Deep Learning–Based Reconstruction for Accelerated Cervical Spine MRI: Utility in the Evaluation of Myelopathy and Degenerative Diseases

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Griswold MA,
   2. Jakob PM,
   3. Heidemann RM, et al

   . Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202–10 doi:10.1002/mrm.10171 pmid:12111967

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Lustig M,
   2. Donoho D,
   3. Pauly JM

   . Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1182–95 doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 pmid:17969013

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Lustig M,
   2. Pauly JM

   . SPIRiT: iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:457–71 doi:10.1002/mrm.22428 pmid:20665790

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Ye JC

   . Compressed sensing MRI: a review from signal processing perspective. BMC Biomed Eng 2019;1:8 doi:10.1186/s42490-019-0006-z pmid:32903346

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Wang S,
   2. Su Z,
   3. Ying L, et al

   . Accelerating magnetic resonance imaging via deep learning. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging 2016;2016:514–17 doi:10.1109/ISBI.2016.7493320 pmid:31709031

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Hammernik K,
   2. Klatzer T,
   3. Kobler E, et al

   . Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:3055–71 doi:10.1002/mrm.26977 pmid:29115689

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Hyun CM,
   2. Kim HP,
   3. Lee SM, et al

   . Deep learning for undersampled MRI reconstruction. Phys Med Biol 2018;63:135007 doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aac71a pmid:29787383

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Yang G,
   2. Yu S,
   3. Dong H, et al

   . DAGAN: deep de-aliasing generative adversarial networks for fast compressed sensing MRI reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018;37:1310–21 doi:10.1109/TMI.2017.2785879 pmid:29870361

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Koch KM,
   2. Sherafati M,
   3. Arpinar VE, et al

   . Analysis and evaluation of a deep learning reconstruction approach with denoising for orthopedic MRI. Radiology Artif Intell 2021;3:e200278 doi:10.1148/ryai.2021200278 pmid:34870214

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Yasaka K,
    2. Tanishima T,
    3. Ohtake Y, et al

    . Deep learning reconstruction for 1.5 T cervical spine MRI: effect on interobserver agreement in the evaluation of degenerative changes. Eur Radiology 2022;32:6118–25 doi:10.1007/s00330-022-08729-z pmid:35348861

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Ueda T,
    2. Ohno Y,
    3. Yamamoto K, et al

    . Deep learning reconstruction of diffusion-weighted MRI improves image quality for prostatic imaging. Radiology 2022;303:373–81 doi:10.1148/radiol.204097 pmid:35103536

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Hahn S,
    2. Yi J,
    3. Lee HJ, et al

    . Image quality and diagnostic performance of accelerated shoulder MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022;218:506–16 doi:10.2214/AJR.21.26577 pmid:34523950

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Yasaka K,
    2. Tanishima T,
    3. Ohtake Y, et al

    . Deep learning reconstruction for the evaluation of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI: comparison with 3T MRI without deep learning reconstruction. Neuroradiology 2022;64:2077–83 doi:10.1007/s00234-022-03024-6 pmid:35918450

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Yoo RE,
    2. Choi SH

    . Deep learning-based image enhancement techniques for fast MRI in neuroimaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2024;23:341–51 doi:10.2463/mrms.rev.2023-0153 pmid:38684425

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Bossuyt PM,
    2. Reitsma JB,
    3. Bruns DE

    ; STARD Group, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2015;277:826–32 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151516 pmid:26509226

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Kingma DP,
    2. Ba J

    . Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv e-prints 2014:14126980
17. 17.↵
    1. Toledano-Massiah S,
    2. Sayadi A,
    3. de Boer R, et al

    . Accuracy of the compressed sensing accelerated 3D-FLAIR sequence for the detection of MS plaques at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:454–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5517 pmid:29348137

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Meindl T,
    2. Wirth S,
    3. Weckbach S, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences. Eur Radiology 2009;19:713–21 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1175-7 pmid:18813933

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Kang Y,
    2. Lee JW,
    3. Koh YH, et al

    . New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W134–40 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5560 pmid:21700974

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Yoo H,
    2. Yoo RE,
    3. Choi SH, et al

    . Deep learning-based reconstruction for acceleration of lumbar spine MRI: a prospective comparison with standard MRI. Eur Radiology 2023;33:8656–68 doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09918-0 pmid:37498386

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Jung W,
    2. Kim J,
    3. Ko J, et al

    . Highly accelerated 3D MPRAGE using deep neural network-based reconstruction for brain imaging in children and young adults. Eur Radiology 2022;32:5468–79 doi:10.1007/s00330-022-08687-6 pmid:35319078

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Awan KM,
    2. Goncalves Filho ALM,
    3. Tabari A, et al

    . Diagnostic evaluation of deep learning accelerated lumbar spine MRI. Neuroradiol J 2024;37:323–31 doi:10.1177/19714009231224428 pmid:38195418

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Kashiwagi N,
    2. Sakai M,
    3. Tsukabe A, et al

    . Ultrafast cervcial spine MRI protocol using deep learning-based reconstruction: diagnostic equivalence to a conventional protocol. Eur J Radiology 2022;156:110531 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110531 pmid:36179465

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Seo G,
    2. Lee SJ,
    3. Park DH, et al

    . Image quality and lesion detectability of deep learning-accelerated T2-weighted Dixon imaging of the cervical spine. Skeletal Radiology 2023;52:2451–59 doi:10.1007/s00256-023-04364-x pmid:37233758

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Kiryu S,
    2. Akai H,
    3. Yasaka K, et al

    . Clinical impact of deep learning reconstruction in MRI. Radiographics 2023;43:E220133 doi:10.1148/RG.220133 pmid:37200221

    CrossRefPubMed