Embolization of Ruptured and Unruptured Aneurysms with the Contour Neurovascular System—Summary of 106 Cases

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Pravdivtseva MS,
   2. Pravdivtsev AN,
   3. Peters S, et al

   . The effect of the size of the new Contour neurovascular device for altering intraaneurysmal flow. Interv Neuroradiol 2023; 31:49–56 doi:10.1177/15910199221145985 pmid:36594503

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Fiorella D,
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Szikora I, et al

   . Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2009;1:56–65 doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.000083 pmid:21994109

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Szikora I,
   2. Berentei Z,
   3. Kulcsar Z, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2023 pmid:20150304

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Akhunbay-Fudge CY,
   2. Deniz K,
   3. Tyagi AK, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using the novel Contour Neurovascular System: a single-center safety and feasibility study. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:987–92 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015628 pmid:31974281

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Bhogal P,
   2. Lylyk I,
   3. Chudyk J, et al

   . The Contour-early human experience of a novel aneurysm occlusion device. Clin Neuroradiol 2021;31:147–54 doi:10.1007/s00062-020-00876-4 pmid:31993679

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Liebig T,
   2. Killer-Oberpfalzer M,
   3. Gal G, et al

   . The safety and effectiveness of the Contour Neurovascular System (Contour) for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms: the CERUS study. Neurosurgery 2022;90:270–77 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001783 pmid:35113830

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Biondi A,
   2. Primikiris P,
   3. Vitale G, et al

   . Endosaccular flow disruption with the Contour Neurovascular System: angiographic and clinical results in a single-center study of 60 unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15:838–43 doi:10.1136/jnis-2022-019271 pmid:35995545

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Hecker C,
   2. Broussalis E,
   3. Pfaff JAR, et al

   . Comparison of the Contour Neurovascular System and Woven EndoBridge device for treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms at a bifurcation or sidewall. J Neurosurg 2023;139:563–72 doi:10.3171/2022.12.JNS222268 pmid:36708532

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Mascitelli JR,
   2. Moyle H,
   3. Oermann EK, et al

   . An update to the Raymond–Roy Occlusion Classification of intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:496–502 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011258 pmid:24898735

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. O’Kelly CJ,
    2. Krings T,
    3. Fiorella D, et al

    . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 doi:10.1177/159101991001600204 pmid:20642887

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Lyden PD,
    2. Lu M,
    3. Levine SR

    ; NINDS rtPA Stroke Study Group, et al. A modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for use in stroke clinical trials: preliminary reliability and validity. Stroke 2001;32:1310–17 doi:10.1161/01.str.32.6.1310 pmid:11387492

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Quinn TJ,
    2. Dawson J,
    3. Walters M

    . Dr John Rankin; his life, legacy and the 50th anniversary of the Rankin Stroke Scale. Scott Med J 2008;53:44–47 doi:10.1258/RSMSMJ.53.1.44 pmid:18422210

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Fisher CM,
    2. Kistler JP,
    3. Davis JM

    . Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 1980;6:1–9 doi:10.1227/00006123-198001000-00001 pmid:7354892

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Hunt WE,
    2. Hess RM

    . Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968;28:14–20 doi:10.3171/jns.1968.28.1.0014 pmid:5635959

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Mostafa K,
    2. Bueno Neves F,
    3. Gärtner F, et al

    . Contour device implantation for treatment of intracranial aneurysms in the basilar tip. Interv Neuroradiol 2023; Dec 10: 15910199231219018 doi:10.1177/15910199231219018 pmid:38073136

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Mostafa K,
    2. Bueno Neves F,
    3. Gärtner F, et al

    . Contour device implantation versus coil embolization for treatment of narrow neck intracranial aneurysms. Sci Rep 2023;13:4904 doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31877-1 pmid:36966218

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Korte J,
    2. Gaidzik F,
    3. Larsen N, et al

    . In vitro and in silico assessment of flow modulation after deploying the Contour Neurovascular System in intracranial aneurysm models. J Neurointerv Surg 2024;16:815–23 doi:10.1136/jnis-2023-020403 pmid:37852752

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Popielski J,
    2. Berlis A,
    3. Weber W, et al

    . Two-center experience in the endovascular treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms using the WEB device: a retrospective analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:111–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5413 pmid:29051205

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Lv X,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Jiang W

    . Systematic review of Woven EndoBridge for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: complications, adequate occlusion rate, morbidity, and mortality. World Neurosurg 2018;110:20–25 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.113 pmid:29107726

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Griessenauer CJ,
    2. Ghozy S,
    3. Biondi A, et al

    . Contour Neurovascular System for endovascular embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a multicenter cohort study of 10 European neurovascular centers. J Neurointerv Surg Epub ahead of print May 17, 2024 doi:10.1136/jnis-2023-021378

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    1. Diana F,
    2. de Dios Lascuevas M,
    3. Peschillo S, et al

    . Intrasaccular flow disruptor-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms using the novel Contour Neurovascular Systems and NEQSTENT: a single-center safety and feasibility study. Brain Sci 2022;12:991 doi:10.3390/brainsci12080991

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Dange NN,
    2. Roy JM

    . Initial experience with the Contour device in the treatment of ruptured intracranial wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: a single-operator, multicenter study. Neurol India 2022;70:2059–64 doi:10.4103/0028-3886.359281 pmid:36352609

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Diestro JDB,
    2. Dibas M,
    3. Adeeb N, et al

    . Intrasaccular flow disruption for ruptured aneurysms: an international multicenter study. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15:844–50 doi:10.1136/jnis-2022-019153 pmid:35868856

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Ghozy S,
    2. Lashin BI,
    3. Elfil M, et al

    . The safety and effectiveness of the Contour Neurovascular System for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of early experience. Interv Neuroradiol 2024;30:496–505 doi:10.1177/15910199221139546 pmid:36384322

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Jagtiani P,
    2. Sioutas GS,
    3. Vivanco-Suarez J, et al

    . An updated meta-analysis on the safety and effectiveness of the Contour Neurovascular system. Interv Neuroradiol Epub ahead of print January 15, 2024 doi:10.1177/15910199231226280 pmid:38225202

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Asnafi S,
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Pierot L, et al

    . Efficacy and safety of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2287–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4900 pmid:27516237

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. van Rooij S,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. Peluso JP, et al

    . A systematic review and meta-analysis of Woven EndoBridge single layer for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2020;26:455–60 doi:10.1177/1591019920904421 pmid:32028824

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Rodriguez-Erazú F,
    2. Cortese J,
    3. Mihalea C, et al

    . Thromboembolic events with the Woven EndoBridge Device: incidence, predictive factors, and management. Neurosurgery 2024;94:183–92 doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000002696 pmid:37728333

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Sprengers ME,
    2. Schaafsma J,
    3. van Rooij WJ, et al

    . Stability of intracranial aneurysms adequately occluded 6 months after coiling: a 3T MR angiography multicenter long-term follow-up study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1768–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1181 pmid:18583406

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Koyanagi M,
    2. Ishii A,
    3. Imamura H, et al

    . Long-term outcomes of coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2018;129:1492–98 doi:10.3171/2017.6.JNS17174 pmid:29303448

    CrossRefPubMed