Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention
Open Access

Validating the Automatic Independent Component Analysis of DSA

J.-S. Hong, Y.-H. Kao, F.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) 540-542; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5963
J.-S. Hong
aFrom the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (J.-S.H., Y.-H.K.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.-S. Hong
Y.-H. Kao
aFrom the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (J.-S.H., Y.-H.K.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y.-H. Kao
F.-C. Chang
bSchool of Medicine (F.-C.C., C.-J.L.), National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
cDepartment of Radiology (F.-C.C., C.-J.L.), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F.-C. Chang
C.-J. Lin
bSchool of Medicine (F.-C.C., C.-J.L.), National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
cDepartment of Radiology (F.-C.C., C.-J.L.), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C.-J. Lin
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Time-density curve analysis of DSA provides useful blood flow information. However, manually selecting the ROI is time-consuming. We developed an automatic technique to provide arterial, capillary, and venous vasculatures with corresponding time-density curves. This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 36 patients with unilateral carotid stenosis. We found that the full width at half maximum of the time-density curve for the automatically segmented capillary vasculature is a suitable representation of the cerebral circulation time.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CCT
cerebral circulation time
FWHM
full width at half maximum
I1 and I2
the internal carotid artery at 2 locations
IA
cervical internal carotid artery in the lateral view
IB
cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery in the lateral view
MCP
manually selected capillary phase
PA
posteroanterior
TDC
time-density curve

X-ray DSA images are the criterion standard for diagnosing cerebrovascular diseases. The time-density curve (TDC) measured from an ROI represents the changes in the intensity of the contrast bolus passing through the selected region. TDC analysis is less computationally intensive, and measurement outcomes are immediately available.1 However, the manual selection of the ROI is time-consuming and is susceptible to interobserver variation. The aim of this study was to develop an automatic analysis method for detecting vascular structures and corresponding TDCs from DSA images. Seven hemodynamic parameters were measured from the TDCs. The automatically measured TDCs and hemodynamic parameters were validated through their comparison with those measured from manually selected ROIs.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of Taipei Veterans General Hospital. This study enrolled 36 patients who had extracranial internal carotid stenosis of >70% according to the NASCET criteria and who consequently underwent stent placement. DSA acquisitions were performed on a biplane angiosuite (Axiom Artis dBA; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). A power injector (Liebel-Flarsheim Angiomat; Illumena, San Diego, California) was used to administer the contrast bolus. The image size was 960 × 960 or 1440 × 1440 pixels, and the FOV was 22 cm. The acquisition rate was 6 frames per second, and the acquisition lasted 8–18 seconds. Each patient was imaged in the posteroanterior (PA) and lateral views before and after treatment. A total of 144 datasets were analyzed.

The scale-invariant feature transform flow technique2 was applied to the dynamic x-ray projection images for reducing motion artifacts. After performing the registration process, we used the FastICA technique (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/fastICA/fastICA.pdf)3 to segment the DSA images into arterial, capillary, and venous vasculature images. The thresholding method of Otsu4 was applied to the output independent component images for generating binary mask images. The binary masks of these 3 vessel types were used to measure the actual TDCs.

Each TDC was fitted by a γ-variate function5 to reduce random noise and recirculation. The following 4 parameters were calculated from the fitted curve: 1) the area under the fitted TDC (area under curve), 2) the maximum enhancement, 3) TTP, and 4) the width between the 2 time points on the TDC when the density was half the maximum enhancement, full width at half maximum (FWHM).

Three other parameters were calculated by fitting the γ-variate curve to straight lines. Every set of 4 consecutive temporal points on the γ-variate function was fitted to a straight line described by a linear equation: C(t) = mt + b, where m was the slope, using a least-squares error technique. The largest and smallest m values were recorded to represent the wash-in and washout slopes, respectively. The bolus arrival time was the time at which the straight line with the largest slope intercepted the horizontal axis (eg, Bolus Arrival Time = −b / Wash-In Slope).

Fifteen ROIs were manually selected to validate the proposed automatic technique. The locations of these ROIs are indicated in Fig 1. The first 13 ROIs had areas of 3 × 3 pixels. In the PA view, we selected 7 ROIs: the ICA at 2 locations (I1 and I2), anterior and middle cerebral arteries in the PA view, transverse sinus in the PA view, and ipsilateral and contralateral internal jugular veins (ipsilateral internal jugular vein and contralateral internal jugular vein in the PA view, respectively). In the lateral view, we selected 6 ROIs: the cervical ICA (anterior cerebral artery in the PA view [IA]), the cavernous segment of the ICA in the lateral view (IB), anterior and cerebral arteries in the lateral view, parietal vein, and superior sagittal sinus. The other 2 manually drawn ROIs were used to represent the manually selected capillary phase (MCP) in the PA and lateral views. In the MCP ROIs, pixels with maximum enhancement higher than the average were excluded.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Color-coded DSA images in the PA (A) and lateral (B) views. The numbers on the right-hand side are TTP values. Fifteen ROIs are manually selected to validate the automatic technique.

For each DSA dataset, 3 TDCs were obtained using the automatic method, and they were designated group A. A total of 15 TDCs were measured from the manually selected ROIs, and they were designated group B. Seven hemodynamic parameters, namely maximum enhancement, bolus arrival time (BAT), TTP, wash-in slope, wash out slope, FWHM, and area under curve, were calculated from the TDCs. We used the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient to compare TDCs and these parameters between groups A and B. The cerebral circulation time (CCT) was defined as the time difference between the TTPs of IB and the parietal vein.1 We compared the CCT with the FWHM measured from the automatically segmented capillary mask and the MCP ROI.

Results

The 3 output independent-component images related to arterial, capillary, and venous phases and the corresponding TDCs are shown in Fig 2A. The mask images and the corresponding TDCs are shown in Fig 2B.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Three output images and corresponding TDCs (A). Mask images for each phase and corresponding TDCs (B). The images are ordered as arterial, capillary, and venous phases from left to right. The red, green, and blue solid lines represent the TDCs of the arterial, capillary, and venous phases. AU indicates arbitrary unit.

The Pearson correlation coefficients between the automatically measured TDCs and some manually measured TDCs showed the following: 1) The TDCs of arterial masks were very similar to those of the manually selected large arterial (I1, I2, IA, IB) ROIs (>0.90); 2) the TDCs of capillary masks were very similar to those of the MCP ROI (>0.85); and 3) the TDCs of venous masks were very similar to those of venous (ipsilateral internal jugular vein in the PA view and superior sagittal sinus) ROIs (>0.90).

The 7 parameters calculated from the TDCs of arterial masks were all significantly correlated with the parameters calculated from manually selected large arterial (I1, I2, IA, IB) ROIs (P < .05). Those parameters (except wash-in slope) of the capillary masks correlated significantly with those of the MCP ROIs (P < .05). The CCT also significantly correlated with the FWHM of capillary masks (P < .05). Figure 3 illustrates scatterplots of several hemodynamic parameters measured manually versus those measured automatically. The results indicate that the TDC of the arterial mask is a suitable representation of those for larger ICAs and that the FWHM of the capillary mask is a suitable representation of both CCT and the FWHM of MCP.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Scatterplot of the TTP between the manually measured I1 (red dots) and IA (blue crosses) and the automatically measured arterial mask (A). Scatterplot between the manually measured CCT and automatically measured FWHM of the capillary mask in the PA (red dots) and lateral (blue crosses) views (B). Scatterplot between the FWHM of MCP and automatically measured FWHM of the capillary mask in the PA (red dots) and lateral (blue crosses) views (C). For comparison, the scatterplot between the manually measured CCT and the FWHM of the MCP in the PA (red dots) and the lateral views (blue crosses) is shown in D.

Discussion

The proposed automatic postprocessing method obtained robust results for segmenting arterial, capillary, and venous vasculatures and generated hemodynamic parameters objectively without the manual selection of ROIs. In the era before the capillary phase could be accurately extracted, most morphologic observations focused on arteries and veins. The brain parenchyma itself, comprising capillaries, could not be visualized on an angiogram. A surrogate marker, CCT, was used to indicate the viability of the brain.1 However, obtaining CCT in a manual manner is inconvenient and has interobserver variation. In the proposed technique, the FWHM of the TDC for the segmented capillary is proportional to the CCT and thus can be considered a useful hemodynamic parameter.

Conclusions

The proposed technique combines scale-invariant feature transform flow, FastICA, and thresholding techniques to decompose DSA images into arterial, capillary, and venous vasculatures in a completely automatic manner. The results obtained were highly consistent with those obtained using manually selected ROIs.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Jia-Sheng Hong—RELATED: Patent Pending. UNRELATED: Grant: Siemens, Comments: a grant to develop 2 Matlab programs.* Yi-Hsuan Kao—RELATED: Patent Pending. UNRELATED: Grant: Siemens, Comments: a grant to develop 2 Matlab programs.* Chung-Jung Lin—RELATED: Grant: Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Comments: grant No. 104-2314-B-010-037*; RELATED: Patent Pending. *Money paid to institution.

  • This work was supported, in part, by the Ministry of Science and Technology (grant No. 104-2314-B-010–037).

  • Paper previously presented, in part, as a scientific poster (P-36, Hemodynamic Segmentation of Digital Subtraction Angiography Using Independent Component Analysis) at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology and the Foundation of the ASNR Symposium, June 2–7, 2018; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lin CJ,
    2. Hung SC,
    3. Guo WY, et al
    . Monitoring peri-therapeutic cerebral circulation time: a feasibility study using color-coded quantitative DSA in patients with steno-occlusive arterial disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1685–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3049 pmid:22499839
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Liu C,
    2. Yuen J,
    3. Torralba A
    . SIFT flow: dense correspondence across scenes and its applications. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2011;33:978–94 doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2010.147 pmid:20714019
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hyvärinen A,
    2. Oja E
    . Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw 2000;13:411–30 doi:10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5 pmid:10946390
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Otsu N
    . A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1979;9:62–66 doi:10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
    CrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Thompson HK Jr.,
    2. Starmer CF,
    3. Whalen RE, et al
    . Indicator transit time considered as a gamma variate. Circ Res 1964;14:502–15 doi:10.1161/01.RES.14.6.502 pmid:14169969
    FREE Full Text
  • Received October 22, 2018.
  • Accepted after revision December 6, 2018.
  • © 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 3
1 Mar 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Validating the Automatic Independent Component Analysis of DSA
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J.-S. Hong, Y.-H. Kao, F.-C. Chang, C.-J. Lin
Validating the Automatic Independent Component Analysis of DSA
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2019, 40 (3) 540-542; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5963

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Validating the Automatic Independent Component Analysis of DSA
J.-S. Hong, Y.-H. Kao, F.-C. Chang, C.-J. Lin
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2019, 40 (3) 540-542; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5963
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (3)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Machine Learning Application With Quantitative Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection of Hemorrhagic Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
    Jia-Sheng Hong, Chung-Jung Lin, Yue-Hsin Lin, Cheng-Chia Lee, Huai-Che Yang, Ling-Hsuan Meng, Te-Ming Lin, Yong-Sin Hu, Wan-Yuo Guo, Wei-Fa Chu, Yu-Te Wu
    IEEE Access 2020 8
  • Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021
    Nazim Haouchine, Parikshit Juvekar, Xin Xiong, Jie Luo, Tina Kapur, Rose Du, Alexandra Golby, Sarah Frisken
    2021 12906
  • Validation of SART 3.5D algorithm for cerebrovascular dynamics and artery versus vein classification in presurgical 3D digital subtraction angiographies
    Sara El Hadji, Augusto Bonilauri, Elena De Momi, Laura Castana, Antonio Macera, Luca Berta, Francesco Cardinale, Giuseppe Baselli
    Physics in Medicine & Biology 2022 67 18

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimizing Voxel Size in 3D Rotational Angiography
  • Neuroform Atlas Stent for Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Neurologic Complication in Transradial Angiography
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire