3D Black-Blood Luminal Angiography Derived from High-Resolution MR Vessel Wall Imaging in Detecting MCA Stenosis: A Preliminary Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Weimar C,
   3. Goertler M,
   4. Harms L, et al

   . Distribution and outcome of symptomatic stenoses and occlusions in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Arch Neurol 2006;63:1287–91 doi:10.1001/archneur.63.9.1287 pmid:16966507

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Nguyen-Huynh MN,
   3. Wintermark M,
   4. English J, et al

   . How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease? Stroke 2008;39:1184–88 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502906 pmid:18292376

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Willinek WA,
   3. Born M,
   4. Simon B, et al

   . Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging—initial experience. Radiology 2003;229:913–20 doi:10.1148/radiol.2293020782 pmid:14657322

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Liu Q,
   3. Huang J,
   4. Degnan AJ, et al

   . Comparison of high-resolution MRI with CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:1491–98 doi:10.1007/s10554-013-0237-3 pmid:23686460

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Lee NJ,
   3. Chung MS,
   4. Jung SC, et al

   . Comparison of high-resolution MR imaging and digital subtraction angiography for the characterization and diagnosis of intracranial artery disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2245–50 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4950 pmid:27659192

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Park JE,
   3. Jung SC,
   4. Lee SH, et al

   . Comparison of 3D magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography for intracranial artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 2017;27:4737–46 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4860-6 pmid:28500366

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Mandell DM,
   3. Mossa-Basha M,
   4. Qiao Y, et al

   ; Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Intracranial vessel wall MRI: principles and expert consensus recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:218–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4893 pmid:27469212

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Kim YJ,
   3. Lee DH,
   4. Kwon JY, et al

   . High resolution MRI difference between moyamoya disease and intracranial atherosclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2013;20:1311–18 doi:10.1111/ene.12202 pmid:23789981

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Debette S,
   3. Compter A,
   4. Labeyrie MA, et al

   . Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intracranial artery dissection. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:640–54 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00009-5 pmid:25987283

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. van der Kolk AG,
    3. Hendrikse J,
    4. Brundel M, et al

    . Multi-sequence whole-brain intracranial vessel wall imaging at 7.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2013;23:2996–3004 doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2905-z pmid:23736375

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Samuels OB,
    3. Joseph GJ,
    4. Lynn MJ, et al

    . A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:643–46 pmid:10782772

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Huang J,
    3. Degnan AJ,
    4. Liu Q, et al

    . Comparison of NASCET and WASID criteria for the measurement of intracranial stenosis using digital subtraction and computed tomography angiography of the middle cerebral artery. J Neuroradiol 2012;39:342–45 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2011.11.005 pmid:22197402

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Jeon JS,
    3. Sheen SH,
    4. Hwang GJ, et al

    . Feasibility of intravenous flat panel detector CT angiography for intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:129–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3301 pmid:22936094

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Bash S,
    3. Villablanca J,
    4. Jahan R, et al

    . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1012–21 pmid:15891154

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Lv P,
    3. Lin J,
    4. Guo D, et al

    . Detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between 2 unenhanced MRAs and dual-source CTA. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2360–65 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4073 pmid:25104291

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Zhao H,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Liu X, et al

    . Assessment of carotid artery atherosclerotic disease by using three-dimensional fast black-blood MR imaging: comparison with DSA. Radiology 2015;274:508–16 doi:10.1148/radiol.14132687 pmid:25286322

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Stivaros SM,
    3. Harris JN,
    4. Adams W, et al

    . Does black blood MRA have a role in the assessment of intracerebral aneurysms? Eur Radiol 2009;19:184–92 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1127-2 pmid:18690453

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Alexander AL,
    3. Buswell HR,
    4. Sun Y, et al

    . Intracranial black-blood MR angiography with high-resolution 3D fast spin echo. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:298–310 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910400216 pmid:9702712

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Ryu CW,
    3. Jahng GH,
    4. Kim EJ, et al

    . High resolution wall and lumen MRI of the middle cerebral arteries at 3 Tesla. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27:433–42 doi:10.1159/000209238 pmid:19295206

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Lell MM,
    3. Anders K,
    4. Uder M, et al

    . New techniques in CT angiography. Radiographics 2006;26(Suppl 1):S45–62 doi:10.1148/rg.26si065508 pmid:17050518

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Ota H,
    3. Takase K,
    4. Rikimaru H, et al

    . Quantitative vascular measurements in arterial occlusive disease. Radiographics 2005;25:1141–58 doi:10.1148/rg.255055014 pmid:16160101

    CrossRefPubMed