Acceleration of Brain TOF-MRA with Compressed Sensitivity Encoding: A Multicenter Clinical Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Chung MS,
   2. Jung SC,
   3. Kim SO, et al

   . Intracranial artery steno-occlusion: diagnosis by using two-dimensional spatially selective radiofrequency excitation pulse MR imaging. Radiology 2017;284:834–43 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161490 pmid:28448235

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Mandell DM,
   2. Mossa-Basha M,
   3. Qiao Y, et al

   . Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI: Principles and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:218–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4893 pmid:27469212

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Park JE,
   2. Jung SC,
   3. Lee SH, et al

   . Comparison of 3D magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography for intracranial artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 2017;27:4737–46 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4860-6 pmid:28500366

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Debrey SM,
   2. Yu H,
   3. Lynch JK, et al

   . Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2008;39:2237–48 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.509877 pmid:18556586

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. van Rooij WJ,
   2. Sprengers ME,
   3. de Gast AN, et al

   . 3D rotational angiography: the new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:976–79 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0964 pmid:18258703

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Fushimi Y,
   2. Fujimoto K,
   3. Okada T, et al

   . Compressed sensing 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms: optimization and evaluation. Invest Radiol 2016;51:228–35 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000226 pmid:26606551

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Li B,
   2. Li H,
   3. Dong L, et al

   . Fast carotid artery MR angiography with compressed sensing based three-dimensional time-of-flight sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 2017;43:129–35 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2017.07.017 pmid:28734956

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Lin Z,
   2. Zhang X,
   3. Guo L, et al

   . Clinical feasibility study of 3D intracranial magnetic resonance angiography using compressed sensing. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;50:1843–51 doi:10.1002/jmri.26752 pmid:30980468

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Bhagat YA,
   2. Emery DJ,
   3. Naik S, et al

   . Comparison of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions and modified sensitivity encoding for diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:293–98 pmid:17296998

   PubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Preibisch C,
    2. Wallenhorst T,
    3. Heidemann R, et al

    . Comparison of parallel acquisition techniques generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) and modified sensitivity encoding (mSENSE) in functional MRI (fMRI) at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:590–98 doi:10.1002/jmri.21191 pmid:18219627

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Larkman DJ,
    2. Nunes RG

    . Parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:R15–55 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/R01 pmid:17374908

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Yamamoto T,
    2. Fujimoto K,
    3. Okada T, et al

    . Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction: comparison with conventional parallel imaging for accelerated imaging. Invest Radiol 2016;51:372–78 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000221 pmid:26561046

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Lustig M,
    2. Donoho D,
    3. Pauly JM

    . Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1182–95 doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 pmid:17969013

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Lu SS,
    2. Qi M,
    3. Zhang X, et al

    . Clinical evaluation of highly accelerated compressed sensing time-of-flight MR angiography for intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1833–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5786 pmid:30213812

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Greve T,
    2. Sollmann N,
    3. Hock A, et al

    . Highly accelerated time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spiral imaging improves conspicuity of intracranial arterial branches while reducing scan time. Eur Radiol 2020;30:855–65 doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06442-y pmid:31664504

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Cao YZ,
    3. Mu XH, et al

    . Highly accelerated compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography may be reliable for diagnosing head and neck arterial steno-occlusive disease: a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 2020;30:3059–65 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06682-3 pmid:32064562

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Suh CH,
    2. Jung SC,
    3. Lee HB, et al

    . High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging using compressed sensing for intracranial and extracranial arteries: comparison with conventional parallel imaging. Korean J Radiol 2019;20:487–97 doi:10.3348/kjr.2018.0424 pmid:30799580

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Yamamoto T,
    2. Okada T,
    3. Fushimi Y, et al

    . Magnetic resonance angiography with compressed sensing: an evaluation of Moyamoya disease. PLoS One 2018;13:e0189493 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189493 pmid:29351284

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Geerts-Ossevoort L,
    2. de Weerdt E,
    3. Duijndam A, et al

    . Compressed SENSE. Speed done right. Every time. Philips Healthcare, Netherlands, 2018. https://philipsproductcontent.blob.core.windows.net/assets/20180109/619119731f2a42c4acd4a863008a46c7.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2020
20. 20.↵
    1. Bratke G,
    2. Rau R,
    3. Weiss K, et al

    . Accelerated MRI of the lumbar spine using compressed sensing: quality and efficiency. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;49:e164–75 doi:10.1002/jmri.26526 pmid:30267462

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Lustig M,
    2. Pauly JM

    . SPIRiT: Iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:457–71 doi:10.1002/mrm.22428 pmid:20665790

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Okubo G,
    2. Okada T,
    3. Yamamoto A, et al

    . MP2RAGE for deep gray matter measurement of the brain: a comparative study with MPRAGE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;43:55–62 doi:10.1002/jmri.24960 pmid:26032895

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Altahawi FF,
    2. Blount KJ,
    3. Morley NP, et al

    . Comparing an accelerated 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CS-SPACE) for knee 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with traditional 3D fast spin-echo (SPACE) and routine 2D sequences. Skeletal Radiol 2017;46:7–15 doi:10.1007/s00256-016-2490-8 pmid:27744578

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Bovik AC,
    3. Sheikh HR, et al

    . Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 2004;13:600–12 doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 pmid:15376593

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Willinsky RA,
    2. Taylor SM,
    3. TerBrugge K, et al

    . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2272012071 pmid:12637677

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Wu H,
    2. Block WF,
    3. Turski PA, et al

    . Noncontrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) intracranial MR angiography using pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling and accelerated 3D radial acquisition. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:708–15 doi:10.1002/mrm.24298 pmid:22532423

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Borisch I,
    2. Horn M,
    3. Butz B, et al

    . Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1117–22 pmid:12812936

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Sartoretti T,
    2. van Smoorenburg L,
    3. Sartoretti E, et al

    . Ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 T. Invest Radiol 2020;55:293–303 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000641 pmid:31895223

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Sartoretti T,
    2. Sartoretti E,
    3. Schwenk A, et al

    . Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: an intra-individual comparison study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0232372 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232372 pmid:32348366

    CrossRefPubMed