Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleHead & Neck

The Unwound Cochlea: A Specific Imaging Marker of Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome

A. Hsu, N. Desai and M.J. Paldino
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2018, 39 (12) 2345-2349; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5856
A. Hsu
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Hsu
N. Desai
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Desai
M.J. Paldino
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.J. Paldino
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Branchio-oto-renal syndrome is an important syndromic cause of hearing loss. Our aim was to determine the test characteristics of the unwound cochlea on temporal bone CT for the diagnosis of branchio-oto-renal syndrome in a cohort of children with hearing loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were identified retrospectively with a clinical diagnosis of branchio-oto-renal syndrome and CT imaging of the temporal bones. Age-matched controls were also identified with sensorineural hearing loss not related to a diagnosis of branchio-oto-renal syndrome and CT imaging of the temporal bones. All examinations were reviewed by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to the diagnosis of branchio-oto-renal syndrome versus controls for the absence/presence of an unwound cochlea defined as anteromedial rotation and displacement of the middle and apical turns away from the basal turn.

RESULTS: The final study group comprised 9 patients with branchio-oto-renal syndrome (age range, 1–14 years; mean age, 8.0 ± 4.3 years) and 50 control patients (age range, 1–16 years; mean age, 7.9 ± 4.1 years). The cochlea was subjectively abnormal in all 9 patients. In 8 patients (89%), imaging demonstrated a typical unwound cochlear morphology. By contrast, none of the control subjects demonstrated an unwound cochlea on either side. Statistically, the unwound cochlea was significantly more frequent in the branchio-oto-renal group compared with controls (P < .001). The unwound cochlea was 89% sensitive and 100% specific for the diagnosis of branchio-oto-renal syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS: The unwound cochlea is a specific imaging marker of branchio-oto-renal syndrome. These findings further support the diagnostic accuracy and therefore the utility of temporal bone imaging in the diagnosis of this disorder.

ABBREVIATION:

BOR
branchio-oto-renal syndrome

Branchio-oto-renal syndrome (BOR) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder that manifests as hearing loss, branchial fistulas, malformations of the ear, and renal anomalies.1 It is one of the most common syndromic causes of hearing loss, with an estimated prevalence of 1:40,000.2⇓–4 In the absence of family history, the diagnosis of BOR is made on the basis of the identification of 3 major criteria (second branchial arch anomalies, hearing loss, preauricular pits, auricular malformation, and renal anomalies) or 2 major and 2 minor criteria (preauricular tags or anomalies of the external auditory canal, middle ear, or inner ear). Expression of these findings is variable, however, resulting in the potential for a delayed or missed diagnosis, which can adversely impact the language and social development of these children.2,5⇓–7 In addition, though frequently silent at presentation, renal anomalies are a substantial cause of morbidity during the life span of these individuals.8 An early and definitive diagnosis prompting a search for associated anomalies would therefore be of great value in the management of these patients. In this regard, genetic testing for mutations in the EYA1, SIX1, and SIX5 genes represents a promising adjunct.2,7,9 Currently, however, only approximately 50% of affected individuals have detectable gene mutations.2,7,10 Furthermore, an index of suspicion is required to justify the cost of such analyses, especially in light of the rarity of this disorder among all patients presenting with abnormal hearing. Given that most patients with BOR manifest hearing loss, temporal bone imaging represents an appealing opportunity to make the diagnosis.7,11,12 Unfortunately previous reports are heterogeneous, and the specificity of imaging findings for this syndrome is only rarely reported.10 As a result, temporal bone anomalies currently constitute minor criteria for the diagnosis.8 Robson3 reported that a distinctive “unwound appearance” of the cochlea, characterized by an anterior offset of the hypoplastic middle and apical turns away from a tapered basal turn, is characteristic of BOR. The diagnostic accuracy of this particular cochlear finding, however, is yet to be assessed. The goal of this study, therefore, was to determine the test characteristics of the unwound cochlea on temporal bone CT for the diagnosis of branchio-oto-renal syndrome in a cohort of children with hearing loss.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant study was approved by the local institutional review board. Informed consent was waived. This article conforms to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy.13 Consecutive patients were identified retrospectively from a search of existing patient data at a single institution. Inclusion in this study was based on the following criteria: 1) a diagnosis of BOR based on the reference standard: clinical evaluation by a member of the department of otorhinolaryngology according to standard criteria8; and 2) available CT imaging of the temporal bones. Control patients were identified with the following inclusion criteria: 1) sensorineural hearing loss (documented by a formal audiologic evaluation) deemed not related to a diagnosis of BOR after evaluation by an otorhinolaryngologist, and 2) available CT imaging of the temporal bones.

Imaging

Representative CT imaging protocol was the following: volumetric acquisition from above the ear to below the base of skull; 120 kV(peak); 220 mA (0–11 years of age) or 230 mA (12–18 years of age). Reconstructions were the following: 1-mm-slice axial and coronal reformats in a standard FOV (22 cm) and 0.5-mm-slice bilateral temporal bone axial and coronal reformats in FOV of 9.6 cm.

Image Review and Analysis

All imaging examinations were reviewed by 2 neuroradiologists, each with approximately 10 years of subspecialty experience in pediatric neuroimaging. Review was performed blinded to the diagnosis of BOR versus controls. The primary measure in this study was a subjective assessment of the absence/presence of an unwound cochlea. In particular, the unwound cochlear dysmorphology consists primarily of anteromedial angulation and displacement of the middle and apical turns of the cochlea away from the basal turn (Fig 1). In addition, the basal-middle turn interval was measured as the maximal distance between the basal (any part) and middle (any part) turns of the cochlea on axial CT images of the temporal bone. This measurement was performed in an attempt to quantify what we believe to be the fundamental dysmorphology of the unwound cochlea and, thereby, corroborate the subjective assessment. Finally, the presence of any other cochlear and inner ear abnormalities was assessed and tabulated.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Unwound cochlea. A, Axial CT image through the right cochlea of a patient with BOR demonstrates characteristic unwound dysmorphology with anteromedial rotation and displacement of the middle turn away from a tapered basal turn (arrow). B, Axial CT image through a normal right cochlea demonstrates normal apposition of the middle and basal turns (arrowhead).

The frequency of the unwound cochlea in patients with BOR was compared with that in control subjects using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of an unwound cochlea for the diagnosis of BOR were calculated in a standard fashion. Agreement between readers was measured using the Cohen κ. Inconsistencies were settled by consensus re-review.

Results

Patients

The final study group comprised 9 patients with a diagnosis of branchio-oto-renal syndrome (age range, 1–14 years; mean age, 8.0 ± 4.3 years; 6 boys, 3 girls). All patients underwent CT imaging from July 2013 through May 2017. All patients with BOR had hearing loss at a formal audiologic evaluation. The control group consisted of 50 patients (age range, 1–16 years; mean age, 7.9 ± 4.1 years; 26 boys, 24 girls) imaged for sensorineural hearing loss between December 2015 and August 2017. Although most of the control patients manifested isolated hearing loss, other relevant diagnoses in this cohort included the following: Usher syndrome (n = 2), meningitis (n = 2), Waardenburg syndrome (n = 1), congenital cytomegalovirus infection (n = 1), chronic otitis media (n = 1), and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (n = 1).

Imaging Findings

Imaging findings in patients with branchio-oto-renal syndrome are summarized in Table 1. The cochlea was subjectively abnormal bilaterally in all 9 patients. In 8 patients (89%), imaging demonstrated typical unwound cochlear dysmorphology with anteromedial rotation and displacement of the middle and apical turns away from the basal turn bilaterally (Fig 2). In the remaining patient with BOR (11%), CT demonstrated complete absence of the middle and apical turns bilaterally (Fig 3). Notably, these findings were symmetric side-to-side in all patients with BOR. By contrast, none of the control subjects demonstrated an unwound cochlea on either side. Cochlear and other inner ear abnormalities identified in control subjects are presented in Table 2. Statistically, the unwound cochlea was significantly more frequent in the BOR group compared with the control group for both reader 1 (8/9 BOR versus 0/50 controls; P < .001) and reader 2 (7/9 BOR versus 0/50 controls; P < .001). Test characteristics of the unwound cochlea for the diagnosis of branchio-oto-renal syndrome are presented in Table 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Summary of inner ear findings in patients with branchio-oto-renal syndrome

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Cochlear morphology in patients with branchio-oto-renal syndrome. Axial CT images through the right temporal bone in 4 representative patients (A–D) with unwound cochleae.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Branchio-oto-renal syndrome without the unwound cochlea. Axial CT image through the right temporal bone demonstrates a truncated basal turn with complete absence of the middle and apical turns of the cochlea.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Abnormalities of the cochlea and inner ear in control patients with hearing loss not associated with branchio-oto-renal syndrome

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Test characteristics of the unwound cochlear morphology for a clinical diagnosis of branchio-oto-renal syndromea

With regard to identification of an unwound cochlea, there was almost perfect agreement between the 2 readers (κ = 0.93), with discrepant interpretations in only 1 of 59 (1.6%) cases. The single discrepant interpretation occurred in a patient with BOR with an unwound cochlea by consensus re-review (Fig 4).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Interreader disagreement. Axial CT images through the right temporal bone in the single patient with BOR with interreader discrepancy. This cochlea was considered unwound at consensus re-review.

The mean basal-middle turn interval was 2.5 ± 0.13 mm in the BOR group compared with 1.4 ± 0.17 mm in the control group. For both readers, measurements of the basal-middle turn interval were significantly larger in the BOR group compared with controls for both the right (P < .001) and left (P < .001) cochleae.

Discussion

We report the following main findings in a cohort of children with hearing loss: The unwound cochlea is a frequent finding in patients with branchio-oto-renal syndrome; this finding was not observed in patients with hearing loss not related to BOR. There was near-perfect agreement between readers regarding the presence/absence of this subjective finding. Together, these results suggest that the unwound cochlea is a specific and reliable imaging marker of branchio-oto-renal syndrome.

Although the association between hearing loss and branchial anomalies has been recognized for more than a century, the pathogenesis of BOR remains incompletely understood. Clinical features point to a developmental defect occurring between 4 and 10 weeks of embryogenesis.14 During this interval, the inner ear develops from a pair of surface placodes that appear in human development during week 4. These placodes fold inward to form fluid-filled sacs called vesicles; each vesicle sinks into the regional mesenchyme to form the otic capsule. The epithelium of the otic capsule then undergoes a series of morphologic changes to form the primitive membranous labyrinth, which ultimately differentiates into the cochlea and vestibular apparatus by week 8.10 During this same time, the ossicles develop from the neural crest–derived cells of the first and second branchial arches, while the external auditory canal and middle ear cavity derive from the first branchial cleft and pouch, respectively; normally, elements of the branchial apparatus disappear by approximately week 8 of development. During this time, EYA1, the most commonly identified gene mutation underlying BOR, functions to promote cell survival within the developing ear.15 Interaction of EYA1 with the DNA-binding proteins SIX1 and SIX5 results in the recruitment of DNA repair (rather than proapoptotic) machinery in response to genetic damage during organogenesis.16 EYA1 has been shown to be prominently expressed by the cochlear and vestibular epithelium as well as by the mesenchyme of the otic capsule and middle ear during early development.14 These findings support a direct role for EYA1 in the development of all components of the middle and inner ear, consistent with the diversity of ear findings reported in patients with BOR.14 Most interesting, EYA1 is also prominently expressed during development by the metanephric cells surrounding the ureteric branches of the kidney, consistent with a role in kidney morphogenesis.14

Branchio-oto-renal syndrome continues to present a diagnostic challenge, mainly due to its clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Given that it has become a mainstay in the evaluation of patients with hearing loss, temporal bone imaging represents an intuitively appealing opportunity to make the diagnosis. Unfortunately, studies investigating temporal bone findings at CT have yielded inconsistent results. Cochlear anomalies are the most frequently reported, typically hypoplasia of the apical turn, with a prevalence that has ranged widely across cohorts from 30%17 to 100%.10,18 Further complicating potential application to clinical practice, the specificity of temporal bone findings has only rarely been reported.10 In response to these deficiencies, Propst et al10 compared the appearance of the temporal bones in a large cohort of patients with BOR with that of subjects with normal hearing. With regard to the cochlea, they observed isolated hypoplasia of the apical turn with a deficient modiolus in all patients with BOR, but none of the healthy controls. Consistent with their findings, we observed apical turn hypoplasia and deficiency of the modiolus in our cohort, though only in 3 of 9 patients. Ultimately, direct comparison with Propst et al on our primary end point—the diagnostic accuracy of the unwound cochlea for BOR—is not possible because their report predates the earliest mention of the unwound cochlea that we could find in the imaging literature.

Other frequently reported inner ear anomalies in BOR include an abnormal course of the facial nerve, a dysmorphic internal auditory canal, dysplasia of the lateral and/or posterior semicircular canals, vestibular aqueduct enlargement, and cochlear aperture stenosis.10,17⇓–19 These imaging findings, however, have been reported in other syndromes as well as in isolated forms of hearing loss.3,17 Most interesting, Propst et al10 observed a characteristic medialized course of the facial nerve (medial to the cochlea) in most patients with BOR but in none of the healthy controls. Consistent with their results, we observed a medialized facial nerve in 7 of 9 patients with BOR but in none of the patients with other causes of hearing loss. The combination of this finding with the unwound cochlea would have resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% in our cohort. This observation raises the possibility that the optimal diagnosis of BOR on temporal bone CT would be based on a combination of findings, rather than a single imaging marker. Finally, our results are consistent with the original assertion by Robson3 that unwound cochlear morphology is characteristic of BOR. Our study adds to the literature by measuring the diagnostic accuracy of this finding in a cohort of children with hearing loss.

This study has several limitations. First, this was a small cohort of patients with BOR. However, the statistical power for the specificity of this finding was driven by the number of control patients, and we observed a relatively narrow confidence interval for specificity (91%–100%). Still, a study with a larger cohort would be of value, especially with regard to defining the optimal combination of findings to identify these patients within the overall population of children with hearing loss. Second, genetic testing was not performed. It therefore cannot be assumed that this cohort captures the spectrum of mutations associated with BOR. This feature is particularly notable, given the observation that genotype may be related to the prevalence of inner ear anomalies.16 Third, our results reflect cochlear findings on temporal bone CT, which is the standard test performed for hearing loss at our institution. However, MR imaging has become increasingly popular in this clinical setting, especially in light of the risks of ionizing radiation in children. Application of this finding to MR imaging will require further study. Finally, this study was not designed to evaluate the unwound cochlea as a potential causative factor in hearing loss. In fact, this finding was identified in patients without a detectable sensorineural component of hearing loss at formal audiologic evaluation. The unwound cochlear morphology may therefore reflect anomalous development of the inner ear in these patients, which is independent, at least in some cases, of the features that determine sensorineural hearing loss.

Conclusions

We report, in a cohort of children with hearing loss, that the unwound cochlea, characterized by anteromedial rotation and displacement of the middle and apical turns away from the basal turn, was a specific and reliable imaging marker of branchio-oto-renal syndrome. These findings further support the diagnostic accuracy and therefore the utility of temporal bone imaging in the diagnosis of this challenging disorder.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ginat DT,
    2. Ferro L,
    3. Gluth MB
    . Anatomic and quantitative temporal bone CT for preoperative assessment of branchio-oto-renal syndrome. Clin Neuroradiol 2016;26:481–83 doi:10.1007/s00062-016-0502-7 pmid:26869444
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lindau TA,
    2. Cardoso AC,
    3. Rossi NF, et al
    . Anatomical changes and audiological profile in branchio-oto-renal syndrome: a literature review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;18:68–76 doi:10.1055/s-0033-1358659 pmid:25992067
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Robson CD
    . Congenital hearing impairment. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:309–24 doi:10.1007/s00247-005-0042-9 pmid:16465539
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Huang BY,
    2. Zdanski C,
    3. Castillo M
    . Pediatric sensorineural hearing loss, Part 2: syndromic and acquired causes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:399–406 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2499 pmid:21596810
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Huang BY,
    2. Zdanski C,
    3. Castillo M
    . Pediatric sensorineural hearing loss, Part 1: practical aspects for neuroradiologists. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:211–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2498 pmid:21566008
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bellini C,
    2. Piaggio G,
    3. Massocco D, et al
    . Branchio-oto-renal syndrome: a report on nine family groups. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:505–09 doi:10.1053/ajkd.2001.22074 pmid:11228174
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Morisada N,
    2. Nozu K,
    3. Iijima K
    . Branchio-oto-renal syndrome: comprehensive review based on nationwide surveillance in Japan. Pediatr Int 2014;56:309–14 doi:10.1111/ped.12357 pmid:24730701
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Chang EH,
    2. Menezes M,
    3. Meyer NC, et al
    . Branchio-oto-renal syndrome: the mutation spectrum in EYA1 and its phenotypic consequences. Hum Mutat 2004;23:582–89 doi:10.1002/humu.20048 pmid:15146463
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Song MH,
    2. Kwon TJ,
    3. Kim HR, et al
    . Mutational analysis of EYA1, SIX1 and SIX5 genes and strategies for management of hearing loss in patients with BOR/BO syndrome. PLoS One 2013;8:e67236 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067236 pmid:23840632
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Propst EJ,
    2. Blaser S,
    3. Gordon KA, et al
    . Temporal bone findings on computed tomography imaging in branchio-oto-renal syndrome. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1855–62 doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000177032.98386.20 pmid:16222209
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chen A,
    2. Francis M,
    3. Ni L, et al
    . Phenotypic manifestations of branchio-oto-renal syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1995;58:365–70 doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320580413 pmid:8533848
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Fraser FC,
    2. Sproule JR,
    3. Halal F
    . Frequency of the branchio-oto-renal (BOR) syndrome in children with profound hearing loss. Am J Med Genet 1980;7:341–49 doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320070316 pmid:7468659
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Cohen JF,
    2. Korevaar DA,
    3. Altman DG, et al
    . STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012799 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799 pmid:28137831
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Abdelhak S,
    2. Kalatzis V,
    3. Heilig R, et al
    . A human homologue of the Drosophila eyes absent gene underlies branchio-oto-renal (BOR) syndrome and identifies a novel gene family. Nat Genet 1997;15:157–64 doi:10.1038/ng0297-157 pmid:9020840
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Cook PJ,
    2. Ju BG,
    3. Telese F, et al
    . Tyrosine dephosphorylation of H2AX modulates apoptosis and survival decisions. Nature 2009;458:591–96 doi:10.1038/nature07849 pmid:19234442
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sanggaard KM,
    2. Rendtorff ND,
    3. Kjaer KW, et al
    . Branchio-oto-renal syndrome: detection of EYA1 and SIX1 mutations in five out of six Danish families by combining linkage, MLPA and sequencing analyses. Eur J Hum Genet 2007;15:1121–31 doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201900 pmid:17637804
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kemperman MH,
    2. Koch SM,
    3. Joosten FB, et al
    . Inner ear anomalies are frequent but nonobligatory features of the branchio-oto-renal syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1033–38 doi:10.1001/archotol.128.9.1033 pmid:12220207
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ceruti S,
    2. Stinckens C,
    3. Cremers CW, et al
    . Temporal bone anomalies in the branchio-oto-renal syndrome: detailed computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:200–07 doi:10.1097/00129492-200203000-00016 pmid:11875350
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ostri B,
    2. Johnsen T,
    3. Bergmann I
    . Temporal bone findings in a family with branchio-oto-renal syndrome (BOR). Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1991;16:163–67 pmid:2070534
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received July 2, 2018.
  • Accepted after revision September 4, 2018.
  • © 2018 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 39 (12)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 39, Issue 12
1 Dec 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Unwound Cochlea: A Specific Imaging Marker of Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. Hsu, N. Desai, M.J. Paldino
The Unwound Cochlea: A Specific Imaging Marker of Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2018, 39 (12) 2345-2349; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5856

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
The Unwound Cochlea: A Specific Imaging Marker of Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome
A. Hsu, N. Desai, M.J. Paldino
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2018, 39 (12) 2345-2349; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5856
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Subtle Malformation of the Cochlear Apex and Genetic Abnormalities: Beyond the "Thorny" Cochlea
  • The Cochlea in Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome: An Objective Method for the Diagnosis of Offset Cochlear Turns
  • Re-Examining the Cochlea in Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome: Genotype-Phenotype Correlation
  • Characteristic Cochlear Hypoplasia in Patients with Walker-Warburg Syndrome: A Radiologic Study of the Inner Ear in {alpha}-Dystroglycan-Related Muscular Disorders
  • Crossref (20)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Temporal bone and intracranial abnormalities in syndromic causes of hearing loss: an updated guide
    Felice D’Arco, Adam Youssef, Evangelia Ioannidou, Sotirios Bisdas, Lorenzo Pinelli, Pablo Caro-Dominguez, Robert Nash, Ata Siddiqui, Giacomo Talenti
    European Journal of Radiology 2020 123
  • Radiological diagnosis of the inner ear malformations in children with sensorineural hearing loss
    Bernadine Quirk, Adam Youssef, Mario Ganau, Felice D'Arco
    BJR|Open 2019 1 1
  • The link between inner ear malformations and the rest of the body: what we know so far about genetic, imaging and histology
    Felice D’Arco, Eser Sanverdi, William T. O’Brien, Ajay Taranath, Giacomo Talenti, Susan I. Blaser
    Neuroradiology 2020 62 5
  • Characteristic Cochlear Hypoplasia in Patients with Walker-Warburg Syndrome: A Radiologic Study of the Inner Ear in α-Dystroglycan–Related Muscular Disorders
    G. Talenti, C. Robson, M.S. Severino, C.A. Alves, D. Chitayat, H. Dahmoush, L. Smith, F. Muntoni, S.I. Blaser, F. D’Arco
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2021 42 1
  • Phenotype–genotype correlation in patients with typical and atypical branchio-oto-renal syndrome
    Masatsugu Masuda, Ayako Kanno, Kiyomitsu Nara, Hideki Mutai, Naoya Morisada, Kazumoto Iijima, Noriko Morimoto, Atsuko Nakano, Tomoko Sugiuchi, Yasuhide Okamoto, Sawako Masuda, Sayaka Katsunuma, Kaoru Ogawa, Tatsuo Matsunaga
    Scientific Reports 2022 12 1
  • Re-Examining the Cochlea in Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome: Genotype-Phenotype Correlation
    J. Pao, F. D’Arco, E. Clement, S. Picariello, G. Moonis, C.D. Robson, A.F. Juliano
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2022 43 2
  • Embryologie, Fehlbildungen und seltene Erkrankungen der Cochlea
    Athanasia Warnecke, Anja Giesemann
    Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 2021 100 S 01
  • Syndromic Hearing Loss in Children
    Martin Lewis, Caroline D. Robson, Felice D‘Arco
    Neuroimaging Clinics of North America 2023 33 4
  • Anatomical and audiological considerations in branchiootorenal syndrome: A systematic review
    Kirsty Biggs, Gemma Crundwell, Christopher Metcalfe, Jameel Muzaffar, Peter Monksfield, Manohar Bance
    Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology 2022 7 2
  • Imaging Guide to Inner Ear Malformations: An Illustrative Review
    Fang Frank Yu, Fabricio Stewan Feltrin, Girish Bathla, Karuna Raj, Amit Agarwal, Wan-Ching Lee, Timothy Booth, Achint Singh
    Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology 2023 52 6

More in this TOC Section

  • Revisiting CT Signs of Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis: A Single, Blinded Study
  • COVID-19–Associated Bifacial Weakness with Paresthesia Subtype of Guillain-Barré Syndrome
  • MRI Findings of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Induced Hypophysitis: Possible Association with Fibrosis
Show more Head & Neck

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire