Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Efficacy of Asahi Fubuki as a Guiding Catheter for Mechanical Thrombectomy: An Institutional Case Series

L. Rinaldo, H. Cloft and W. Brinjikji
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2020, 41 (11) 2114-2116; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6748
L. Rinaldo
aFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (L.R., W.B.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Rinaldo
H. Cloft
bRadiology (H.C., W.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Cloft
W. Brinjikji
aFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (L.R., W.B.)
bRadiology (H.C., W.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W. Brinjikji
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Treatment outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke secondary to large-vessel occlusion in which the Asahi Fubuki was used as a guide catheter were reviewed. Among 154 patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy, the Fubuki was successfully delivered to the cervical ICA in 151 cases (98.1%) and the lesion was successfully crossed in 150 cases (97.4%). Median times to lesion crossing and revascularization were 9 and 19 minutes, respectively.

ABBREVIATION:

MT
mechanical thrombectomy

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is now an established therapy for treatment of acute ischemic stroke secondary to large-vessel occlusion.1 Essential to timely MT performance is navigation of a guiding catheter to a location allowing delivery of interventional devices to the site of vessel occlusion, typically the cervical ICA in instances of anterior circulation occlusion. For the past few years at our institution, we have used the Fubuki catheter (Asahi Intecc) as a first-line guide catheter for MT. Herein, we report on the efficacy of the Fubuki when used for this procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient Selection

After institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed the radiology reports of patients undergoing MT for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large-vessel occlusion at our institution between November 2015 and January 2020. Patients were included for analysis if the Fubuki was used as the initial guide catheter for the procedure. The catheter is 90 cm in length, with inner and outer diameters of 2.28 mm (0.090 inches) and 2.70 mm (0.106 inches), respectively. The Fubuki was used in 2 acute stroke cases between 2015 and 2016 and was subsequently used in most mechanical thrombectomies performed at our institution starting in February 2017. Between February 2017 and January 2020, 196 MTs were performed at our institution, and the Fubuki was selected as the guide catheter for 152 (77.6%) of these procedures. Guide catheters used in the remaining procedures included the 6F Neuron MAX (Penumbra, n = 22), 8F FlowGate2 (Stryker Neurovascular, n = 17), 6F Benchmark (Penumbra, n = 2), 6F Shuttle (Cook, n = 2), and the Mo.MA proximal balloon protection device (Medtronic, n = 1). The FlowGate2 and Mo.Ma were preferentially selected for cases of acute stroke secondary to tandem cervical internal carotid artery and intracranial large-vessel occlusions. Two cases were performed via a radial approach, and for both of these cases, the Benchmark guide catheter was used. Otherwise guide catheters were selected according to the physician’s preference and not on the basis of specific patient anatomic characteristics.

Patient and Treatment Characteristics

Collected patient demographic information included sex and age at the time of stroke. Anatomic information included laterality and the site of large-vessel occlusion, aortic arch configuration, and the presence or absence of bovine anatomy. The aortic arch configuration was categorized as type I, II, or III based on preprocedural neck CT angiography according to standard criteria.2 Treatment characteristics included the method of Fubuki insertion into the femoral artery and type of revascularization device used.

Outcome measures of interest included whether the Fubuki was delivered to the cervical ICA, whether the lesion was crossed with the Fubuki as a guide catheter, whether there was herniation of the Fubuki into the aortic arch during interventional device delivery, and whether crossover to another guide catheter was necessary due to failure of the Fubuki. Whether revascularization was achieved was also noted and characterized as a TICI score of <2b or ≥2b according to established criteria.3 Times to lesion crossed and revascularization in minutes from the time of femoral access were also recorded. We also recorded the incidence of significant access site complications. The incidence of self-limited groin hematomas not requiring imaging evaluation or further intervention was not recorded.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics for continuous and categoric variables are reported as means and SDs and frequency and percentage, respectively. Descriptive statistics for times to lesion crossed and revascularization are provided as median and range. Predictors of failure to deliver the Fubuki to the cervical ICA were identified using logistic regression analysis. The α level for statistical significance was set at .05. Analyses were performed using commercially available software (JMP; SAS Institute).

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

There were 154 patients who underwent MT between November 2015 and January 2020 and met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The mean age of patients was 67.6 ± 15.1 years, and a slight majority of patients were men (51.9%). The site of large-vessel occlusion was most often the M1 segment (42.2%), followed in frequency by the internal carotid artery terminus (18.8%). Most large-vessel occlusions occurred on the patient’s left side (57.1%). The frequencies of type I, II, and III aortic arch configurations were 62.7%, 26.1%, and 11.2%, respectively, and there were 24 patients with bovine anatomy. A complete summary of patient characteristics is presented in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Patient characteristics

Treatment Outcomes

Insertion of the Fubuki directly into the femoral artery was performed in a large majority cases (96.1%). The Fubuki was delivered to the cervical ICA, and the occlusive lesion was successfully crossed with the Fubuki as the guide catheter in 98.1% and 97.4% of cases, respectively. Herniation of the Fubuki into the aortic arch was noted in a single case (0.6%), and crossover to another guide catheter was necessary in 1 case (0.6%). The mechanism of revascularization was most often aspiration (72.1%), followed by aspiration in combination with a stent retriever (22.1%). An interventional device could not be delivered to the site of occlusion in 5 cases (3.2%). TICI 2b revascularization was achieved in 83.1% of cases. Median times to lesion crossed and revascularization were 9 and 17 minutes, respectively (Table 2). For comparison, herniation of the guide catheter from the carotid artery into the aortic arch occurred in 3 of the 22 cases (13.6%) in which the 8F FlowGate2 was used and 1 of 17 cases (5.9%) in which the 6F Neuron MAX was used. Procedural outcomes for the other guiding catheters were not included due to the small sample size.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Treatment characteristics and outcomes

There were 3 instances (1.9%) of major access site complications. One patient experienced a painful femoral pseudoaneurysm that ultimately resolved without intervention. A second patient experienced persistent bleeding from the femoral access site after the procedure, requiring surgical femoral cutdown and repair of the artery. The final patient experienced occlusion of a previously placed femoropopliteal graft, resulting in limb ischemia; this patient also required surgical femoral cutdown and arterial revascularization.

Predictors of failure to deliver the Fubuki to the cervical ICA were determined using logistic regression analysis. A type III aortic arch was the only variable significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of Fubuki delivery to the ICA (OR, 18.15; 95% CI, 1.54–214.16; P = .021; Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Logistic regression identifying predictors of failure to deliver the Fubuki to the ICA

DISCUSSION

While previous studies have assessed the efficacy of specific guide catheters for the performance of MT,4 to our knowledge, our study is unique in that its focus was on the navigability of the Fubuki as determined by the frequency of failure to deliver the catheter to the cervical ICA. The reported rate of failure in tandem with our relatively low median time to lesion crossed of 9 minutes suggests that the Fubuki is highly efficacious at reaching the cervical ICA in a timely fashion and maintaining a stable position. On logistic regression analysis, a type III aortic arch was the only patient characteristic associated with Fubuki failure, which was unsurprising given previous studies associating complicated arch anatomy with the inability to perform MT.5 Nevertheless, as depicted in our representative case, the Fubuki was able to cross relatively tortuous arch anatomy while providing adequate support to complete the MT. In the future, more in-depth anatomic analyses of MT cases may allow improved quantification of guide catheter performance and facilitate comparison among different catheters.

Limitations

Our study is limited by the single-center, retrospective methodology; thus, it is possible that our results are not completely generalizable. Similar efficacy of the Fubuki should be confirmed in multi-institutional series.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the 6F Fubuki is highly effective when used for MT to treat acute ischemic stroke secondary to large-vessel occlusion. These results may serve as a benchmark when assessing the performance of other guide catheters used for this procedure.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Berkhemer OA,
    2. Fransen PS,
    3. Beumer D, et al
    ; MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bhatt CT
    . Guide to Peripheral and Cerebrovascular Intervention. Remedica; 2004
  3. 3.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Yoo AJ,
    3. Khatri P, et al
    ; STIR Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Task Force. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 2013;44:2650–63 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972 pmid:23920012
    FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Yi HJ,
    2. Sung JH,
    3. Lee MH, et al
    . Experience of the new FlowGate2 device as a balloon guide catheter for ischemic stroke intervention. World Neurosurg 2019;126:736–42 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.140 pmid:30851472
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Knox JA,
    2. Alexander MD,
    3. McCoy DB, et al
    . Impact of aortic arch anatomy on technical performance and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:268–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6422 pmid:32001445
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received April 14, 2020.
  • Accepted after revision June 21, 2020.
  • © 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 41 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 41, Issue 11
1 Nov 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficacy of Asahi Fubuki as a Guiding Catheter for Mechanical Thrombectomy: An Institutional Case Series
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
L. Rinaldo, H. Cloft, W. Brinjikji
Efficacy of Asahi Fubuki as a Guiding Catheter for Mechanical Thrombectomy: An Institutional Case Series
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2020, 41 (11) 2114-2116; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6748

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Efficacy of Asahi Fubuki as a Guiding Catheter for Mechanical Thrombectomy: An Institutional Case Series
L. Rinaldo, H. Cloft, W. Brinjikji
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2020, 41 (11) 2114-2116; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6748
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (3)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • First multicenter study evaluating the utility of the BENCHMARKTM BMXTM 81 large-bore access catheter in neurovascular interventions
    Ahmed Abdelsalam, Hayes B Fountain, Ian A Ramsay, Evan M Luther, Mohammad Mahdi Sowlat, Michael A Silva, Ameer E Hassan, Aman B Patel, Tiffany Eatz, Pradeep Joseph, Robert W Regenhardt, Sudhakar R Satti, Adnan H Siddiqui, Sai Sanikommu, Ammad A Baig, Priyank Khandelwal, Alejandro M Spiotta, Robert M Starke
    Interventional Neuroradiology 2024
  • Initial experience of using a large-bore (0.096″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions
    Robert M Starke, Isaac Josh Abecassis, Vasu Saini, Charles C Matouk, Ameer E Hassan, Adnan H Siddiqui, Donald F Frei
    Interventional Neuroradiology 2024 30 3
  • Fubuki XF Long Sheath guide catheter use in neuroendovascular procedures: Institutional experience in 60 cases
    Hamzah M Saei, Samantha E Miller, Holly M Pope, Ameer E Hassan
    Interventional Neuroradiology 2024

More in this TOC Section

  • Factors Associated with Major Re-recanalization
  • A Key Factor Shapes LS-DAVFs EVT Outcome
  • Optimizing Voxel Size in 3D Rotational Angiography
Show more Neurointervention

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire