Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleHead and Neck Imaging

Benign Miliary Osteoma Cutis of the Face: A Common Incidental CT Finding

D. Kim, G.A. Franco, H. Shigehara, J. Asaumi and P. Hildenbrand
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2017, 38 (4) 789-794; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5096
D. Kim
aFrom the Department of Radiology (D.K., P.H.), Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Kim
G.A. Franco
bCommonwealth Radiology Associates (G.A.F.), Brockton, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G.A. Franco
H. Shigehara
cDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (H.S., J.A.), Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H. Shigehara
J. Asaumi
cDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (H.S., J.A.), Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Asaumi
P. Hildenbrand
aFrom the Department of Radiology (D.K., P.H.), Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Hildenbrand
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Osteoma cutis of the face represents a primary or secondary formation of ossific foci in the facial skin. Its primary form has been sparsely described in the plastic surgery and dermatology literature. As radiologists, we routinely encounter incidental, very small facial calcified nodules on CT studies performed for a variety of unrelated reasons. We hypothesized that this routinely encountered facial calcification represents primary miliary osteoma cutis and is a common, benign, age-related finding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1315 consecutive sinus CTs obtained during an 8-month period and their associated demographics. The number of dermal radiopaque lesions with Hounsfield units of >150 was counted, and we analyzed the association between the prevalence of these lesions and patients' demographics with logistic regression methods.

RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-nine males and 716 females from 4 to 90 years of age were included in the study (mean, 52 versus 51 years; P = .259). Among these, 252 males and 301 females had small facial calcified nodules (42.1% versus 42.0%, P = .971). The patient's age was a statistically significant predictor for having facial calcified nodules (odds ratio = 1.02, P < .001), while the patient's sex was not (P = .826).

CONCLUSIONS: Facial calcified nodules, observed in routine head and face CT imaging, are common, benign, age-related findings, which have been largely overlooked in the radiology literature. It is a manifestation of primary miliary osteoma cutis.

Osteoma cutis (cutaneous ossification) represents primary or secondary formation of ossific foci in the skin. It was first described by Martin Wilckens in 1858.1 It is distinguished radiographically and pathologically from calcinosis cutis by the deposition of organized bone matrix, while the latter is characterized by the deposition of amorphous calcium salts within the skin.2⇓–4 Some consider calcinosis cutis a precursor or the early manifestation of osteoma cutis.5 Similar to secondary cutaneous calcification, the etiologies of secondary osteoma cutis have been well-described in the radiology and dermatopathology literature and are attributed to iatrogenic, traumatic, metabolic (eg, Albright hereditary osteodystrophy), inflammatory (eg, acne or dermatomyositis), and neoplastic (eg, basal cell carcinoma) processes.2,5⇓–7 However, primary or idiopathic osteoma cutis has been sparsely described as a rare disease entity in the plastic surgery and dermatology literature, mostly in the form of case reports.4,6,8⇓⇓–11

The most frequently reported subclass of primary osteoma cutis occurs in the face and scalp soft tissues. It is reported as “miliary osteoma cutis of the face.”4,10,12,13 Current literature agrees on its idiopathic etiology and its benign, noninvasive, and asymptomatic nature.4,6,10,12,13 However, there have been varying reports regarding its epidemiology. While several authors describe it as a very rare disease6,9,12 with slightly increased incidence in elderly or middle-aged women,2,14,15 other authors report it as a very common entity in the general population,16 without sex or age predilection.6

As radiologists, we routinely encounter incidental, punctate facial hypodermal calcifications on CT studies performed for a variety of reasons in patients without clinically recognized underlying dermatopathology (Fig 1). Due to their benign and asymptomatic nature, these incidental facial calcified nodules have been largely overlooked in the imaging literature. We performed a retrospective review of a large CT dataset. Our imaging technique extended the results of a previously reported large, radiographic, cadaveric case series,16 in an effort to establish that routinely encountered facial dermal calcification/ossification is primary miliary osteoma cutis, a common, benign, age-related finding.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Axial (A), sagittal (B), and coronal (C) CT images of 3 different representative patients demonstrate multiple millimetric scattered facial and scalp hypodermal calcified nodules with varying degrees of severity. A 3D bone window reconstruction of a patient's sinus CT (D) also demonstrates a relatively large, 4- to 5-mm facial calcified nodule within the right premaxillary skin.

Materials and Methods

Patients

The study was approved by the institutional review board at Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, which waived the requirement for informed consent. A total of 1389 consecutive sinus CTs during an 8-month period and their associated demographics were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-four cases were excluded from the study because the most anterior portion of face was not imaged on coronal sequences or there was excessive image degradation due to motion or dental artifacts.

