Index by author
Hey, S.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult BrainYou have accessSpiral T1 Spin-Echo for Routine Postcontrast Brain MRI Exams: A Multicenter Multireader Clinical EvaluationM.B. Ooi, Z. Li, R.K. Robison, D. Wang, A.G. Anderson, N.R. Zwart, A. Bakhru, S. Nagaraj, T. Mathews, S. Hey, J.J. Koonen, I.E. Dimitrov, H.T. Friel, Q. Lu, M. Obara, I. Saha, H. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhao, M. Temkit, H.H. Hu, T.L. Chenevert, O. Togao, J.A. Tkach, U.D. Nagaraj, M.C. Pinho, R.K. Gupta, J.E. Small, M.M. Kunst, J.P. Karis, J.B. Andre, J.H. Miller, N.K. Pinter and J.G. PipeAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 238-245; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6409
The authors report a multicenter multireader study that was designed to compare spiral with standard-of-care Cartesian postcontrast structural brain MR imaging on the basis of relative performance in 10 metrics of image quality, artifact prevalence, and diagnostic benefit. Seven clinical sites acquired 88 total subjects. For each subject, sites acquired 2 postcontrast MR imaging scans: a spiral 2D T1 spin-echo, and 1 of 4 routine Cartesian 2D T1 spin-echo/TSE scans. Nine neuroradiologists independently reviewed each subject, with the matching pair of spiral and Cartesian scans compared side-by-side, and scored the subject on 10 image-quality metrics. Spiral was superior to Cartesian in 7 of 10 metrics (flow artifact mitigation, SNR, GM/WM contrast, image sharpness, lesion conspicuity, preference for diagnosing abnormal enhancement, and overall intracranial image quality), comparable in 1 of 10 metrics (motion artifacts), and inferior in 2 of 10 metrics (susceptibility artifacts, overall extracranial image quality). Spiral 2D T1 spin-echo for routine structural brain MR imaging is feasible in the clinic with conventional scanners and was preferred by neuroradiologists for overall postcontrast intracranial evaluation.
Higashida, R.T.
- NeurointerventionOpen AccessImpact of Aortic Arch Anatomy on Technical Performance and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic StrokeJ.A. Knox, M.D. Alexander, D.B. McCoy, D.C. Murph, P.J. Hinckley, J.C. Ch'ang, C.F. Dowd, V.V. Halbach, R.T. Higashida, M.R. Amans, S.W. Hetts and D.L. CookeAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 268-273; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6422
Hill, M.D.
- NeurointerventionYou have accessEndovascular Treatment Decisions in Patients with M2 Segment MCA OcclusionsM. Almekhlafi, J.M. Ospel, G. Saposnik, N. Kashani, A. Demchuk, M.D. Hill, M. Goyal and B.K. MenonAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 280-285; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6397
- NeurointerventionYou have accessHow Do Physicians Approach Intravenous Alteplase Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Who Are Eligible for Intravenous Alteplase and Endovascular Therapy? Insights from UNMASK-EVTJ.M. Ospel, N. Kashani, U. Fischer, B.K. Menon, M. Almekhlafi, A.T. Wilson, M.M. Foss, G. Saposnik, M. Goyal and M.D. HillAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 262-267; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6396
Hinckley, P.J.
- NeurointerventionOpen AccessImpact of Aortic Arch Anatomy on Technical Performance and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic StrokeJ.A. Knox, M.D. Alexander, D.B. McCoy, D.C. Murph, P.J. Hinckley, J.C. Ch'ang, C.F. Dowd, V.V. Halbach, R.T. Higashida, M.R. Amans, S.W. Hetts and D.L. CookeAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 268-273; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6422
Hirai, T.
- Extracranial VascularOpen AccessCharacterization of Carotid Plaque Components by Quantitative Susceptibility MappingM. Azuma, K. Maekawa, A. Yamashita, K. Yokogami, M. Enzaki, Z.A. Khant, H. Takeshima, Y. Asada, Y. Wang and T. HiraiAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 310-317; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6374
Hoi, Y.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult BrainYou have accessAssessment of a Bayesian Vitrea CT Perfusion Analysis to Predict Final Infarct and Penumbra Volumes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison with RAPIDR.A. Rava, K.V. Snyder, M. Mokin, M. Waqas, A.B. Allman, J.L. Senko, A.R. Podgorsak, M.M. Shiraz Bhurwani, Y. Hoi, A.H. Siddiqui, J.M. Davies, E.I. Levy and C.N. IonitaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 206-212; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6395
Data were retrospectively collected for 105 patients with acute ischemic stroke (55 patients with successful recanalization [TICI 2b/2c/3] and large-vessel occlusions and 50 patients without interventions). Final infarct volumes were calculated using DWI and FLAIR 24 hours following CTP imaging. RAPID and the Vitrea Bayesian CTP algorithm (with 3 different settings) predicted infarct and penumbra volumes for comparison with final infarct volumes to assess software performance. RAPID and Vitrea default setting had the most accurate final infarct volume prediction in patients with interventions. Default Vitrea and RAPID were the most and least accurate in determining final infarct volume for patients without an intervention, respectively. Compared with RAPID, the Vitrea default setting was noninferior for patients with interventions and superior in penumbra estimation for patients without interventions as indicated by mean infarct differences and correlations with final infarct volumes.
Hu, H.H.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult BrainYou have accessSpiral T1 Spin-Echo for Routine Postcontrast Brain MRI Exams: A Multicenter Multireader Clinical EvaluationM.B. Ooi, Z. Li, R.K. Robison, D. Wang, A.G. Anderson, N.R. Zwart, A. Bakhru, S. Nagaraj, T. Mathews, S. Hey, J.J. Koonen, I.E. Dimitrov, H.T. Friel, Q. Lu, M. Obara, I. Saha, H. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhao, M. Temkit, H.H. Hu, T.L. Chenevert, O. Togao, J.A. Tkach, U.D. Nagaraj, M.C. Pinho, R.K. Gupta, J.E. Small, M.M. Kunst, J.P. Karis, J.B. Andre, J.H. Miller, N.K. Pinter and J.G. PipeAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 238-245; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6409
The authors report a multicenter multireader study that was designed to compare spiral with standard-of-care Cartesian postcontrast structural brain MR imaging on the basis of relative performance in 10 metrics of image quality, artifact prevalence, and diagnostic benefit. Seven clinical sites acquired 88 total subjects. For each subject, sites acquired 2 postcontrast MR imaging scans: a spiral 2D T1 spin-echo, and 1 of 4 routine Cartesian 2D T1 spin-echo/TSE scans. Nine neuroradiologists independently reviewed each subject, with the matching pair of spiral and Cartesian scans compared side-by-side, and scored the subject on 10 image-quality metrics. Spiral was superior to Cartesian in 7 of 10 metrics (flow artifact mitigation, SNR, GM/WM contrast, image sharpness, lesion conspicuity, preference for diagnosing abnormal enhancement, and overall intracranial image quality), comparable in 1 of 10 metrics (motion artifacts), and inferior in 2 of 10 metrics (susceptibility artifacts, overall extracranial image quality). Spiral 2D T1 spin-echo for routine structural brain MR imaging is feasible in the clinic with conventional scanners and was preferred by neuroradiologists for overall postcontrast intracranial evaluation.
Hwang, S.
- Pediatric NeuroimagingYou have accessMRI Patterns of Extrapontine Lesion Extension in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine GliomasL. Makepeace, M. Scoggins, B. Mitrea, Y. Li, A. Edwards, C.L. Tinkle, S. Hwang, A. Gajjar and Z. PatayAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 323-330; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6391
Ikeda, O.
- Adult BrainYou have accessMetal Artifact Reduction in Head CT Performed for Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices: Effectiveness of a Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction AlgorithmY. Nagayama, S. Tanoue, S. Oda, D. Sakabe, T. Emoto, M. Kidoh, H. Uetani, A. Sasao, T. Nakaura, O. Ikeda, K. Yamada and Y. YamashitaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 231-237; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6375
Ikemura, A.
- FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBNeurointerventionYou have accessDelayed Leukoencephalopathy: A Rare Complication after Coiling of Cerebral AneurysmsA. Ikemura, T. Ishibashi, K. Otani, I. Yuki, T. Kodama, I. Kan, N. Kato and Y. MurayamaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 286-292; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6386
Delayed leukoencephalopathy is a rare complication that occurs after endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms and is found in the literature with several different names, such as delayed leukoencephalopathy, delayed enhancing lesions, and delayed multiple white matter lesions. Its various suggested etiologies include granulation reaction caused by foreign body emboli from the hydrophilic coating of procedural devices, contrast-induced encephalopathy, and nickel or bioactive polyglycolic/polylactic acid coil sensitivity. The authors analyzed 1754 endovascular coiling procedures of 1594 aneurysms. Sixteen procedures demonstrated delayed leukoencephalopathy on follow-up FLAIR MR imaging examinations after a median period of 71.5 days in the form of high-signal changes in the white matter at locations remote from the coil mass. Seven patients had headaches or hemiparesis, and 9 patients were asymptomatic. All imaging-associated changes improved subsequently. They found evidence of an association between delayed leukoencephalopathy and the number of microcatheters used per procedure, along with evidence suggesting that these procedures required larger median volumes of contrast medium and weak evidence regarding the need for a longer median fluoroscopy duration.