Specificity of Quantitative Functional Brain Mapping with Arterial Spin-Labeling for Preoperative Assessment

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Glover GH

   . Overview of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2011;22:133–39, vii doi:10.1016/j.nec.2010.11.001 pmid:21435566

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Boubela RN,
   3. Kalcher K,
   4. Huf W, et al

   . fMRI measurements of amygdala activation are confounded by stimulus correlated signal fluctuation in nearby veins draining distant brain regions. Sci Rep 2015;5:10499 doi:10.1038/srep10499 pmid:25994551

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Fujiwara N,
   3. Sakatani K,
   4. Katayama Y, et al

   . Evoked-cerebral blood oxygenation changes in false-negative activations in BOLD contrast functional MRI of patients with brain tumors. Neuroimage 2004;21:1464–71 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.042 pmid:15050571

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Giussani C,
   3. Roux FE,
   4. Ojemann J, et al

   . Is preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging reliable for language areas mapping in brain tumor surgery? Review of language functional magnetic resonance imaging and direct cortical stimulation correlation studies. Neurosurgery 2010;66:113–20 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000360392.15450.C9 pmid:19935438

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Pittau F,
   3. Fahoum F,
   4. Zelmann R, et al

   . Negative BOLD response to interictal epileptic discharges in focal epilepsy. Brain Topogr 2013;26:627–40 doi:10.1007/s10548-013-0302-1 pmid:23793553

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Rathakrishnan R,
   3. Moeller F,
   4. Levan P, et al

   . BOLD signal changes preceding negative responses in EEG-fMRI in patients with focal epilepsy. Epilepsia 2010;51:1837–45 doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02643.x pmid:20550554

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Carusone LM,
   3. Srinivasan J,
   4. Gitelman DR, et al

   . Hemodynamic response changes in cerebrovascular disease: implications for functional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1222–28 pmid:12169483

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Gerloff C,
   3. Grodd W,
   4. Altenmuller E, et al

   . Coregistration of EEG and fMRI in a simple motor task. Hum Brain Mapp 1996;4:199–209 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1996)4:3<199::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-Z pmid:20408198

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Inuggi A,
   3. Filippi M,
   4. Chieffo R, et al

   . Motor area localization using fMRI-constrained cortical current density reconstruction of movement-related cortical potentials, a comparison with fMRI and TMS mapping. Brain Res 2010;1308:68–78 doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.042 pmid:19853590

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Lascano AM,
    3. Grouiller F,
    4. Genetti M, et al

    . Surgically relevant localization of the central sulcus with high-density somatosensory-evoked potentials compared with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 2014;74:517–26 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000298 pmid:24463494

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Pike GB

    . Quantitative functional MRI: concepts, issues and future challenges. Neuroimage 2012;62:1234–40 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.046 pmid:22056462

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Hyder F,
    3. Sanganahalli BG,
    4. Herman P, et al

    . Neurovascular and neurometabolic couplings in dynamic calibrated fMRI: transient oxidative neuroenergetics for block-design and event-related paradigms. Front Neuroenergetics 2010;2:18 doi:10.3389/fnene.2010.00018 pmid:20838476

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Detre JA,
    3. Rao H,
    4. Wang DJ, et al

    . Applications of arterial spin labeled MRI in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:1026–37 doi:10.1002/jmri.23581 pmid:22246782

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Krainik A,
    3. Villien M,
    4. Tropres I, et al

    . Functional imaging of cerebral perfusion. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013;94:1259–78 doi:10.1016/j.diii.2013.08.004 pmid:24011870

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Liu TT,
    3. Wong EC

    . A signal processing model for arterial spin labeling functional MRI. Neuroimage 2005;24:207–15 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.047 pmid:15588612

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Hernandez-Garcia L,
    3. Aramendia-Vidaurreta V,
    4. Bolar DS, et al

    . Recent technical developments in ASL: a review of the state of the art. Magn Reson Med 2022;88:2021–42 doi:10.1002/mrm.29381 pmid:35983963

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Pinto J,
    3. Chappell MA,
    4. Okell TW, et al

    . Calibration of arterial spin labeling data-potential pitfalls in post-processing. Magn Reson Med 2020;83:1222–34 doi:10.1002/mrm.28000 pmid:31605558

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Wang Z

    . Improving cerebral blood flow quantification for arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI by removing residual motion artifacts and global signal fluctuations. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1409–15 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.004 pmid:22789842

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Borogovac A,
    3. Habeck C,
    4. Small SA, et al

    . Mapping brain function using a 30-day interval between baseline and activation: a novel arterial spin labeling fMRI approach. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010;30:1721–33 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.89 pmid:20648039

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Stewart SB,
    3. Koller JM,
    4. Campbell MC, et al

    . Arterial spin labeling versus BOLD in direct challenge and drug-task interaction pharmacological fMRI. PeerJ 2014;2:e687 doi:10.7717/peerj.687 pmid:25538867

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Hoogenraad FG,
    3. Pouwels PJ,
    4. Hofman MB, et al

    . Quantitative differentiation between BOLD models in fMRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:233–46 doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200102)45:2<233::AID-MRM1032>3.0.CO;2-W pmid:11180431

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Hassanpour MS,
    3. Yan L,
    4. Wang DJ, et al

    . How the heart speaks to the brain: neural activity during cardiorespiratory interoceptive stimulation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2016;371:20160017 doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0017 pmid:28080974

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Tancredi FB,
    3. Lajoie I,
    4. Hoge RD

    . Test-retest reliability of cerebral blood flow and blood oxygenation level-dependent responses to hypercapnia and hyperoxia using dual-echo pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and step changes in the fractional composition of inspired gases. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:1144–57 doi:10.1002/jmri.24878 pmid:25752936

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Hodkinson DJ,
    3. Krause K,
    4. Khawaja N, et al

    . Quantifying the test-retest reliability of cerebral blood flow measurements in a clinical model of on-going post-surgical pain: a study using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling. Neuroimage Clin 2013;3:301–10 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.09.004 pmid:24143296

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Gardumi A,
    3. Ivanov D,
    4. Havlicek M, et al

    . Tonotopic maps in human auditory cortex using arterial spin labeling. Hum Brain Mapp 2017;38:1140–54 doi:10.1002/hbm.23444 pmid:27790786

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Pimentel MA,
    3. Vilela P,
    4. Sousa I, et al

    . Localization of the hand motor area by arterial spin labeling and blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2013;34:96–108 doi:10.1002/hbm.21418 pmid:22121040

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Storti SF,
    3. Galazzo IB,
    4. Pizzini FB, et al

    . Dual-echo ASL based assessment of motor networks: a feasibility study. J Neural Eng 2018;15:026018 doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aa8b27 pmid:28884708

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Jann K,
    3. Orosz A,
    4. Dierks T, et al

    . Quantification of network perfusion in ASL cerebral blood flow data with seed based and ICA approaches. Brain Topogr 2013;26:569–80 doi:10.1007/s10548-013-0280-3 pmid:23508714

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Storti SF,
    3. Boscolo Galazzo I,
    4. Montemezzi S, et al

    . Dual-echo ASL contributes to decrypting the link between functional connectivity and cerebral blow flow. Hum Brain Mapp 2017;38:5831–44 doi:10.1002/hbm.23804 pmid:28885752

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Raoult H,
    3. Petr J,
    4. Bannier E, et al

    . Arterial spin labeling for motor activation mapping at 3T with a 32-channel coil: reproducibility and spatial accuracy in comparison with BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 2011;58:157–67 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.011 pmid:21689761

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Diekhoff S,
    3. Uludağ K,
    4. Sparing R, et al

    . Functional localization in the human brain: gradient-echo, spin-echo, and arterial spin-labeling fMRI compared with neuronavigated TMS. Hum Brain Mapp 2011;32:341–57 doi:10.1002/hbm.21024 pmid:20533563

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Faraco CC,
    3. Strother MK,
    4. Dethrage LM, et al

    . Dual echo vessel-encoded ASL for simultaneous BOLD and CBF reactivity assessment in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:1579–92 doi:10.1002/mrm.25268 pmid:24757044

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Tak S,
    3. Wang DJ,
    4. Polimeni JR, et al

    . Dynamic and static contributions of the cerebrovasculature to the resting-state BOLD signal. Neuroimage 2014;84:672–80 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.057 pmid:24099842

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. McGonigle DJ,
    3. Howseman AM,
    4. Athwal BS, et al

    . Variability in fMRI: an examination of intersession differences. Neuroimage 2000;11:708–34 doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0562 pmid:10860798

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    2. Rossi S,
    3. Antal A,
    4. Bestmann S, et al

    ; basis of this article began with a Consensus Statement from the IFCN Workshop on Present, Future of TMS: Safety, Ethical Guidelines, Siena, October 17–20, 2018, updating through April 2020. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2021;132:269–306 doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003 pmid:33243615

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Rossini PM,
    3. Barker AT,
    4. Berardelli A, et al

    . Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;91:79–92 doi:10.1016/0013-4694(94)90029-9 pmid:7519144

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Aguirre GK,
    4. Rao H, et al

    . Empirical optimization of ASL data analysis using an ASL data processing toolbox: ASLtbx. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:261–69 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2007.07.003 pmid:17826940

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. Aguirre GK,
    3. Detre JA,
    4. Zarahn E, et al

    . Experimental design and the relative sensitivity of BOLD and perfusion fMRI. Neuroimage 2002;15:488–500 doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0990 pmid:11848692

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    2. Vidyasagar R,
    3. Parkes LM

    . Reproducibility of functional MRI localization within the human somatosensory cortex. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:1439–44 doi:10.1002/jmri.22758 pmid:21960411

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Sondergaard RE,
    3. Martino D,
    4. Kiss ZHT, et al

    . TMS motor mapping methodology and reliability: a structured review. Front Neurosci 2021;15:709368 doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.709368 pmid:34489629

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Lotze M,
    3. Kaethner RJ,
    4. Erb M, et al

    . Comparison of representational maps using functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:306–12 doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00380-2 pmid:12559238

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    2. Numssen O,
    3. Zier AL,
    4. Thielscher A, et al

    . Efficient high-resolution TMS mapping of the human motor cortex by nonlinear regression. Neuroimage 2021;245:118654 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118654 pmid:34653612

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Takahashi S,
    3. Vajkoczy P,
    4. Picht T

    . Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the motor cortex in patients with Rolandic brain tumors. Neurosurg Focus 2013;34:E3 doi:10.3171/2013.1.FOCUS133 pmid:23544409

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Wilson M,
    3. Dadachanji H,
    4. Greenwell D

    . The motor homunculus: linking the past with the present. J Physiol 2021;599:1731–32 doi:10.1113/JP280982 pmid:33616918

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    2. Penfield W,
    3. Boldrey E

    . Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 1937;60:389–443 doi:10.1093/brain/60.4.389

    CrossRef
46. 46.↵
    2. Tieleman A,
    3. Deblaere K,
    4. Van Roost D, et al

    . Preoperative fMRI in tumour surgery. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2523–34 doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1429-z pmid:19430795

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    2. Schweisfurth MA,
    3. Frahm J,
    4. Schweizer R

    . Individual fMRI maps of all phalanges and digit bases of all fingers in human primary somatosensory cortex. Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:658 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00658 pmid:25228867

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    2. Kober H,
    3. Nimsky C,
    4. Moller M, et al

    . Correlation of sensorimotor activation with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography in presurgical functional imaging: a spatial analysis. Neuroimage 2001;14:1214–28 doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0909 pmid:11697953

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    2. Christmann C,
    3. Ruf M,
    4. Braus DF, et al

    . Simultaneous electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging of primary and secondary somatosensory cortex in humans after electrical stimulation. Neurosci Lett 2002;333:69–73 doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00969-2 pmid:12401562

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    2. Korvenoja A,
    3. Kirveskari E,
    4. Aronen HJ, et al

    . Sensorimotor cortex localization: comparison of magnetoencephalography, functional MR imaging, and intraoperative cortical mapping. Radiology 2006;241:213–22 doi:10.1148/radiol.2411050796 pmid:16908676

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    2. Ulmer JL,
    3. Hacein-Bey L,
    4. Mathews VP, et al

    . Lesion-induced pseudo-dominance at functional magnetic resonance imaging: implications for preoperative assessments. Neurosurgery 2004;55:569–79; discussion 580–61 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000134384.94749.b2 pmid:15335424

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    2. Tomasi SO,
    3. Umana GE,
    4. Scalia G, et al

    . The superficial anastomosing veins of the human brain cortex: a microneurosurgical anatomical study. Front Surg 2021;8:817002 doi:10.3389/fsurg.2021.817002 pmid:35083275

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    2. Fesl G,
    3. Braun B,
    4. Rau S, et al

    . Is the center of mass (COM) a reliable parameter for the localization of brain function in fMRI? Eur Radiol 2008;18:1031–37 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-0850-z pmid:18228024

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    2. Kallioniemi E,
    3. Pitkanen M,
    4. Kononen M, et al

    . Localization of cortical primary motor area of the hand using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, BOLD and arterial spin labeling fMRI. J Neurosci Methods 2016;273:138–48 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.09.002 pmid:27615740

    CrossRefPubMed
55. 55.↵
    2. Alsop DC,
    3. Detre JA,
    4. Golay X, et al

    . Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:102–16 doi:10.1002/mrm.25197 pmid:24715426

    CrossRefPubMed