Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Brief ReportUltra-High-Field MRI/Imaging of Epilepsy/Demyelinating Diseases/Inflammation/Infection
Open Access

7T MRI as a Powerful Tool to Detect Small- and Medium-Size Vessel CNS Vasculitis

Angelika Hoffmann, William Almiri, Pasquale Mordasini, Alexandrine Bähler, David J. Seiffge, Martina B. Göldlin, Eugen Jäger, Ioan-Paul Muresan, Lisa Christ, Mirjam R. Heldner, Roland Wiest and Piotr Radojewski
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2025, 46 (6) 1283-1286; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8627
Angelika Hoffmann
aFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.H., W.A., P.M., A.B., R.W., P.R.), Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Angelika Hoffmann
William Almiri
aFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.H., W.A., P.M., A.B., R.W., P.R.), Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for William Almiri
Pasquale Mordasini
aFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.H., W.A., P.M., A.B., R.W., P.R.), Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
bNetzwerk Radiologie (P.M.), Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pasquale Mordasini
Alexandrine Bähler
aFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.H., W.A., P.M., A.B., R.W., P.R.), Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Seiffge
cDepartment of Neurology (D.J.S., M.B.G., M.R.H.), University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David J. Seiffge
Martina B. Göldlin
cDepartment of Neurology (D.J.S., M.B.G., M.R.H.), University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martina B. Göldlin
Eugen Jäger
dInstitute of Radiology (E.J.), Clinic Maennedorf, Maennedorf, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ioan-Paul Muresan
eDepartment of Neurology (I.-P.M.), RHNe, Hôpital Pourtalès, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Christ
fDepartment of Rheumatology (L.C.), Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mirjam R. Heldner
cDepartment of Neurology (D.J.S., M.B.G., M.R.H.), University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mirjam R. Heldner
Roland Wiest
aFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.H., W.A., P.M., A.B., R.W., P.R.), Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
gTranslational Imaging Center (TIC) (R.W., P.R.), Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roland Wiest
Piotr Radojewski
aFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.H., W.A., P.M., A.B., R.W., P.R.), Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
gTranslational Imaging Center (TIC) (R.W., P.R.), Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Piotr Radojewski
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Imaging can help to diagnose CNS vasculitis. Yet so far, no imaging studies of CNS vasculitis at 7T are available. We share our experience of vessel wall imaging (VWI) at 7T in patients with suspected vasculitis. All included patients (n=45) underwent a clinically approved 7T MRI comprising high-resolution arterial TOF angiography as well as high-resolution VWI with T1 sampling perfection with application-optimized contrast using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) and T1 SE acquired pre- and postcontrast. Twenty-three patients showed negative and 22 patients showed positive VWI at 7T. Ten of 22 7T VWI-positive cases were suggestive of vasculitis with 9 patients showing VWI of large- and medium-size vessels and 1 patient VWI of small vessels. Small-vessel vasculitis was only depicted with 7T VWI, but not 3T VWI. Our work demonstrates that diagnosing CNS vasculitis, especially small-vessel vasculitis, is feasible at 7T and highlights the potential of high-field VWI encouraging further studies in this field.

ABBREVIATIONS:

FS
fat-saturated
TIC
Translational Imaging Center
VWI
vessel wall imaging

CNS vasculitis is a relatively rare but serious and potentially life-threatening condition.1,2 The diagnostic process of CNS vasculitis is usually challenging, because there are currently no specific biochemical, immunologic, serologic, or imaging techniques available.3 A biopsy of the leptomeninges or cortex remains the standard, yet it is an invasive method associated with relevant morbidity and it is prone to sampling error and thus, prone to false-negative results.4,5 DSA has strongly varying sensitivity, decreasing significantly in small vessels, emphasizing that a normal angiogram therefore does not exclude primary CNS vasculitis.6⇓–8 Vessel wall imaging (VWI) is a useful adjunct technique to visualize vascular changes indicative of vasculitis that differ, for example, from intracranial atherosclerotic plaques and other causes of intracranial arterial narrowing.1,9 Current vessel wall visualization techniques at 3T are limited by its special resolution and SNR limits and do not resolve smaller intracranial vessels. Common pitfalls are caused by slow flow, dural enhancement, veins, and vasa vasorum mimicking arterial wall thickening or enhancement.9 So far VWI for the assessment of vasculitis has mainly been performed at 3T9 and explored at lower field strengths.10 While VWI at 7T is widely explored, especially in atherosclerotic disease and aneurysms, imaging studies specifically dedicated to vasculitis at 7T are currently not available.11 The aim of this work is to share our experience of VWI at 7T in patients with suspected vasculitis and highlight the potential of this technique at higher field strength.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively screened the health records of our tertiary care institution to identify patients examined at 7T MRI with clinical suspicion of any CNS vasculitis. This retrospective analysis was approved by the local ethic committee (2020-02902). As far as being applicable to this brief report, the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed. Patients with suspicion of any form of CNS vasculitis were included (ie, involvement of large vessels, small vessels or mixed pattern, suspected or confirmed neurovascular pathologies). Cases with isolated leptomeningeal enhancement only were classified as negative for vessel wall enhancement.

All patients were scanned on a clinically approved 7T whole-body MRI scanner (Magnetom Terra, clinical mode, Siemens Healthcare) equipped with a 1-channel transmit and 32-channel receive head coil (Nova Medical) and on a 3T scanner (Magnetom Prisma, Siemens Healthcare) with a 32-channel head coil in the same session at the Translational Imaging Center (TIC). This retrospective analysis was approved by the local ethics committee. All patients were informed about the MRI-related risks before the examinations as a part of the routine procedure and signed a general consent form.

VWI at 7T comprised axial arterial TOF angiography 0.14 × 0.14 × 0.25 mm3 (interpolated, acquired: 0.36 × 0.28 × 0.50 mm3) with whole brain coverage; axial T1 sampling perfection with application optimized contrast by using different flip angle evolution (SPACE; Siemens) isovoxel 0.50 × 0.50 × 0.50 mm3 with TR/TE = 1200/13 ms, variable flip angle, turbo factor of 40, and total acquisition time 9 minutes and 16 seconds; as well as T1 spin echo (SE) of a selected region of interest with 0.20 × 0.20 × 1.0 mm3 and TR/TE = 700/13 ms, flip angles = 71°/135°, FOV = 195 × 240 × 16, 2 averages, and total acquisition time of 7 minutes and 45 seconds. The remaining sequences comprised: 3D MP2RAGE, SWI, and T2 TSE sequences as previously described.12

The 3T MRI followed a standardized (standard product sequences) vasculitis contrast-enhanced protocol including TOF angiography 0.50 × 0.50 × 0.50 mm3, VWI axial T1 SPACE 0.50 × 0.50 × 0.50 mm3 (extrapolated) precontrast and postcontrast, TR/TE = 600/12 ms, 2D axial T2 fat-saturated (FS) dark-blood postcontrast 2D axial T1 FS dark-blood, and 2D axial T1 SE 2.0 mm slice thickness, TR/TE = 500/13 ms, flip angle = 70°, FOV = 159 × 159 × 19.8, as well as DSC perfusion if not available from recent examinations. Macrocyclic IV contrast agent (gadobutrol 1 mmol/mL, 1 mL/10 kg body weight, 5 mL/s; Gadovist) was administered. Exemplary T1 SPACE and T1 SE images at 3T and 7T are illustrated in the Supplemental Data.

We extracted the referral information, radiologic reports, final clinical diagnosis and follow-up information if available. VWI was defined as suggestive of vasculitis with the presence of circumferential contrast enhancement in multiple foci on multiple slices with or without abnormalities on TOF angiography. The findings were regarded independent of different etiologies of vasculitis, however, the distribution pattern of vessel involvement was reported. All examinations were interpreted in the clinical routine by 2 experienced clinical readers (5 and 10 years of 7T MRI experience). No additional image reading was performed.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (20 men and 25 women) were examined between November 2020 and July 2023. Median age was 54.8 years (mean 53.6, range 17.8–83.3). All examinations were performed without interruption or side effects. All cases referred for imaging at the TIC were ambiguous, based on standard diagnostic work-up for vasculitis including 1.5T or 3T MRI with or without prior VWI (Supplemental Data). Twenty-one patients had acute or subacute infarcts, 5 patients presented with hemorrhages, and 19 with other pathologies (chronic stroke, leptomeningeal enhancement, white matter lesions). Twenty-one of these patients underwent prior VWI in the routine clinical setting, of whom 10 had vessel wall enhancement. Specifically, the cohort includes cases with an equivocal clinical picture, discrepancies between imaging sessions, diverging multimodal evidence or mismatch between the clinical picture and cerebrovascular findings (Supplemental Data).

All examinations at the TIC were performed in the following order: 7T examination without contrast agent, 3T examination with sequences pre- and postapplication of IV contrast, and 7T examination with contrast agent. The mean time between contrast application and acquisition of T1 SPACE at 7T was 20 minutes (mean 18 minutes, minimum 6, and maximum 54 minutes; the delay was equally distributed among the VWI-negative and VWI-positive cases).

According to 7T radiologic reports, all examinations showed diagnostic quality. Twenty-three (51%) of 45 cases were reported as negative, including 1 previously VWI-positive case in clinical routine at 3T (Supplemental Data) based on negative VWI sequences on 7T MRI with subsequent exclusion of vasculitis. Twenty-two (49%) of 45 cases were reported with positive VWI findings. Ten of those 22 cases were suggestive of vasculitis, 9 affecting large and midsize arteries (Fig 1) and 1 exclusively affecting perforating arteries that are considered to be small vessels, as their diameter is smaller than 300 µm (Fig 2, Supplemental Data).

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Medium- to large-vessel vasculitis. Representative T1 SPACE images of a patient later diagnosed with CNS vasculitis due to Borrelia burgdorferi infection are presented at admission at 3T (A) and 7T (B). VWI at 3T and 7T show enhancement of the proximal M2 segment. The thickened, enhancing vessel wall is more clearly delineated at 7T compared with 3T.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Detection of small vessel vasculitis at 7T with VWI in a patient with Sjögren disease and subacute stroke. Sagittal T1 SPACE contrast-enhanced vessel wall images are shown at 3T (A) and 7T (B). The MCA perforators are enlarged in both images. At 7T, vessel wall enhancement of the MCA perforators, not visible at 3T, is visualized. The MCA perforators are enlarged in both images to better appreciate vessel wall enhancement at 7T and a very faint perforator vessel silhouette at 3T in knowledge of the 7T images. Medium-sized vessels were not affected in this patient.

The remaining 12 cases were reported with arteriosclerosis (7), nonvasculitic small vessel disease (2), dolichoectasia (1), local inflammatory process not related to vasculitis (1), and persisting imaging changes after inflammation (1).

DISCUSSION

In this report, we highlight the potential of 7T imaging to support the diagnosis of CNS vasculitis, because it overcomes several limitations encountered at lower field strengths.

In contrast to 3T, 7T has a higher SNR and imaging resolution and is able to sharply resolve the vessel wall and its lumen.13 We used a whole-brain 3D T1 SPACE sequence and a 2D T1 TSE sequence, covering the brain area adapted to the clinical question. As illustrated in this brief report, vasculitic vessel wall enhancement can be better delineated at 7T with both sequences compared with 3T. T1 TSE achieved a higher in-plane resolution allowing slightly better characterization of a particular vessel segment. However, the whole brain coverage of T1 SPACE is advantageous, because vasculitis often affects several vessel segments.14 Also, the possibility to assess the whole vessel wall circumference with 3D isotropic data of T1 SPACE improves analysis. Importantly, smaller vessels, such as perforating arteries, are robustly visualized at 7T with the whole-brain T1 SPACE. This is of particular significance, as other techniques such as DSA are only moderately sensitive in detecting VWI of small vessels.

Thus, VWI at 7T may help to depict especially deep small vessel involvement in, for example, autoimmune connective tissue disorders that are prone to cerebrovascular events compared with the overall population. To date, there are only a few published case reports about VWI in patients with rheumatic diseases. For example, a published case report of CNS vasculitis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus who initially presented with stroke, showed circular VWI of the distal ICA and the M1 segment, consistent with vasculitis.15 Another case report of a patient with Sjögren disease with stroke showed circular VWI in the ICA, M1, and the A1 segment, also consistent with CNS vasculitis.16 In the patient with Sjögren disease in our cohort, only perforating vessels were affected, but no medium-sized vessels. Because detection of vessel wall enhancement of perforating vessels is only feasible at very high field strength, we hypothesize that CNS vasculitis is likely underdiagnosed in patients with rheumatic diseases, and merits further investigations.

Also for disease monitoring, 7T VWI may add value because it allows better visualization of the vessel wall and consequently treatment effects. Importantly, as evident in our patient collective, the presented imaging technique is feasible in clinical routine and can help to solve ambiguous cases, with the increasing availability of FDA-approved and Conformité Européenne-certified 7T MR scanners.

Our work has limitations, as the time of contrast application and the acquisition of VWI sequences is nonstandardized, not established at 7T (in contrast to lower field strength17), and varied between individuals but to a similar degree in VWI-positive and VWI-negative cases in this study. Nevertheless, quantitative analysis of vessel wall enhancement was not feasible due to different contrast delay time and a small patient collective. Properties of contrast enhancement as well as optimal delay for VWI at 7T including direct application at 7T need to be further studied; they have been examined to some extent, however, for other applications but not specifically for CNS vasculitis.18,19 Potentially, delayed imaging could lead to a decrease of false-positive findings reducing specificity. On the other hand, sensitivity could increase, because the contrast agent has more time to accumulate within the vessel wall. In the field of CNS vasculitis specifically, a prospective head-to-head comparison of 7T versus 3T would be necessary to prove a benefit of the higher field strength. Furthermore, advantages and pitfalls of T1 SPACE and T1 SE at 7T should be examined with T1 SPACE providing whole brain coverage and T1 SE providing superior SNR in a selected field of view. Finally, subgroups of patients with CNS vasculitis benefiting most from 7T must be identified. In summary, higher resolution VWI at 7T is feasible, addresses several limitations encountered at lower field strength, and shows the potential to improve detection of CNS vasculitis, including involvement of small vessels, encouraging further studies in this field.

Acknowledgments

We kindly thank our magnetic resonance imaging technologists, in particular Samuel Stettler, Sabrina Herzog, and Osman Limanoski for the excellent support.

Footnotes

  • Indicates article with online supplemental data.

  • This research has been supported by the sitem-insel Support Funds 2021.

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rice CM,
    2. Scolding NJ
    . The diagnosis of primary central nervous system vasculitis. Pract Neurol 2020;20:109–14 doi:10.1136/practneurol-2018-002002 pmid:31649101
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kitching AR,
    2. Anders HJ,
    3. Basu N, et al
    . ANCA-associated vasculitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020;6:71 doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0204-y pmid:32855422
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pascarella R,
    2. Antonenko K,
    3. Boulouis G, et al
    . European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS). Eur Stroke J 2023;8:842–79 doi:10.1177/23969873231190431 pmid:37903069
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Berlit P,
    2. Kraemer M
    . Cerebral vasculitis in adults: what are the steps in order to establish the diagnosis? Red flags and pitfalls. Clin Exp Immunol 2014;175:419–24 doi:10.1111/cei.12221 pmid:24117125
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. McVerry F,
    2. McCluskey G,
    3. McCarron P, et al
    . Diagnostic test results in primary CNS vasculitis: a systematic review of published cases. Neurol Clin Pract 2017;7:256–65 doi:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000359 pmid:30107009
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Agarwal S,
    2. Sebastian LJD,
    3. Gaikwad S, et al
    . The role of susceptibility-weighted imaging & contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of primary CNS vasculitis: a large case series. Sci Rep 2024;14:4718 doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55222-2 pmid:38413676
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Chen SH,
    2. Sur S,
    3. Sedighim S, et al
    . Utility of diagnostic cerebral angiography in the management of suspected central nervous system vasculitis. J Clin Neurosci 2019;64:98–100 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2019.03.058 pmid:30952556
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kuker W
    . Cerebral vasculitis: imaging signs revisited. Neuroradiology 2007;49:471–79 doi:10.1007/s00234-007-0223-3
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mandell DM,
    2. Mossa-Basha M,
    3. Qiao Y, et al
    ; Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI: principles and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:218–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4893 pmid:27469212
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kumagai K,
    2. Hayashi M,
    3. Takahashi T, et al
    . Three-dimensional vessel wall imaging with 1.5-T MRI to visualize invisible occluded cerebral artery. Acta Radiology 2023;64:3052–55 doi:10.1177/02841851231205487 pmid:37828855
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zhang C,
    2. Shi J
    . 7T MRI for intracranial vessel wall lesions and its associated neurological disorders: a systematic review. Brain Sci 2022;12:528 doi:10.3390/brainsci12050528 pmid:35624915
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Radojewski P,
    2. Slotboom J,
    3. Joseph A, et al
    . Clinical implementation of 7T MRI for the identification of incidental intracranial aneurysms versus anatomic variants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:2172–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7331 pmid:34711553
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. van der Kolk AG,
    2. Zwanenburg JJ,
    3. Brundel M, et al
    . Intracranial vessel wall imaging at 7.0-T MRI. Stroke 2011;42:2478–84 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.620443 pmid:21757674
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Eiden S,
    2. Beck C,
    3. Venhoff N, et al
    . High-resolution contrast-enhanced vessel wall imaging in patients with suspected cerebral vasculitis: prospective comparison of whole-brain 3D T1 SPACE versus 2D T1 black blood MRI at 3 Tesla. PLoS One 2019;14:e0213514 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213514 pmid:30849127
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Nishigaichi A,
    2. Oiwa H,
    3. Hosokawa Y, et al
    . A case of systemic lupus erythematosus associated with cerebral arteritis: a case report and case-based literature review. Nagoya J Med Sci 2020;82:807–14 doi:10.18999/nagjms.82.4.807 pmid:33311811
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Unnikrishnan G,
    2. Hiremath N,
    3. Chandrasekharan K, et al
    . Cerebral large-vessel vasculitis in Sjogren’s syndrome: utility of high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging. J Clin Neurol 2018;14:588–90 doi:10.3988/jcn.2018.14.4.588 pmid:30284770
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lindenholz A,
    2. van der Kolk AG,
    3. Zwanenburg JJM, et al
    . The use and pitfalls of intracranial vessel wall imaging: how we do it. Radiology 2018;286:12–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162096 pmid:29261469
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Noebauer-Huhmann IM,
    2. Szomolanyi P,
    3. Kronnerwetter C, et al
    . Brain tumours at 7T MRI compared to 3T–contrast effect after half and full standard contrast agent dose: initial results. Eur Radiol 2015;25:106–12 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3351-2 pmid:25194707
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Knobloch G,
    2. Frenzel T,
    3. Pietsch H, et al
    . Signal enhancement and enhancement kinetics of gadobutrol, gadoteridol, and gadoterate meglumine in various body regions: a comparative animal study. Invest Radiology 2020;55:367–73 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000645 pmid:31985602
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received July 3, 2024.
  • Accepted after revision December 3, 2024.
  • © 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 46 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 46, Issue 6
1 Jun 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
7T MRI as a Powerful Tool to Detect Small- and Medium-Size Vessel CNS Vasculitis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Angelika Hoffmann, William Almiri, Pasquale Mordasini, Alexandrine Bähler, David J. Seiffge, Martina B. Göldlin, Eugen Jäger, Ioan-Paul Muresan, Lisa Christ, Mirjam R. Heldner, Roland Wiest, Piotr Radojewski
7T MRI as a Powerful Tool to Detect Small- and Medium-Size Vessel CNS Vasculitis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2025, 46 (6) 1283-1286; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8627

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
7T MRI vasculitis imaging
Angelika Hoffmann, William Almiri, Pasquale Mordasini, Alexandrine Bähler, David J. Seiffge, Martina B. Göldlin, Eugen Jäger, Ioan-Paul Muresan, Lisa Christ, Mirjam R. Heldner, Roland Wiest, Piotr Radojewski
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2025, 46 (6) 1283-1286; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8627
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Synthetic MRI Links to MS Disability
  • 7T MRI of the Internal Auditory Canal
Show more Ultra-High-Field MRI/Imaging of Epilepsy/Demyelinating Diseases/Inflammation/Infection

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire