Does CISS MRI Reliably Depict the Endolymphatic Duct in Children with and without Vestibular Aqueduct Enlargement?

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Joshi VM,
   3. Navlekar SK,
   4. Kishore GR, et al

   . CT and MR imaging of the inner ear and brain in children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Radiographics 2012;32:683–98 doi:10.1148/rg.323115073 pmid:22582354

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Koesling S,
   3. Rasinski C,
   4. Amaya B

   . Imaging and clinical findings in large endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:54–62 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.09.005 pmid:16289429

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Madden C,
   3. Halsted M,
   4. Benton C, et al

   . Enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome in the pediatric population. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:625–32 doi:10.1097/00129492-200307000-00016 pmid:12851556

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Connor SE,
   3. Dudau C,
   4. Pai I, et al

   . Is CT or MRI the optimal imaging investigation for the diagnosis of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and large endolymphatic sac anomaly? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;276:693–702 doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05279-x pmid:30635710

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Naganawa S,
   3. Koshikawa T,
   4. Iwayama E, et al

   . MR imaging of the enlarged endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome by use of a 3D fast asymmetric spin-echo sequence: volume and signal-intensity measurement of the endolymphatic duct and sac and area measurement of the cochlear modiolus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1664–69 pmid:11039347

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Deep NL,
   3. Hoxworth JM,
   4. Barrs DM

   . What is the best imaging modality for diagnosing a large vestibular aqueduct? Laryngoscope 2016;126:302–03 doi:10.1002/lary.25684 pmid:26418544

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Kachniarz B,
   3. Chen JX,
   4. Gilani S, et al

   . Diagnostic yield of MRI for pediatric hearing loss: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;152:5–22 doi:10.1177/0194599814555837 pmid:25389321

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Simons JP,
   3. Mandell DL,
   4. Arjmand EM

   . Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric unilateral and asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:186–92 doi:10.1001/archotol.132.2.186 pmid:16490877

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Parry DA,
   3. Booth T,
   4. Roland PS

   . Advantages of magnetic resonance imaging over computed tomography in preoperative evaluation of pediatric cochlear implant candidates. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:976–82 doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000185049.61770.da pmid:16151346

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Clarke RL,
    3. Isaacson B,
    4. Kutz JW, et al

    . MRI evaluation of the normal and abnormal endolymphatic duct in the pediatric population: a comparison with high-resolution CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1865–69 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7224 pmid:34446455

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Dahlen RT,
    3. Harnsberger HR,
    4. Gray SD, et al

    . Overlapping thin-section fast spin-echo MR of the large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:67–75 pmid:9010522

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Deep NL,
    3. Carlson ML,
    4. Weindling SM, et al

    . Diagnosing large vestibular aqueduct: radiological review of high-resolution CT versus high-resolution volumetric MRI. Otol Neurotol 2017;38:948–55 doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001482 pmid:28604576

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Sarioglu FC,
    3. Cetin AC,
    4. Guleryuz H, et al

    ; Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey. The diagnostic efficacy of MRI in the evaluation of the enlarged vestibular aqueduct in children with hearing loss. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021;58:220–26 doi:10.5152/tao.2020.5864

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    2. Boston M,
    3. Halsted M,
    4. Meinzen-Derr J, et al

    . The large vestibular aqueduct: a new definition based on audiologic and computed tomography correlation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:972–77 doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.011 pmid:17547990

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Juliano AF,
    3. Ting EY,
    4. Mingkwansook V, et al

    . Vestibular aqueduct measurements in the 45 degrees oblique (Pöschl) plane. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1331–37 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4735 pmid:27012297

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Landis JR,
    3. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 pmid:843571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Byun JS,
    3. Kim HJ,
    4. Yim YJ, et al

    . MR imaging of the internal auditory canal and inner ear at 3T: comparison between 3D driven equilibrium and 3D balanced fast field echo sequences. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:212–18 doi:10.3348/kjr.2008.9.3.212 pmid:18525223

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Naganawa S,
    3. Koshikawa T,
    4. Fukatsu H, et al

    . MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional fast asymmetrical spin-echo and three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady-state sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1179–85 pmid:11415916

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Saeed HS,
    3. Rajai A,
    4. Dixon R, et al

    . Can MRI biomarkers for hearing loss in enlarged vestibular aqueduct be measured reproducibly? Br J Radiol 2023;96:20220274 doi:10.1259/bjr.20220274 pmid:37162001

    CrossRefPubMed