Clinical and Imaging Findings in Children with Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody Associated Disease (MOGAD): From Presentation to Relapse

Elizabeth George, Jeffrey B. Russ, Alexandria Validrighi, Heather Early, Mark D. Mamlouk, Orit A. Glenn, Carla M. Francisco, Emmanuelle Waubant, Camilla Lindan and Yi Li

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIG 1.

    Thirteen-year-old adolescent boy who presented with encephalopathy after a viral prodrome, found to have papilledema and opening pressure >39, subsequently found to have serum positivity for anti-MOG antibody. Brain MR imaging demonstrates features of ADEM-like pattern of pediatric MOGAD. A-C, FLAIR hyperintensity involving the left frontal subcortical white matter with ill-defined borders and beginning confluence (white arrowheads), bilateral thalami (black arrows), pons and brachium pontis (white arrow). D, Solid nodular enhancement associated with the left frontal white matter lesions.

  • FIG 2.

    Ten-year-old boy with rapid-onset altered mental status and seizures. A, Cortical FLAIR hyperintensity (white arrow) involving the left parietal lobe. B, Associated leptomeningeal enhancement (black arrow). C, Concurrently acquired arterial spine labeling image demonstrates hyperperfusion of the left parietal cortex (white arrowhead), reflective of associated seizure activity.

  • FIG 3.

    Imaging patterns at presentation and relapses.

Tables

  • Table 1:

    Demographics and clinical data at time of diagnosis in cohort of pediatric patients with MOGAD

    n = 61
    Age, median (IQR), years7 (4–11)
    Female (%)34 (55.7)
    Race (%)
     African American6 (9.8)
     Hispanic13 (21.3)
     White22 (36.1)
     Other14 (23.0)
     Unknown6 (9.8)
    Initial clinical presentation
     Syndrome
     ADEM14 (23.0)
     ON31 (50.8)
     Myelitis12 (19.7)
    Symptom
     Headache19 (31.1)
     Altered mental status12 (19.7)
     Ataxia7 (11.5)
     Fever11 (18.0)
     Seizure2 (3.3)
    Anti-MOG titer, median (IQR)a1:100 (1:80–1:1000)
    Relapsing disease45 (73.8)
    Total episodes up to 10, median (IQR)3 (1–4)
    Time to first relapse, median (IQR), months5 (2–13)
    • aTiter while acutely symptomatic during initial presentation was not available for 45 patients.

  • Table 2:

    Brain MR imaging features at presentation for serum antibody-positive MOGAD

    Brain Involvementn = 44n = 44
    Supratentorial41/44 (93.2)Marginsa
    Cortex9/44 (20.5) Well-defined3/42 (7.1)
    Deep grayb26/44 (59.1) Ill-defined32/42 (76.2)
     Caudate9/44 (20.5) Mixed7/42 (16.7)
     Putamen9/44 (20.5)Confluencea
     Globus pallidus6/44 (13.6) Discrete16/42 (38.1)
     Thalamus21/44 (47.7) Beginning confluence18/42 (42.9)
    White matterb Confluent8/42 (19)
     Frontal lobe31/44 (70.5) Mass effect19/44 (43.2)
     Parietal lobe28/44 (63.6)Enhancementb
     Temporal lobe22/44 (50) Solid/nodular17/44 (38.6)
     Occipital lobe19/44 (43.2) Peripheral ring0
     Insula21/44 (47.7) Incomplete ring1/44 (2.3)
    White matterb Ill-defined9/44 (20.5)
     Subcortical33/44 (75) Linear10/44 (22.7)
     Deep17/44 (38.6) Leptomeningeal4/44 (9.1)
     Periventricular14/44 (31.8) Cortical0/44
     Internal capsule9/44 (20.5) None17/44 (2.3)
     Corpus callosum8/44 (18.2) >1 enhancement characteristic10/44 (22.7)
    Infratentorialb31/44 (70.5)Low diffusivityc2/43 (4.7)
     Midbrain15/44 (34.1)Susceptibilityd0/36
     Pons21/44 (47.7)
     Medulla9/44 (20.5)
     Brachium pontis12/44 (27.3)
     Cerebellum15/44 (34.1)
     Other5/44 (11.4)
    • aNot applicable in 2 cases of cortical only involvement.

    • bPercentages do not add up to 100% as many cases had multiple combinations of features.

    • cUnknown in 1 patient due to lack of DWI sequence.

    • dUnknown in 8 patients due to lack of SWI/gradient echo sequence.

  • Table 3:

    Orbit and spine MR imaging features at presentation for serum antibody-positive MOGAD

    Orbital Involvementn =31Spine Involvementn = 11
    Unilateral6/31 (19.4)Long segment4/11 (36.4)
    Bilateral25/31 (80.6)Short segment6/11 (54.5)
    Segments involvedCauda equina enhancement1/11 (9.1)
     Orbital24/31 (77.4)Focality
     Intracanalicular20/31 (64.5) Unifocal3/11 (27.3)
     Prechiasmatic17/31 (54.8) Multifocal8/11 (72.7)
     Optic chiasm5/31 (16.1)Location
     Optic tract4/31 (12.9) Cervical8/11 (72.7)
    Optic nerve enhancementa25/29 (86.2) Thoracic6/11 (54.5)
    Perineural enhancementb17/25 (68) Conus5/11 (45.4)
    Optic nerve low diffusivityc10/15 (66.7) Cauda equina1/11 (9)
    Pattern
     Central6/11 (54.5)
     Peripheral4/11 (36.4)
     Entire cross-section3/11 (27.3)
     Central gray only4/11 (36.4)
    Enhancement
     None7/11 (63.6)
     Intramedullary3/11 (27.3)
     Leptomeningeal1/11 (9)
    Cord expansion5/11 (45.4)
    • aUnknown in 2 patients due to absence of contrast.

    • bUnknown in 6 patients due to absence of contrast and/or fat saturation.

    • cUnknown in 16 patients due to missing DWI sequence.

  • Table 4:

    Variation of imaging patterns at relapse stratified by age greater or less than 9 years

    Relapse 1Relapse 2
    Age ≤9 (n = 23)Age >9 (n = 18)P ValueAge <=9 (n = 13)Age >9 (n = 15)P Value
    Normal1/23 (4.3)4/18 (22.2).0081/13 (7.7)2/15 (13.3).211
    ADEM-like8/23 (34.8)1/18 (5.6)8/13 (61.5)2/15 (13.3)
    ON3/23 (13.0)2/18 (11.1)1/13 (7.7)2/15 (13.3)
    Myelitis02/15 (13.3)
    ADEM-like + ON + myelitis2/23 (8.7)001/15 (6.7)
    ADEM-like + ON7/23 (30.4)3/18 (16.7)2/13 (15.4)3/15 (20)
    Myelitis + ON01/18 (5.6)
    ADEM-like + myelitis2/23 (8.7)2/18 (11.1)1/13 (7.7)1/15 (6.7)
    Any FLAMES05/18 (27.8)02/15 (13.3)
Advertisement