Lumbar Puncture Test in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Does the Volume of CSF Removed Affect the Response to Tap?

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Hakim S,
   3. Adams RD

   . The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci 1965;2:307–27 doi:10.1016/0022-510X(65)90016-X pmid:5889177

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Larsson A,
   3. Wikkelsö C,
   4. Bilting M, et al

   . Clinical parameters in 74 consecutive patients shunt operated for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 1991;84:475–82 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1991.tb04998.x pmid:1792852

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Klinge P,
   3. Marmarou A,
   4. Bergsneider M, et al

   . Outcome of shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the value of outcome assessment in shunted patients. Neurosurgery 2005;57(3 Suppl):S40–52; discussion ii–v doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000168187.01077.2f pmid:16160428

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Serulle Y,
   3. Rusinek H,
   4. Kirov II, et al

   . Differentiating shunt-responsive normal pressure hydrocephalus from Alzheimer disease and normal aging: pilot study using automated MRI brain tissue segmentation. J Neurol 2014;261:1994–2002 doi:10.1007/s00415-014-7454-0 pmid:25082631

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Miskin N,
   3. Serulle Y,
   4. Wu W, et al

   . Post-shunt gait improvement correlates with increased cerebrospinal fluid peak velocity in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a retrospective observational phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging study. Int J Sci Study 2015;3:48–54
6. 6.↵
   2. Tarnaris A,
   3. Kitchen ND,
   4. Watkins LD

   . Noninvasive biomarkers in normal pressure hydrocephalus: evidence for the role of neuroimaging. J Neurosurg 2009;110:837–51 doi:10.3171/2007.9.17572 pmid:18991499

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Golomb J,
   3. de Leon MJ,
   4. George AE, et al

   . Hippocampal atrophy correlates with severe cognitive impairment in elderly patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:590–93 doi:10.1136/jnnp.57.5.590 pmid:8201330

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Holodny AI,
   3. George AE,
   4. de Leon MJ, et al

   . Focal dilation and paradoxical collapse of cortical fissures and sulci in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1998;89:742–47 doi:10.3171/jns.1998.89.5.0742 pmid:9817411

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Holodny AI,
   3. Waxman R,
   4. George AE, et al

   . MR differential diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer disease: significance of perihippocampal fissures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:813–19 pmid:9613493

   Abstract
10. 10.↵
    2. Bradley WG Jr.,
    3. Whittemore AR,
    4. Kortman KE, et al

    . Marked cerebrospinal fluid void: indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Radiology 1991;178:459–66 doi:10.1148/radiology.178.2.1987609 pmid:1987609

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Bradley WG Jr.,
    3. Scalzo D,
    4. Queralt J, et al

    . Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:523–29 doi:10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596861 pmid:8596861

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Bradley WG,
    3. Safar FG,
    4. Furtado C, et al

    . Increased intracranial volume: a clue to the etiology of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1479–84 pmid:15502125

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Tamaki N,
    3. Kusunoki T,
    4. Wakabayashi T, et al

    . Cerebral hemodynamics in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Evaluation by 133Xe inhalation method and dynamic CT study. J Neurosurg 1984;61:510–14 doi:10.3171/jns.1984.61.3.0510 pmid:6747687

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Jagust WJ,
    3. Friedland RP,
    4. Budinger TF

    . Positron emission tomography with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose differentiates normal pressure hydrocephalus from Alzheimer-type dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:1091–96 doi:10.1136/jnnp.48.11.1091 pmid:3878390

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. George AE,
    3. de Leon MJ,
    4. Miller J, et al

    . Positron emission tomography of hydrocephalus. Metabolic effects of shunt procedures. Acta Radiol Suppl 1985;369:435–39 pmid:2980520

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Waldemar G,
    3. Schmidt JF,
    4. Delecluse F, et al

    . High resolution SPECT with [99mTc]-d,l-HMPAO in normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunt operation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:655–64 doi:10.1136/jnnp.56.6.655 pmid:8509780

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Kizu O,
    3. Yamada K,
    4. Nishimura T

    . Proton chemical shift imaging in normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1659–64 pmid:11673158

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Ahlberg J,
    3. Norlén L,
    4. Blomstrand C, et al

    . Outcome of shunt operation on urinary incontinence in normal pressure hydrocephalus predicted by lumbar puncture. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51:105–08 doi:10.1136/jnnp.51.1.105 pmid:3351510

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Ravdin LD,
    3. Katzen HL,
    4. Jackson AE, et al

    . Features of gait most responsive to tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008;110:455–61 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.02.003 pmid:18359152

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Shprecher D,
    3. Schwalb J,
    4. Kurlan R

    . Normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnosis and treatment. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2008;8:371–76 doi:10.1007/s11910-008-0058-2 pmid:18713572

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Virhammar J,
    3. Cesarini KG,
    4. Laurell K

    . The CSF tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation time, reliability and the influence of pain. Eur J Neurol 2012;19:271–76 doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03486.x pmid:21801282

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Sand T,
    3. Bovim G,
    4. Grimse R, et al

    . Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: the CSF tap-test may predict the clinical response to shunting. Acta Neurol Scand 1994;89:311–16 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb02640.x pmid:8085427

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Walchenbach R,
    3. Geiger E,
    4. Thomeer RT, et al

    . The value of temporary external lumbar CSF drainage in predicting the outcome of shunting on normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:503–06 pmid:11909911

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Marmarou A,
    3. Bergsneider M,
    4. Klinge P, et al

    . The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57(3 Suppl):S17–28; discussion ii-v doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000168184.01002.60 pmid:16160426

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Mihalj M,
    3. Dolić K,
    4. Kolić K, et al

    . CSF tap test - obsolete or appropriate test for predicting shunt responsiveness? A systemic review. J Neurol Sci 2016;362:78–84 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.028 pmid:26944123

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Mori E,
    3. Ishikawa M,
    4. Kato T, et al

    . Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012;52:775–809 doi:10.2176/nmc.52.775

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Malm J,
    3. Kristensen B,
    4. Karlsson T, et al

    . The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with the idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Arch Neurol 1995;52:783–89 doi:10.1001/archneur.1995.00540320059013 pmid:7639630

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Takeuchi T,
    3. Kasahara E,
    4. Iwasaki M, et al

    . Indications for shunting in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus presenting with dementia and brain atrophy (atypical idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2000;40:38–46; discussion 46–47 doi:10.2176/nmc.40.38

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Meier U,
    3. Bartels P

    . The importance of the intrathecal infusion test in the diagnostic of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Neurol 2001;46:178–86 doi:10.1159/000050801 pmid:11721123

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Wikkelsø C,
    3. Andersson H,
    4. Blomstrand C, et al

    . The clinical effect of lumbar puncture in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1982;45:64–69 doi:10.1136/jnnp.45.1.64 pmid:7062072

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Williams MA,
    3. Thomas G,
    4. de Lateur B, et al

    . Objective assessment of gait in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:39–45 doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e31815b6461 pmid:17993991

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Warnecke K

    . Analysis of gait before and after cerebrospinal fluid lumbar tap test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a literature review and case report. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2009;25:203–10 doi:10.1097/TGR.0b013e3181b02cdf

    CrossRef