Automated Detection of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Using CT Imaging for Calculating the Ventricle-to-Subarachnoid Volume Ratio

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Davis A,
   2. Luciano M,
   3. Moghekar A, et al

   . Assessing the predictive value of common gait measure for predicting falls in patients presenting with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. BMC Neurol 2021;21:60 doi:10.1186/s12883-021-02068-0 pmid:33557773

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Andersson J,
   2. Rosell M,
   3. Kockum K, et al

   . Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective, population-based study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0217705 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217705 pmid:31141553

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Jaraj D,
   2. Rabiei K,
   3. Marlow T, et al

   . Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology 2014;82:1449–54 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000342 pmid:24682964

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Kambara A,
   2. Kajimoto Y,
   3. Yagi R, et al

   . Long-term prognosis of cognitive function in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt surgery. Front Aging Neurosci 2020;12:617150 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.617150 pmid:33551791

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Toma AK,
   2. Papadopoulos MC,
   3. Stapleton S, et al

   . Systematic review of the outcome of shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013;155:1977–80 doi:10.1007/s00701-013-1835-5 pmid:23975646

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Pujari S,
   2. Kharkar S,
   3. Metellus P, et al

   . Normal pressure hydrocephalus: long-term outcome after shunt surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:1282–86 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.123620 pmid:18356257

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Oliveira LM,
   2. Nitrini R,
   3. Roman GC

   . Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a critical review. Dement Neuropsychol 2019;13:133–43 doi:10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-020001 pmid:31285787

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Andren K,
   2. Wikkelso C,
   3. Tisell M, et al

   . Natural course of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:806–10 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-306117 pmid:24292998

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Kajimoto Y,
   2. Kameda M,
   3. Kambara A, et al

   . Impact of early intervention for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus on long-term prognosis in prodromal phase. Front Neurol 2022;13:866352 doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.866352 pmid:35481276

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Hu T,
    2. Lee Y

    . Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. CMAJ 2019;191:E15 doi:10.1503/cmaj.180877 pmid:30617229

    FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Kockum K,
    2. Virhammar J,
    3. Riklund K, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of the iNPH Radscale in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. PLoS One 2020;15:e0232275 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232275 pmid:32330190

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Miskin N,
    2. Patel H,
    3. Franceschi AM, et al

    ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus: use of traditional measures in the era of volumetric MR imaging. Radiology 2017;285:197–205 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161216 pmid:28498794

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Muschelli J

    . Recommendations for processing head CT data. Front Neuroinform 2019;13:61 doi:10.3389/fninf.2019.00061 pmid:31551745

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Cauley KA,
    2. Och J,
    3. Yorks PJ, et al

    . Automated segmentation of head computed tomography images using FSL. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2018;42:104–10 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000660 pmid:28786900

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Rorden C,
    2. Brett M

    . Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 2000;12:191–200 doi:10.1155/2000/421719 pmid:11568431

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Beckmann CF,
    3. Behrens TE, et al

    . FSL. Neuroimage 2012;62:782–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 pmid:21979382

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Smith SM

    . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55 doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 pmid:12391568

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Brady M,
    3. Smith S

    . Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:45–57 doi:10.1109/42.906424 pmid:11293691

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Smith S

    . A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 2001;5:143–56 doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00036-6 pmid:11516708

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Bannister P,
    3. Brady M, et al

    . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002;17:825–41 doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Rohlfing T,
    2. Zahr NM,
    3. Sullivan EV, et al

    . The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain structure. Hum Brain Mapp 2010;31:798–819 doi:10.1002/hbm.20906 pmid:20017133

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Relkin N,
    2. Marmarou A,
    3. Klinge P, et al

    . Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57:S4–16 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000168185.29659.c5 pmid:16160425

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Palm WM,
    2. Saczynski JS,
    3. van der Grond J, et al

    ; Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study. Ventricular dilation: association with gait and cognition. Ann Neurol 2009;66:485–93 doi:10.1002/ana.21739 pmid:19847895

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Drayer BP

    . Imaging of the aging brain. Part I. Normal findings. Radiology 1988;166:785–96 doi:10.1148/radiology.166.3.3277247 pmid:3277247

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Borzage M,
    2. Saunders A,
    3. Hughes J, et al

    . The first examination of diagnostic performance of automated measurement of the callosal angle in 1856 elderly patients and volunteers indicates that 12.4% of exams met the criteria for possible normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1942–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7294 pmid:34620589

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Park HY,
    2. Kim M,
    3. Suh CH, et al

    . Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of the callosal angle and Evans’ index in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiology 2021;31:5300–11 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07555-5 pmid:33409775

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Kijonka M,
    2. Borys D,
    3. Psiuk-Maksymowicz K, et al

    . Whole brain and cranial size adjustments in volumetric brain analyses of sex- and age-related trends. Front Neurosci 2020;14:278 doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00278 pmid:32317915

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Han J,
    2. Kim MN,
    3. Lee HW, et al

    . Distinct volumetric features of cerebrospinal fluid distribution in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer’s disease. Fluids Barriers CNS 2022;19:66 doi:10.1186/s12987-022-00362-8 pmid:36045420

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Muller-Schmitz K,
    2. Krasavina-Loka N,
    3. Yardimci T, et al

    . Normal pressure hydrocephalus associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 2020;88:703–11 doi:10.1002/ana.25847 pmid:32662116

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Golomb J,
    2. Wisoff J,
    3. Miller DC, et al

    . Alzheimer’s disease comorbidity in normal pressure hydrocephalus: prevalence and shunt response. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:778–81 doi:10.1136/jnnp.68.6.778 pmid:10811706

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Hamilton R,
    2. Patel S,
    3. Lee EB, et al

    . Lack of shunt response in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with Alzheimer disease pathology. Ann Neurol 2010;68:535–40 doi:10.1002/ana.22015 pmid:20687117

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Román GC

    . Frequent falls in the elderly: think NPH. Texas Neurological Society Broca’s Area 2016;8–10
33. 33.↵
    1. Mori E,
    2. Ishikawa M,
    3. Kato T, et al

    ; Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012;52:775–09 doi:10.2176/nmc.52.775 pmid:23183074

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Zhang A,
    2. Khan A,
    3. Majeti S, et al

    . Automated segmentation and connectivity analysis for normal pressure hydrocephalus. BME Front 2022;2022:9783128 doi:10.34133/2022/9783128 pmid:37850185

    CrossRefPubMed