Imaging G-Ratio in Multiple Sclerosis Using High-Gradient Diffusion MRI and Macromolecular Tissue Volume

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Dutta R,
   3. Trapp BD

   . Mechanisms of neuronal dysfunction and degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Prog Neurobiol 2011;93:1–12 doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.09.005 pmid:20946934

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Kremer D,
   3. Akkermann R,
   4. Kury P, et al

   . Current advancements in promoting remyelination in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2019;25:7–14 doi:10.1177/1352458518800827 pmid:30270725

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Mallik S,
   3. Samson RS,
   4. Wheeler-Kingshott CA, et al

   . Imaging outcomes for trials of remyelination in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol, Neurosurg, Psychiatry 2014;85:1396–1404 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-307650 pmid:24769473

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Jensen JH,
   3. Helpern JA,
   4. Ramani A, et al

   . Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1432–40 doi:10.1002/mrm.20508 pmid:15906300

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Zhang H,
   3. Schneider T,
   4. Wheeler-Kingshott CA, et al

   . NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 2012;61:1000–16 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072 pmid:22484410

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Assaf Y,
   3. Blumenfeld-Katzir T,
   4. Yovel Y, et al

   . AxCaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:1347–54 doi:10.1002/mrm.21577 pmid:18506799

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Huang SY,
   3. Tobyne SM,
   4. Nummenmaa A, et al

   . Characterization of axonal disease in patients with multiple sclerosis using high-gradient-diffusion MR imaging. Radiology 2016:280:244–51 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016151582 pmid:26859256

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Fu X,
   3. Shrestha S,
   4. Sun M, et al

   . Microstructural white matter alterations in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: study based on neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI). Clin Neuroradiol 2019 June 7. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00062-019-00805-0] pmid:31175374

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Huang SY,
   3. Nummenmaa A,
   4. Witzel T, et al

   . The impact of gradient strength on in vivo diffusion MRI estimates of axon diameter. Neuroimage 2015;106:464–72 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.008 pmid:25498429

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Veraart J,
    3. Fieremans E,
    4. Rudrapatna U, et al

    . Breaking the power law scaling of the dMRI signal on the Connectom scanner reveals its sensitivity to axon diameters. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Paris, France; June 16–21, 2018: 252
11. 11.↵
    2. Veraart J,
    3. Fieremans E,
    4. Novikov DS

    . On the scaling behavior of water diffusion in human brain white matter. Neuroimage 2019;185:379–87 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.075 pmid:30292815

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Henkelman RM,
    3. Huang X,
    4. Xiang QS, et al

    . Quantitative interpretation of magnetization transfer. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:759–66 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910290607 pmid:8350718

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. MacKay A,
    3. Whittall K,
    4. Adler J, et al

    . In vivo visualization of myelin water in brain by magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:673–77 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910310614 pmid:8057820

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Mezer A,
    3. Yeatman JD,
    4. Stikov N, et al

    . Quantifying the local tissue volume and composition in individual brains with magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Med 2013;19:1667–72 doi:10.1038/nm.3390 pmid:24185694

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Stikov N,
    3. Campbell JS,
    4. Stroh T, et al

    . In vivo histology of the myelin g-ratio with magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2015;118:397–405 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.023 pmid:26004502

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Cercignani M,
    3. Giulietti G,
    4. Dowell NG, et al

    . Characterizing axonal myelination within the healthy population: a tract-by-tract mapping of effects of age and gender on the fiber g-ratio. Neurobiol Aging 2017;49:109–18 doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.09.016 pmid:27792897

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Hagiwara A,
    3. Hori M,
    4. Yokoyama K, et al

    . Analysis of white matter damage in patients with multiple sclerosis via a novel in vivo MR method for measuring myelin, axons, and g-ratio. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1934–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5312 pmid:28775058

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Berman S,
    3. West KL,
    4. Does MD, et al

    . Evaluating g-ratio weighted changes in the corpus callosum as a function of age and sex. Neuroimage 2018;182:304–13 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.076 pmid:28673882

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Campbell JSW,
    3. Leppert IR,
    4. Narayanan S, et al

    . Promise and pitfalls of g-ratio estimation with MRI. Neuroimage 2018;182:80–96 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.038 pmid:28822750

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Duval T,
    3. Le Vy S,
    4. Stikov N, et al

    . G-ratio weighted imaging of the human spinal cord in vivo. Neuroimage 2017;145:11–23 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.018 pmid:27664830

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Keil B,
    3. Blau JN,
    4. Biber S, et al

    . A 64-channel 3T array coil for accelerated brain MRI. Magn Reson Med 2013;70:248–58 doi:10.1002/mrm.24427 pmid:22851312

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Huang SY,
    3. Witzel T,
    4. Fan Q, et al

    . TractCaliber: axon diameter estimation across white matter tracts in the in vivo human brain using 300 mT/m gradients. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Toronto, Ontario, Canada; May 20 to June 5, 2015
23. 23.↵
    2. Fan Q,
    3. Witzel T,
    4. Nummenmaa A, et al

    . MGH-USC Human Connectome Project datasets with ultra-high b-value diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 2016;124:1108–14 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.075 pmid:26364861

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Andersson JL,
    3. Skare S,
    4. Ashburner J

    . How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2003;20:870–88 doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 pmid:14568458

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Jenkinson M,
    4. Woolrich MW, et al

    . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23(Suppl 10):S208–19 pmid:15501092

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Andersson JLR,
    3. Sotiropoulos SN

    . An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage 2016;125:1063–78 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019 pmid:26481672

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Fan Q,
    3. Nummenmaa A,
    4. Witzel T, et al

    . Axon diameter mapping independent of crossing structures using spherical mean technique. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Paris, France; June 16–21, 2018
28. 28.↵
    2. Huang SY,
    3. Tobyne SM,
    4. Nummenmaa A, et al

    . Characterization of axonal pathology independent of fiber crossings in multiple sclerosis using high-gradient diffusion MRI. Radiology 2016;280:244–51 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016151582 pmid:26859256

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Dale AM,
    3. Fischl B,
    4. Sereno MI

    . Cortical surface-based analysis, I: segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999;9:179–94 doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 pmid:9931268

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Fischl B,
    3. van der Kouwe A,
    4. Destrieux C, et al

    . Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 2004;14:11–22 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg087 pmid:14654453

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Lindemer ER,
    3. Salat DH,
    4. Smith EE, et al

    . White matter signal abnormality quality differentiates mild cognitive impairment that converts to Alzheimer's disease from nonconverters. Neurobiol Aging 2015;36:2447–57 doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.05.011 pmid:26095760

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Plemel JR,
    3. Liu W-Q,
    4. Yong VW

    . Remyelination therapies: a new direction and challenge in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017;16:617–34 doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.115 pmid:28685761

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Stangel M,
    3. Kuhlmann T,
    4. Matthews PM, et al

    . Achievements and obstacles of remyelinating therapies in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2017;13:742–54 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.139 pmid:29146953

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Berman S,
    3. West KL,
    4. Does MD, et al

    . Evaluating g-ratio weighted changes in the corpus callosum as a function of age and sex. Neuroimage 2018;182:1304–13 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.076 pmid:28673882

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Levesque IR,
    3. Giacomini PS,
    4. Narayanan S, et al

    . Quantitative magnetization transfer and myelin water imaging of the evolution of acute multiple sclerosis lesions. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:633–40 doi:10.1002/mrm.22244 pmid:20146232

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Jelescu IO,
    3. Veraart J,
    4. Adisetiyo V, et al

    . One diffusion acquisition and different white matter models: how does microstructure change in human early development based on WMTI and NODDI? Neuroimage 2015;107:242–56 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.009 pmid:25498427

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Kunz N,
    3. da Silva AR,
    4. Jelescu IO

    . Intra- and extra-axonal axial diffusivities in the white matter: which one is faster? Neuroimage 2018;181:314–22 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.020 pmid:30005917

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Fan Q,
    3. Nummenmaa A,
    4. Wichtmann B, et al

    . Validation of diffusion MRI estimates of compartment size and volume fraction in a biomimetic brain phantom using a human MRI scanner with 300mT/m maximum gradient strength. Neuroimage 2018;182:469–78 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.004 pmid:29337276

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Duval T,
    3. Saliani A,
    4. Nami H, et al

    . Axons morphometry in the human spinal cord. Neuroimage 2019;185:119–28 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.033 pmid:30326296

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Frischer JM,
    3. Weigand SD,
    4. Guo Y, et al

    . Clinical and pathological insights into the dynamic nature of the white matter multiple sclerosis plaque. Ann Neurol 2015;78:710–21 doi:10.1002/ana.24497 pmid:26239536

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.
    2. Abelev B,
    3. Adam J,
    4. Adamova D, et al; ALICE Collaboration

    . A measurement of quarkonium production at forward rapidity in [Formula: see text] collisions at [Formula: see text]TeV. Eur Phys J C Part Fields 2014;74:2974 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2974-4 pmid:25814905

    CrossRefPubMed