Head CT: Toward Making Full Use of the Information the X-Rays Give

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Hounsfield GN

   . Computed medical imaging. Nobel lecture, December 8, 1979. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1980;4:665–74 doi:10.1097/00004728-198010000-00017 pmid:6997341

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Hess EH,
   3. Shah ND,
   4. Stroebel RJ, et al

   . Trends in computed tomography utilization rates: a longitudinal practice-based study. J Patient Saf 2014;10:52–58 doi:10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948b1a pmid:24080717

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   The IMV Medical Imaging MasterFile. IMV. https://imvinfo.com/. Accessed May 22, 2021
4. 4.↵
   2. Jenkinson M,
   3. Beckmann CF,
   4. Behrens TE, et al

   . FSL. Neuroimage 2012;62:782–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 pmid:21979382

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Muschelli J,
   3. Ullman NL,
   4. Mould WA, et al

   . Validated automatic brain extraction of head CT images. Neuroimage 2015;114:379–85 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.074 pmid:25862260

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Cauley KA,
   3. Och J,
   4. Yorks PJ, et al

   . Automated segmentation of head computed tomography images using FSL. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2018;42:104–10 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000660 pmid:28786900

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Cauley KA,
   3. Hu Y,
   4. Fielden SW

   . Aging and the brain: a quantitative study of clinical CT images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:809–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6510 pmid:32327433

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Rudick RA,
   3. Fisher E,
   4. Lee JC, et al

   . Use of the brain parenchymal fraction to measure whole brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology 1999;53:1698–704 doi:10.1212/wnl.53.8.1698 pmid:10563615

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Blatter DD,
   3. Bigler ED,
   4. Gale SD, et al

   . Quantitative volumetric analysis of brain MR: normative database spanning 5 decades of life. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:241–51 pmid:7726068

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Condon B,
    3. Grant R,
    4. Hadley D, et al

    . Brain and intracranial cavity volumes: in vivo determination by MRI. Acta Neurol Scand 1988;78:387–93 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1988.tb03674.x pmid:3218445

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Courchesne E,
    3. Chisum HJ,
    4. Townsend J, et al

    . Normal brain development and aging: quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers. Radiology 2000;216:672–82 doi:10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au37672 pmid:10966694

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Matsumae M,
    3. Kikinis R,
    4. Mórocz IA, et al

    . Age-related changes in intracranial compartment volumes in normal adults assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 1996;84:982–91 doi:10.3171/jns.1996.84.6.0982 pmid:8847593

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Rajagopalan V,
    3. Pioro EP

    . Brain parenchymal fraction: a relatively simple MRI measure to clinically distinguish ALS phenotypes. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:693206 doi:10.1155/2015/693206 pmid:26783524

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Fjell AM,
    3. McEvoy L,
    4. Holland D, et al

    . Brain changes in older adults at very low risk for Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 2013;33:8237–42 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5506-12.2013 pmid:23658162

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Bin Zahid A,
    3. Mikheev A,
    4. Srivatsa N, et al

    . Accelerated brain atrophy on serial computed tomography: potential marker of the progression of Alzheimer disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2016;40:827–32 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000435 pmid:27224227

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Förstl H,
    3. Zerfass R,
    4. Geiger-Kabisch C, et al

    . Brain atrophy in normal ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Volumetric discrimination and clinical correlations. Br J Psychiatry 1995;167:739–46 doi:10.1192/bjp.167.6.739 pmid:8829740

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Vågberg M,
    3. Granåsen G,
    4. Svenningsson A

    . Brain parenchymal fraction in healthy adults-a systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 2017;12:e0170018 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170018 pmid:28095463

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Cauley KA,
    3. Hu Y,
    4. Fielden SW

    . Pediatric head CT: automated quantitative analysis with quantile regression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42: 382–88 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6885 pmid:33303521

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Haggstrom M

    . Housfield unit. http://radlines.org/Houndfield_unit. Accessed May 22, 2021
20. 20.↵
    2. Nguyen HS,
    3. Li L,
    4. Patel M, et al

    . Radiodensity of intraventricular hemorrhage associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage may be a negative predictor of outcome. J Neurosurg 2018;128:1032–36 doi:10.3171/2016.11.JNS152839 pmid:28474990

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Wagner I,
    3. Volbers B,
    4. Hilz MJ, et al

    . Radiopacity of intracerebral hemorrhage correlates with perihemorrhagic edema. Eur J Neurol 2012;19:525–28 doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03526.x pmid:21951394

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Kim H,
    3. Kim GD,
    4. Yoon BC, et al

    . Quantitative analysis of computed tomography images and early detection of cerebral edema for pediatric traumatic brain injury patients: retrospective study. BMC Med 2014;12:186 doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0186-2 pmid:25339549

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Cauley KA,
    3. Fielden SW

    . A radiodensity histogram study of the brain in multiple sclerosis. Tomography 2018;4:194–203 doi:10.18383/j.tom.2018.00050 pmid:30588505

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Inaba K,
    3. Teixeira PG,
    4. David JS, et al

    . Computed tomographic brain density measurement as a predictor of elevated intracranial pressure in blunt head trauma. Am Surg 2007;73:1023–26 doi:10.1177/000313480707301022 pmid:17983073

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Cauley KA,
    3. Hu Y,
    4. Och J, et al

    . Modeling early postnatal brain growth and development with CT: changes in the brain radiodensity histogram from birth to 2 years. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:775–81 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5559 pmid:29449277

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Scahill RI,
    3. Frost C,
    4. Jenkins R, et al

    . A longitudinal study of brain volume changes in normal aging using serial registered magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol 2003;60:989–94 doi:10.1001/archneur.60.7.989 pmid:12873856

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Despotović I,
    3. Goossens B,
    4. Philips W

    . MRI segmentation of the human brain: challenges, methods, and applications. Comput Math Methods Med 2015;2015:450341 doi:10.1155/2015/450341 pmid:25945121

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Kemmling A,
    3. Wersching H,
    4. Berger K, et al

    . Decomposing the Hounsfield unit: probabilistic segmentation of brain tissue in computed tomography. Clin Neuroradiol 2012;22:79–91 doi:10.1007/s00062-011-0123-0 pmid:22270832

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Furat OW,
    3. Neumann M,
    4. Petrich M, et al

    . Machine learning techniques for the segmentation of tomographic image data of functional materials. Front Mater 2019;6:1–17 doi:10.3389/fmats.2019.00145

    CrossRef
30. 30.↵
    2. Eggert LD,
    3. Sommer J,
    4. Jansen A, et al

    . Accuracy and reliability of automated gray matter segmentation pathways on real and simulated structural magnetic resonance images of the human brain. PLoS One 2012;7:e45081 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045081 pmid:23028771

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Lee BK,
    3. Jeung KW,
    4. Song KH, et al

    . Prognostic values of gray matter to white matter ratios on early brain computed tomography in adult comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac etiology. Resuscitation 2015;96:46–52 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.027 pmid:26232516

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Hanning U,
    3. Sporns PB,
    4. Lebiedz P, et al

    . Automated assessment of early hypoxic brain edema in non-enhanced CT predicts outcome in patients after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2016;104:91–94 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.03.018 pmid:27036663

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Berger N,
    3. Ampanozi G,
    4. Schweitzer W, et al

    . Racking the brain: detection of cerebral edema on postmortem computed tomography compared with forensic autopsy. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:643–51 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.014 pmid:25604908

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Hanzlik E,
    3. Gigante J

    . Microcephaly. Children (Basel) 2017;4:47 doi:10.3390/children4060047 pmid:28598357

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Purugganan OH

    . Abnormalities in head size. Pediatr Rev 2006;27:473–76 doi:10.1542/pir.27-12-473 pmid:17142470

    FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    2. Gillebert CR,
    3. Humphreys GW,
    4. Mantini D

    . Automated delineation of stroke lesions using brain CT images. Neuroimage Clin 2014;4:540–48 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.03.009 pmid:24818079

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Di Chiro G,
    3. Brooks RA,
    4. Dubal L, et al

    . The apical artifact: elevated attenuation values toward the apex of the skull. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1978;2:65–70 doi:10.1097/00004728-197801000-00010 pmid:670474

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. Gado M,
    3. Phelps M

    . The peripheral zone of increase density in cranial computed tomography. Radiology 1975;117:71–74 doi:10.1148/117.1.71 pmid:1162076

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    2. Craddock C,
    3. Chen MY,
    4. Dixon RL, et al

    . The effect of skull volume and density on differentiating gray and white matter on routine computed tomography scans of the head. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:734–38 doi:10.1097/01.rct.0000216111.16774.d2 pmid:16954919

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Barrett JF,
    3. Keat N

    . Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004;24:1679–91 doi:10.1148/rg.246045065 pmid:15537976

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    2. Boas EF,
    3. D

    . CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques. Imaging in Medicine 2012;4:229–40
42. 42.↵
    2. Cauley KA,
    3. Yorks PJ,
    4. Flora S, et al

    . The effects of the skull on CT imaging of the brain: a skull and brain phantom study. BR J Radiol 2021;94:20200714 doi:10.1259/bjr.20200714 pmid:33533635

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Hou Z

    . A review on MR image intensity inhomogeneity correction. Int J Biomed Imaging 2006;2006:49515 doi:10.1155/IJBI/2006/49515 pmid:23165035

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Vovk U,
    3. Pernus F,
    4. Likar B

    . A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:405–21 doi:10.1109/TMI.2006.891486 pmid:17354645

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    2. Choi SP,
    3. Park HK,
    4. Park KN, et al

    . The density ratio of grey to white matter on computed tomography as an early predictor of vegetative state or death after cardiac arrest. Emerg Med J 2008;25:666–69 doi:10.1136/emj.2007.053306 pmid:18843066

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    2. Metter RB,
    3. Rittenberger JC,
    4. Guyette FX, et al

    . Association between a quantitative CT scan measure of brain edema and outcome after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2011;82:1180–85 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.001 pmid:21592642

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    2. Torbey MT,
    3. Selim M,
    4. Knorr J, et al

    . Quantitative analysis of the loss of distinction between gray and white matter in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Stroke 2000;31:2163–67 doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.9.2163 pmid:10978046

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    2. Carne RP,
    3. Vogrin S,
    4. Litewka L, et al

    . Cerebral cortex: an MRI-based study of volume and variance with age and sex. J Clin Neurosci 2006;13:60–72 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2005.02.013 pmid:16410199

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 49.↵
    2. Xu J,
    3. Kobayashi S,
    4. Yamaguchi S, et al

    . Gender effects on age-related changes in brain structure. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:112–18 pmid:10669234

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
50. 50.↵
    2. Bozzali M,
    3. Cercignani M,
    4. Caltagirone C

    . Brain volumetrics to investigate aging and the principal forms of degenerative cognitive decline: a brief review. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:1065–70 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.044 pmid:18436405

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    2. Geuze E,
    3. Vermetten E,
    4. Bremner JD

    . MR-based in vivo hippocampal volumetrics: 2. Findings in neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry 2005;10:160–84 doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001579 pmid:15356639

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    2. Cai JC,
    3. Akkus Z,
    4. Philbrick KA, et al

    . Fully automated segmentation of head CT neuroanatomy using deep learning. Radiol: Artificial Intelligence 2020;2:e190183 doi:10.1148/ryai.2020190183

    CrossRef
53. 53.↵
    2. Pessis E,
    3. Campagna R,
    4. Sverzut JM, et al

    . Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: reduction of metal artifacts at CT. Radiographics 2013;33:573–83 doi:10.1148/rg.332125124 pmid:23479714

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    2. Pomerantz SR,
    3. Kamalian S,
    4. Zhang D, et al

    . Virtual monochromatic reconstruction of dual-energy unenhanced head CT at 65-75 keV maximizes image quality compared with conventional polychromatic CT. Radiology 2013;266:318–25 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111604 pmid:23074259

    CrossRefPubMed