ,
   4. Goadsby PJ

   . Diffusion and perfusion weighted MR imaging in persistent migrainous visual disturbances. Cephalagia 2005;25:323–32 pmid:15839846

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Oberndorfer S,
   3. Wober C,
   4. Nasel C, et al

   . Familial hemiplegic migraine: follow-up findings of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), perfusion-MRI and [99mTc] HMPAO-SPECT in a patient with prolonged hemiplegic aura. Cephalalgia 2004;24:533–39 pmid:15196295

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Rocca MA,
   3. Colombo B,
   4. Pratesi A, et al

   . A magnetization transfer imaging study of the brain in patients with migraine. Neurology 2000;54:507–09 pmid:10668727

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Messina R,
   3. Rocca MA,
   4. Colombo B, et al

   . White matter microstructure abnormalities in pediatric migraine patients. Cephalalgia 2015;35:1278–86 doi:10.1177/0333102415578428 pmid:25795038

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Degirmenci B,
   3. Yaman M,
   4. Haktanir A, et al

   . Cerebral and cerebellar ADC values during a migraine attack. Neuroradiology 2007;49:419–26 doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0201-1 pmid:17225143

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Belvís R,
    3. Ramos R,
    4. Villa C, et al

    . Brain apparent water diffusion coefficient magnetic resonance imaging during a prolonged visual aura. Headache 2010;50:1045–49 doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01672.x pmid:20408884

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Forkert ND,
    3. Li MD,
    4. Lober RM, et al

    . Gray matter growth is accompanied by increasing blood flow and decreasing apparent diffusion coefficient during childhood. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1738–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4772 pmid:27102314

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Grech-Sollars M,
    3. Hales PW,
    4. Miyazaki K, et al

    . Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain. NMR Biomed 2015;28:468–85 doi:10.1002/nbm.3269 pmid:25802212

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Stejskal EO,
    3. Tanner JE

    . Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. Journal of Chemical Physics 1965;42:288–92

    CrossRefWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Mazziotta J,
    3. Toga A,
    4. Evans A, et al

    . A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001;356:1293–322 doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0915 pmid:11545704

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Sakov A,
    3. Golani I,
    4. Lipkind D, et al

    . High-throughput data analysis in behavior genetics. Ann Appl Stat 2010;4:743–63 doi:10.1214/09-AOAS304

    CrossRef
16. 16.↵
    2. Wilcox SL,
    3. Veggeberg R,
    4. Lemme J, et al

    . Increased functional activation of limbic brain regions during negative emotional processing in migraine. Front Hum Neurosci 2016;10:366 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00366 pmid:27507939

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Demarquay G,
    3. Mauguière F

    . Central nervous system underpinnings of sensory hypersensitivity in migraine: insights from neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies. Headache 2016;56:1418–38 doi:10.1111/head.12651 pmid:26350583

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Akerman S,
    3. Holland PR,
    4. Goadsby PJ

    . Diencephalic and brainstem mechanisms in migraine. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011;12:570–84 doi:10.1038/nrn3057 pmid:21931334

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Cutrer FM,
    3. O'Donnell A,
    4. Sanchez del Rio M

    . Functional neuroimaging: enhanced understanding of migraine pathophysiology. Neurology 2000;55(9 suppl 2):S36–45 pmid:11089518

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Weiller C,
    3. May A,
    4. Limmroth V, et al

    . Brain stem activation in spontaneous human migraine attacks. Nat Med 1995;1:658–60 doi:10.1038/nm0795-658 pmid:7585147

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Maleki N,
    3. Becerra L,
    4. Brawn J, et al

    . Common hippocampal structural and functional changes in migraine. Brain Struct Funct 2013;218:903–12 doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0437-y pmid:22760159

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Schmidt-Wilcke T,
    3. Leinisch E,
    4. Straube A, et al

    . Gray matter decrease in patients with chronic tension type headache. Neurology 2005;65:1483–86 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000183067.94400.80 pmid:16275843

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Amin FM,
    3. Hougaard A,
    4. Magon S, et al

    . Altered thalamic connectivity during spontaneous attacks of migraine without aura: a resting state fMRI study. Cephalalgia 2017 Jan 1. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/0333102417729113 pmid:28853611

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Magon S,
    3. May A,
    4. Stankewitz A, et al

    . Morphological abnormalities of thalamic subnuclei in migraine: a multicenter MRI study at 3 Tesla. J Neurosci 2015;35:13800–06 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2154-15.2015 pmid:26446230

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Jia Z,
    4. Chen X, et al

    . Volumetric abnormalities of thalamic subnuclei in medication overuse headache. J Headache Pain 2017;18:82 doi:10.1186/s10194-017-0791-5 pmid:28808921

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Schmitz N,
    3. Admiraal-Behloul F,
    4. Arkink EB, et al

    . Attack frequency and disease duration as indicators for brain damage in migraine. Headache 2008;48:1044–55 doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01133.x pmid:18479421

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Coppola G,
    3. Di Renzo A,
    4. Tinelli E, et al

    . Thalamo-cortical network activity between migraine attacks: insights from MRI-based microstructural and functional resting-state network correlation analysis. J Headache Pain 2016;17:100 doi:10.1186/s10194-016-0693-y pmid:27778244

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Genizi J,
    3. Khourieh Matar A,
    4. Zelnik N, et al

    . Frequency of pediatric migraine with aura in a clinic-based sample. Headache 2016;56:113–17 doi:10.1111/head.12741 pmid:26790850

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Split W,
    3. Neuman W

    . Epidemiology of migraine among students from randomly selected secondary schools in Lodz. Headache 1999;39:494–501 doi:10.1046/j.1526-4610.1999.3907494.x pmid:11279934

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Zwart JA,
    3. Dyb G,
    4. Holmen TL, et al

    . The prevalence of migraine and tension-type headaches among adolescents in Norway: the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (Head-HUNT-Youth), a large population-based epidemiological study. Cephalalgia 2004;24:373–79 doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00680.x pmid:15096226

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Fendrich K,
    3. Vennemann M,
    4. Pfaffenrath V, et al

    . Headache prevalence among adolescents: the German DMKG headache study. Cephalalgia 2007;27:347–54 doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01289.x pmid:17376112

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science