Hemodynamic Analysis of Postoperative Rupture of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms after Placement of Flow-Diverting Stents: A Matched Case-Control Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Walcott BP,
   3. Stapleton CJ,
   4. Choudhri O, et al

   . Flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:1002–08 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0609 pmid:27294446

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Brinjikji W,
   4. Cekirge S, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg 2017;127:775–80 doi:10.3171/2016.8.JNS16467 pmid:27791519

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Brinjikji W,
   4. Potts MB, et al

   . Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following Pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial. Neurosurgery 2017;80:40–48 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw014 pmid:28362885

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Mut F,
   4. Raschi M, et al

   . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2398 pmid:21071533

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Siddiqui AH,
   3. Kan P,
   4. Abla AA, et al

   . Complications after treatment with Pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery 2012;71:E509–13; discussion E513 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318258e1f8 pmid:22710418

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Chow M,
   3. McDougall C,
   4. O'Kelly C, et al

   . Delayed spontaneous rupture of a posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm following treatment with flow diversion: a clinicopathologic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:E46–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2532 pmid:21835950

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Kulcsar Z,
   3. Houdart E,
   4. Bonafe A, et al

   . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2370 pmid:21071538

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Murad MH,
   4. Lanzino G, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Turowski B,
    3. Macht S,
    4. Kulcsar Z, et al

    . Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 2011;53:37–41 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0676-7 pmid:20339842

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Hampton T,
    3. Walsh D,
    4. Tolias C, et al

    . Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:i51–55 doi:10.1136/jnis.2010.002873.rep pmid:30037958

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Tateshima S,
    3. Jones JG,
    4. Mayor BF, et al

    . Aneurysm pressure measurement before and after placement of a Pipeline stent: feasibility study using a 0.014 inch pressure wire for coronary intervention. J Neurointervent Surg 2016;8:603–07 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011214 pmid:24871764

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Byrne JV,
    3. Beltechi R,
    4. Yarnold JA, et al

    . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5:e12492 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012492 pmid:20824070

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Wang C,
    3. Tian Z,
    4. Liu J, et al

    . Flow diverter effect of LVIS stent on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: a comparison with Enterprise stents and the Pipeline device. J Transl Med 2016;14:199 doi:10.1186/s12967-016-0959-9 pmid:27370946

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Mitsos AP,
    3. Kakalis NM,
    4. Ventikos YP, et al

    . Haemodynamic simulation of aneurysm coiling in an anatomically accurate computational fluid dynamics model: technical note. Neuroradiology 2008;50:341–47 doi:10.1007/s00234-007-0334-x pmid:18043912

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Weir J, et al

    . Association of hemodynamic characteristics and cerebral aneurysm rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:264–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2274 pmid:21051508

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Liu J,
    3. Fan J,
    4. Xiang J, et al

    . Hemodynamic characteristics of large unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms prior to rupture: a case control study. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:367–72 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011577 pmid:25653231

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. He X,
    3. Ku DN

    . Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. J Biomech Eng 1996;118:74–82 doi:10.1115/1.2795948 pmid:8833077

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Jing L,
    4. Liu J, et al

    . Clinical, morphological, and hemodynamic independent characteristic factors for rupture of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:808–12 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011865 pmid:26253110

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Takao H,
    3. Murayama Y,
    4. Otsuka S, et al

    . Hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms during observation. Stroke 2012;43:1436–39 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.640995 pmid:22363053

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Huang Q,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Cheng J, et al

    . Hemodynamic changes by flow diverters in rabbit aneurysm models: a computational fluid dynamic study based on micro-computed tomography reconstruction. Stroke 2013;44:1936–41 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001202 pmid:23640830

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Ikeda H,
    3. Ishii A,
    4. Kikuchi T, et al

    . Delayed aneurysm rupture due to residual blood flow at the inflow zone of the intracranial paraclinoid internal carotid aneurysm treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device: histopathological investigation. Interv Neuroradiol 2015;21:674–83 doi:10.1177/1591019915609121 pmid:26500232

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Fox B,
    3. Humphries WE,
    4. Doss VT, et al

    . Rupture of giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm following flow diversion: mechanical stretch as a potential mechanism for early aneurysm rupture. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:e37 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011325.rep pmid:25361560

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Hassan T,
    3. Ahmed YM,
    4. Hassan AA

    . The adverse effects of flow-diverter stent-like devices on the flow pattern of saccular intracranial aneurysm models: computational fluid dynamics study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:1633–40 doi:10.1007/s00701-011-1055-9 pmid:21647821

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Frosen J,
    3. Piippo A,
    4. Paetau A, et al

    . Remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm wall is associated with rupture: histological analysis of 24 unruptured and 42 ruptured cases. Stroke 2004;35:2287–93 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000140636.30204.da pmid:15322297

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology 2016;58:171–77 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1615-4 pmid:26553302

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Schneiders JJ,
    3. VanBavel E,
    4. Majoie CB, et al

    . A flow-diverting stent is not a pressure-diverting stent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:E1–4 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2613 pmid:21852372

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Qian Y,
    3. Takao H,
    4. Umezu M, et al

    . Risk analysis of unruptured aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics technology: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1948–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2655 pmid:21903914

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Liu J,
    3. Xiang J,
    4. Zhang Y, et al

    . Morphologic and hemodynamic analysis of paraclinoid aneurysms: ruptured versus unruptured. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:658–63 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010946 pmid:24220206

    Abstract/FREE Full Text