Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIGURE.
Flowchart of the study population.
Tables
- Table 1:
Patient characteristics according to the IDH1-mutation status and 1p/19q-codeletion statusa
IDH1 Wild-Type (n = 18) IDH1 Mutant without 1p/19q Codeletion (n = 45) IDH1 Mutant with 1p/19q Codeletion (n = 30) Age (yr) (mean) 49.57 ± 3.45 40.80 ± 1.25 45.10 ± 1.91 Sex Male 8 (44.4) 27 (60) 13 (43.3) Female 10 (55.6) 18 (40) 17 (56.7) Karnofsky performance status (mean) 88.89 ± 1.37 90.67 ± 1.12 91.00 ± 1.39 Extent of resection Gross total resection 7 (38.9) 29 (64.5) 15 (50) Subtotal/partial resection 7 (38.9) 14 (31.1) 14 (46.7) Biopsy 4 (22.2) 2 (4.4) 1 (3.3) ↵a Unless otherwise indicated, data are presented as number of patients (%).
- Table 2:
Prediction model for an IDH1-mutation status in WHO grade II gliomas using the LASSO procedure
Imaging Parameters Adjusted OR for IDH1 Wild-Type ADC skewness 1.04 ADC energy 1.15 FA 10th percentile 23.19 FA 25th percentile 998.91 FA correlation 0.004 - Table 3:
Prediction model for 1p/19q-codeletion status in IDH1-mutant WHO grade II gliomas using the LASSO procedure
Imaging Parameters Adjusted OR for 1p/19q Codeletion ADC skewness 1.71 ADC cluster shade 1.00 FA energy 0.005 FA correlation 0.12
