Predicting Post-Operative Side Effects in VIM MRgFUS Based on THalamus Optimized Multi Atlas Segmentation (THOMAS) on White-Matter-Nulled MRI: A Retrospective Study

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Bruno F,
   2. Catalucci A,
   3. Arrigoni F, et al

   . An experience-based review of HIFU in functional interventional neuroradiology: transcranial MRgFUS thalamotomy for treatment of tremor. Radiol Med 2020;125:877–886 doi:10.1007/s11547-020-01186-y pmid:32266693

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Elias WJ,
   2. Lipsman N,
   3. Ondo WG, et al

   . A Randomized Trial of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor. N Engl J Med 2016;375:730–739 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1600159 pmid:27557301

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Jolesz FA

   . MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Annu Rev Med 2009;60:417–430 doi:10.1146/annurev.med.60.041707.170303 pmid:19630579

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Yamamoto K,
   2. Sarica C,
   3. Loh A, et al

   . Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of tremor. Expert Rev Neurother 2022;22:849–861 doi:10.1080/14737175.2022.2147826 pmid:36469578

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Elias WJ,
   2. Huss D,
   3. Voss T, et al

   . A pilot study of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. N Engl J Med 2013;369:640–648 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1300962 pmid:23944301

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Wintermark M,
   2. Druzgal J,
   3. Huss DS, et al

   . Imaging findings in MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound treatment for patients with essential tremor. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:891–896 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3808 pmid:24371027

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Quadri SA,
   2. Waqas M,
   3. Khan I, et al

   . High-intensity focused ultrasound: past, present, and future in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 2018;44:E16 doi:10.3171/2017.11.FOCUS17610 pmid:29385923

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. de Rijk MC,
   2. Breteler MM,
   3. Graveland GA, et al

   . Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology 1995;45:2143–2146 doi:10.1212/wnl.45.12.2143 pmid:8848182

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Jochems ACC,
   2. Muñoz Maniega S,
   3. Del CVHM, et al

   . Contribution of white matter hyperintensities to ventricular enlargement in older adults. Neuroimage Clin 2022;34:103019 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103019 pmid:35490587

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Børretzen MN,
    2. Bjerknes S,
    3. Sæhle T, et al

    . Long-term follow-up of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor - patient satisfaction and mortality. BMC Neurol 2014;14:120 doi:10.1186/1471-2377-14-120 pmid:24903550

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Peters J,
    2. Maamary J,
    3. Kyle K, et al

    . Outcomes of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy in Tremor Syndromes. Mov Disord 2024;39:173–182 doi:10.1002/mds.29658 pmid:37964429

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Obwegeser AA,
    2. Uitti RJ,
    3. Witte RJ, et al

    . Quantitative and qualitative outcome measures after thalamic deep brain stimulation to treat disabling tremors. Neurosurgery 2001;48:274–281; discussion 281–274 doi:10.1227/00006123-200102000-00004 pmid:11220369

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Boutet A,
    2. Ranjan M,
    3. Zhong J, et al

    . Focused ultrasound thalamotomy location determines clinical benefits in patients with essential tremor. Brain 2018;141:3405–3414 doi:10.1093/brain/awy278 pmid:30452554

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Bruno F,
    2. Catalucci A,
    3. Varrassi M, et al

    . Comparative evaluation of tractography-based direct targeting and atlas-based indirect targeting of the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus in MRgFUS thalamotomy. Sci Rep 2021;11:13538 doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93058-2 pmid:34188190

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Mohammed N,
    2. Patra D,
    3. Nanda A

    . A meta-analysis of outcomes and complications of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in the treatment of essential tremor. Neurosurg Focus 2018;44:E4 doi:10.3171/2017.11.FOCUS17628 pmid:29385917

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Paff M,
    2. Boutet A,
    3. Germann J, et al

    . Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy Sensory Side Effects Follow the Thalamic Structural Homunculus. Neurol Clin Pract 2021;11:e497–e503 doi:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001013 pmid:34484947

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Su JH,
    2. Choi EY,
    3. Tourdias T, et al

    . Improved Vim targeting for focused ultrasound ablation treatment of essential tremor: A probabilistic and patient-specific approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2020;41:4769–4788 doi:10.1002/hbm.25157 pmid:32762005

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Yamamoto K,
    2. Sarica C,
    3. Elias GJB, et al

    . Ipsilateral and axial tremor response to focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: clinical outcomes and probabilistic mapping. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2021-328459

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Agrawal M,
    2. Garg K,
    3. Samala R, et al

    . Outcome and Complications of MR Guided Focused Ultrasound for Essential Tremor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol 2021;12:654711 doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.654711 pmid:34025558

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. King NKK,
    2. Krishna V,
    3. Basha D, et al

    . Microelectrode recording findings within the tractography- defined ventral intermediate nucleus. J Neurosurg 2017;126:1669–1675 doi:10.3171/2016.3.JNS151992 pmid:27447439

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Sammartino F,
    2. Krishna V,
    3. King NK, et al

    . Tractography-Based Ventral Intermediate Nucleus Targeting: Novel Methodology and Intraoperative Validation. Mov Disord 2016;31:1217–1225 doi:10.1002/mds.26633 pmid:27214406

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Wakim AA,
    2. Sioda NA,
    3. Zhou JJ, et al

    . Direct targeting of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a prospective study with comparison to a historical cohort. J Neurosurg 2022;136:662–671 doi:10.3171/2021.2.JNS203815 pmid:34560647

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Abosch A,
    2. Yacoub E,
    3. Ugurbil K, et al

    . An assessment of current brain targets for deep brain stimulation surgery with susceptibility-weighted imaging at 7 Tesla. Neurosurgery 2010;67:1745–1756; discussion 1756 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f74105 pmid:21107206

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Deistung A,
    2. Schäfer A,
    3. Schweser F, et al

    . Toward in vivo histology: a comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with magnitude-, phase-, and R2*-imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength. Neuroimage 2013;65:299–314 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.055 pmid:23036448

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Najdenovska E,
    2. Tuleasca C,
    3. Jorge J, et al

    . Comparison of MRI-based automated segmentation methods and functional neurosurgery targeting with direct visualization of the Ventro-intermediate thalamic nucleus at 7T. Sci Rep 2019;9:1119 doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37825-8 pmid:30718634

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Xiao Y,
    2. Zitella LM,
    3. Duchin Y, et al

    . Multimodal 7T Imaging of Thalamic Nuclei for Preclinical Deep Brain Stimulation Applications. Front Neurosci 2016;10:264 doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00264 pmid:27375422

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Grewal SS,
    2. Middlebrooks EH,
    3. Kaufmann TJ, et al

    . Fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery MRI to delineate the mammillothalamic tract for preoperative direct targeting of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for deep brain stimulation in epilepsy. Neurosurg Focus 2018;45:E6 doi:10.3171/2018.4.FOCUS18147 pmid:30064328

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Morishita T,
    2. Higuchi MA,
    3. Kobayashi H, et al

    . A retrospective evaluation of thalamic targeting for tremor deep brain stimulation using high-resolution anatomical imaging with supplementary fiber tractography. J Neurol Sci 2019;398:148–156 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2019.01.025 pmid:30716581

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Neudorfer C,
    2. Kroneberg D,
    3. Al-Fatly B, et al

    . Personalizing Deep Brain Stimulation Using Advanced Imaging Sequences. Ann Neurol 2022;91:613–628 doi:10.1002/ana.26326 pmid:35165921

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Sudhyadhom A,
    2. Haq IU,
    3. Foote KD, et al

    . A high resolution and high contrast MRI for differentiation of subcortical structures for DBS targeting: the Fast Gray Matter Acquisition T1 Inversion Recovery (FGATIR). Neuroimage 2009;47 Suppl 2:T44–52 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.018 pmid:19362595

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Su JH,
    2. Thomas FT,
    3. Kasoff WS, et al

    . Thalamus Optimized Multi Atlas Segmentation (THOMAS): fast, fully automated segmentation of thalamic nuclei from structural MRI. Neuroimage 2019;194:272–282 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.021 pmid:30894331

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Lipsman N,
    2. Mainprize TG,
    3. Schwartz ML, et al

    . Intracranial applications of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. Neurotherapeutics 2014;11:593–605 doi:10.1007/s13311-014-0281-2 pmid:24850310

