Validation of a Denoising Method Using Deep Learning–Based Reconstruction to Quantify Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Load on Fast FLAIR Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Compston A,
   2. Coles A

   . Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2008;372:1502–17 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61620-7 pmid:18970977

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Thompson AJ,
   2. Banwell BL,
   3. Barkhof F, et al

   . Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:162–73 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 pmid:29275977

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Ziemssen T,
   2. Derfuss T,
   3. de Stefano N, et al

   . Optimizing treatment success in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2016;263:1053–65 doi:10.1007/s00415-015-7986-y pmid:26705122

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Tan IL,
   2. Pouwels PJ,
   3. van Schijndel RA, et al

   . Isotropic 3D fast FLAIR imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis patients: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2002;12:559–67 doi:10.1007/s00330-001-1170-8 pmid:11870470

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Traboulsee A,
   2. Simon JH,
   3. Stone L, et al

   . Revised Recommendations of the Consortium of MS Centers Task Force for a Standardized MRI Protocol and Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Multiple Sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:394–401 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4539 pmid:26564433

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Wattjes MP,
   2. Ciccarelli O,
   3. Reich DS, et al

   ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis study group; Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centres; North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Cooperative MRI guidelines working group. MAGNIMS–CMSC–NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2021;20:653–70 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00095-8 pmid:34139157

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Feinberg DA,
   2. Hale JD,
   3. Watts JC, et al

   . Halving MR imaging time by conjugation: demonstration at 3.5 kG. Radiology 1986;161:527–31 doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763926 pmid:3763926

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Deshmane A,
   2. Gulani V,
   3. Griswold MA, et al

   . Parallel MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:55–72 doi:10.1002/jmri.23639 pmid:22696125

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Barth M,
   2. Breuer F,
   3. Koopmans PJ, et al

   . Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:63–81 doi:10.1002/mrm.25897 pmid:26308571

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Toledano-Massiah S,
    2. Sayadi A,
    3. de Boer R, et al

    . Accuracy of the compressed sensing accelerated 3D-FLAIR sequence for the detection of MS plaques at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:454–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5517 pmid:29348137

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Tian C,
    2. Fei L,
    3. Zheng W, et al

    . Deep learning on image denoising: an overview. Neural Netw 2020;131:251–75 doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 pmid:32829002

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Bai W,
    2. Sanrona G,
    3. Wu G

    1. Manjón JV,
    2. Coupe P

    . MRI denoising using deep learning. In: Bai W, Sanrona G, Wu G, eds. Patch-Based Techniques in Medical Imaging. Springer-Verlag International Publishing 2018:12–19
13. 13.
    1. Chaudhari AS,
    2. Fang Z,
    3. Kogan F, et al

    . Super-resolution musculoskeletal MRI using deep learning. Magn Reson Med 2018;80:2139–54 doi:10.1002/mrm.27178 pmid:29582464

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Kidoh M,
    2. Shinoda K,
    3. Kitajima M, et al

    . Deep learning based noise reduction for brain MR imaging: tests on phantoms and healthy volunteers. MRMS 2020;19:195–206 doi:10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0018 pmid:31484849

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Marc Lebel R

    . Performance characterization of a novel deep learning-based MR image reconstruction pipeline. arXiv [eessIV] 2020 Aug 14. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.06559. Accessed May 31, 2022
16. 16.↵
    1. Drake-Pérez M,
    2. Delattre BM,
    3. Boto J, et al

    . Normal values of magnetic relaxation parameters of spine components with the synthetic MRI sequence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:788–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5566 pmid:29496723

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Saranathan M,
    2. Worters PW,
    3. Rettmann DW, et al

    . Physics for clinicians: fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and double inversion recovery (DIR) imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017;46:1590–600 doi:10.1002/jmri.25737 pmid:28419602

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Fedorov A,
    2. Beichel R,
    3. Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al

    . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1323–41 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 pmid:22770690

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Coupé P,
    2. Tourdias T,
    3. Linck P

    1. Coupé P,
    2. Tourdias T,
    3. Linck P, et al

    . LesionBrain: an online tool for white matter lesion segmentation. In: Coupé P, Tourdias T, Linck P. Patch-Based Techniques in Medical Imaging. September 15, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00500-9_11. Accessed May 31, 2022
20. 20.↵
    1. Manjón JV,
    2. Coupé P

    . volBrain: an online MRI brain volumetry system. Front Neuroinform 2016;10:30 doi:10.3389/fninf.2016.00030 pmid:27512372

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Commowick O,
    2. Istace A,
    3. Kain M, et al

    . Objective evaluation of multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using a data management and processing infrastructure. Sci Rep 2018;8:13650 doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31911-7 pmid:30209345

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Wobbrock JO,
    2. Findlater L,
    3. Gergle D, et al

    . The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). Vancourver, British Columbia, Canada. May 7–12, 2011 doi:10.1145/1978942.1978963

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    1. Brisset JC,
    2. Kremer S,
    3. Hannoun S, et al

    . New OFSEP recommendations for MRI assessment of multiple sclerosis patients: special consideration for gadolinium deposition and frequent acquisitions. J Neuroradiol 2020;47:250–58 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2020.01.083 pmid:32014494

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Mohan J,
    2. Krishnaveni V,
    3. Guo Y

    . A survey on the magnetic resonance image denoising methods. Biomed Signal Processing and Control 2014;9:56–69 doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2013.10.007

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. Annavarapu A,
    2. Borra S

    . Development of magnetic resonance image de-noising methodologies: a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art. Smart Health 2020;18:100138 doi:10.1016/j.smhl.2020.100138

    CrossRef
26. 26.↵
    1. Moreno López M,
    2. Frederick JM,
    3. Ventura J

    . Evaluation of MRI denoising methods using unsupervised learning. Front Artif Intell 2021;4:642731 doi:10.3389/frai.2021.642731 pmid:34151253

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Ilesanmi AE,
    2. Ilesanmi TO

    . Methods for image denoising using convolutional neural network: a review. Complex & Intelligent Systems 2020;7:2179–98 doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00428-4

    CrossRef
28. 28.↵
    1. Lundervold AS,
    2. Lundervold A

    . An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI. Z Med Phys 2019;29:102–27 doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.002 pmid:30553609

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Benou A,
    2. Veksler R,
    3. Friedman A, et al

    . Ensemble of expert deep neural networks for spatio-temporal denoising of contrast-enhanced MRI sequences. Med Image Anal 2017;42:145–59 doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.006 pmid:28802145

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.
    1. Yokota Y,
    2. Takeda C,
    3. Kidoh M, et al

    . Effects of deep learning reconstruction technique in high-resolution non-contrast magnetic resonance coronary angiography at a 3-Tesla machine. Can Assoc Radiol J 2021;72:120–27 doi:10.1177/0846537119900469 pmid:32070116

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Bash S,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Airriess C, et al

    . Deep learning enables 60% accelerated volumetric brain MRI while preserving quantitative performance: a prospective, multicenter, multireader trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:2130–37 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7358 pmid:34824098

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Gaitán MI,
    2. Shea CD,
    3. Evangelou IE, et al

    . Evolution of the blood-brain barrier in newly forming multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol 2011;70:22–29 doi:10.1002/ana.22472 pmid:21710622

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Jäckle K,
    2. Zeis T,
    3. Schaeren-Wiemers N, et al

    . Molecular signature of slowly expanding lesions in progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 2020;143:2073–88 doi:10.1093/brain/awaa158 pmid:32577755

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Elliott C,
    2. Wolinsky JS,
    3. Hauser SL, et al

    . Slowly expanding/evolving lesions as a magnetic resonance imaging marker of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions. Mult Scler 2019;25:1915–25 doi:10.1177/1352458518814117 pmid:30566027

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Lu G,
    2. Beadnall HN,
    3. Barton J, et al

    . The evolution of “no evidence of disease activity” in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2018;20:231–38 doi:10.1016/j.msard.2017.12.016 pmid:29579629

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Coupe P,
    2. Yger P,
    3. Prima S, et al

    . An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008;27:425–41 doi:10.1109/TMI.2007.906087 pmid:18390341

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Danelakis A,
    2. Theoharis T,
    3. Verganelakis DA

    . Survey of automated multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation techniques on magnetic resonance imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2018;70:83–100 doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.10.002 pmid:30326367

    CrossRefPubMed