Alterations in the Magnetoencephalography Default Mode Effective Connectivity following Concussion

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Virji-Babul N,
   3. Hilderman CG,
   4. Makan N, et al

   . Changes in functional brain networks following sports-related concussion in adolescents. J Neurotrauma 2014;31:1914–19 doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3450 pmid:24956041

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. McCrea M,
   3. Guskiewicz KM,
   4. Marshall SW, et al

   . Acute effects and recovery time following concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study. JAMA 2003;290:2556–63 doi:10.1001/jama.290.19.2556 pmid:14625332

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Tormenti M,
   3. Krieger D,
   4. Puccio AM, et al

   . Magnetoencephalographic virtual recording: a novel diagnostic tool for concussion. Neurosurgical Focus 2012;33:E9 1–7 doi:10.3171/2012.10.FOCUS12282 pmid:23199432

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Huang MX,
   3. Theilmann RJ,
   4. Robb A, et al

   . Integrated imaging approach with MEG and DTI to detect mild traumatic brain injury in military and civilian patients. J Neurotrauma 2009;26:1213–26 doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0672 pmid:19385722

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Zhu DC,
   3. Covassin T,
   4. Nogle S, et al

   . A potential biomarker in sports-related concussion: brain functional connectivity alteration of the default-mode network measured with longitudinal resting-state fMRI over thirty days. J Neurotrauma 2015;32:327–41 doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3413 pmid:25116397

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Fibel K,
   3. Cardinale N,
   4. Nichols S, et al

   . Evaluating concussion in sport: a case for magnetoencephalography. J Athletic Enhancement 2014;3:4 doi:10.4172/2324-9080.1000155

   CrossRef
7. 7.↵
   2. Brookes MJ,
   3. Woolrich M,
   4. Luckhoo H, et al

   . Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:16783–88 doi:10.1073/pnas.1112685108 pmid:21930901

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Dale AM,
   3. Liu AK,
   4. Fischl BR, et al

   . Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 2000;26:55–67 doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81138-1 pmid:10798392

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Schwartz ES,
   3. Edgar JC,
   4. Gaetz WC, et al

   . Magnetoencephalography. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:50–58 doi:10.1007/s00247-009-1451-y pmid:19937237

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Maldjian JA,
    3. Davenport EM,
    4. Whitlow CT

    . Graph theoretical analysis of resting-state MEG data: Identifying interhemispheric connectivity and the default mode. Neuroimage 2014;96:88–94 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.065 pmid:24699016

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Lee RR,
    3. Huang M

    . Magnetoencephalography in the Diagnosis of Concussion. In: Concussion. Vol 28. Karger Publishers; 2014:94–111
12. 12.↵
    2. Dunkley B,
    3. Da Costa L,
    4. Bethune A, et al

    . Low-frequency connectivity is associated with mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin 2015;7:611–21 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.02.020 pmid:25844315

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Dimitriadis SI,
    3. Zouridakis G,
    4. Rezaie R, et al

    . Functional connectivity changes detected with magnetoencephalography after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin 2015;9:519–31 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.011 pmid:26640764

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Dunkley BT,
    3. Urban K,
    4. Da Costa L, et al

    . Default mode network oscillatory coupling is increased following concussion. Front Neurol 2018;9:280 doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00280 pmid:29755402

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Tarapore PE,
    3. Findlay AM,
    4. LaHue SC, et al

    . Resting state magnetoencephalography functional connectivity in traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2013;118:1306–16 doi:10.3171/2013.3.JNS12398 pmid:23600939

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Friston KJ

    . Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect 2011;1:13–36 doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0008 pmid:22432952

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Tana MG,
    3. Sclocco R,
    4. Bianchi AM

    . GMAC: a Matlab toolbox for spectral Granger causality analysis of fMRI data. Comput Biol Med 2012;42:943–56 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.07.003 pmid:22925560

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Friston K,
    3. Moran R,
    4. Seth AK

    . Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2013;23:172–78 doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.010 pmid:23265964

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Sharp DJ,
    3. Beckmann CF,
    4. Greenwood R, et al

    . Default mode network functional and structural connectivity after traumatic brain injury. Brain 2011;134:2233–47 doi:10.1093/brain/awr175 pmid:21841202

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Raichle ME,
    3. MacLeod AM,
    4. Snyder AZ, et al

    . A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:676–82 doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 pmid:11209064

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Bharath RD,
    3. Munivenkatappa A,
    4. Gohel S, et al

    . Recovery of resting brain connectivity ensuing mild traumatic brain injury. Front Hum Neurosci 2015;9:513 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00513

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Urban JE,
    3. Davenport EM,
    4. Golman AJ, et al

    . Head impact exposure in youth football: high school ages 14 to 18 years and cumulative impact analysis. Ann Biomed Eng 2013;41:2474–87 doi:10.1007/s10439-013-0861-z pmid:23864337

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Ashburner J,
    3. Friston KJ

    . Voxel-based morphometry: the methods. Neuroimage 2000;11:805–21 doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0582 pmid:10860804

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Tadel F,
    3. Baillet S,
    4. Mosher JC, et al

    . Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011;2011:879716 doi:10.1155/2011/879716 pmid:21584256

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Hämäläinen MS,
    3. Ilmoniemi RJ

    . Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput 1994;32:35–42 doi:10.1007/BF02512476 pmid:8182960

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Desikan RS,
    3. Ségonne F,
    4. Fischl B, et al

    . An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006;31:968–80 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 pmid:16530430

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Kabbara A,
    3. Falou WE,
    4. Khalil M, et al

    . The dynamic functional core network of the human brain at rest. Sci Rep 2017;7:2936 doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03420-6 pmid:28592794

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Hillebrand A,
    3. Tewarie P,
    4. Van Dellen E, et al

    . Direction of information flow in large-scale resting-state networks is frequency-dependent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:3867–72 doi:10.1073/pnas.1515657113 pmid:27001844

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Granger CW

    . Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969;37:424–38 doi:10.2307/1912791

    CrossRef
30. 30.↵
    2. Geweke J

    . Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J Am Stat Assoc 1982;77:304–13 doi:10.1080/01621459.1982.10477803

    CrossRefWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Li L,
    3. Pagnotta MF,
    4. Arakaki X, et al

    . Brain activation profiles in mTBI: Evidence from combined resting-state EEG and MEG activity. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015;2015:6963–66 doi:10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319994 pmid:26737894

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Mayer AR,
    3. Mannell MV,
    4. Ling J, et al

    . Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp 2011;32:1825–35 doi:10.1002/hbm.21151 pmid:21259381

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Hillary FG,
    3. Rajtmajer SM,
    4. Roman CA, et al

    . The rich get richer: brain injury elicits hyperconnectivity in core subnetworks. PLoS One 2014;9:e104021 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104021 pmid:25121760

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Tang CY,
    3. Eaves E,
    4. Dams-O'Connor K, et al

    . Diffuse disconnectivity in traumatic brain injury: a resting state fMRI and DTI study. Transl Neurosci 2012;3:9–14 doi:10.2478/s13380-012-0003-3 pmid:23459252

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Palacios EM,
    3. Sala-Llonch R,
    4. Junque C, et al

    . Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging activity and connectivity and cognitive outcome in traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol 2013;70:845–51 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.38 pmid:23689958

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Hristopulos D,
    3. Babul A,
    4. Brucar L, et al

    . Disrupted information flow in resting-state in adolescents with sports related concussion. Front Hum Neurosci 2019;13:419 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00419 pmid:31920584

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. de Almeida JR,
    3. Versace A,
    4. Mechelli A, et al

    . Abnormal amygdala-prefrontal effective connectivity to happy faces differentiates bipolar from major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2009;66:451–59 doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.03.024 pmid:19450794

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. Liu Z,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Bai L, et al

    . Investigation of the effective connectivity of resting state networks in Alzheimer's disease: a functional MRI study combining independent components analysis and multivariate Granger causality analysis. NMR Biomed 2012;25:1311–20 doi:10.1002/nbm.2803 pmid:22505275

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Wang L,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Zhang Y, et al

    . Conditional granger causality analysis of effective connectivity during motor imagery and motor execution in stroke patients. BioMed Res Int 2016;2016:3870863 doi:10.1155/2016/3870863 pmid:27200373

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Eierud C,
    3. Craddock RC,
    4. Fletcher S, et al

    . Neuroimaging after mild traumatic brain injury: review and meta-analysis. Neuroimage Clin 2014;4:283–94 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.12.009 pmid:25061565

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Hashimoto K,
    3. Abo M

    . Abnormal regional benzodiazepine receptor uptake in the prefrontal cortex in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:661–65 doi:10.2340/16501977-0388 pmid:19565161

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    2. Huang MX,
    3. Nichols S,
    4. Baker DG, et al

    . Single-subject-based whole-brain MEG slow-wave imaging approach for detecting abnormality in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin 2014;5:109–19 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.06.004 pmid:25009772

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Milham MP,
    4. Lui YW, et al

    . Default-mode network disruption in mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology 2012;265:882–92 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120748 pmid:23175546

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Gorman LK,
    3. Fu K,
    4. Hovda DA, et al

    . Effects of traumatic brain injury on the cholinergic system in the rat. J Neurotrauma 1996;13:457–63 doi:10.1089/neu.1996.13.457 pmid:8880609

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    2. Schaul N,
    3. Gloor P,
    4. Ball G, et al

    . The electromicrophysiology of delta waves induced by systemic atropine. Brain Res 1978;143:475–86 doi:10.1016/0006-8993(78)90358-X pmid:647373

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    2. D'Andola M,
    3. Rebollo B,
    4. Casali AG, et al

    . Bistability, causality, and complexity in cortical networks: an in vitro perturbational study. Cereb Cortex 2018;28:2233–42 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx122 pmid:28525544

    CrossRefPubMed