Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Optic Nerve Sheath MR Imaging Measurements in Patients with Orthostatic Headaches and Normal Findings on Conventional Imaging Predict the Presence of an Underlying CSF-Venous Fistula

Wouter I. Schievink, Marcel M. Maya, Angelique Sao-Mai S. Tay, Peyton L. Nisson, Jay Acharya, Rachelle B. Taché and Miriam Nuño
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2024, 45 (5) 655-661; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8165
Wouter I. Schievink
aFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (W.I.S., A.S.-M.S.T., P.L.N., R.B.T.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Wouter I. Schievink
Marcel M. Maya
bDepartments of Imaging (M.M.M., J.A.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marcel M. Maya
Angelique Sao-Mai S. Tay
aFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (W.I.S., A.S.-M.S.T., P.L.N., R.B.T.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peyton L. Nisson
aFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (W.I.S., A.S.-M.S.T., P.L.N., R.B.T.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peyton L. Nisson
Jay Acharya
bDepartments of Imaging (M.M.M., J.A.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachelle B. Taché
aFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (W.I.S., A.S.-M.S.T., P.L.N., R.B.T.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rachelle B. Taché
Miriam Nuño
cDepartment of Public Health Sciences (M.N.), University of California, Davis, Davis, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spontaneous spinal CSF leaks typically cause orthostatic headache, but their detection may require specialized and invasive spinal imaging. We undertook a study to determine the value of simple optic nerve sheath MR imaging measurements in predicting the likelihood of finding a CSF-venous fistula, a type of leak that cannot be detected with routine spine MR imaging or CT myelography, among patients with orthostatic headache and normal conventional brain and spine imaging findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cohort study included a consecutive group of patients with orthostatic headache and normal conventional brain and spine imaging findings who underwent digital subtraction myelography under general anesthesia to look for spinal CSF-venous fistulas.

RESULTS: The study group consisted of 93 patients (71 women and 22 men; mean age, 47.5 years; range, 17–84 years). Digital subtraction myelography demonstrated a CSF-venous fistula in 15 patients. The mean age of these 8 women and 7 men was 56 years (range, 23–83 years). The mean optic nerve sheath diameter was 4.0 mm, and the mean perioptic subarachnoid space was 0.5 mm in patients with a CSF-venous fistula compared with 4.9 and 1.2 mm, respectively, in patients without a fistula (P < .001). Optimal cutoff values were found at 4.4 mm for optic nerve sheath diameter and 1.0 mm for the perioptic subarachnoid space. Fistulas were detected in about 50% of patients with optic nerve sheath diameter or perioptic subarachnoid space measurements below these cutoff values compared with <2% of patients with optic nerve sheath diameter or perioptic subarachnoid space measurements above these cutoff values. Following surgical ligation of the fistula, optic nerve sheath diameter increased from 4.0 to 5.3 mm and the perioptic subarachnoid space increased from 0.5 to 1.2 mm (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: Concerns about a spinal CSF leak should not be dismissed in patients with orthostatic headache when conventional imaging findings are normal, and simple optic nerve sheath MR imaging measurements can help decide if more imaging needs to be performed in this patient population.

ABBREVIATIONS:

BMI
body mass index
DSM
digital subtraction myelography
ONS
optic nerve sheath
ONSD
optic nerve sheath diameter
OP
opening pressure
SAS
subarachnoid space
SIHDAS
SIH Disability Assessment Score
SIH
spontaneous intracranial hypotension

Orthostatic headaches, ie, headaches that worsen after assuming the upright position and that are least noticeable on awakening in the morning before getting out of bed, are the hallmark of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH).1,2 CSF leaks at the level of the spine are responsible for causing SIH in most patients.1

The diagnosis of SIH can be made with confidence under the following circumstances: 1) brain MR imaging shows a combination of ≥1 of the typical reversible findings of SIH, ie, subdural fluid collections, enhancement of the pachymeninges, engorgement of venous structures, pituitary enlargement, and sagging of the brain (mnemonic, SEEPS); or 2) if spine imaging shows the presence of an extradural CSF collection, indicating a dural tear and CSF leak.1,3 An estimated one-fifth of patients with spinal CSF leaks have normal findings on brain imaging.4 However, a common type of spontaneous spinal CSF leak, the CSF-venous fistula, is not associated with an extradural spinal CSF collection and thus is not detectable on routine CT myelography or spine MR imaging.1 These spinal CSF-venous fistulas require specialized imaging with digital subtraction myelography (DSM)5,6 or dynamic CT myelography6,7 for their detection. In a prior study using DSM, we found that approximately 10% of patients with orthostatic headaches and normal conventional brain and spine imaging findings have an underlying spinal CSF-venous fistula.8 Since the completion of that study, we have added MR imaging sequences to our SIH protocol that allow precise measurements of the optic nerve sheath (ONS). The ONS diameter (ONSD) is correlated with CSF pressure and is known to be significantly altered in not only intracranial hypertension but also SIH.9⇓⇓⇓⇓-14 However, to our knowledge, the ONSD has not been studied in patients with orthostatic headaches and normal findings on routine brain and spine imaging. The hypothesis of the current study is that ONSD could be affected by the presence of a CSF-venous fistula causing loss of CSF in the setting of otherwise normal brain MR imaging findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cohort study was approved by the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center institutional review board, who waived the requirement for written informed consent.

The patient population consisted of a consecutive group of patients with orthostatic headaches, normal findings on brain MR imaging, and no evidence of extradural CSF on spine MR imaging with MR myelography,15 who underwent DSM in the lateral decubitus position between June 2020 and May 2022. The goal of DSM was to identify a spontaneous spinal CSF-venous fistula. Patients who had a history of any prior brain MR imaging or spinal imaging consistent with SIH or spinal CSF leak and patients who did not have a brain MR imaging performed at our institution with the SIH protocol before DSM were excluded from the analysis.

SIH Disability Assessment Score

All patients completed a modified Migraine Disability Assessment Test 5-item questionnaire to assess the severity of the symptoms before and after treatment.16 This questionnaire measures disability in 3 domains of activity (employment, household work, and nonwork activities), capturing the number of days affected during a 3-month period, with the score ranging from 0 to 270 (3 [domains] × 3 [months] × 30 [days]).16 The modification consists of substituting “symptoms of SIH” for “headaches.” We refer to this modified questionnaire as the SIH Disability Assessment Score questionnaire. (SIHDAS).17 A score of 0–5 (grade I) equates to little or no disability, a score of 6–10 (grade II) is mild disability, a score of 11–20 (grade III) is moderate disability, and a score of 21–270 (grade IV) is severe disability.

Brain MR Imaging Protocol

MR imaging was performed on 1.5 or 3T scanners. The SIH brain MR imaging protocol is shown in the Online Supplemental Data. The MR imaging sequences allowing precise measurements of the ONS consisted of coronal fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences through the orbit (TR = 5750 ms, TE = 99 ms, flip angle = 150°, section thickness = 3.0 mm, section gap = 0%, FOV = 230 mm2).

Definition of Normal Brain MR Imaging Findings

The findings of a normal brain MR imaging were based on the report of 1 of 4 board-certified neuroradiologists, all with a special interest in SIH. For this study, findings of all brain MR imaging designated as normal were re-reviewed by 1 board-certified neuroradiologist who was not involved in the initial interpretation of the brain MR imaging and 1 board-certified neurosurgeon to confirm the absence of the reversible findings of SIH, ie, subdural fluid collections; enhancement and/or thickening of the pachymeninges; venous engorgement using the venous distention sign;18 pituitary enlargement using the measurements of maximal pituitary height;19 and brain sagging using a cutoff of 5.5 mm for the pontomammillary distance,20 a cutoff of 45° for the pontomesencephalic angle,21 and a cutoff of 5 mm for cerebellar tonsillar herniation. In addition, the absence of infratentorial superficial siderosis22 and calvarial hyperostosis,23 the 2 mostly irreversible brain MR imaging findings that may be observed in patients with chronic SIH, was confirmed. Any discrepancies were adjudicated by a second board-certified neuroradiologist.

Brain MR Imaging Assessments

The ONSD and perioptic subarachnoid space (Fig 1) were measured by 2 board-certified neuroradiologists and 1 senior neurosurgery resident blinded to the outcome of the DSM. On the basis of prior measurements of ONSD and perioptic subarachnoid space as reported by Rohr et al,24 who found significant variability of these measurements within the first 10 mm of the optic nerve, measurements were made 10–12 mm posterior to the globe. In addition, a previously published and validated probabilistic score for the presence of SIH, known as the Bern score,25 was calculated by the same 2 board-certified neuroradiologists and a senior neurosurgery resident blinded to the outcome of the DSM. Measurements by an individual physician of the ONSD, perioptic subarachnoid space, and Bern score were averaged for the final measurement.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

How to measure the ONSD and perioptic subarachnoid space. Illustration (A) depicting the measurements for the ONSD and the perioptic subarachnoid space. Pre- (B) and post- (C) operative coronal fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR imaging shows restoration of the perioptic subarachnoid space (arrows) following ligation of a spinal CSF-venous fistula.

DSM Technique

In all patients, the DSM technique as described by Hoxworth et al26 was used with some minor modifications.5,27 Briefly, DSM is performed with the patient under general endotracheal anesthesia with deep paralysis and suspended respiration for maximal detail and temporal resolution. Patients are positioned in the lateral decubitus position in a biplane angiography suite, with tilt table capability. Pillows or foam padding are placed to optimize cervicothoracic alignment. Under fluoroscopic guidance, a 22-ga needle is placed midline, usually at the L2–3 level, being careful to avoid tenting and subdural injection. An opening pressure is obtained at this time. Then, an accurate needle position is confirmed with an injection of 0.5 mL of contrast (Omnipaque 240 or 300 mg/mL; GE Healthcare). Patients are then further positioned on the basis of the area of interest, with the table tilted to achieve contrast flow to the cervicothoracic spine. Finally, contrast is injected manually 1 mL per second, with suspended respiration for 60–75 seconds while acquiring biplane subtraction images at 1–2 frames per second.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are presented as means (SDs) in addition to medians and interquartile ranges. Categoric variables are presented as absolute numbers and percentages. Comparison of demographic and disease characteristics between groups by fistula status are performed using a t test or Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon test for continuous variables, and χ2 and Fisher exact tests are performed to compare categoric variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the predicted probability of a fistula. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine optimal thresholds for perioptic subarachnoid space and the ONSD for the outcome of a fistula. We computed agreement (κ) of the perioptic subarachnoid space, ONSD, and Bern scores among multiple raters implementing the Magree macro (https://www.agreestat.com/books/sas2/chap3/chap3sas.pdf) in the subarachnoid space (SAS). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated among body mass index (BMI), opening pressure (OP), ONSD, and the perioptic subarachnoid space. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS, Version 9.4 (SAS Institute).

RESULTS

Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics

The mean age of the 93 patients with orthostatic headache was 47.5 (SD, 15.7) years. There were 71 women (76.3%) and 22 men (23.7%). The mean duration of orthostatic headache was 51.2 months (median, 32 months). An occipital or suboccipital headache was the most common, occurring in 43 patients (46.2%). At the onset of symptoms, orthostatic worsening of the headache occurred within 10 minutes in 35 patients (37.6%), between 11 and 60 minutes in 32 patients (34.4%), and after 60 minutes in 26 patients (31.2%).

Lateral decubitus DSM demonstrated a CSF-venous fistula in 15 (16.1%) of the 93 patients. The mean age of the 7 men and 8 women was 56 (14.4 SD) years. There was a less pronounced female preponderance among the patients with a CSF-venous fistula (P = .022), and these patients were about a decade older than patients without a CSF-venous fistula (P = .015), but there were no significant differences in the duration of symptoms, location of the headache, time to orthostatic worsening of the headache, BMI, results of prior epidural blood patching, time interval between the onset of symptoms and the first brain MR imaging, or time interval between the brain MR imaging with the SIH protocol and DSM (Online Supplemental Data). Although CSF opening pressure was normal in all patients (reference range, 6–25 cm CSF), it was lower in those who were found to have a CSF-venous fistula (13.3 versus 16.1 cm CSF; P < .016). A CSF-venous fistula was found in 19.4% of patients with a spinal meningeal diverticulum and in 4.8% of those without such a diverticulum (P = .177). The SIHDAS was II in 1 patient, III in 1 patient, and IV in 13 patients. All 15 patients had a single CSF-venous fistula, and all fistulas were located in the thoracic spine. The CSF-venous fistula was on the right side in 9 patients and on the left side in 6 patients.

Findings among Those with and without a Spinal CSF-Venous Fistula

The mean ONSD was significantly decreased in patients with a CSF-venous fistula (4.0 mm), compared with patients without a CSF-venous fistula (4.9 mm) (P < .001) (Fig 2). This difference in the ONSD was mostly due to the reduction of the perioptic subarachnoid space, a component of the ONSD. The mean perioptic subarachnoid space measured 0.5 mm among the patients with a CSF-venous fistula and 1.2 mm in the patients without a CSF-venous fistula (P < .001) (Fig 2). By means of the Youden index analysis, optimal cutoff values were found at 4.4 mm for ONSD and 1.0 mm for the perioptic subarachnoid space. Using these cutoff values, we detected fistulas in 47% and 54% of patients, respectively, with the ONSD or perioptic subarachnoid space measurements below these cutoff values compared with 0% and 2% of patients with ONSD or perioptic subarachnoid space measurements above these cutoff values. The predicted probability of identifying a CSF-venous fistula increased <1% at a perioptic subarachnoid space of 1.8 mm to 82% at a perioptic subarachnoid space of 0 mm, and from <1% at an ONSD of 5.7 mm to 93% at an ONSD of 2.6 mm (Fig 3).

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

ONSD and perioptic subarachnoid space measurements in patients with and without spinal CSF-venous fistulas. Box and whisker plots of the ONSD and perioptic SAS in patients without and with a spinal CSF-venous fistula. The box represents the upper and lower quartiles with the line splitting the box representing the median. The diamond represents the mean. The whiskers represent the upper and lower values of the data, up to 1.5 times the interquartile range. The single points represent the outliers.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Predicted probability of finding a spinal CSF-venous fistula based on the ONSD and perioptic subarachnoid space measurements. The graphs depict the predicted probability (and 80% confidence intervals) of identifying a CSF-venous fistula according to ONSD and perioptic SAS.

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.883 (95% CI, 0.816–0.950) for ONSD and 0.932 (95% CI, 0.877–0.987) for the perioptic subarachnoid space. By means of the ONSD cutoff point of 4.4 mm for identifying a CSF-venous fistula, specificity was 79.5% and sensitivity was 100%. With the perioptic subarachnoid space cutoff point of 1.0 mm for identifying a CSF-venous fistula, specificity was 85.9% and sensitivity was 93.3%.

There was no significant difference in the mean Bern score between patients with a CSF-venous fistula (0.58) compared with those without a CSF-venous fistula (0.64) (P = .78). Interrater agreement was substantial for all measurements, including the Bern score (κ = 0.73), perioptic subarachnoid space (κ = 0.79), and the ONSD (κ = 0.87). Significant linear correlations were found between the ONSD and the perioptic subarachnoid space with CSF opening pressure and BMI (Fig 4).

FIG 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4.

The relationship among the BMI, CSF opening pressure, ONSD, and perioptic subarachnoid space. Scatterplots depict the relationships among BMI, CSF OP (in centimeters CSF), ONSD, and the perioptic SAS. By ranking from the weakest to the strongest correlation, positive correlations are found between the ONSD and OP, BMI and OP, perioptic SAS and OP, and ONSD and perioptic SAS.

Treatment of a Spinal CSF-Venous Fistula and the Postoperative Course

All 15 patients with a CSF-venous fistula underwent an uneventful laminoforaminotomy for clip ligation of the fistula. Postoperative brain MR imaging with the same SIH protocol was performed in 14 of the 15 patients between 18 and 52 hours (mean, 40 hours) following surgical ligation of the CSF-venous fistula. Postoperatively, the ONSD increased from 4.0 to 5.3 mm, and the perioptic subarachnoid space increased from 0.5 to 1.2 mm (P < .001) (Fig 5). There was no change in the Bern score (0.58 to 0.42). During a mean clinical postoperative follow-up of 10 months (range, 3–26 months), 12 patients (80%) reported complete or near-complete and sustained resolution of SIH symptoms (SIHDAS grade II, III, or IV to grade I), 1 patient (6.7%) reported incomplete resolution of SIH symptoms (SIHDAS grade IV to III), and 2 patients (13.3%) reported no change in SIH symptoms (SIHDAS grade IV). The mean SIHDAS for all 15 patients improved from 139.9 to 21.5 (P < .001).

FIG 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5.

Normalization of the ONSD and perioptic subarachnoid space following ligation of spinal CSF-venous fistulas. Individual measurements of the pre- and postoperative ONSD and perioptic SAS following ligation of the spinal CSF-venous fistula.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we found that among patients with orthostatic headache and normal findings on conventional brain and spine imaging, the ONSD and perioptic subarachnoid space were significantly decreased in patients with a CSF-venous fistula compared with patients without a CSF-venous fistula. In this patient population, we found CSF-venous fistulas in about one-half of patients with a perioptic subarachnoid space measuring ≤1.0 mm or with an ONSD measuring ≤4.4 mm (measured 10–12 mm posterior to the globe) compared with <2% of patients with measurements above these cutoff values.

The perioptic subarachnoid space is a continuation of the intracranial subarachnoid space, and unlike the intracranial subarachnoid space that is enveloped by the dura mater, it is surrounded by the soft tissues of the orbit, allowing unrestricted expansion or collapse depending on the amount of CSF volume.28,29 We hypothesize that in the presently reported patients with CSF-venous fistulas and normal findings on conventional brain MR imaging, the CSF loss was sufficient to cause a decrease in the perioptic subarachnoid space volume but not sufficient to cause the other brain MR imaging features of SIH. Rapid restoration of the normal perioptic subarachnoid space was seen within about 24–48 hours after surgical ligation of the CSF-venous fistula. In a series of experiments, Hansen and Helmke30 have shown a prompt response of the ONS to changes in spinal CSF volume and pressure.

In our prior study, we found CSF-venous fistulas in 10% of patients with orthostatic headache but normal conventional brain and spine imaging findings; fistulas were present in 20% of patients with meningeal diverticula and in none of the patients without diverticula.8 Although we found similar results in the current study, the number of patients without meningeal diverticula was relatively small and the difference did not reach statistical significance. Prior studies have shown a relationship between the ONSD and BMI and between the ONSD and CSF pressure. The ONSD is weakly correlated with BMI and strongly correlated with CSF opening pressure and with intracranial pressure. We were able to replicate these findings for BMI, ONSD, and CSF opening pressure, providing internal validation of the data.

The Bern score is based on a summation of several of the well-established features of SIH on brain MR imaging and was established and validated to predict the presence of spinal extradural CSF and specifically excluded CSF-venous fistulas,25 but subsequently, this score has also been used in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with SIH due to CSF-venous fistulas.31 In the present study of patients with orthostatic headaches and normal conventional brain and spine imaging findings, the Bern score was not able to differentiate patients with a CSF-venous fistula from those without such a fistula, and there was no change in the Bern score following surgical ligation of the CSF-venous fistula.

The MR imaging sequence used in the present study adds 4 minutes of MR imaging time. This MR imaging sequence allows precise and reproducible measurements, and in our study, interrater agreement was substantial for both the perioptic subarachnoid space and the ONSD. Ultrasonography also has been used extensively for the evaluation of the ONS and has the advantage of obtaining measurements in different body positions, but the technology is very user-dependent, limiting its use.12,14

The burden of SIH is high among patients seeking medical care,32⇓-34 and this was reflected in the SIHDAS in the present study, showing severe disability in almost all patients. Following treatment of the CSF-venous fistula, the SIHDAS was significantly improved with complete or near-complete resolution of the symptoms of SIH in 80% of patients.

It has been known since the 1990s that CSF opening pressure may be normal in patients with SIH,35 and this finding has now been confirmed in several SIH patient populations, including in patients with CSF-venous fistulas.5,8,36 In the current study, all patients had a normal CSF opening pressure, but CSF opening pressure was lower in those with a CSF-venous fistula.

Spontaneous spinal CSF-venous fistulas were first described in 2014.37 These abnormal communications between the spinal subarachnoid space and epidural veins were initially believed to be rare but are now known to be a common cause of SIH. The radiographic studies necessary for the reliable detection of CSF-venous fistulas currently require a lumbar puncture and use an iodine-based contrast agent and ionizing radiation, are expensive and time-consuming, and, in our institution, are performed with the patient under general endotracheal anesthesia. The current study shows that measurements of the ONSD and perioptic subarachnoid space will be of use in making decisions regarding increasing imaging for patients with orthostatic headache but otherwise normal conventional brain and spine imaging findings.

This study had some limitations. First, the current study mostly represents a highly selected group of patients referred to a quaternary referral center for SIH, and the generalizability of our findings is unknown. However, the radiographic techniques capable of reliably demonstrating spinal CSF-venous fistulas are not widely available and are mainly used in high-volume SIH referral centers. Second, this study was undertaken during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and this timing may have introduced referral and other biases favoring a patient population with higher disability. However, the overall detection rate of finding a CSF-venous fistula was very similar to that in a prior study performed before the COVID-19 pandemic. Third, brain MR imaging findings of SIH may spontaneously resolve with time despite persistent symptoms, and the timing of MR imaging in our study could not be standardized. However, the time interval between the onset of symptoms and the first MR imaging did not differ between those with and without a CSF-venous fistula. Finally, this was a single-center study, and the relatively small number of patients resulted in our calculations having relatively wide confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

ONS MR imaging measurements showing a reduced ONS diameter and perioptic subarachnoid space predict the presence of an underlying spinal CSF-venous fistula in patients with orthostatic headaches and normal conventional brain and spine imaging findings. In addition, ONS measurements normalized promptly after ligation of the fistula.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Schievink WI
    . Spontaneous intracranial hypotension. N Engl J Med 2021;385:2173–78 doi:10.1056/NEJMra2101561 pmid:34874632
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mehta D,
    2. Cheema S,
    3. Davagnanam I, et al
    . Diagnosis and treatment evaluation in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Front Neurol 2023;14:1145949 doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1145949 pmid:36970531
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Schievink WI
    . Spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks and intracranial hypotension. JAMA 2006;295:2286–96 doi:10.1001/jama.295.19.2286 pmid:16705110
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. D’Antona L,
    2. Jaime Merchan MA,
    3. Vassiliou A, et al
    . Clinical presentation, investigation findings, and treatment outcomes of spontaneous intracranial hypotension syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:329–37 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4799 pmid:33393980
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Maya MM,
    3. Moser FG, et al
    . Lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography to identify spinal CSF-venous fistulas in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. J Neurosurg Spine 2019;31:1–4 doi:10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19487 pmid:31518974
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kranz PG,
    2. Gray L,
    3. Malinzak MD, et al
    . CSF-venous fistulas: anatomy and diagnostic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021;217:1418–29 doi:10.2214/AJR.21.26182 pmid:34191547
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mamlouk MD,
    2. Ochi RP,
    3. Jun P, et al
    . Decubitus CT myelography for CSF-venous fistulas: a procedural approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:32–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6844 pmid:33122215
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Maya M,
    3. Prasad RS, et al
    . Spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistulas in patients with orthostatic headaches and normal conventional brain and spine imaging. Headache 2021;61:387–91 doi:10.1111/head.14048 pmid:33484155
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Watanabe A,
    2. Horikoshi T,
    3. Uchida M, et al
    . Decreased diameter of the optic nerve sheath associated with CSF hypovolemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:863–64 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1027 pmid:18310231
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Rohr A,
    2. Jensen U,
    3. Riedel C, et al
    . MR imaging of the optic nerve sheath in patients with craniospinal hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1752–57 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2120 pmid:20522569
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Takeuchi N,
    2. Horikoshi T,
    3. Kinouchi H, et al
    . Diagnostic value of the optic nerve sheath subarachnoid space in patients with intracranial hypotension syndrome. J Neurosurg 2012;117:372–77 doi:10.3171/2012.5.JNS1271 pmid:22680244
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Fichtner J,
    2. Ulrich CT,
    3. Fung C, et al
    . Management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension: transorbital ultrasound as discriminator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016;87:650–55 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-310853 pmid:26285586
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Holbrook JF,
    2. Hudgins PA,
    3. Bruce BB, et al
    . Novel orbital findings of intracranial hypotension. Clin Imaging 2017;41:125–31 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.10.019 pmid:27840264
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wang L-J,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Li C, et al
    . Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter as a noninvasive marker for intracranial hypotension. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022;15:17562864211069744 doi:10.1177/17562864211069744 pmid:35186123
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Tay ASS,
    2. Maya M,
    3. Moser FG, et al
    . Computed tomography vs heavily T2-weighted magnetic resonance myelography for the initial evaluation of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:1275–76 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2868 pmid:34459855
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Stewart WF,
    2. Lipton RB,
    3. Whyte J, et al
    . An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score. Neurology 1999;53:988–94 doi:10.1212/wnl.53.5.988 pmid:10496257
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Maya MM,
    3. Barnard ZR, et al
    . Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia as a serious complication of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018;15:505–15 doi:10.1093/ons/opy029 pmid:29534203
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Farb RI,
    2. Forghani R,
    3. Lee SK, et al
    . The venous distension sign: a diagnostic sign of intracranial hypotension at MR imaging of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1489–93 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0621 pmid:17846197
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Forghani R,
    2. Farb RI
    . Diagnosis and temporal evolution of signs of intracranial hypotension on MRI of the brain. Neuroradiology 2008;50:1025–34 doi:10.1007/s00234-008-0445-z pmid:18795275
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Shah LM,
    2. McLean LA,
    3. Heilbrun ME, et al
    . Intracranial hypotension: improved MRI detection with diagnostic intracranial angles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:400–07 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8611 pmid:23345364
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Houk JL,
    2. Amrhein TJ,
    3. Gray L, et al
    . Differentiation of Chiari malformation type 1 and spontaneous intracranial hypotension using objective measurements of midbrain sagging. J Neurosurg 2021;136:1796–803 doi:10.3171/2021.6.JNS211010 pmid:34715671
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Maya MM,
    3. Harris J, et al
    . Infratentorial superficial siderosis and spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Ann Neurol 2023;93:64–75 doi:10.1002/ana.26521 pmid:36200700
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Johnson DR,
    2. Carr CM,
    3. Luetmer PH, et al
    . Diffuse calvarial hyperostosis in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. World Neurosurg 2021;146:e848–53 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.066 pmid:33220476
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Rohr A,
    2. Riedel C,
    3. Reimann G, et al
    . Pseudotumor cerebri: quantitative normalwerte anatomisher kennstrukturen im kraniellen MRT. RoFo 2008;180:884–90 doi:10.1055/s-2008-1027627 pmid:19238638
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Dobrocky T,
    2. Grunder L,
    3. Breiding PS, et al
    . Assessing spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension with a scoring system based on brain magnetic resonance imaging findings. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:580–87 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4921 pmid:30776059
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hoxworth JM,
    2. Patel AC,
    3. Bosch EP, et al
    . Localization of a rapid CSF leak with digital subtraction myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:516–19 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1294 pmid:18842766
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Galvan J,
    2. Maya M,
    3. Prasad RS, et al
    . Spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak localization with digital subtraction myelography: tips, tricks, and pitfalls. Radiol Clin 2024;62:321–32 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2023.10.004 pmid:38272624
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Anderson DR
    . Ultrastructure of meningeal sheaths: normal human and monkey optic nerves. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;82:659–74 doi:10.1001/archopht.1969.00990020653015 pmid:4981605
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Hayreh SS
    . The sheath of the optic nerve. Ophthalmologica 1984;189:54–63 doi:10.1159/000309386 pmid:6472807
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hansen HC,
    2. Helmke K
    . Validation of the optic nerve sheath response to changing cerebrospinal fluid pressure: ultrasound findings during intrathecal infusion tests. J Neurosurg 1997;87:34–40 doi:10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0034 pmid:9202262
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Garza I,
    3. Whealy M, et al
    . Clinical and imaging outcomes of cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistula embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:953–56 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018466 pmid:35074899
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Cheema S,
    2. Joy C,
    3. Pople J, et al
    . Patient experience of diagnosis and management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a cross-sectional online survey. BMJ Open 2022;12:e057438 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057438 pmid:35058269
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Jesse CM,
    2. Häni L,
    3. Fung C, et al
    . The impact of spontaneous intracranial hypotension on social life and health-related quality of life. J Neurol 2022;269:5466–73 doi:10.1007/s00415-022-11207-7 pmid:35701531
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Liaw V,
    2. McCreary M,
    3. Friedman DI
    . Quality of life in patients with confirmed and suspected spinal CSF leaks. Neurology 2023;101:e2411–22 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000207763 pmid:37816637
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mokri B,
    2. Hunter SF,
    3. Atkinson JLD, et al
    . Orthostatic headaches caused by CSF leak but with normal CSF pressures. Neurology 1998;51:786–90 doi:10.1212/wnl.51.3.786 pmid:9748027
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Kranz PG,
    2. Tanpitukpongse TP,
    3. Choudhury KR, et al
    . How common is normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure in spontaneous intracranial hypotension? Cephalalgia 2016;36:1209–17 doi:10.1177/0333102415623071 pmid:26682575
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Moser FG,
    3. Maya MM
    . CSF-venous fistula in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurology 2014;83:472–73 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000639 pmid:24951475
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received October 17, 2023.
  • Accepted after revision January 4, 2024.
  • © 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 45 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 45, Issue 5
1 May 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optic Nerve Sheath MR Imaging Measurements in Patients with Orthostatic Headaches and Normal Findings on Conventional Imaging Predict the Presence of an Underlying CSF-Venous Fistula
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Wouter I. Schievink, Marcel M. Maya, Angelique Sao-Mai S. Tay, Peyton L. Nisson, Jay Acharya, Rachelle B. Taché, Miriam Nuño
Optic Nerve Sheath MR Imaging Measurements in Patients with Orthostatic Headaches and Normal Findings on Conventional Imaging Predict the Presence of an Underlying CSF-Venous Fistula
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2024, 45 (5) 655-661; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8165

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Optic Nerve Sheath MRI for CSF-Venous Fistula
Wouter I. Schievink, Marcel M. Maya, Angelique Sao-Mai S. Tay, Peyton L. Nisson, Jay Acharya, Rachelle B. Taché, Miriam Nuño
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2024, 45 (5) 655-661; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8165
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Additional Diagnostic Value of Conebeam CT Myelography Performed after Digital Subtraction Myelography for Detecting CSF-Venous Fistulas
  • Spinal CSF Leaks: The Neuroradiologist Transforming Care
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
  • Characteristics of SIH Type I Culprit Lesions
  • Advanced Imaging of Type 2 Spinal CSF Leaks
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire