Performance of Automated ASPECTS Software and Value as a Computer-Aided Detection Tool

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Barber PA,
   2. Demchuk AM,
   3. Zhang J, et al

   . Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. Lancet 2000;355:1670–74 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02237-6 pmid:10905241

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Powers WJ,
   2. Rabinstein AA,
   3. Ackerson T, et al

   . Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke—A Guideline For Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019;50:E344–418 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 pmid:31662037

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Coutts SB,
   2. Demchuk AM,
   3. Barber PA, et al

   ; VISION Study Group. Interobserver variation of ASPECTS in real time. Stroke 2004;35:e103–05 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000127082.19473.45 pmid:15073381

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Gupta AC,
   2. Schaefer PW,
   3. Chaudhry ZA, et al

   . Interobserver reliability of baseline noncontrast CT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score for intra-arterial stroke treatment selection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1046–49 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2942 pmid:22322602

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. McTaggart RA,
   2. Jovin TG,
   3. Lansberg MG, et al

   ; DEFUSE 2 Investigators. Alberta stroke program early computed tomographic scoring performance in a series of patients undergoing computed tomography and MRI: reader agreement, modality agreement, and outcome prediction. Stroke 2015;46:407–12 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006564 pmid:25538199

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Nicholson P,
   2. Hilditch CA,
   3. Neuhaus A, et al

   . Per-region interobserver agreement of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores (ASPECTS). J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:1069–71 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015473 pmid:32024784

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Farzin B,
   2. Fahed R,
   3. Guilbert F, et al

   . Early CT changes in patients admitted for thrombectomy: intrarater and interrater agreement. Neurology 2016;87:249–56 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002860 pmid:27316243

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Wilson AT,
   2. Dey S,
   3. Evans JW, et al

   . Minds treating brains: understanding the interpretation of non-contrast CT ASPECTS in acute ischemic stroke. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2018;16:143–45 PMC]doi:10.1080/14779072.2018.1421069 pmid:29265903

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Pfaff J,
   2. Herweh C,
   3. Schieber S, et al

   . E-ASPECTS correlates with and is predictive of outcome after mechanical thrombectomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1594–99 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5236 pmid:28596195

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Olive-Gadea M,
    2. Martins N,
    3. Boned S, et al

    . Baseline ASPECTS and e-ASPECTS correlation with infarct volume and functional outcome in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. J Neuroimaging 2019;29:198–202 doi:10.1111/jon.12564 pmid:30230093

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Mair G,
    2. White P,
    3. Bath PM, et al

    . External validation of e‐ASPECTS software for interpreting brain CT in stroke. Ann Neurol 2022;92:943–57 doi:10.1002/ana.26495 pmid:36053916

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Håkansson M,
    2. Svensson S,
    3. Zachrisson S, et al

    . ViewDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;139:42–51 doi:10.1093/rpd/ncq057 pmid:20200105

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. McHugh ML

    . Interrater reliability: the κ statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012;22:276–82 pmid:23092060

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 pmid:843571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Vanbelle S

    . Comparing dependent κ coefficients obtained on multilevel data. Biom J 2017;59:1016–34 doi:10.1002/bimj.201600093 pmid:28464322

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Sundaram VK,
    2. Goldstein J,
    3. Wheelwright D, et al

    . Automated ASPECTS in acute ischemic stroke: a comparative analysis with CT perfusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:2033–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6303 pmid:31727750

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Goebel J,
    2. Stenzel E,
    3. Guberina N, et al

    . Automated ASPECT rating: comparison between the Frontier ASPECT Score software and the Brainomix software. Neuroradiology 2018;60:1267–72 doi:10.1007/s00234-018-2098-x pmid:30219935

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Hoelter P,
    2. Muehlen I,
    3. Goelitz P, et al

    . Automated ASPECT scoring in acute ischemic stroke: comparison of three software tools. Neuroradiology 2020;62:1231–33 doi:10.1007/s00234-020-02439-3 pmid:32382795

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Neuhaus A,
    2. Seyedsaadat SM,
    3. Mihal D, et al

    . Region-specific agreement in ASPECTS estimation between neuroradiologists and e-ASPECTS software. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:720–23 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015442 pmid:31818971

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Austein F,
    2. Wodarg F,
    3. Jürgensen N, et al

    . Automated versus manual imaging assessment of early ischemic changes in acute stroke: comparison of two software packages and expert consensus. Eur Radiol 2019;29:6285–92 doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06252-2 pmid:31076862

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Maegerlein C,
    2. Lehm M,
    3. Friedrich B, et al

    . Automated calculation of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score: feasibility and reliability. Radiology 2019;291:141–48 doi:10.1148/radiol.2019181228 pmid:30720400

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Albers GW,
    2. Wald MJ,
    3. Mlynash M, et al

    . Automated calculation of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score: validation in patients with large hemispheric infarct. Stroke 2019;50:3277–79 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026430 pmid:31500555

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Löffler MT,
    2. Sollmann N,
    3. Mönch S, et al

    . Improved reliability of automated ASPECTS evaluation using iterative model reconstruction from head CT scans. J Neuroimaging 2021;31:341–44 doi:10.1111/jon.12810 pmid:33421036

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Chen Z,
    2. Shi Z,
    3. Lu F, et al

    . Validation of two automated ASPECTS software on non-contrast computed tomography scans of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurol 2023;14 doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1170955 pmid:37090971

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. van Horn N,
    2. Kniep H,
    3. Broocks G, et al

    . ASPECTS interobserver agreement of 100 investigators from the TENSION study. Clin Neuroradiol 2021;31:1093–100 doi:10.1007/s00062-020-00988-x pmid:33502563

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Delio PR,
    2. Wong ML,
    3. Tsai JP, et al

    . Assistance from automated ASPECTS software improves reader performance. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;30:105829 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105829 pmid:33989968

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Ernst M,
    2. Bernhardt M,
    3. Bechstein M, et al

    . Effect of CAD on performance in ASPECTS reading. Inform Med Unlocked 2020;18:100295 doi:10.1016/j.imu.2020.100295

    CrossRef
28. 28.↵
    1. Cagnazzo F,
    2. Derraz I,
    3. Dargazanli C, et al

    . Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and ASPECTS ≤6: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:350–55 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015237 pmid:31401563

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Huo X,
    2. Ma G,
    3. Tong X, et al

    ; ANGEL-ASPECT Investigators. Trial of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1272–83 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2213379 pmid:36762852

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Sarraj A,
    2. Hassan AE,
    3. Abraham MG, et al

    ; SELECT2 Investigators. Trial of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1259–71 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2214403 pmid:36762865

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Herweh C,
    2. Ringleb PA,
    3. Rauch G, et al

    . Performance of e-ASPECTS software in comparison to that of stroke physicians on assessing CT scans of acute ischemic stroke patients. Int J Stroke 2016;11:438–45 doi:10.1177/1747493016632244 pmid:26880058

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Nagel S,
    2. Sinha D,
    3. Day D, et al

    . e-ASPECTS software is non-inferior to neuroradiologists in applying the ASPECT score to computed tomography scans of acute ischemic stroke patients. Int J Stroke 2017;12:615–22 doi:10.1177/1747493016681020 pmid:27899743

    CrossRefPubMed