Association of Carotid Artery Disease with Collateralization and Infarct Growth in Patients with Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Jiang B,
   2. Ball RL,
   3. Michel P, et al

   . Factors influencing infarct growth including collateral status assessed using computed tomography in acute stroke patients with large artery occlusion. Int J Stroke 2019;14:603–12 doi:10.1177/1747493019851278 pmid:31096871

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Liebeskind DS,
   2. Saber H,
   3. Xiang B, et al

   . Collateral circulation in thrombectomy for stroke after 6 to 24 hours in the DAWN trial. Stroke 2022;53:742–48 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034471 pmid:34727737

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Liebeskind DS

   . Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003;34:2279–84 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000086465.41263.06 pmid:12881609

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Sebök M,
   2. Niftrik C,
   3. Lohaus N, et al

   . Leptomeningeal collateral activation indicates severely impaired cerebrovascular reserve capacity in patients with symptomatic unilateral carotid artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021;41:3039–51 doi:10.1177/0271678X211024373 pmid:34112002

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Hartkamp NS,
   2. Petersen ET,
   3. Chappell MA, et al

   . Relationship between haemodynamic impairment and collateral blood flow in carotid artery disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2018;38:2021–32 doi:10.1177/0271678X17724027 pmid:28776469

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Hofmeijer J,
   2. Klijn CJM,
   3. Kappelle LJ, et al

   . Collateral circulation via the ophthalmic artery or leptomeningeal vessels is associated with impaired cerebral vasoreactivity in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;14:22–26 doi:10.1159/000063719 pmid:12097847

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Menon BK,
   2. Smith EE,
   3. Coutts SB, et al

   . Leptomeningeal collaterals are associated with modifiable metabolic risk factors. Ann Neurol 2013;74:241–48 doi:10.1002/ana.23906 pmid:23536377

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Forestier G,
   2. Agbonon R,
   3. Bricout N, et al

   . Small vessel disease and collaterals in ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombectomy. J Neurol 2022;269:4708–16 doi:10.1007/s00415-022-11099-7 pmid:35384484

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Cipolla MJ,
   2. Liebeskind DS,
   3. Chan SL

   . The importance of comorbidities in ischemic stroke: Impact of hypertension on the cerebral circulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2018;38:2129–49 doi:10.1177/0271678X18800589 pmid:30198826

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Arsava EM,
    2. Vural A,
    3. Akpinar E, et al

    . The detrimental effect of aging on leptomeningeal collaterals in ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23:421–26 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.03.014 pmid:23583014

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Pienimäki JP,
    2. Sillanpaa N,
    3. Jolma P, et al

    . Carotid artery stenosis is associated with better intracranial collateral circulation in stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2020;49:200–5 doi:10.1159/000506826 pmid:32200383

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Hassler E,
    2. Kneihsl M,
    3. Deutschmann H, et al

    . Relationship between stroke etiology and collateral status in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. J Neurol 2020;267:3362–70 doi:10.1007/s00415-020-10009-z pmid:32588184

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Guglielmi V,
    2. LeCouffe NE,
    3. Zinkstok SM, et al

    . Collateral circulation and outcome in atherosclerotic versus cardioembolic cerebral large vessel occlusion. Stroke 2019;50:3360–68 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026299 pmid:31658903

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Rebello LC,
    2. Bouslama M,
    3. Haussen DC, et al

    . Stroke etiology and collaterals: atheroembolic strokes have greater collateral recruitment than cardioembolic strokes. Eur J Neurol 2017;24:762–67 doi:10.1111/ene.13287 pmid:28432712

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Dankbaar JW,
    2. Kerckhoffs KGP,
    3. Horsch AD, et al

    . Internal carotid artery stenosis and collateral recruitment in stroke patients. Clin Neuroradiol 2018;28:339–44 doi:10.1007/s00062-017-0568-x pmid:28439614

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Sobczyk O,
    2. Sam K,
    3. Mandell DM, et al

    . Cerebrovascular reactivity assays collateral function in carotid stenosis. Front Physiol 2020;11:1031 doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.01031 pmid:33041841

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Khan MB,
    2. Hafez S,
    3. Hoda MN, et al

    . Chronic remote ischemic conditioning is cerebroprotective and induces vascular remodeling in a VCID model. Transl Stroke Res 2018;9:51–63 doi:10.1007/s12975-017-0555-1 pmid:28755277

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Busch HJ,
    2. Buschmann IR,
    3. Mies G, et al

    . Arteriogenesis in hypoperfused rat brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003;23:621–28 doi:10.1097/01.WCB.0000057741.00152.E4 pmid:12771578

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Ohtaki H,
    2. Fujimoto T,
    3. Sato T, et al

    . Progressive expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiogenesis after chronic ischemic hypoperfusion in rat. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2006;96:283–87 doi:10.1007/3-211-30714-1_61 pmid:16671472

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Hai J,
    2. Li ST,
    3. Lin Q, et al

    . Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis induced by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in rat brain. Neurosurgery 2003;53:963–72 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000083594.10117.7a pmid:14519228

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Fischer E

    . Die Lageabweichungen der vorderen Hirnarterie im Gefäßbild. Zentralbl Neurochir 1938;3:300–13
22. 22.↵
    1. Capocci R,
    2. Shotar E,
    3. Sourour NA, et al

    . Caution; confusion ahead. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:E40–E43 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5179 pmid:28473348

    FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Ospel JM,
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Kappelhof M, et al

    . Which acute ischemic stroke patients are fast progressors?: Results from the ESCAPE trial control arm. Stroke 2021;52:1847–50 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032950 pmid:33813863

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Flint AC,
    3. Budzik RF, et al

    . Carotid I's, L's and T's: collaterals shape the outcome of intracranial carotid occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:402–7 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011231 pmid:24789707

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    Collaborators. NASCET. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Saba L,
    2. Mallarini G

    . A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids: evaluation using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography. Eur J Radiology 2010;76:7
27. 27.↵
    1. Saba L,
    2. Mallarini G

    . Comparison between quantification methods of carotid artery stenosis and computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:421–30 doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181d0f640 pmid:20498548

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Randoux B,
    2. Marro B,
    3. Koskas F, et al

    . Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;220:179–85 doi:10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl35179 pmid:11425993

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Bartlett E,
    2. Walters T,
    3. Symons S, et al

    . Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:13–19

    PubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Tan IY,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Hopyan J, et al

    . CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:525–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1408 pmid:19147716

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Souza LC,
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Chaudhry ZA, et al

    . Malignant CTA collateral profile is highly specific for large admission DWI infarct core and poor outcome in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1331–36. 20120301. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2985 pmid:22383238

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Deng W,
    2. Teng J,
    3. Liebeskind D, et al

    . Predictors of infarct growth measured by apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in patients with acute ischemic stroke. World Neurosurg 2019;123:e797–e802 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.051 pmid:30590217

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Dirnagl U,
    2. Becker K,
    3. Meisel A

    . Preconditioning and tolerance against cerebral ischaemia: from experimental strategies to clinical use. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:398–412 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70054-7 pmid:19296922

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Choi SA,
    2. Kim EH,
    3. Lee JY, et al

    . Preconditioning with chronic cerebral hypoperfusion reduces a focal cerebral ischemic injury and increases apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease/redox factor-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression. Curr Neurovasc Res 2007;4:89–97 doi:10.2174/156720207780637252 pmid:17504207

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Kim YS,
    2. Garami Z,
    3. Mikulik R, et al

    . Early recanalization rates and clinical outcomes in patients with tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion and isolated middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2005;36:869–71 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000160007.57787.4c pmid:15746449

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Kasab SA,
    3. Sheth S, et al

    . TESLA trial: Rationale, protocol, and design. SVIN 2023;3:e000787 doi:10.1161/SVIN.122.000787

    CrossRef
37. 37.↵
    1. Yoshimura S,
    2. Sakai N,
    3. Yamagami H, et al

    . Endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large ischemic region. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1303–13 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2118191 pmid:35138767

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Sarraj A,
    2. Hassan AE,
    3. Abraham MG, et al

    . Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1259–71 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2214403 pmid:36762865

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Huo X,
    2. Ma G,
    3. Tong X, et al

    . Trial of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1272–83 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2213379 pmid:36762852

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Costalat V,
    2. Lapergue B,
    3. Albucher J, et al

    . Evaluation of acute mechanical revascularization in large stroke (ASPECTS ≤5) and large vessel occlusion within 7h of last-seen-well: The LASTE multicenter, randomized, clinical trial protocol. Int J Stroke 2023;19:114–19 doi:10.1177/17474930231191033 pmid:37462028

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Bendszus M,
    2. Fiehler J,
    3. Subtil F, et al

    . Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke with established large infarct: multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet 2023;402:1753–63 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02032-9 pmid:37837989

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Maus V,
    2. Behme D,
    3. Borggrefe J, et al

    . Carotid artery stenosis contralateral to acute tandem occlusion: an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy with concomitant carotid artery stenting. Cerebrovasc Dis 2018;45:10–17 doi:10.1159/000484719 pmid:29208850

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. McTaggart RA,
    2. Jovin TG,
    3. Lansberg MG, et al

    . Alberta stroke program early computed tomographic scoring performance in a series of patients undergoing computed tomography and MRI: reader agreement, modality agreement, and outcome prediction. Stroke 2015;46:407–12 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006564 pmid:25538199

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. 44.↵
    1. Potreck A,
    2. Weyland CS,
    3. Seker F, et al

    . Accuracy and prognostic role of NCCT-ASPECTS depend on time from acute stroke symptom-onset for both human and machine-learning based evaluation. Clin Neuroradiol 2022;32:133–40 doi:10.1007/s00062-021-01110-5 pmid:34709408

    CrossRefPubMed