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Bouley DM,
    3. Harris BT, et al

    . MRI study of immediate cell viability in focused ultrasound lesions in the rabbit brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:23–30 doi:10.1002/1522-2586(200101)13:1<23::AID-JMRI1004>3.0.CO;2-G

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Ghanouni P,
    2. Pauly KB,
    3. Elias WJ, et al

    . Transcranial MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound: A Review of the Technologic and Neurologic Applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:150–159 doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13632 pmid:26102394

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Ram Z,
    2. Cohen ZR,
    3. Harnof S, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging-guided, high-intensity focused ultrasound for brain tumor therapy. Neurosurgery 2006;59:949–955; discussion 955–946 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000254439.02736.D8 pmid:17143231

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Tustison NJ,
    2. Cook PA,
    3. Holbrook AJ, et al

    . The ANTsX ecosystem for quantitative biological and medical imaging. Sci Rep 2021;11:9068 doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87564-6 pmid:33907199

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Segar DJ,
    2. Lak AM,
    3. Lee S, et al

    . Lesion location and lesion creation affect outcomes after focused ultrasound thalamotomy. Brain 2021;144:3089–3100 doi:10.1093/brain/awab176 pmid:34750621

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Kapadia AN,
    2. Elias GJB,
    3. Boutet A, et al

    . Multimodal MRI for MRgFUS in essential tremor: post-treatment radiological markers of clinical outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020;91:921–927 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2020-322745 pmid:32651242

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Boutet A,
    2. Loh A,
    3. Chow CT, et al

    . A literature review of magnetic resonance imaging sequence advancements in visualizing functional neurosurgery targets. J Neurosurg 2021;135:1445–1458 doi:10.3171/2020.8.JNS201125 pmid:33770759

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Tourdias T,
    2. Saranathan M,
    3. Levesque IR, et al

    . Visualization of intra-thalamic nuclei with optimized white-matter-nulled MPRAGE at 7T. Neuroimage 2014;84:534–545 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.069 pmid:24018302

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Lehman VT,
    2. Lee KH,
    3. Klassen BT, et al

    . MRI and tractography techniques to localize the ventral intermediate nucleus and dentatorubrothalamic tract for deep brain stimulation and MR-guided focused ultrasound: a narrative review and update. Neurosurg Focus 2020;49:E8 doi:10.3171/2020.4.FOCUS20170 pmid:32610293

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Ranjan M,
    2. Elias GJB,
    3. Boutet A, et al

    . Tractography-based targeting of the ventral intermediate nucleus: accuracy and clinical utility in MRgFUS thalamotomy. J Neurosurg 2019:1–8 doi:10.3171/2019.6.JNS19612 pmid:31561221

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Zhuang J,
    2. Hrabe J,
    3. Kangarlu A, et al

    . Correction of eddy-current distortions in diffusion tensor images using the known directions and strengths of diffusion gradients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1188–1193 doi:10.1002/jmri.20727 pmid:17024663

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Coenen VA,
    2. Varkuti B,
    3. Parpaley Y, et al

    . Postoperative neuroimaging analysis of DRT deep brain stimulation revision surgery for complicated essential tremor. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017;159:779–787 doi:10.1007/s00701-017-3134-z

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Yamada K,
    2. Sakai K,
    3. Akazawa K, et al

    . MR tractography: a review of its clinical applications. Magn Reson Med Sci 2009;8:165–174 doi:10.2463/mrms.8.165 pmid:20035125

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Nowacki A,
    2. Schlaier J,
    3. Debove I, et al

    . Validation of diffusion tensor imaging tractography to visualize the dentatorubrothalamic tract for surgical planning. J Neurosurg 2018;130:99–108 doi:10.3171/2017.9.JNS171321 pmid:29570012

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Baek H,
    2. Lockwood D,
    3. Mason EJ, et al

    . Clinical Intervention Using Focused Ultrasound (FUS) Stimulation of the Brain in Diverse Neurological Disorders. Front Neurol 2022;13:880814 doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.880814 pmid:35614924

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Mattay RR,
    2. Kim K,
    3. Shah L, et al

    . MR Thermometry during Transcranial MR Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound Procedures: A Review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023;45:1–8 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8038 pmid:38123912

    CrossRefPubMed