MR Elastography Analysis of Glioma Stiffness and IDH1-Mutation Status

References

1. 1.↵
   Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia: An Overview 2014. Cancer Series No. 90. Cat. No. CAN 88. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2014
2. 2.↵
   2. Miles K

   . Can imaging help improve the survival of cancer patients? Cancer Imaging 2011;1:Spec No A:S86–92 doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2011.9022 pmid:22185954

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Louis DN,
   3. Perry A,
   4. Reifenberger G, et al

   . The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803–20 doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 pmid:27157931

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Smits M,
   3. van den Bent MJ

   . Imaging correlates of adult glioma genotypes. Radiology 2017;284:316–31 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017151930 pmid:28723281

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Yan H,
   3. Parsons DW,
   4. Jin G, et al

   . IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 2009;360:765–73 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0808710 pmid:19228619

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Labussiere M,
   3. Sanson M,
   4. Idbaih A, et al

   . IDH1 gene mutations: a new paradigm in glioma prognosis and therapy? Oncologist 2010;15:196–99 doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0218 pmid:20133500

   FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Gorovets D,
   3. Kannan K,
   4. Shen R, et al

   . IDH mutation and neuroglial developmental features define clinically distinct subclasses of lower grade diffuse astrocytic glioma. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:2490–501 doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2977 pmid:22415316

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Li S,
   3. Chou AP,
   4. Chen W, et al

   . Overexpression of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant proteins renders glioma cells more sensitive to radiation. Neuro Oncol 2013;15:57–68 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nos261 pmid:23115158

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Cairncross JG,
   3. Wang M,
   4. Jenkins RB, et al

   . Benefit from procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in oligodendroglial tumors is associated with mutation of IDH. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:783–90 doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.49.3726 pmid:24516018

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Choi C,
    3. Ganji SK,
    4. DeBerardinis RJ, et al

    . 2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with gliomas. Nat Med 2012;18:624–29 doi:10.1038/nm.2682 pmid:22281806

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Lin G,
    3. Chung YL

    . Current opportunities and challenges of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, positron emission tomography, and mass spectrometry imaging for mapping cancer metabolism in vivo. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:625095 doi:10.1155/2014/625095 pmid:24724090

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Kumar S,
    3. Weaver VM

    . Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: the force journey of a tumor cell. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2009;28:113–27 doi:10.1007/s10555-008-9173-4 pmid:19153673

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Miroshnikova YA,
    3. Mouw JK,
    4. Barnes JM, et al

    . Tissue mechanics promote IDH1-dependent HIF1α-tenascin C feedback to regulate glioblastoma aggression. Nat Cell Biol 2016;18:1336–45 doi:10.1038/ncb3429 pmid:27820599

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Muthupillai R,
    3. Lomas DJ,
    4. Rossman PJ, et al

    . Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 1995;269:1854–57 doi:10.1126/science.7569924 pmid:7569924

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Tortoli P,
    2. Masotti L

    2. Muthupillai R,
    3. Lomas DJ,
    4. Rossman PJ, et al

    . Visualizing propagating transverse mechanical waves in tissue-like media using magnetic resonance imaging. In: Tortoli P, Masotti L, eds. Acoustical Imaging. Vol 22. Boston: Springer; 1996;279–83
16. 16.↵
    2. Pepin KM,
    3. Ehman RL,
    4. McGee KP

    . Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in cancer: technique, analysis, and applications. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 2015;90–91:32–48 doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2015.06.001 pmid:26592944

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Simon M,
    3. Guo J,
    4. Papazoglou S, et al

    . Non-invasive characterization of intracranial tumors by magnetic resonance elastography. New J Phys 2013;15:1–15 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/8/085024

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    2. Reiss-Zimmermann M,
    3. Streitberger KJ,
    4. Sack I, et al

    . High resolution imaging of viscoelastic properties of intracranial tumours by multi-frequency magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Neuroradiol 2015;25:371–78 doi:10.1007/s00062-014-0311-9 pmid:24916129

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Sakai N,
    3. Takehara Y,
    4. Yamashita S, et al

    . Shear stiffness of 4 common intracranial tumors measured using MR elastography: comparison with intraoperative consistency grading. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1851–59 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4832 pmid:27339950

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Streitberger KJ,
    3. Reiss-Zimmermann M,
    4. Freimann FB, et al

    . High-resolution mechanical imaging of glioblastoma by multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography. PLoS One 2014;9:e110588 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110588 pmid:25338072

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Murphy MC,
    3. Huston J 3rd.,
    4. Glaser KJ, et al

    . Preoperative assessment of meningioma stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography. J Neurosurg 2013;118:643–48 doi:10.3171/2012.9.JNS12519 pmid:23082888

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Murphy MC,
    3. Huston J 3rd.,
    4. Jack CR Jr., et al

    . Measuring the characteristic topography of brain stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography. PLoS One 2013;8:e81668 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081668 pmid:24312570

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Murphy MC,
    3. Huston J 3rd.,
    4. Jack CR Jr., et al

    . Decreased brain stiffness in Alzheimer's disease determined by magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:494–98 doi:10.1002/jmri.22707 pmid:21751286

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Sinkus R,
    3. Tanter M,
    4. Xydeas T, et al

    . Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. Magn Reson Imaging 2005;23:159–65 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2004.11.060 pmid:15833607

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Papazoglou S,
    3. Hamhaber U,
    4. Braun J, et al

    . Algebraic Helmholtz inversion in planar magnetic resonance elastography. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:3147–58 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/12/005 pmid:18495979

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Manduca A,
    3. Oliphant TE,
    4. Dresner MA, et al

    . Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal 2001;5:237–54 doi:10.1016/S1361-8415(00)00039-6 pmid:11731304

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Clayton EH,
    3. Genin GM,
    4. Bayly PV

    . Transmission, attenuation and reflection of shear waves in the human brain. J R Soc Interface 2012;9:2899–910 doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0325 pmid:22675163

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Sack I,
    3. Beierbach B,
    4. Hamhaber U, et al

    . Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed 2008;21:265–71 doi:10.1002/nbm.1189 pmid:17614101

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Jugé L,
    3. Doan BT,
    4. Seguin J, et al

    . Colon tumor growth and antivascular treatment in mice: complementary assessment with MR elastography and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2012;264:436–44 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111548 pmid:22692038

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Heldin CH,
    3. Rubin K,
    4. Pietras K, et al

    . High interstitial fluid pressure—an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:806–13 doi:10.1038/nrc1456 pmid:15510161

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Beiko J,
    3. Suki D,
    4. Hess KR, et al

    . IDH1 mutant malignant astrocytomas are more amenable to surgical resection and have a survival benefit associated with maximal surgical resection. Neuro Oncol 2014;16:81–91 doi:10.1093/neuonc/not159 pmid:24305719

    CrossRefPubMed