Pseudo-Leptomeningeal Contrast Enhancement at 3T in Pediatric Patients Sedated by Propofol

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Smirniotopoulos JG,
   3. Murphy FM,
   4. Rushing EJ, et al

   . Patterns of contrast enhancement in the brain and meninges. Radiographics 2007;27:525–51 doi:10.1148/rg.272065155 pmid:17374867

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. McKinstry CS,
   3. Worthington BS,
   4. Niendorf HP, et al

   . Demonstration of meningeal contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol Suppl 1986;369:564–67 pmid:2980559

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Kaisti KK,
   3. Långsjö JW,
   4. Aalto S, et al

   . Effects of sevoflurane, propofol, and adjunct nitrous oxide on regional cerebral blood flow, oxygen consumption, and blood volume in humans. Anesthesiology 2003;99:603–13 doi:10.1097/00000542-200309000-00015 pmid:12960544

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Harreld JH,
   3. Helton KJ,
   4. Kaddoum RN, et al

   . The effects of propofol on cerebral perfusion MRI in children. Neuroradiology 2013;55:1049–56 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1187-0 pmid:23673874

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Klein KU,
   3. Fukui K,
   4. Schramm P, et al

   . Human cerebral microcirculation and oxygen saturation during propofol-induced reduction of bispectral index. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:735–41 doi:10.1093/bja/aer227 pmid:21862494

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Gragasin FS,
   3. Davidge ST

   . The effects of propofol on vascular function in mesenteric arteries of the aging rat. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009;297:H466–74 doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01317.2008 pmid:19465540

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Machata AM,
   3. Willschke H,
   4. Kabon B, et al

   . Propofol-based sedation regimen for infants and children undergoing ambulatory magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:239–43 doi:10.1093/bja/aen153 pmid:18534971

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Martin LD,
   3. Pasternak LR,
   4. Pudimat MA

   . Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in pediatric patients outside the operating room. Anesth Analg 1992;74:609–12 pmid:1554131

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Szabó EZ,
   3. Luginbuehl I,
   4. Bissonnette B

   . Impact of anesthetic agents on cerebrovascular physiology in children. Pediatr Anesth 2009;19:108–18 doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02826.x pmid:19040505

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Remsen LG,
    3. Pagel MA,
    4. McCormick CI, et al

    . The influence of anesthetic choice, PaCO2, and other factors on osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in rats with brain tumor xenografts. Anesth Analg 1999;88:559–67 pmid:10072006

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Kwong KK,
    3. Wanke I,
    4. Donahue KM, et al

    . EPI imaging of global increase of brain MR signal with breath-hold preceded by breathing O2. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:448–52 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330322 pmid:7760716

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. McKinney AM

    . Atlas of Normal Imaging Variations of the Brain, Skull, and Craniocervical Vasculature. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2017:413–26; chap 18
13. 13.↵
    2. Komada T,
    3. Naganawa S,
    4. Ogawa H, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of metastatic brain tumor at 3 Tesla: utility of T(1)-weighted SPACE compared with 2D spin echo and 3D gradient echo sequence. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008;7:13–21 doi:10.2463/mrms.7.13 pmid:18460844

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Chappell PM,
    3. Pelc NJ,
    4. Foo TK, et al

    . Comparison of lesion enhancement on spin-echo and gradient-echo images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:37–44 pmid:8141064

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Mugler JP 3rd.,
    3. Brookeman JR

    . Theoretical analysis of gadopentetate dimeglumine enhancement in T1-weighted imaging of the brain: comparison of two-dimensional spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:761–69 doi:10.1002/jmri.1880030512 pmid:8400563

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Saunders DE,
    3. Thompson C,
    4. Gunny R, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for paediatric neuroradiology. Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:789–97 doi:10.1007/s00247-007-0462-9 pmid:17487479

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Appropriateness-Criteria. Accessed May 1, 2018.
18. 18.↵
    2. Soares BP,
    3. Lequin MH,
    4. Huisman TA

    . Safety of contrast material use in children. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2017;25:779–85 doi:10.1016/j.mric.2017.06.009 pmid:28964467

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Roberts DR,
    3. Chatterjee AR,
    4. Yazdani M, et al

    . Pediatric patients demonstrate progressive T1-weighted hyperintensity in the dentate nucleus following multiple doses of gadolinium-based contrast agent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2340–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4891 pmid:27469211

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Ryu YJ,
    3. Choi YH,
    4. Cheon JE, et al

    . Pediatric brain: gadolinium deposition in dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted images is dependent on the type of contrast agent. Invest Radiol 2018;53:246–55 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000436 pmid:29300210

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Frigon C,
    3. Shaw DW,
    4. Heckbert SR, et al

    . Supplemental oxygen causes increased signal intensity in subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid on brain FLAIR MR images obtained in children during general anesthesia. Radiology 2004;233:51–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.2331031375 pmid:15454616

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Filippi CG,
    3. Ulug AM,
    4. Lin D, et al

    . Hyperintense signal abnormality in subarachnoid spaces and basal cisterns on MR images of children anesthetized with propofol: new fluid-attenuated inversion recovery finding. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:394–99 pmid:11156789

    Abstract/FREE Full Text