Does the Presence or Absence of DESH Predict Outcomes in Adult Hydrocephalus?

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Adams RD,
   3. Fisher CM,
   4. Hakim S, et al

   . Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure: a treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 1965;273:117–26 doi:10.1056/NEJM196507152730301 pmid:14303656

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
2. 2.↵
   2. Hashimoto M,
   3. Ishikawa M,
   4. Mori E, et al

   ; Study of INPH on neurologic improvement (SINPHONI). Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2010;7:18 doi:10.1186/1743-8454-7-18 pmid:21040519

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
3. 3.↵
   2. Marmarou A,
   3. Bergsneider M,
   4. Klinge P, et al

   . The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57(3 Suppl):S17–28; discussion ii-v pmid:16160426

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
4. 4.↵
   2. Relkin N,
   3. Marmarou A,
   4. Klinge P, et al

   . Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57(3 Suppl):S4–16; discussion ii-v pmid:16160425

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
5. 5.↵
   2. Keong NC,
   3. Pena A,
   4. Price SJ, et al

   . Imaging of normal pressure hydrocephalus: theories, techniques, and challenges. Neurosurg Focus 2016;41:E11 doi:10.3171/2016.7.FOCUS16194 pmid:27581307

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
6. 6.↵
   2. Mori E,
   3. Ishikawa M,
   4. Kato T, et al

   ; Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012;52:775–809 doi:10.2176/nmc.52.775 pmid:23183074

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
7. 7.↵
   2. Mendes GAS,
   3. de Oliveira MF,
   4. Pinto FCG

   . The Timed Up and Go Test as a diagnostic criterion in normal pressure hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg 2017;105:456–61 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.137 pmid:28578116

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
8. 8.↵
   2. Gallagher RM,
   3. Marquez J,
   4. Osmotherly P

   . Cognitive and upper limb symptom changs from a tap test in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018;10:92–96.

   Google Scholar
9. 9.↵
   2. Kitagaki H,
   3. Mori E,
   4. Ishii K, et al

   . CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1277–84 pmid:9726467

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
10. 10.↵
    2. Matsumae M,
    3. Kikinis R,
    4. Mórocz IA, et al

    . Age-related changes in intracranial compartment volumes in normal adults assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 1996;84:982–91 doi:10.3171/jns.1996.84.6.0982 pmid:8847593

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
11. 11.↵
    2. Gammal TE,
    3. Allen MB,
    4. Brooks BS, et al

    . MR evaluation of hydrocephalus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:807–13 doi:10.2214/ajr.149.4.807 pmid:3498334

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
12. 12.↵
    2. Narita W,
    3. Nishio Y,
    4. Baba T, et al

    . High-convexity tightness predicts the shunt response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1831–37 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4838 pmid:27365329

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
13. 13.↵
    2. Mostafa T,
    3. Craven C,
    4. Patel NA, et al

    . DESH negative normal pressure hydrocephalus: can patients still benefit from shunt insertion? Fluids and Barriers of the CN 2015;12(Suppl 1):O52 doi:10.1186/2045-8118-12-S1-O52

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar