MR Perfusion to Determine the Status of Collaterals in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Look Beyond Time Maps

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Bang OY,
   3. Saver JL,
   4. Kim SJ, et al

   . Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011;42:693–99 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595256 pmid:21233472

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
2. 2.↵
   2. Liebeskind DS,
   3. Tomsick TA,
   4. Foster LD, et al

   ; IMS III Investigators. Collaterals at angiography and outcomes in the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III trial. Stroke 2014;45:759–64 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004072 pmid:24473178

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
3. 3.↵
   2. Jung S,
   3. Gilgen M,
   4. Slotboom J, et al

   . Factors that determine penumbral tissue loss in acute ischaemic stroke. Brain 2013;136:3554–60 doi:10.1093/brain/awt246 pmid:24065722

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
4. 4.↵
   2. Galimanis A,
   3. Jung S,
   4. Mono ML, et al

   . Endovascular therapy of 623 patients with anterior circulation stroke. Stroke 2012;43:1052–57 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.639112 pmid:22363057

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
5. 5.↵
   2. Bang OY,
   3. Saver JL,
   4. Buck BH, et al

   ; UCLA Collateral Investigators. Impact of collateral flow on tissue fate in acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:625–29 pmid:18077482

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
6. 6.↵
   2. Menon BK,
   3. O'Brien B,
   4. Bivard A, et al

   . Assessment of leptomeningeal collaterals using dynamic CT angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metabol 2013;33:365–71 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.171 pmid:23149554

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
7. 7.↵
   2. Lima FO,
   3. Furie KL,
   4. Silva GS, et al

   . The pattern of leptomeningeal collaterals on CT angiography is a strong predictor of long-term functional outcome in stroke patients with large vessel intracranial occlusion. Stroke 2010;41:2316–22 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592303 pmid:20829514

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
8. 8.↵
   2. Hernández-Pérez M,
   3. Puig J,
   4. Blasco G, et al

   . Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography provides collateral circulation and hemodynamic information in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2016;47:531–34 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010748 pmid:26658445

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
9. 9.↵
   2. Ernst M,
   3. Forkert ND,
   4. Brehmer L, et al

   . Prediction of infarction and reperfusion in stroke by flow- and volume-weighted collateral signal in MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:275–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4145 pmid:25500313

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
10. 10.↵
    2. Shuaib A,
    3. Butcher K,
    4. Mohammad AA, et al

    . Collateral blood vessels in acute ischaemic stroke: a potential therapeutic target. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:909–21 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70195-8 pmid:21939900

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
11. 11.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Rowley HA,
    4. Lev MH

    . Acute stroke triage to intravenous thrombolysis and other therapies with advanced CT or MR imaging: pro CT. Radiology 2009;251:619–26 doi:10.1148/radiol.2513081073 pmid:19474369

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
12. 12.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Christensen S,
    4. Tress BM, et al

    ; EPITHET Investigators. Failure of collateral blood flow is associated with infarct growth in ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metabol 2013;33:1168–72 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2013.77 pmid:23652626

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
13. 13.↵
    2. Marks MP,
    3. Lansberg MG,
    4. Mlynash M, et al

    ; Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 2 Investigators. Effect of collateral blood flow on patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2014;45:1035–39 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004085 pmid:24569816

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
14. 14.↵
    2. Lee MJ,
    3. Son JP,
    4. Kim SJ, et al

    . Predicting collateral status with magnetic resonance perfusion parameters: probabilistic approach with a Tmax-derived prediction model. Stroke 2015;46:2800–07 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009828 pmid:26306754

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
15. 15.↵
    2. Keedy AW,
    3. Fischette WS,
    4. Soares BP, et al

    . Contrast delay on perfusion CT as a predictor of new, incident infarct: a retrospective cohort study. Stroke 2012;43:1295–301 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.639229 pmid:22363062

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
16. 16.↵
    2. Vagal A,
    3. Menon BK,
    4. Foster LD, et al

    . Association between CT angiogram collaterals and CT perfusion in the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial. Stroke 2016;47:535–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011461 pmid:26658448

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
17. 17.↵
    2. Kim SJ,
    3. Son JP,
    4. Ryoo S, et al

    . A novel magnetic resonance imaging approach to collateral flow imaging in ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 2014;76:356–69 doi:10.1002/ana.24211 pmid:24985162

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
18. 18.↵
    2. Boutelier T,
    3. Kudo K,
    4. Pautot F, et al

    . Bayesian hemodynamic parameter estimation by bolus tracking perfusion weighted imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012;31:1381–95 doi:10.1109/TMI.2012.2189890 pmid:22410325

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
19. 19.↵
    2. Nicoli F,
    3. Scalzo F,
    4. Saver JL, et al

    ; UCLA Stroke Investigators. The combination of baseline magnetic resonance perfusion-weighted imaging-derived tissue volume with severely prolonged arterial-tissue delay and diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume is predictive of MCA-M1 recanalization in patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy. Neuroradiology 2014;56:117–27 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1310-2 pmid:24337610

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
20. 20.↵
    2. Dardzinski BJ,
    3. Sotak CH,
    4. Fisher M, et al

    . Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of experimental focal cerebral ischemia using diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 1993;30:318–25 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910300307 pmid:8412602

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
21. 21.↵
    2. Higashida RT,
    3. Furlan AJ,
    4. Roberts H, et al

    ; Technology Assessment Committee of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003;34:e109–37 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09 pmid:12869717

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
22. 22.↵
    2. Tomsick T,
    3. Broderick J,
    4. Carrozella J, et al

    ; Interventional Management of Stroke II Investigators. Revascularization results in the Interventional Management of Stroke II trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:582–87 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0843 pmid:18337393

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
23. 23.↵
    2. Olivot JM,
    3. Mlynash M,
    4. Inoue M, et al

    ; DEFUSE 2 Investigators. Hypoperfusion intensity ratio predicts infarct progression and functional outcome in the DEFUSE 2 cohort. Stroke 2014;45:1018–23 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003857 pmid:24595591

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
24. 24.↵
    2. Liebeskind DS

    . Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003;34:2279–84 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000086465.41263.06 pmid:12881609

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
25. 25.↵
    2. Mouridsen K,
    3. Friston K,
    4. Hjort N, et al

    . Bayesian estimation of cerebral perfusion using a physiological model of microvasculature. Neuroimage 2006;33:570–79 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.015 pmid:16971140

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
26. 26.↵
    2. Sasaki M,
    3. Kudo K,
    4. Boutelier T, et al

    . Assessment of the accuracy of a Bayesian estimation algorithm for perfusion CT by using a digital phantom. Neuroradiology 2013;55:1197–203 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1237-7 pmid:23852431

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
27. 27.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Albers GW,
    4. Broderick JP, et al

    . Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap II. Stroke 2013;44:2628–39 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002015 pmid:23860298

    FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar