Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Correlation of Call Burden and Sleep Deprivation with Physician Burnout, Driving Crashes, and Medical Errors among US Neurointerventionalists

R.N. Abdalla, S.A. Ansari, M.C. Hurley, H. Attarian, K.M. Fargen, J.A. Hirsch, D.R. Cantrell, P.K. Curl, P.R. Daves and A. Shaibani
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2022, 43 (9) 1286-1291; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7606
R.N. Abdalla
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (R.N.A., S.A.A., D.R.C., A.S.)
cNeurological Surgery (R.N.A., S.A.A., A.S.)
eDepartment of Radiology (R.N.A.), Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.N. Abdalla
S.A. Ansari
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (R.N.A., S.A.A., D.R.C., A.S.)
bNeurology (S.A.A.)
cNeurological Surgery (R.N.A., S.A.A., A.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.A. Ansari
M.C. Hurley
fDepartment of Radiology (M.C.H.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.C. Hurley
H. Attarian
dSleep Medicine (H.A.), Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Attarian
K.M. Fargen
gDepartment of Neurosurgery (K.M.F.), Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K.M. Fargen
J.A. Hirsch
hDepartment of Radiology (J.A.H.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.A. Hirsch
D.R. Cantrell
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (R.N.A., S.A.A., D.R.C., A.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.R. Cantrell
P.K. Curl
iDepartment of Radiology (P.K.C.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.K. Curl
P.R. Daves
jDepartment of Finance (P.R.D.), University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.R. Daves
A. Shaibani
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (R.N.A., S.A.A., D.R.C., A.S.)
cNeurological Surgery (R.N.A., S.A.A., A.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Shaibani
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High call frequency can lead to inadequate sleep, fatigue, and burnout, resulting in detrimental effects on physicians and patients. We aimed to assess the correlation between the frequency and burden of neurointerventional surgery calls and sleep deprivation with physician burnout, physical and driving safety, and fatigue-related medical errors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We sent an online questionnaire to the members of the 2 neurointerventional surgery societies comprising 50 questions and spanning 3 main topics: 1) overnight/weekend call burden, 2) sleeping patterns, and 3) Copenhagen Burnout Inventory.

RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four surveys were completed. Most (54%) neurointerventional surgeons reported burnout. Call burden of ≥1 every 3 days and being in practice >10 years were independent predictors of burnout. Thirty-nine percent reported falling asleep at the wheel, 23% reported a motor vehicle crash/near-crash, and 34% reported medical errors they considered related to call/work fatigue. On multivariate logistic regression, high call burden (called-in >3 times/week) was an independent predictor of sleeping at the wheel and motor vehicle crashes. Reporting <4 hours of uninterrupted sleep was an independent predictor of motor vehicle crashes and medical errors. Most neurointerventional surgeons recommended a maximum call frequency of once every 3 days.

CONCLUSIONS: Call frequency and burden, number of years in practice, and sleep deprivation are associated with burnout of neurointerventional surgeons, sleeping at the wheel, motor vehicle crashes, and fatigue-related medical errors. These findings contribute to the increasing literature on physician burnout and may guide future societal recommendations related to call burden in neurointerventional surgery.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CBI
Copenhagen Burnout Inventory
NIS
neurointerventional surgeons
RVU
Relative Value Unit
SNIS
Society of Neurointerventional Surgery
SVIN
Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology

Physician burnout is a major health care concern and is very common among health care workers compared with the general population.1 More than 45% of US physicians reported at least 1 symptom of burnout with a prevalence approaching 50%.2,3 Work-related burnout has been defined as a combination of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and job dissatisfaction.4

Physicians experiencing burnout syndrome feel emotional exhaustion with a loss of enthusiasm for work, depersonalization and cynicism, and a low sense of personal accomplishment.5,6 Burnout is associated with alcohol and substance abuse, broken relationships, early retirement, and suicidal ideation in cross-sectional studies.7-10 Not only does burnout correlate with adverse personal effects, but it is also associated with professionalism, quality of patient care, and increased medical errors.11,12 Variable rates of physician burnout are noted among different subspecialties but range from approximately 40% to 75% in certain specialties such as emergency medicine. Nearly 60% of radiologists and neurologists as well as 50% of neurosurgeons have reported burnout.13

Neurointerventional surgeons (NIS) may be at high risk for burnout given the call frequency, overnight calls, the relatively high proportion of urgent/emergent cases, and, in particular, the considerable increase since 2015 in the number of acute stroke thrombectomy cases, frequently occurring outside regular hours. NIS often commute emergently from home with interrupted sleep, raising their risk of sleeping at the wheel, being involved in motor vehicle crashes, and committing fatigue-related medical errors. Work-related interruption of sleep has been strongly correlated with physician burnout.14,15

The American College of Graduate Medical Education has recently increased its focus on promoting well-being and avoiding burnout in trainees by increasing education on wellness, exercise, healthy diet, sleeping habits, and work-life balance, in addition to setting limits on weekly and individual shift work hours. However, attending physicians are not subject to these guidelines on call frequency or work hours. Our study aimed to establish more accurate and robust rates of burnout among NIS by using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) survey and to specifically assess the association of call frequency and coverage to rates of burnout, inadequate sleep, daytime fatigue, medical errors, and vehicular crashes/near-crashes. Finally, we polled the NIS community for recommendations on optimum call frequency, organization, and compensation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study protocol was reviewed by Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine institutional review board, which exempted the study as a nonhuman subject design. The study survey was designed by 5 experienced NIS and 1 sleep medicine physician. The study used a 3-part survey (a detailed 3-part questionnaire that can be found in the Online Supplemental Data) and was designed to be completed in 5 minutes. The survey was initially developed in the REDCap electronic data capture tool (https://catalyst.harvard.edu/redcap/) and distributed via e-mail to the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery (SNIS) and Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) boards as a single-click link to be distributed to their membership. In addition, it was then posted to SNIS members using the society’s “SNIS Connect” platform, and the remainder was sent by direct e-mail. A reminder e-mail was sent 10–15 days later during the period of the study, which extended from March 1 to May 31, 2018. Because responses were anonymous, REDCap recorded the Internet Protocol addresses of respondents to avoid duplicates.

The study questionnaire comprised 3 parts:

  • Part 1, Overnight and weekend call: 15 questions that surveyed the existing frequency and model of call, including backup call, number of hospitals covered, following-day adjustment in response to being late on call, division of weeknight and weekend calls, call-compensation systems, and their recommendations on optimal call frequency, model, and compensation.

  • Part 2, Sleep: surveyed the association of work and call coverage with sleep, daytime fatigue, history of previous call-related motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes, history of previous work-related errors, and the existing prevalence of sleep disorders. We categorized sleeping hours into 3 categories: <4 hours, 4–6 hours, and 6–8 hours.

  • Part 3, Burnout: CBI used 3 domains: personal burnout (6 questions), work-related burnout (7 questions), and patient-related burnout (6 questions).

There were 5 possible answers to each question, and those answers were converted to a scoring system from 0 to 100 and subcategorized as follows: always, 100; often, 75; sometimes, 50; seldom, 25; and never/almost never, 0. A mean score of >50 points in any domain was positive for burnout.16,17 We also collected the demographics of survey respondents, including age, sex, years of practice, practice setting, and location.

Statistical Analysis

All analysis was conducted using SPSS (Version 24.0; IBM) and R statistical and computing software (http://www.r-project.org/). Descriptive statistics were reported in percentages, means, medians, and range. Factors affecting our dependent variables (burnout, motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes, sleeping at the wheel, and fatigue-related medical errors) were evaluated in a univariate analysis using the Fisher exact and χ2 tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent predictors of those dependent variables. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. The Cronbach α coefficient testing was used to assess the reliability of the CBI Likert scale, with values ≥.9 considered excellent, .7 to <.9 good, .6 to <.7 acceptable, .5 to <.6 poor, and <.5 unacceptable.

RESULTS

Sample and Demographics

Based on a previously published study in 2019, the number of US NIS in 2 of the largest neurointerventional societies in the United States, SNIS and SVIN, was 898 and 496, respectively with many of those physician-surgeons having dual membership in >1 society. The study estimated the total number of US NIS at that time to be approximately 1200 physicians. After sending surveys to the members of SNIS and SVIN, we had 164 respondents, most of whom were between 40 and 49 years of age (50%), with approximately 20% of respondents between 30 and 39 years, 20% between 50 and 59 years, and 10% between 60 and 69 years of age. Only 1 respondent was  older than 69 years of age, and 2 respondents were younger than 30 years of age. Seventy-eight percent of respondents had been in practice for >5 years, with approximately 18% practicing for >20 years. Most respondents practiced in large urban cities with populations of >500,000, with only 11.5% of respondents practicing in small or rural cities. There was a homogeneous distribution among respondents in terms of their practice settings with 41.5% in academic, 33.5% in private practice, and 25% in a mixed practice. The male/female ratio among respondents was approximately 9:1.

Call Burden

Regarding call frequency, 48% of respondents were on call more than once every 3 days; 32%, once every 3 days; 15%, once every 4 days; 4%, once every 5 days; and only 1%, less than once every 5 days. Most respondents (59%) use a one week at a time call coverage model, whereas 28% had fixed weekdays with a rotating weekend, and 13% used miscellaneous arrangements including a night float, sole operator call, or alternating calls on a biweekly or monthly basis. When it came to being “called-in” during nights and weekends, 33% of respondents reported an average ≥4 times during a week of calls; 26%, 3 times; 29%, twice; and 12%, once, resulting in approximately 60% of respondents being called-in ≥3 times during weekends and after-hours. Nearly all (98%) respondents had no built-in mechanism for taking the next day off if they were called-in or worked past midnight, and 86% responded “never or rarely” to how often they rescheduled next-day patients under these circumstances. A third (35%) of respondents covered >1 hospital when on-call, but only 6% were responsible for >3 hospitals. Only 34% of respondents reported having >1 person on call (eg, backup or call tree), while 48% of respondents who covered call at >1 hospital did not have a built-in system for a backup call person. When asked what would constitute optimal call frequency, most NIS recommended once every 3–4 days (39% once every 4 days and 37% once every 3 days) with only 7% suggesting a call frequency greater than every 3 days.

Increased call-in frequency ≥3 times a week was significantly associated with falling asleep at the wheel (47.9% versus 26.5%, P = .006), and in multivariate logistic regression, it was an independent predictor of falling asleep at the wheel (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.51–7.86; P = .004). Even though increased call-in frequency showed a trend only toward motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes in univariate analysis (28.1% versus 16.2%, P = .09), when controlling for other variables in a multivariate logistic regression analysis, increased call-in frequency was an independent predictor of motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.17–8.80; P = .03).

Call Compensation

When looking at different compensation models, 84% of respondents were salary-based versus only 8% reporting a compensation model that was purely based on Relative Value Units (RVUs) or 9% with alternative compensation models. Greater than half of respondents received bonuses based on RVUs alone (18%) or RVUs combined with other productivity factors (35%), but only 8% of respondents had their RVUs in after-hours multiplied by a factor because most (92%) had fixed RVUs regardless of the day and time of the week. Only half of respondents (51%) received extra compensation for overnight/weekend calls, with 22% having call compensation built into their base salary and the rest having a certain number of calls included in their baseline salary. Only 61 physicians (37%) responded to the question about the number of calls included in the baseline salary, and the mean/median and mode of answers were 10 calls per month, with a range between 1 and 31. When we looked at the monetary value for weeknight call compensation, 50% of respondents were compensated at $1000–$2000, 30% were compensated <$1000, and 20% were compensated at >$2000. Call compensation was overall slightly greater on the weekends, with 21% being compensated <$1000% and 28% compensated >$2000.

Physician Burnout

Table 1 demonstrates the mean, SD, median, and range of the CBI scales. The results showed good-to-excellent internal consistency with a Cronbach α coefficient of ≥ 0.8. The Cronbach α was .91 for personal burnout, .79 for work-related burnout, and .91 for patient-related burnout. More than half of respondents (54%) reported burnout in at least 1 of the domains: 12.2% in a single domain, 28.7% in 2 domains, and 13.4% in all domains. The highest burnout perceived was in the personal burnout domain with almost half of respondents (48.8%) reporting burnout in this domain and a nearly equivalent number (44.5%) of respondents reporting work-related burnout, but only 16.5% perceived patient-related burnout (for which the cutoff point of CBI scale score was 50 points).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Baseline characteristic (in scores) of CBI questionnaires

The Online Supplemental Data demonstrate a univariate correlation of potential independent factors for burnout. There was a trend toward increased burnout in respondents who covered calls a week at a time compared with using a split weekday/weekend model (60.4% versus 43.5%; P = .07) after removing other less common models. There was a trend toward increased burnout with decreased sleep (61.4% versus 48.9%, P = .12, for <4 hours of uninterrupted sleep and 75% versus 51.4%, P = .06, for <6 total hours of sleep), but this did not reach statistical significance. Even though call frequency did not correlate with burnout in univariate analysis, a call frequency of ≥3 times a week was an independent predictor of burnout (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.22–9.19; P = .02) when accounting for various factors in a multivariate logistic regression model (Online Supplemental Data). NIS with >10 years of practice showed a trend toward an increased likelihood of experiencing burnout (59.3% versus 47.9%, P = .16), and practicing for >10 years was an independent predictor of burnout in multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.11–7.69; P = .03). However, physicians reporting burnout did not have a statistically increased risk of motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes (28.1% versus 17.3%; P = .14), sleeping at the wheel (39.3% versus 38.7%; P = .99), and/or reporting fatigue-related medical errors (31.5% versus 37.3%; P = .51).

Sleep and Fatigue

The total and uninterrupted hours of sleep while on call and not on call are demonstrated in Table 2. Regarding on-call days and total sleep hours, 65% slept between 4 and 6 hours versus 23% who had 6–8 hours of sleep, but there was also less uninterrupted sleep, with 43% reporting <4 hours and only 10% achieving 6–8 hours. When off-call, no respondent slept <4 hours, and 89% reported 6–8 hours of sleep per day, most of which was uninterrupted (80%). When asked to rate the quality of sleep during a call night, only 9% of respondents thought it was average/same as a noncall night, 57% believed they had fair sleep quality, and 34% reported poor sleep quality. Sleep disorders were identified in 16% of respondents, with 9% reporting sleep apnea. Sleep deprivation and call-/work-related fatigue resulted in 39% falling asleep at the wheel at least once, 23% experiencing motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes, and 34% reporting medical errors. Most (75%) respondents related that they needed a daytime nap due to call-related fatigue, yet only 42% would have the ability/chance to sleep during work hours.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Total and uninterrupted sleep hours–on call versus not on call

The Online Supplemental Data demonstrate a univariate correlation between multiple independent factors and burnout, sleeping at the wheel, having motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes, and fatigue-related medical errors. Less than 4 hours of total sleep and <4 hours of uninterrupted sleep demonstrated a trend toward burnout (75% versus 51.4%, P = .06, and 61.4% versus 48.9%, P = .12, respectively). There was a statistically significant association of sleeping <6 hours with falling asleep at the wheel (43.7% versus 23.7%, P = .04) and fatigue-related medical errors (38.9% versus 18.4%, P = .02). The risk of medical errors showed an even stronger association in respondents reporting <4 hours of uninterrupted sleep (45.7% versus 25.5%, P = .008), as well as a significantly increased risk for motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes (34.3% versus 14.9%, P = .005). Uninterrupted sleep of <4 hours was an independent predictor of motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.28–7.92; P = .01) and medical errors (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.21–5.68; P = .01). In terms of demographics, men were more likely to fall asleep at the wheel (OR, 10.90; 95% CI, 1.83–210.90; P = .0.03), and women were more likely to report fatigue-related medical errors (OR, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.10–18.52; P = .04).

DISCUSSION

NIS may be at high risk of burnout, in large part due to the high proportion of emergency procedures and the frequency of on-call coverage.18,19 Among those who participated in our study, we found that increased years of practice and a call frequency greater than or equal to once every 3 days (increased call frequency) were independently associated with burnout. In addition, an increased call frequency was associated with an increased risk of falling asleep at the wheel, motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes, and medical errors. In addition, sleeping <4 hours, which was more commonly encountered during call days, was an independent predictor of motor vehicle crashes and medical errors. To date, there are no standards for call frequency for NIS; when asked about optimal call frequency, most responding physicians selected a maximum of once every 3 days.

In our survey, 54% of respondents reported burnout in at least 1 domain of the CBI survey, with 13.4% reporting burnout in all domains. We used the CBI survey rather than the more commonly used Maslach Burnout Inventory for several reasons. The validity of the CBI has been supported by prior studies and has been used in multiple health care studies.17,20,21 When they are compared directly, the CBI and Maslach Burnout Inventory showed very similar results, but unlike the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the CBI can measure personal burnout as a total score with better psychomotor properties, allowing it to measure the degree of burnout change across time (rather than assuming a stable individual trait).22,23 The CBI is also nonproprietary and open access.

In a previous study of burnout, physician well-being, and the correlation to medical errors in 6695 physicians across different medical specialties, 54.3% of physicians reported burnout; 32.8%, excessive fatigue; and 10.5%, a major medical error within the prior 3 months. The study found that burnout and fatigue were independently associated with medical errors.24 Risks for burnout included long working hours, frequent overnight call duties, sleep deprivation and sleep disturbances, high work intensity, and suboptimal compensation among other factors.19 In our study, call burden (being on call once or more every 3 days) was an independent predictor of burnout. This finding aligns with prior studies showing a 3% increased risk for burnout with every extra hour of work per week and a 3%–9% increased risk of burnout for additional nights and weekend call.25

As per the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines, mechanical thrombectomy is standard-of-care treatment for large-vessel-occlusion acute ischemic strokes with salvageable brain tissue up to 24 hours from symptom onset or time last known well.26,27 Stroke call is inherently stressful due to the challenging, emergent nature of the interventions and the often high morbidity of the disease, with increased burnout also demonstrated among noninterventional stroke neurologists.28 Wilson et al29 demonstrated that almost 60% of stroke consults in a 24-hour shift occurred during nonworking hours. The same study showed increasing stroke thrombectomy rates from once every 5 days to once every 3 days,29 which are expected to further increase with expanding indications and place NIS at an even higher risk of burnout. When asked about the optimal maximal neurointerventional call burden in our survey, approximately 80% of respondents selected a call frequency not to exceed once every 3 days, with 39% selecting once every 4 days as the ideal call frequency, yet nearly half (48%) reported a current call frequency of greater than once every 3 days.

Our finding that >10 years of neurointerventional practice experience independently predicts burnout is contrary to prior studies that showed early-to-middle career physicians work more hours and have lower career satisfaction, less work-life balance, and more burnout and are more likely to quit the practice of medicine.30 The discrepancy may be related to the steep learning curve and time required for proficiency as well as the novel, challenging nature of neurointervention being strong motivators in the early years, whereas senior practitioners are liable to experience greater monotony, frustration, and less opportunity for advancement.

As a direct consequence of call burden, sleep deprivation, and burnout, it is important to consider the physical well-being of physicians and the risk of medical errors, patient harm, and litigation. Most studies find that a majority of emergent stroke thrombectomy calls occur outside standard daytime work hours. Combined with stricter guidelines for earlier access and reperfusion times, this timing means that the NIS will often transition from sleeping to driving within minutes, potentially putting them at risk for motor vehicle crashes. Although the frequency of call coverage did not directly correlate with sleeping at the wheel or motor vehicle crashes, increased call-in frequency or being called-in >3 times per week was an independent predictor of sleeping at the wheel or being involved in motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes. This finding is alarming and raises an important question of who should be responsible for ensuring good backup coverage from partners when the interventionalist has been up all night treating patients. Should there be a societal guideline by the SNIS/SVIN to restrict the number of call days per week, number of call days taken back-to-back, and the number of hours worked continuously? Does the frequency of call coverage need to be tailored to practice volumes, the number of hospitals covered on call, and the likelihood of being called-in multiple times during call periods?

The relationship between sleep and cognitive and psychomotor function has been well-established, as well as the impact on medical errors, motor vehicle crashes, and health, such as obesity and heart disease. Sleep is a very complex process and varies significantly from one night to another. Frequent call coverage is likely to cause disturbed sleep. In our survey, 65% of respondents reported <6 hours of total sleep when on call, and 43% reported <4 hours of uninterrupted sleep. While the American College of Graduate Medical Education has regulated minimum hours of protected sleep among trainees, no such rules exist for attending physicians.31,32 The American Academy of Sleep Medicine recently published a position statement on sleep, fatigue, and burnout, estimating that maladaptive sleep techniques led to a burnout prevalence of 50%, with sleep deprivation being one of the main culprits.32 A previous study demonstrated that the risk of procedural complication rates significantly increased if physicians experienced <6 hours of sleep (3.4% versus 6.2% with an OR of 1.72).33 In our study, having <4 hours of uninterrupted sleep while on call was an independent predictor of motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes and medical errors, whereas we found a nonsignificant trend toward increased burnout.

Again, this sounds an alarm on what needs to be done to provide call coverage for emergency stroke cases, without affecting the patients’ outcomes or putting the providers at considerable risk. Should we train more neurointerventionalists to have adequate coverage, and if so, how would that affect the volume for other neurovascular pathologies treated by those physicians and would that eventually reduce individual expertise for treating those pathologies? On the other hand, should there be an alternative training pathway in which physicians are given the opportunity to do either 1 year of training to only perform stroke thrombectomies versus 2 years of training for all neurovascular pathologies, to ensure adequate stroke coverage without affecting the expertise in treatment of other neurovascular pathologies? Should there be a minimum number of emergent large-vessel occlusions in a hospital to allow the hospital to offer stroke thrombectomy service while having enough physicians to cover/backup the call? Should there be a minimum number of neurointerventionalists/stroke interventionalists employed by the hospital to provide thrombectomy service?

With regard to compensation models that use productivity/RVU as a basis, other specialties such as Emergency Medicine have developed formulas that assign a positive multiplication factor to RVUs generated during evening/night shifts. Should this model be applied to NIS as well? Given the tremendous societal burden of stroke, should productivity models be used at all for NIS compensation? These are all important questions that need to be addressed on a societal level to ensure continued provision of thrombectomy coverage without putting physicians at significant life-threatening risk or increasing medical errors that would affect patients’ outcomes.

Our study has several limitations. First, the survey results may be distorted by recall and selection bias in that a physician experiencing burnout may be more inclined to respond and lead to an overestimation of the burnout problem. However, the rates of burnout in our survey aligned with previously published data in the neurointerventional surgery field18 and other studies analyzing burnout in radiology, neurology, and neurosurgery.13 Second, the small proportion of responses limited the power of our study to find statistically significant associations. Due to the relatively small number of NIS compared with other specialties, we suggest conducting a repeat survey designed by a collaboration of the major neurointerventional societies, distributed more efficiently through conferences and e-mail lists, with emphasis on specific issues identified in these previous studies. Finally, we assessed burnout, accidents, and medical errors as a function of call burden, compensation, and sleep deprivation but did not include other, more difficult-to-categorize personal factors. Controlling for this myriad of influences will always pose a challenge to surveys addressing the complex causes of burnout, fatigue, and sleep disturbances.

CONCLUSIONS

Call frequency/burden, the number of years in practice, and sleep deprivation are associated with NIS burnout, falling asleep at the wheel, motor vehicle crashes/near-crashes, and fatigue-related medical errors. Our findings add to the increasing literature on physician burnout and point out the increased risk of medical errors in patient care and significant life-threatening risks for physicians, and hopefully, they will guide future society-led surveys and practice-improvement guidelines related to call burden for NIS.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Dyrbye LN,
    2. West CP,
    3. Satele D, et al
    . Burnout among U.S. medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general U.S. population. Acad Med 2014;89:443–51 doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000134 pmid:24448053
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Rotenstein LS,
    2. Torre M,
    3. Ramos MA, et al
    . Prevalence of burnout among physicians: a systematic review. JAMA 2018;320:1131–50 doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12777 pmid:30326495
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Shanafelt TD,
    2. Boone S,
    3. Tan L, et al
    . Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:1377–85 doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3199 pmid:22911330
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Maslach C,
    2. Jackson SE
    . The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organiz Behav 1981;2:99–113 doi:10.1002/job.4030020205
    CrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Spickard A Jr.,
    2. Gabbe SG,
    3. Christensen JF
    . Mid-career burnout in generalist and specialist physicians. JAMA 2002;288:1447–50 doi:10.1001/jama.288.12.1447 pmid:12243624
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Shanafelt TD,
    2. Balch CM,
    3. Bechamps GJ, et al
    . Burnout and career satisfaction among American surgeons. Ann Surg 2009;250:463–71 doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ac4dfd pmid:19730177
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Shanafelt T,
    2. Sloan J,
    3. Satele D, et al
    . Why do surgeons consider leaving practice? J Am Coll Surg 2011;212:421–22 doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.11.006 pmid:21356491
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Shanafelt TD,
    2. Sloan JA,
    3. Habermann TM
    . The well-being of physicians. Am J Med 2003;114:513–19 doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00117-7 pmid:12727590
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Oreskovich MR,
    2. Kaups KL,
    3. Balch CM, et al
    . Prevalence of alcohol use disorders among American surgeons. Arch Surg 2012;147:168–74 doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.1481 pmid:22351913
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Shanafelt TD,
    2. Balch CM,
    3. Dyrbye L, et al
    . Special report: suicidal ideation among American surgeons. Arch Surg 2011;146:54–62 doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.292 pmid:21242446
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Dyrbye LN,
    2. Massie FS Jr.,
    3. Eacker A, et al
    . Relationship between burnout and professional conduct and attitudes among US medical students. JAMA 2010;304:1173–80 doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1318 pmid:20841530
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Shanafelt TD,
    2. Balch CM,
    3. Bechamps G, et al
    . Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg 2010;251:995–1000 doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bfdab3 pmid:19934755
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Shanafelt TD,
    2. Hasan O,
    3. Dyrbye LN, et al
    . Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:1600–13 doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.023 pmid:26653297
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Vela-Bueno A,
    2. Moreno-Jiménez B,
    3. Rodríguez-Muñoz A, et al
    . Insomnia and sleep quality among primary care physicians with low and high burnout levels. J Psychosom Res 2008;64:435–42 doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.10.014 pmid:18374744
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Stewart NH,
    2. Arora VM
    . The impact of sleep and circadian disorders on physician burnout. Chest 2019;156:1022–30 doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.07.008 pmid:31352036
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Creedy DK,
    2. Sidebotham M,
    3. Gamble J, et al
    . Prevalence of burnout, depression, anxiety and stress in Australian midwives: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:13 doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1212-5 pmid:28068942
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kristensen TS,
    2. Borritz M,
    3. Villadsen E, et al
    . The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: a new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress 2005;19:192–207 doi:10.1080/02678370500297720
    CrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Fargen KM,
    2. Arthur AS,
    3. Leslie-Mazwi T, et al
    . A survey of burnout and professional satisfaction among United States neurointerventionalists. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:1100–04 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014833 pmid:30975735
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fargen KM,
    2. Hirsch JA
    . Neurointerventionalists, stroke and burnout. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:811–12 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014304 pmid:30127070
    FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Bourbonnais R,
    2. Brisson C,
    3. Vinet A, et al
    . Development and implementation of a participative intervention to improve the psychosocial work environment and mental health in an acute care hospital. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:326–34 doi:10.1136/oem.2004.018069 pmid:16621853
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bourbonnais R,
    2. Brisson C,
    3. Vinet A, et al
    . Effectiveness of a participative intervention on psychosocial work factors to prevent mental health problems in a hospital setting. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:335–42 doi:10.1136/oem.2004.018077 pmid:16621854
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Maslach C,
    2. Schaufeli WB,
    3. Leiter MP
    . Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52:397–422 doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 pmid:11148311
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Winwood PC,
    2. Winefield AH
    . Comparing two measures of burnout among dentists in Australia. Int J Stress Manag 2004;11:282–89 doi:10.1037/1072-5245.11.3.282 pmid:30001832
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Tawfik DS,
    2. Profit J,
    3. Morgenthaler TI, et al
    . Physician burnout, well-being, and work unit safety grades in relationship to reported medical errors. Mayo Clin Proc 2018;93:1571–80 doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.05.014 pmid:30001832
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. West CP,
    2. Dyrbye LN,
    3. Shanafelt TD
    . Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions. J Intern Med 2018;283:516–29 doi:10.1111/joim.12752 pmid:29505159
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Goyal M,
    2. Menon BK,
    3. van Zwam WH, et al
    ; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387:1723–31 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X pmid:26898852
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Powers WJ,
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Ackerson T, et al
    . Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019;50:e344– 418 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 pmid:31662037
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kenton EJ,
    2. Culebras A,
    3. Fayad PB, et al
    ; AAN Vascular Neurology Stroke Practice Resources Workgroup. Impact of stroke call on the stroke neurology workforce in the United States: possible challenges and opportunities. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018;27:2019–25 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.02.063 pmid:29625799
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Wilson TA,
    2. Leslie-Mazwi T,
    3. Hirsch JA, et al
    . A multicenter study evaluating the frequency and time requirement of mechanical thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:235–39 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013147 pmid:28600482
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Dyrbye LN,
    2. Varkey P,
    3. Boone SL, et al
    . Physician satisfaction and burnout at different career stages. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88:1358–67 doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.07.016 pmid:24290109
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. McHill AW,
    2. Czeisler CA,
    3. Shea SA
    . Resident physician extended work hours and burnout. Sleep 2018;41:zsy112 doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy112 pmid:29901751
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kancherla BS,
    2. Upender R,
    3. Collen JF, et al
    . Sleep, fatigue and burnout among physicians: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine position statement. J Clin Sleep Med 2020;16:803–05 doi:10.5664/jcsm.8408 pmid:32108570
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Rothschild JM,
    2. Keohane CA,
    3. Rogers S, et al
    . Risks of complications by attending physicians after performing nighttime procedures. JAMA 2009;302:1565–72 doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1423 pmid:19826026
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received April 6, 2022.
  • Accepted after revision June 27, 2022.
  • © 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 43 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 43, Issue 9
1 Sep 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Correlation of Call Burden and Sleep Deprivation with Physician Burnout, Driving Crashes, and Medical Errors among US Neurointerventionalists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R.N. Abdalla, S.A. Ansari, M.C. Hurley, H. Attarian, K.M. Fargen, J.A. Hirsch, D.R. Cantrell, P.K. Curl, P.R. Daves, A. Shaibani
Correlation of Call Burden and Sleep Deprivation with Physician Burnout, Driving Crashes, and Medical Errors among US Neurointerventionalists
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2022, 43 (9) 1286-1291; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7606

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Call Burden and Physician Burnout
R.N. Abdalla, S.A. Ansari, M.C. Hurley, H. Attarian, K.M. Fargen, J.A. Hirsch, D.R. Cantrell, P.K. Curl, P.R. Daves, A. Shaibani
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2022, 43 (9) 1286-1291; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7606
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Medical malpractice claims and state medical board complaints among United States neurointerventionalists
  • Crossref (10)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • More than a marker: potential pathogenic functions of MAP2
    Rebecca A. DeGiosio, Melanie J. Grubisha, Matthew L. MacDonald, Brandon C. McKinney, Carlos J. Camacho, Robert A. Sweet
    Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 2022 15
  • Sleep matters: Neurodegeneration spectrum heterogeneity, combustion and friction ultrafine particles, industrial nanoparticle pollution, and sleep disorders—Denial is not an option
    Lilian Calderón-Garcidueñas, Ricardo Torres-Jardón, Glen P. Greenough, Randy Kulesza, Angélica González-Maciel, Rafael Reynoso-Robles, Griselda García-Alonso, Diana A. Chávez-Franco, Edgar García-Rojas, Rafael Brito-Aguilar, Héctor G. Silva-Pereyra, Alberto Ayala, Elijah W. Stommel, Partha S. Mukherjee
    Frontiers in Neurology 2023 14
  • The Threat to the Soul of Interventional Radiology Escalated by COVID-19
    Ammar Sarwar, Tait D. Shanafelt, Daniel Y. Sze, Michael R. Jaff
    Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2023 34 6
  • Burnout and Mental Illness related Stigma among Healthcare Professionals in Pakistan
    Madeeha Malik, Hamza Saeed, Azhar Hussain, Ayisha Hashmi
    Archives of Pharmacy Practice 2023 14 3
  • Burnout in Practicing Neurologists
    Janet Guo, Senay Gokcebel, Parneet Grewal, Sasha Alick-Lindstrom, Kelly Holder, Mathew J. Gregoski, Neishay Ayub
    Neurology Clinical Practice 2025 15 1
  • Burnout and career satisfaction among urologists specializing in sexual health
    Sarah Schrup, Meg Hanley, Emily May, James M Jones, Matthew Ziegelmann, Martin S Gross
    The Journal of Sexual Medicine 2025 22 5
  • Medical malpractice claims and state medical board complaints among United States neurointerventionalists
    Kyle M Fargen, Ankitha M Iyer, J Mocco, Johanna T Fifi, Guilherme Dabus, Justin F Fraser, Joshua A Hirsch, Mahesh V Jayaraman
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2024
  • Mehr Fallbeispiele Notfallmedizin
    Jörg Switalski
    2023
  • More Case Studies in Emergency Medicine
    Jörg Switalski
    2025
  • Neurosurgical Residency Training at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, the Resident Perspective
    Alexander G. Yearley, Marcelle Altshuler, Ruchit V. Patel, Jacob R. Rachlin, Michael A. Mooney
    Operative Neurosurgery 2025 28 6

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimizing Voxel Size in 3D Rotational Angiography
  • Neuroform Atlas Stent for Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Neurologic Complication in Transradial Angiography
Show more Neurointervention

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire