Perfusion Collateral Index versus Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio in Assessment of Collaterals in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Sheth SA,
   3. Liebeskind DS

   . Collaterals in endovascular therapy for stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2015;28:10–15 doi:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000166 pmid:25514251

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Liebeskind DS

   . Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003;34:2279–84 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000086465.41263.06 pmid:12881609

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Christoforidis GA,
   3. Mohammad Y,
   4. Kehagias D, et al

   . Angiographic assessment of pial collaterals as a prognostic indicator following intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1789–97 pmid:6091531

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Menon BK,
   3. Smith EE,
   4. Modi J, et al

   . Regional leptomeningeal score on CT angiography predicts clinical and imaging outcomes in patients with acute anterior circulation occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1640–45 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2564 pmid:21799045

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Jiang B,
   3. Ball RL,
   4. Michel P, et al

   . Factors influencing infarct growth including collateral status assessed using computed tomography in acute stroke patients with large artery occlusion. Int J Stroke 2019;14:603–12 doi:10.1177/1747493019851278 pmid:31096871

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Powers WJ,
   3. Rabinstein AA,
   4. Ackerson T, et al

   . Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke—a Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019;50:e344–418 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 pmid:31662037

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Menon BK,
   3. O'Brien B,
   4. Bivard A, et al

   . Assessment of leptomeningeal collaterals using dynamic CT angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:365–71 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.171 pmid:23149554

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Lima FO,
   3. Furie KL,
   4. Silva GS, et al

   . The pattern of leptomeningeal collaterals on CT angiography is a strong predictor of long-term functional outcome in stroke patients with large-vessel intracranial occlusion. Stroke 2010;41:23160–22 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592303 pmid:20829514

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Hernández-Pérez M,
   3. Puig J,
   4. Blasco G, et al

   . Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography provides collateral circulation and hemodynamic information in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2016;47:531–34 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010748 pmid:26658445

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Ernst M,
    3. Forkert ND,
    4. Brehmer L, et al

    . Prediction of infarction and reperfusion in stroke by flow- and volume-weighted collateral signal in MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:275–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4145 pmid:25500313

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Menon BK,
    3. d'Esterre CD,
    4. Qazi EM, et al

    . Multiphase CT angiography: a new tool for the imaging triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Radiology 2015;275:510–20 doi:10.1148/radiol.15142256 pmid:25633505

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Tsui B,
    3. Nour M,
    4. Chen I, et al

    . MR angiography in assessment of collaterals in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography. Brain Sci 2022;12:1181 doi:10.3390/brainsci12091181 pmid:36138917

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Kim HJ,
    3. Lee SB,
    4. Choi JW, et al

    . Multiphase MR angiography collateral map: functional outcome after acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke. Radiology 2020;295:192–201 doi:10.1148/radiol.2020191712 pmid:32068506

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Olivot JM,
    3. Mlynash M,
    4. Inoue M, et al

    . Hypoperfusion intensity ratio predicts infarct progression and functional outcome in the DEFUSE 2 cohort. Stroke 2014;45:1018–23 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003857 pmid:24595591

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Nael K,
    3. Doshi A,
    4. De Leacy R, et al

    . MR perfusion to determine the status of collaterals in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a look beyond time maps. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:219–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5454 pmid:29217747

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Nael K,
    3. Sakai Y,
    4. Larson J, et al

    . CT perfusion collateral index in assessment of collaterals in acute ischemic stroke with delayed presentation: comparison to single phase CTA. J Neuroradiol 2022;49:1988–204 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2021.11.002 pmid:34800563

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Guenego A,
    3. Fahed R,
    4. Albers GW, et al

    . Hypoperfusion intensity ratio correlates with angiographic collaterals in acute ischaemic stroke with M1 occlusion. Eur J Neurol 2020;27:864–70 doi:10.1111/ene.14181 pmid:32068938

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Tomsick T,
    3. Broderick J,
    4. Carrozella J, et al

    . Revascularization results in the Interventional Management of Stroke II trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Mar 2008;29:582–87 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0843 pmid:18337393

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Higashida RT,
    3. Furlan AJ,
    4. Roberts H, et al

    . Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:e109–37 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09 pmid:12869717

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Boutelier T,
    3. Kudo K,
    4. Pautot F, et al

    . Bayesian hemodynamic parameter estimation by bolus tracking perfusion weighted imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012;31:1381–95 doi:10.1109/TMI.2012.2189890 pmid:22410325

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. An H,
    3. Ford AL,
    4. Vo K, et al

    . Signal evolution and infarction risk for apparent diffusion coefficient lesions in acute ischemic stroke are both time- and perfusion-dependent. Stroke 2011;42:1276–81 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.610501 pmid:21454821

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Guenego A,
    3. Mlynash M,
    4. Christensen S, et al

    . Hypoperfusion ratio predicts infarct growth during transfer for thrombectomy. Ann Neurol 2018;84:616–20 doi:10.1002/ana.25320 pmid:30168180

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Lyndon D,
    3. van den Broek M,
    4. Niu B, et al

    . Hypoperfusion index ratio correlates as a surrogate of collateral scoring on CT angiogram in large vessel stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1380–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7181 pmid:34140276

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Wang CM,
    3. Chang YM,
    4. Sung PS, et al

    . Hypoperfusion index ratio as a surrogate of collateral scoring on CT angiogram in large vessel stroke. J Clin Med 2021;10:1296 doi:10.3390/jcm10061296 pmid:33801050

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Arenillas JF,
    3. Cortijo E,
    4. García-Bermejo P, et al

    . Relative cerebral blood volume is associated with collateral status and infarct growth in stroke patients in SWIFT PRIME. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2018;38:1839–47 doi:10.1177/0271678X17740293 pmid:29135347

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Mlynash M,
    3. Lansberg MG,
    4. Kemp S, et al

    . Combination of Tmax and relative CBV perfusion parameters more accurately predicts CTA collaterals than a single perfusion parameter in DEFUSE 3. Stroke 2019;50(Suppl) doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.WP79

    CrossRef
27. 27.↵
    2. Jerosch-Herold M,
    3. Hu X,
    4. Murthy NS, et al

    . Time delay for arrival of MR contrast agent in collateral-dependent myocardium. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004;23:881–90 doi:10.1109/TMI.2004.827969 pmid:15250640

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Parthasarathy R,
    3. Kate M,
    4. Rempel JL, et al

    . Prognostic evaluation based on cortical vein score difference in stroke. Stroke 2013;44:2748–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001231 pmid:23887836

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Parthasarathy R,
    3. Sohn SI,
    4. Jeerakathil T, et al

    . A combined arterial and venous grading scale to predict outcome in anterior circulation ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging 2015;25:969–77 doi:10.1111/jon.12260 pmid:26082023

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Wardlaw JM,
    3. Keir SL,
    4. Bastin ME, et al

    . Is diffusion imaging appearance an independent predictor of outcome after ischemic stroke? Neurology 2002;59:1381–87 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000032495.71720.c3 pmid:12427888

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Johnston KC,
    4. Homer D, et al

    . Infarct volume as a surrogate or auxiliary outcome measure in ischemic stroke clinical trial: the RANTTAS Investigators. Stroke 1999;30:293–98 doi:10.1161/01.str.30.2.293 pmid:9933262

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Ganesh A,
    3. Ospel JM,
    4. Menon BK, et al

    . Assessment of discrepancies between follow-up infarct volume and 90-day outcomes among patients with ischemic stroke who received endovascular therapy. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2132376 doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32376 pmid:34739060

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Deng W,
    3. Teng J,
    4. Liebeskind D, et al

    . Predictors of infarct growth measured by apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in patients with acute ischemic stroke. World Neurosurg 2019;123:e797–802 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.051 pmid:30590217

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Kauw F,
    3. Dankbaar JW,
    4. Martin BW, et al

    . Collateral status in ischemic stroke: a comparison of computed tomography angiography, computed tomography perfusion, and digital subtraction angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2020;44:984–92 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000001090 pmid:33196604

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Jansen IG,
    3. Berkhemer OA,
    4. Yoo AJ, et al

    . Comparison of CTA- and DSA-based collateral flow assessment in patients with anterior circulation stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2037–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4878 pmid:27418474

    Abstract/FREE Full Text