PACS Integration of Semiautomated Imaging Software Improves Day-to-Day MS Disease Activity Detection

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Ramagopalan SV,
   3. Sadovnick AD

   . Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin 2011;40:207–17 doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2010.12.010 pmid:21439437

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Degenhardt A,
   3. Ramagopalan SV,
   4. Scalfari A, et al

   . Clinical prognostic factors in multiple sclerosis: a natural history review. Nat Rev Neurol 2009;5:672–82 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.178 pmid:19953117

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Weiner HL

   . The challenge of multiple sclerosis: how do we cure a chronic heterogeneous disease? Ann Neurol 2009;65:239–48 doi:10.1002/ana.21640 pmid:19334069

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Havrdova E,
   3. Galetta S,
   4. Stefoski D, et al

   . Freedom from disease activity in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2010;74(Suppl 3):S3–7 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dbb51c pmid:20421571

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Fisniku LK,
   3. Brex PA,
   4. Altmann DR, et al

   . Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2008;131:808–17 doi:10.1093/brain/awm329 pmid:18234696

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Bar-Zohar D,
   3. Agosta F,
   4. Goldstaub D, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging metrics and their correlation with clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature and future perspectives. Mult Scler 2008;14:719–27 doi:10.1177/1352458507088102 pmid:18424478

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Abraham AG,
   3. Duncan DD,
   4. Gange SJ, et al

   . Computer-aided assessment of diagnostic images for epidemiological research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:74 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-74 pmid:19906311

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. van Heerden J,
   3. Rawlinson D,
   4. Zhang A, et al

   . Improving multiple sclerosis plaque detection using a semiautomated assistive approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1465–71 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4375 pmid:26089318

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Wang W,
   3. van Heerden J,
   4. Tacey MA, et al

   . Neuroradiologists compared with non-neuroradiologists in the detection of new multiple sclerosis plaques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1323–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5185 pmid:28473341

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Filippi M,
    3. Grossman RI

    . MRI techniques to monitor MS evolution: the present and the future. Neurology 2002;58:1147–53 doi:10.1212/wnl.58.8.1147 pmid:11971079

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Goodin DS

    . Magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate outcome measure of disability in multiple sclerosis: have we been overly harsh in our assessment? Ann Neurol 2006;59:597–605 doi:10.1002/ana.20832 pmid:16566022

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Bilello M,
    3. Arkuszewski M,
    4. Nasrallah I, et al

    . Multiple sclerosis lesions in the brain: computer-assisted assessment of lesion load dynamics on 3D FLAIR MR images. Neuroradiol J 2012;25:17–21 doi:10.1177/197140091202500102 pmid:24028871

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Moraal B,
    3. Meier DS,
    4. Poppe PA, et al

    . Subtraction MR images in a multiple sclerosis multicenter clinical trial setting. Radiology 2009;250:506–14 doi:10.1148/radiol.2501080480 pmid:19037018

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Dahan A,
    3. Wang W,
    4. Gaillard F

    . Computer-aided detection can bridge the skill gap in multiple sclerosis monitoring. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15(1 Pt A):93–96 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.06.030 pmid:28764954

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Polman CH,
    3. Reingold SC,
    4. Banwell B, et al

    . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011;69:29–302 doi:10.1002/ana.22366 pmid:21387374

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    The R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014
17. 17.↵
    2. Jain S,
    3. Sima DM,
    4. Ribbens A, et al

    . Automatic segmentation and volumetry of multiple sclerosis brain lesions from MR images. Neuroimage Clin 2015;8:367–75 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.05.003 pmid:26106562

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Schmidt P,
    3. Gaser C,
    4. Arsic M, et al

    . An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2012;59:3774–83 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.032 pmid:22119648

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Galletto Pregliasco AG,
    3. Collin A,
    4. Guéguen A, et al

    . Improved detection of new MS lesions during follow-up using an automated MR coregistration-fusion method. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1226–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5690 pmid:29880479

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Mortazavi D,
    3. Kouzani AZ,
    4. Soltanian-Zadeh H

    . Segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in MR images: a review. Neuroradiology 2012;54:299–320 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0886-7 pmid:21584674

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Caramanos Z,
    3. Francis S,
    4. Narayanan S, et al

    . Large, nonplateauing relationship between clinical disability and cerebral white matter lesion load in patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2012;69:89–95 doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.765 pmid:22232348

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Sormani MP,
    3. Rovaris M,
    4. Comi G, et al

    . A reassessment of the plateauing relationship between T2 lesion load and disability in MS. Neurology 2009;73:1538–42 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c06679 pmid:19794123

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Traboulsee A,
    3. Simon J,
    4. Stone L, et al

    . Revised recommendations of the consortium of MS centers task force for a standardized MRI protocol and clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:394–401 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4539 pmid:26564433

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Kanda T,
    3. Nakai Y,
    4. Hagiwara A, et al

    . Distribution and chemical forms of gadolinium in the brain: a review. Br J Radiology 2017;90:20170115. doi:10.1259/bjr.20170115 pmid:28749164

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Wang C,
    3. Beadnall HN,
    4. Hatton SN, et al

    . Automated brain volumetrics in multiple sclerosis: a step closer to clinical application. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016;87:754–57 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-312304 pmid:27071647

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Giger ML

    . Machine learning in medical imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15:512–20 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.028 pmid:29398494

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Goodkin DE,
    3. Vanderburg-Medendorp S,
    4. Ross J

    . The effect of repositioning error on serial magnetic resonance imaging scans. Arch Neurol 1993;50:569–70 doi:10.1001/archneur.1993.00540060011007 pmid:8347222

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Gawne-Cain ML,
    3. Webb S,
    4. Tofts P, et al

    . Lesion volume measurement in multiple sclerosis: how important is accurate repositioning? J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:705–13 pmid:8890007

    PubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Molyneux PD,
    3. Miller DH,
    4. Filippi M, et al

    . Visual analysis of serial T2-weighted MRI in multiple sclerosis: intra- and interobserver reproducibility. Neuroradiology 1999;41:882–88 pmid:10639661

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Duan Y,
    3. Hildenbrand PG,
    4. Sampat MP, et al

    . Segmentation of subtraction images for the measurement of lesion change in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:340–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0795

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.
    2. Kurtzke JF

    . Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–52 doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 pmid:6685237

    Abstract/FREE Full Text