Evaluation of the Statistical Detection of Change Algorithm for Screening Patients with MS with New Lesion Activity on Longitudinal Brain MRI

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Filippi M,
   2. Rocca MA,
   3. Ciccarelli O

   , et al; MAGNIMS Study Group. MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:292–303 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00393-2 pmid:26822746

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Moraal B,
   2. Wattjes MP,
   3. Geurts JJ, et al

   . Improved detection of active multiple sclerosis lesions: 3D subtraction imaging. Radiology 2010;255:154–63 doi:10.1148/radiol.09090814 pmid:20308453

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Wattjes MP,
   2. Ciccarelli O,
   3. Reich DS

   , et al; North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative MRI Guidelines Working Group. 2021 MAGNIMS-CMSC-NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2021;20:653–70 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00095-8 pmid:34139157

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Carass A,
   2. Roy S,
   3. Jog A, et al

   . Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: resource and challenge. Neuroimage 2017;148:77–102 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.064 pmid:28087490

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Patriarche J,
   2. Erickson B

   . A review of the automated detection of change in serial imaging studies of the brain. J Digit Imaging 2004;17:158–74 doi:10.1007/s10278-004-1010-x pmid:15534751

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Llado X,
   2. Ganiler O,
   3. Oliver A, et al

   . Automated detection of multiple sclerosis lesions in serial brain MRI. Neuroradiology 2012;54:787–807 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0992-6 pmid:22179659

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Diaz-Hurtado M,
   2. Martinez-Heras E,
   3. Solana E, et al

   . Recent advances in the longitudinal segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Neuroradiology 2022;64:2103–17 doi:10.1007/s00234-022-03019-3 pmid:35864180

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Sweeney EM,
   2. Shinohara RT,
   3. Shea CD, et al

   . Automatic lesion incidence estimation and detection in multiple sclerosis using multisequence longitudinal MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:68–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3172 pmid:22766673

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Battaglini M,
   2. Rossi F,
   3. Grove RA, et al

   . Automated identification of brain new lesions in multiple sclerosis using subtraction images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:1543–49 doi:10.1002/jmri.24293 pmid:24987754

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Ganiler O,
    2. Oliver A,
    3. Diez Y, et al

    . A subtraction pipeline for automatic detection of new appearing multiple sclerosis lesions in longitudinal studies. Neuroradiology 2014;56:363–74 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1343-1 pmid:24590302

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Jain S,
    2. Ribbens A,
    3. Sima DM, et al

    . Two time point MS lesion segmentation in brain MRI: an expectation-maximization framework. Front Neurosci 2016;10:576 doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00576 pmid:28066162

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Cabezas M,
    2. Corral JF,
    3. Oliver A, et al

    . Improved automatic detection of new T2 lesions in multiple sclerosis using deformation fields. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1816–23 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4829 pmid:27282863

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Eichinger P,
    2. Wiestler H,
    3. Zhang H, et al

    . A novel imaging technique for better detecting new lesions in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2017;264:1909–18 doi:10.1007/s00415-017-8576-y pmid:28756606

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Nguyen TD,
    2. Zhang S,
    3. Gupta A, et al

    . Fast and robust unsupervised identification of MS lesion change using the statistical detection of changes algorithm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:830–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5594 pmid:29519791

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Galletto Pregliasco A,
    2. Collin A,
    3. Gueguen A, et al

    . Improved detection of new MS lesions during follow-up using an automated MR coregistration-fusion method. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1226–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5690 pmid:29880479

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Birenbaum A,
    2. Greenspan H

    . Multi-view longitudinal CNN for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation. Eng Appl Artif Intel 2017;65:111–18 doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2017.06.006

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    1. Fartaria MJ,
    2. Kober T,
    3. Granziera C, et al

    . Longitudinal analysis of white matter and cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin 2019;23:101938 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101938 pmid:31491829

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Salem M,
    2. Valverde S,
    3. Cabezas M, et al

    . A fully convolutional neural network for new T2-w lesion detection in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage Clin 2020;25:102149 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102149 pmid:31918065

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Schmidt-Mengin M,
    2. Soulier T,
    3. Hamzaoui M, et al

    . Online hard example mining vs. fixed oversampling strategy for segmentation of new multiple sclerosis lesions from longitudinal FLAIR MRI. Front Neurosci 2022;16:1004050 doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1004050 pmid:36408404

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Basaran BD,
    2. Matthews PM,
    3. Bai W

    . New lesion segmentation for multiple sclerosis brain images with imaging and lesion-aware augmentation. Front Neurosci 2022;16:1007453 doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1007453 pmid:36340756

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Smith SM

    . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55 doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 pmid:12391568

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Brady M,
    3. Smith S

    . Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:45–57 doi:10.1109/42.906424 pmid:11293691

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Bannister P,
    3. Brady M, et al

    . Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002;17:825–41 doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 pmid:12377157

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Avants BB,
    2. Tustison NJ,
    3. Song G, et al

    . A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage 2011;54:2033–44 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 pmid:20851191

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Yushkevich PA,
    2. Piven J,
    3. Hazlett HC, et al

    . User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006;31:1116–28 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 pmid:16545965

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2021. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed April 20, 2023
27. 27.↵
    1. Collett D

    . Modelling Binary Data. 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis; 2002
28. 28.↵
    1. Efron B,
    2. Tibshirani RJ

    . An Introduction to the Bootstrap. CRC Press; 1994
29. 29.↵
    1. Breslow N,
    2. Day NE

    . Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: The Analysis of Case-Control Studies. IARC Scientific Publication; 1980
30. 30.↵
    1. Kay SM

    . Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Detection Theory. Vol. II. Prentice Hall; 1998
31. 31.↵
    1. Shamonin DP,
    2. Bron EE,
    3. Lelieveldt BP, et al

    ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Fast parallel image registration on CPU and GPU for diagnostic classification of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neuroinform 2013;7:50 doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00050 pmid:24474917

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Balakrishnan G,
    2. Zhao A,
    3. Sabuncu MR, et al

    . An unsupervised learning model for deformable medical image registration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, Utah. June 18–23, 2018;9252–60
33. 33.↵
    1. Yang X,
    2. Kwitt R,
    3. Styner M, et al

    . Quicksilver: fast predictive image registration—a deep learning approach. Neuroimage 2017;158:378–96 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.008 pmid:28705497

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Obuchowski NA,
    2. Bullen J

    . Multireader diagnostic accuracy imaging studies: fundamentals of design and analysis. Radiology 2022;303:26–34 doi:10.1148/radiol.211593 pmid:35166584

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Maranzano J,
    2. Dadar M,
    3. Rudko DA, et al

    . Comparison of multiple sclerosis cortical lesion types detected by multicontrast 3T and 7T MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1162–69 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6099 pmid:31221631

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Zhang S,
    2. Nguyen TD,
    3. Zhao Y, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of semiautomatic lesion detection plus quantitative susceptibility mapping in the identification of new and enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions. Neuroimage Clin 2018;18:143–48 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.013 pmid:29387531

    CrossRefPubMed