CT Technique

Direct coronal, nonhelical, sinus CT images were obtained on all patients. Bone and soft-tissue algorithms, display field of view of 15 cm at a 520 × 520 matrix, provided an in-plane resolution of 0.29 mm (approximately 2 lp/mm). Section thickness was 3 mm. In addition, as a function of the deployed CT imaging device, nonhelical 1.5-mm-thick axial or axial multisection 0.6-mm volumetric CT techniques were used with both bone and soft-tissue algorithms.

Imaging Analysis

The number of hypodermal radiopaque lesions with Hounsfield units of >150 were counted (G.A.F.), and their distribution was recorded for each sinus CT. Validation of positive case numbers was subsequently performed (D.K.).

Statistical Analysis

To investigate the qualitative association between the subject's age/sex and the presence of facial calcified nodules, we performed logistic regression analysis by using the presence of facial calcified nodules as a binary dependent variable. To investigate the quantitative effect of the subject's age and sex on the number of facial calcified nodules, we performed the Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc analysis (Dunn test), with age decade and sex as qualitative independent variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was chosen given the nonparametric nature of our study population. The prevalence of calcified nodules and the mean ages between male and female sex were compared with the χ2 and Z-tests, respectively. All statistical calculation was performed with MedCalc for Windows software (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). P < .05 was considered a cutoff value for statistical significance.

Results

We included 599 males and 716 females from 4 to 90 years of age in the study (mean, 52 versus 51 years; P = .259). Among the 1315 included cases, most CTs were performed for sinusitis or upper respiratory infection (1112 cases, 84.6%) (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Study population and the distribution of CT indicationsa

Of 1315 sinus CT cases, 553 (42.1%) patients had hypodermal calcifications. Most were punctate, ≤1 mm. In some cases, occasional 3- to 4-mm flocculent calcific foci were encountered (Fig 1D). Facial involvement, particularly when extensive, was conspicuously symmetric. The frontal hypodermis was the most frequent distribution of facial calcified nodules (480 cases, 86.8%), followed by the maxillary hypodermis (255 cases, 46.1%). One hundred ninety-five cases (35.3%) demonstrated calcifications in both the frontal and maxillary hypodermis. A few cases demonstrated calcifications in the temporal (7, 1.3%), mandibular (4, 0.01%), and periorbital hypodermal tissue (2, 0.01%). Table 2 summarizes the distribution of calcified nodules by location.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Distribution of facial calcified nodules by location

Age and Facial Calcified Nodules

To investigate the possible association between the presence of facial calcified nodules and the subject's age, we dichotomized the study population into 2 groups with and without facial calcifications. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that increased age of the subject was strongly associated with the presence of facial calcified nodules (odds ratio = 1.02, P < .001).

For the association between the subject's age and the severity of facial calcified nodules, we used the number of calcified nodules as a surrogate for the severity of disease. At first, linear regression was performed on 553 patients with facial calcified nodules. It demonstrated no statistically significant, quantitative, linear relationship between the subject's age and the number of facial calcified nodules [b=0.13, F(1,551) = 2.79, P = .095] with R2 = 0.01 (Fig 2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A scatterplot and linear regression between age and the number of facial calcified nodules among 553 patients with positive facial calcified nodules. No significant linear quantitative relationship was observed.

Although there is a nonlinear relationship, the severity of facial calcified nodules was also age-dependent. In an effort to investigate any nonlinear effect of age decade and sex of the subjects on the mean number of facial calcified nodules, the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed, revealing a statistically significant difference of the median number of facial calcified nodules among age decade groups [H(8) = 27.46, P = .001]. Post hoc comparison analysis between each age decade group with the Dunn test revealed a significantly higher median number of facial calcified nodules in the sixth and seventh decades compared with the second, third, and fourth decades (Fig 3). Additionally, subjects from the fifth, eighth, and ninth decades also had a significantly higher median number of facial calcified nodules than those in the second and third decades (Fig 3).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A, The average number of facial calcified nodules in each age group by decade. B, The median number of facial calcified nodules in each age group by decade. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a statistically significant difference in the median number of nodules among different age-decade groups. Post hoc analysis between each age group in the overall population, including both males and females, revealed a significantly higher (asterisk indicates P < .05) median number of nodules in the fifth–ninth decades compared with the second and third decades. An additional statistically significant difference was observed between the sixth and seventh decades and the fourth decade.

Sex and Facial Calcified Nodules

In our study population, 252 males of 599 (42.1%) and 301 of 716 females (42.0%) had facial calcified nodules. There was no statistically significant difference between the prevalence of facial calcified nodules between male and female groups (P = .971). By logistic regression, neither male nor female sex was shown to increase the odds of having calcified nodules (odds ratio = 1.02, P = .826). Similarly, the Kruskal-Wallis test did not reveal any significant effect of the subject's sex on the median number of nodules [H(1) = 0.032, P = .857] among 553 patients with nodules.

Discussion

Our large-scale, retrospective review of 1315 sinus CT examinations revealed that facial calcified nodules, observed in routine head and face CT imaging, are a common, benign, age-related finding. The prevalence of facial calcified nodules in our study group was 42.1%, indicating that these nodules are a very common finding, compared with 2.3% in the most recent literature.13 The distribution of these facial nodules is symmetric and predominantly involves the frontal and maxillary hypodermal tissue (540/553 subjects, 97.6%).

Although there was no linear association between the age and the severity of facial calcified nodules, our study revealed a strong association between the age and the likelihood of having facial calcified nodules and their severity, supporting the age dependency of these nodules (Fig 3). In contrast to some prior studies,2,14,15 we observed no female or male sex predilection for these calcified nodules or their severity.

In 1998, Shigehara et al16 reported a cadaveric case series of 33 individuals. They analyzed facial skin specimens from 19 males and 14 females, with ages ranging from 19 to 85 years. The cause of death for these cadavers was not related to any disease predisposing to secondary osteoma or calcinosis cutis. None of the cadavers displayed obvious signs of changes in the skin (1 exception was fatal burns without involving the face). Radiographic examination of these specimens demonstrated hypodermal, subcutaneous calcified nodules in all 33 subjects (Fig 4A, -B). They reported that the most frequently involved facial regions were the forehead (29 of 33, 87.9%) and zygomatic region of the cheek (30 of 33, 90.9%), similar to the observation in our larger scale study (Table 2). Pathologic and elemental analysis of these nodules revealed a benign, mature bone-like morphology and characteristic and hydroxyapatite-like elemental composition (Fig 5). These nodules demonstrated a concentric, multilamellated, peripheral osteoid, and central adipose medulla, which correlated well with benign, normal bone formation and appeared as well-circumscribed calcified nodules with central lucency in radiographs (Fig 4B). In addition, by obtaining dental radiographs, Shigehara et al detected calcifications in 28% of 158 living subjects and 36% of subjects older than 40 years of age. They recognized the potential for underestimation due to the limited FOV of dental radiographic techniques.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Radiographic examination of cadaveric facial skin specimen (A) reveals multiple calcified nodules. A magnified view of inflated buccal skin on an asymptomatic living patient (B) demonstrates multiple calcified nodules with central lucency. Benign breast skin calcification detected in a routine screening mammogram in a middle-aged female subject (C) demonstrates classic imaging findings of central lucency, which resemble the radiographic appearance of facial calcified nodules in (B). Axial (D) and coronal (E) CT images of the buccal area of a patient demonstrate facial calcified nodules. A magnified axial CT image of a relatively large 5-mm maxillary hypodermal calcified nodule (F) demonstrates a subtle central lucency. A and B, Images adapted from Shigehara et al16 and obtained from Dr Shigehara with permission.

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

A, Pathologic examination of facial calcified nodules from a cadaveric specimen demonstrates mature bone-like characteristics, including a concentric, multilamellated, osteoid cortex and a central adipose medulla. B, A magnified view of a portion of A. C and D, Elemental composition and peak ratios of a cadaveric facial nodule (C) and the clavicle (D) are similar to each other and well-correlated with the composition of hydroxyapatite. Images are adapted from Shigehara et al16 and obtained with permission from Dr Shigehara. MMO indicates multiple miliary osteoma.

The radiographic appearance resembles the classic description of benign breast skin calcification, which is believed to be secondary to sebaceous inspissations or low-grade infection.17 Routinely encountered breast skin calcification was also described as a “calcified nodule with central lucency”17 and appears similar to facial calcified nodules identified in cadaveric specimens (Fig 4C). While the demonstration of central lucency in most facial calcified nodules by CT compared with mammography is limited due to their very small size relative to the section thickness (Fig 4D, -E), the appearance of some larger nodules was suggestive of a subtle central lucency (Fig 4F).

In conclusion, combined evidence from our large-scale sinus CT dataset of 1315 cases with previously reported dental radiographic examinations of 158 patients and a cadaveric study of 33 patients supports our hypothesis that the commonly encountered facial calcified nodules on routine head and neck CT examinations are manifestations of primary miliary osteoma cutis as described in dermatologic and plastic surgery literature, yet overlooked in the radiologic literature. The discrepancy between previous reports regarding the epidemiology of the disease is likely due to its benign and asymptomatic nature. It is possible that most cases have been overlooked until they are sufficiently advanced or extensive to require dermatologic or surgical attention/intervention. This possibility may also explain the higher incidence of reported cases in females who are more attuned to facial cosmetics than males.

Due to the small, millimetric size of these nodules, it is technically challenging to identify and characterize them (Fig 4D–F). The FOV in many dental series was restricted to the mandible and maxillary jaw architecture without including the remaining face. Because the forehead was most frequently involved in our series, its exclusion also, in part, accounts for the discrepancy in prevalence from previous reports. Shigehara et al (1998)16 observed that “the condition was detected in 28% (44/158) of the living subjects by clinical dental radiographic examination (36% over age 40).”

The major limitation of our study arises from its retrospective design. Although the large number of subjects may have overcome potential confounders, we did not obtain prospective data such as dermatologic history or clinical evaluation. Correlative full-thickness dermatopathology on asymptomatic patients was clearly not possible; thus, we relied on our coauthors' prior large postmortem case series. Some studies suggested the history of severe adolescent acne as a potential precursor of miliary osteoma cutis,4,7,10,12 but this was not formally evaluated in our retrospective, informed-consent-waived study. In addition, because benign breast skin calcification is thought to be secondary to sebaceous inspissations and low-grade infection, one can only speculate that the idiopathic, primary formation of these nodules may be secondary to subclinical or low-grade inflammatory, infectious, traumatic, or environmental insults. The age dependency of facial calcified nodules may, thereby, be explained by longer potential exposure time to any of the above insults than their younger counterparts. In our study group, a small number of subjects demonstrated >100 facial calcified nodules (Fig 1C), while the average number of these nodules in a subject was 14 (Figs 2 and 3), raising the possibility of additional disease-exacerbating factors for these individuals with unusually higher numbers of calcified nodules. A prospective, cohort study with multivariable logistic regression could be designed and performed to delineate any of these potential inciting clinical factors in the future.

Conclusions

Dermal calcified nodules, observed in routine head and face CT imaging, are common, benign, age-related findings, which have been largely overlooked in the radiology literature. These are a manifestation of primary miliary osteoma cutis.

Footnotes

  • Paper previously presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology and the Foundation of the ASNR Symposium, May 23–26, 2016; Washington, DC.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wilckens M
    . Ueber die Verknöcherung und Verkalkung der Haut und die s. g. Hautsteine. Göttingen: Gottingen University Press; 1858
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fazeli P,
    2. Harvell J,
    3. Jacobs MB
    . Osteoma cutis (cutaneous ossification). West J Med 1999;171:243–45 pmid:10578679
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Reiter N,
    2. El-Shabrawi L,
    3. Leinweber B, et al
    . Calcinosis cutis, part I: diagnostic pathway. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;65:1–12; quiz 13–14 doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.038 pmid:21679810
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Gfesser M,
    2. Worret WI,
    3. Hein R, et al
    . Multiple primary osteoma cutis. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:641–43 doi:10.1001/archderm.134.5.641 pmid:9606346
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Walsh JS,
    2. Fairley JA
    . Calcifying disorders of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;33(5 pt 1):693–706; quiz 707–10 pmid:7593766
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Duarte IG
    . Multiple injuries of osteoma skin in the face: therapeutical least invasive in patients with acne sequela: case report. An Bras Dermatol 2010;85:695–98 pmid:21152797
    PubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Jeong KH,
    2. Lew BL,
    3. Sim WY
    . Osteoma cutis as the presenting feature of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy associated with pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism. Ann Dermatol 2009;21:154–58 doi:10.5021/ad.2009.21.2.154 pmid:20523775
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Boschert MT,
    2. Puckett CL
    . Osteoma cutis of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:1017–18 doi:10.1097/00006534-200003000-00027 pmid:10724263
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. O'Donnell TF Jr.,
    2. Geller SA
    . Primary osteoma cutis. Arch Dermatol 1971;104:325–26 pmid:5096840
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Myllylä RM,
    2. Haapasaari KM,
    3. Palatsi R, et al
    . Multiple miliary osteoma cutis is a distinct disease entity: four case reports and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 2011;164:544–52 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.1012 pmid:21062265
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Cottoni F,
    2. Dell' Orbo C,
    3. Quacci D, et al
    . Primary osteoma cutis: clinical, morphological, and ultrastructural study. Am J Dermatopathol 1993;15:77–81 doi:10.1097/00000372-199302000-00016 pmid:8434738
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bouraoui S,
    2. Mlika M,
    3. Kort R, et al
    . Miliary osteoma cutis of the face. J Dermatol Case Rep 2011;5:77–81 doi:10.1186/1752-1947-5-77 pmid:22408708
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Safi Y,
    2. Valizadeh S,
    3. Vasegh S, et al
    . Prevalence of osteoma cutis in the maxillofacial region and classification of its radiographic pattern in cone beam CT. Dermatol Online J 2016;22 pmid:26990467
  14. 14.↵
    1. Boneschi V,
    2. Alessi E,
    3. Brambilla L
    . Multiple miliary osteomas of the face. Am J Dermatopathol 1993;15:268–71 pmid:8517498
    PubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Bowman PH,
    2. Lesher JL Jr.
    . Primary multiple miliary osteoma cutis and exogenous ochronosis. Cutis 2001;68:103–06 pmid:11534909
    PubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Shigehara H,
    2. Honda Y,
    3. Kishi K, et al
    . Radiographic and morphologic studies of multiple miliary osteomas of cadaver skin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:121–25 doi:10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90161-5 pmid:9690257
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kopans DB,
    2. Meyer JE,
    3. Homer MJ, et al
    . Dermal deposits mistaken for breast calcifications. Radiology 1983;149:592–94 doi:10.1148/radiology.149.2.6622710 pmid:6622710
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received September 6, 2016.
  • Accepted after revision December 6, 2016.
  • © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 4
1 Apr 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Benign Miliary Osteoma Cutis of the Face: A Common Incidental CT Finding
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
D. Kim, G.A. Franco, H. Shigehara, J. Asaumi, P. Hildenbrand
Benign Miliary Osteoma Cutis of the Face: A Common Incidental CT Finding
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2017, 38 (4) 789-794; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5096

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Benign Miliary Osteoma Cutis of the Face: A Common Incidental CT Finding
D. Kim, G.A. Franco, H. Shigehara, J. Asaumi, P. Hildenbrand
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2017, 38 (4) 789-794; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5096
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (19)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Multiple miliary osteoma cutis: an overlooked dermatosis?
    B. Duarte, R.R. Pinheiro, J. Cabete
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2018 32 1
  • Two cases of treatment with aromatase inhibitors and development of miliary osteoma cutis—Is there an association?
    Eric D. Schadler, Stephanie L. Mehlis, Thomas L. Cibull, Bernhard Ortel
    JAAD Case Reports 2018 4 7
  • Multiple miliary osteoma cutis treatment response to Q-switched Nd:YAG laser: A case report
    Augustin C. Barolet, Ivan V. Litvinov, Daniel Barolet
    SAGE Open Medical Case Reports 2020 8
  • A Case of Surgical Removal of a Giant and Multiple Acquired Plate-Like Osteoma Cutis After Implantation of a Dilator
    Fangfang Wu, Weilong Qiao, Xiangdong Sun, Chengzhi Li, Huiqing Pan, Renliang He
    Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology 2021 Volume 14
  • High-frequency ultrasonography helps to confirm the diagnosis of multiple miliary osteoma cutis
    Frédéric Jaouen, Matthias Tallegas, Odile Treffandier, Frédéric Patat, Loïc Vaillant, Laurent Machet
    European Journal of Dermatology 2019 29 3
  • Imaging feature of cosmetic fillers in cone-beam computed tomography and its dental consideration
    Chena Lee, Yoon Joo Choi, Kug Jin Jeon, Seong Ho Choi, Sang-Sun Han
    Head & Face Medicine 2022 18 1
  • Multiple miliary osteoma cutis, renal failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism in a geriatric patient
    John K. Brooks, Hokyoung Jang, Arthur S. Harrow, Jeffery B. Price
    Gerodontology 2022 39 2
  • Plewig and Kligman´s Acne and Rosacea
    Gerd Plewig, Bodo Melnik, WenChieh Chen
    2019
  • What do we know about osteoma cutis? Literature review. Clinical cases
    Elena S. Snarskaya, Natalia P. Teplyuk, Ksenia D. Vasileva, E. Yu. Vertieva
    Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases 2021 24 2
  • A case of miliaris osteoma cutis in a male: Dermoscopic findings and microablation treatment
    Francesco Moro, Francesco Ricci, Ilaria Pennacchia, Cinzia Mazzanti, Damiano Abeni, Luca Fania
    Dermatologic Therapy 2019 32 5

More in this TOC Section

  • FDG Uptake and Thyroid Cancer Post-BRAF Therapy
  • Normal Facial Nerve Enhancement on VIBE Sequence
  • Comprehensive Review of Inner Ear Anatomy on Photon-Counting CT
Show more Head and Neck Imaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire