Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleHead and Neck Imaging

Measuring 3D Cochlear Duct Length on MRI: Is It Accurate and Reliable?

M.B. Eser, B. Atalay, M.B. Dogan, N. Gündüz and M.T. Kalcioglu
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2021, 42 (11) 2016-2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7287
M.B. Eser
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.B.E., B.A., M.B.D., N.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.B. Eser
B. Atalay
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.B.E., B.A., M.B.D., N.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. Atalay
M.B. Dogan
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.B.E., B.A., M.B.D., N.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.B. Dogan
N. Gündüz
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (M.B.E., B.A., M.B.D., N.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Gündüz
M.T. Kalcioglu
bOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (M.T.K.), Faculty of Medicine, Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.T. Kalcioglu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Roth TN,
    2. Hanebuth D,
    3. Probst R
    . Prevalence of age-related hearing loss in Europe: a review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:1101–07 doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1597-8 pmid:21499871
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.↵
    1. Roche JP,
    2. Hansen MR
    . On the horizon: cochlear implant technology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2015;48:1097–116 doi:10.1016/j.otc.2015.07.009 pmid:26443490
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.↵
    1. Atalay B,
    2. Eser MB,
    3. Kalcioglu MT, et al
    . Comprehensive analysis of factors affecting cochlear size: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Laryngoscope 2021 Mar 25. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1002/lary.29532 pmid:33764541
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.↵
    1. Koch RW,
    2. Ladak HM,
    3. Elfarnawany M, et al
    . Measuring cochlear duct length: a historical analysis of methods and results. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;46:1–11 doi:10.1186/s40463-017-0194-2 pmid:28270200
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mistrík P,
    2. Jolly C
    . Optimal electrode length to match patient specific cochlear anatomy. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2016;133(Suppl 1):S68–71 doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2016.05.001 pmid:27246743
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kjer HM,
    2. Fagertun J,
    3. Wimmer W, et al
    . Patient-specific estimation of detailed cochlear shape from clinical CT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiology Surg 2018;13:389–96 doi:10.1007/s11548-017-1701-7 pmid:29305790
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.↵
    1. Timm ME,
    2. Majdani O,
    3. Weller T, et al
    . Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges. PLoS One 2018;13:e0206435 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206435 pmid:30365565
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.↵
    1. Schurzig D,
    2. Timm ME,
    3. Batsoulis C, et al
    . A novel method for clinical cochlear duct length estimation toward patient-specific cochlear implant selection. OTO Open 2018;2:2473974X1880023 doi:10.1177/2473974X18800238 pmid:30719505
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.↵
    1. Eser MB,
    2. Atalay B,
    3. Kalcıoğlu MT
    . Comment on “The Effect of Cochlear Size on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes.” Biomed Res Int 2020;2020:5674547 doi:10.1155/2020/5674547 pmid:32802858
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.↵
    1. Helal RA,
    2. Jacob R,
    3. Elshinnawy MA, et al
    . Cone-beam CT versus multidetector CT in postoperative cochlear implant imaging: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:362–67 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6894 pmid:33414229
    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bossuyt PM,
    2. Reitsma JB,
    3. Bruns DE, et al
    . STARD Group. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2015;277:826–69 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151516 pmid:26509226
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.↵
    1. Eser MB,
    2. Atalay B,
    3. Kalcıoğlu MT
    . Is cochlear length related to congenital sensorineural hearing loss: preliminary data. J Int Adv Otol 2021;17:1–8 doi:10.5152/iao.2020.7863 pmid:32147598
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.↵
    1. Koo TK,
    2. Li MY
    . A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155–63 doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 pmid:27330520
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.↵
    1. Connor SE,
    2. Bell DJ,
    3. O’Gorman R, et al
    . CT and MR imaging cochlear distance measurements may predict cochlear implant length required for a 360° insertion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1425–30 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1571 pmid:19386728
    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.↵
    1. Sobrinho FP,
    2. Lazarini PR,
    3. Yoo HJ, et al
    . A method for measuring the length of the cochlea through magnetic resonance imaging. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2009;75:261–67 doi:10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30788-6 pmid:19575114
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.↵
    1. Schurzig D,
    2. Timm ME,
    3. Lexow GJ, et al
    . Cochlear helix and duct length identification: evaluation of different curve fitting techniques. Cochlear Implants Int 2018;19:268–83 doi:10.1080/14670100.2018.1460025 pmid:29631499
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.↵
    1. Widmann G,
    2. Dejaco D,
    3. Luger A, et al
    . Pre- and post-operative imaging of cochlear implants: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2020;11:93 doi:10.1186/s13244-020-00902-6 pmid:32803542
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.↵
    1. Verbist BM,
    2. Frijns JH,
    3. Geleijns J, et al
    . Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:424–29 pmid:15709150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.↵
    1. Erixon E,
    2. Rask-Andersen H
    . How to predict cochlear length before cochlear implantation surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 2013;133:1258–65 doi:10.3109/00016489.2013.831475 pmid:24053486
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.↵
    1. Dhanasingh A
    . Cochlear duct length along the outer wall vs organ of corti: which one is relevant for the electrode array length selection and frequency mapping using Greenwood function? World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;5:117–21 doi:10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.09.004 pmid:31334491
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.↵
    1. Heutink F,
    2. Koch V,
    3. Verbist B, et al
    . Multi-scale deep learning framework for cochlea localization, segmentation and analysis on clinical ultra-high-resolution CT images. Computer Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2020;191:105387 doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105387 pmid:32109685
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lu A,
    2. Gorny KR,
    3. Ho ML
    . Zero TE MRI for craniofacial bone imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:1562–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6175 pmid:31467238
    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.↵
    1. Delso G,
    2. Wiesinger F,
    3. Sacolick LI, et al
    . Clinical evaluation of zero-echo-time MR imaging for the segmentation of the skull. J Nucl Med 2015;56:417–22 doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.149997 pmid:25678489
    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.↵
    1. Byun JS,
    2. Kim HJ,
    3. Yim YJ, et al
    . MR imaging of the internal auditory canal and inner ear at 3T: comparison between 3D driven equilibrium and 3D balanced fast field echo sequences. Korean J Radiology 2008;9:212–18 doi:10.3348/kjr.2008.9.3.212 pmid:18525223
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.↵
    1. Naganawa S,
    2. Koshikawa T,
    3. Fukatsu H, et al
    . MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional fast asymmetrical spin-echo and three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady-state sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1179–85 pmid:11415916
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.↵
    1. Jung NY,
    2. Moon WJ,
    3. Lee MH, et al
    . Magnetic resonance cisternography: comparison between 3-dimensional driven equilibrium with sensitivity encoding and 3-dimensional balanced fast-field echo sequences with sensitivity encoding. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:588–91 doi:10.1097/rct.0b013e31809861fb pmid:17882037
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.↵
    1. Schmalbrock P
    . Comparison of three-dimensional fast spin echo and gradient echo sequences for high-resolution temporal bone imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:814–25 pmid:11105019
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.↵
    1. Benson JC,
    2. Carlson ML,
    3. Lane JI
    . MRI of the internal auditory canal, labyrinth, and middle ear: how we do it. Radiology 2020;297:252–65 doi:10.1148/radiol.2020201767 pmid:32960730
    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 42 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 42, Issue 11
1 Nov 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Cite this article
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Measuring 3D Cochlear Duct Length on MRI: Is It Accurate and Reliable?
M.B. Eser, B. Atalay, M.B. Dogan, N. Gündüz, M.T. Kalcioglu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2021, 42 (11) 2016-2022; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7287
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Performance of US in Neck Node NIRADS 2
  • Hydrops Herniation into the Semicircular Canals
  • ASL Sensitivity for Head and Neck Paraganglioma
Show more HEAD AND NECK IMAGING

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measuring 3D Cochlear Duct Length on MRI: Is It Accurate and Reliable?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M.B. Eser, B. Atalay, M.B. Dogan, N. Gündüz, M.T. Kalcioglu
Measuring 3D Cochlear Duct Length on MRI: Is It Accurate and Reliable?
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2021, 42 (11) 2016-2022; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7287

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.