Diffusion-Weighted Imaging–Detected Ischemic Lesions following Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Kang DW,
   3. Lattimore SU,
   4. Latour LL, et al

   . Silent ischemic lesion recurrence on magnetic resonance imaging predicts subsequent clinical vascular events. Arch Neurol 2006;63:1730–33 doi:10.1001/archneur.63.12.1730 pmid:17172612

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Vermeer SE,
   3. Prins ND,
   4. den Heijer T, et al

   . Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1215–22 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022066 pmid:12660385

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Choi SH,
   3. Na DL,
   4. Chung CS, et al

   . Diffusion-weighted MRI in vascular dementia. Neurology 2000;54:83–89 doi:10.1212/WNL.54.1.83 pmid:10636130

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Nishikawa Y,
   3. Satow T,
   4. Takagi T, et al

   . Efficacy and safety of single versus dual antiplatelet therapy for coiling of unruptured aneurysms. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22:650–55 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.02.008 pmid:22440685

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Park JC,
   3. Lee DH,
   4. Kim JK, et al

   . Microembolism after endovascular coiling of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: incidence and risk factors. J Neurosurg 2016;124:777–83 doi:10.3171/2015.3.JNS142835 pmid:26381257

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Kang DH,
   3. Kim BM,
   4. Kim DJ, et al

   . MR-DWI-positive lesions and symptomatic ischemic complications after coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:789–91 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.669853 pmid:23204052

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Hahnemann ML,
   3. Ringelstein A,
   4. Sandalcioglu IE, et al

   . Silent embolism after stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms: diffusion-weighted MRI study of 75 cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:461–65 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010820 pmid:23929549

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Sim SY,
   3. Shin YS

   . Silent microembolism on diffusion-weighted MRI after coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms. Neurointervention 2012;7:77–84 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2012.7.2.77 pmid:22970416

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Rordorf G,
   3. Bellon RJ,
   4. Budzik RF Jr., et al

   . Silent thromboembolic events associated with the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms by use of Guglielmi detachable coils: prospective study applying diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:5–10 pmid:11158880

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Kim B,
    3. Kim K,
    4. Jeon P, et al

    . Thromboembolic complications in patients with clopidogrel resistance after coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1786–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3955 pmid:24831597

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Kim MJ,
    3. Lim YC,
    4. Oh SY, et al

    . Thromboembolic events associated with electrolytic detachment of Guglielmi detachable coils and target coils: comparison with use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013;54:19–24 doi:10.3340/jkns.2013.54.1.19 pmid:24044075

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Altay T,
    3. Kang HI,
    4. Woo HH, et al

    . Thromboembolic events associated with endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;3:147–50 doi:10.1136/jnis.2010.003616 pmid:21990807

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Soeda A,
    3. Sakai N,
    4. Murao K, et al

    . Thromboembolic events associated with Guglielmi detachable coil embolization with use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging, part II: detection of the microemboli proximal to cerebral aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:2035–38 pmid:14625228

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Takigawa T,
    3. Suzuki K,
    4. Sugiura Y, et al

    . Thromboembolic events associated with single balloon-, double balloon-, and stent-assisted coil embolization of asymptomatic unruptured cerebral aneurysms: evaluation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Neuroradiology 2014;56:1079–86 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1421-4 pmid:25185529

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Ishibashi T,
    3. Murayama Y,
    4. Saguchi T, et al

    . Thromboembolic events during endovascular coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2006;12:112–16 pmid:20569613

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Brasiliense LB,
    3. Stanley MA,
    4. Grewal SS, et al

    . Silent ischemic events after Pipeline embolization device: a prospective evaluation with MR diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurointerv Surg 2016 Jan 8. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:26747877
17. 17.↵
    2. Heller RS,
    3. Dandamudi V,
    4. Calnan D, et al

    . Neuroform intracranial stenting for aneurysms using simple and multi-stent technique is associated with low risk of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging lesions. Neurosurgery 2013;73:582–90; discussion 590–91 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000053 pmid:23787881

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Iosif C,
    3. Camilleri Y,
    4. Saleme S, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted imaging-detected ischemic lesions associated with flow-diverting stents in intracranial aneurysms: safety, potential mechanisms, clinical outcome, and concerns. J Neurosurg 2015;122:627–36 doi:10.3171/2014.10.JNS132566 pmid:25559933

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Tan LA,
    3. Keigher KM,
    4. Munich SA, et al

    . Thromboembolic complications with Pipeline Embolization Device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:217–21 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011111 pmid:24553344

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. DerSimonian R,
    3. Laird N

    . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88 doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 pmid:3802833

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Barendregt JJ,
    3. Doi SA,
    4. Lee YY, et al

    . Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health 2013;67:974–78 doi:10.1136/jech-2013-203104 pmid:23963506

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Freeman MF,
    3. Tukey JW

    . Transformations related to the angular and the square root. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1950;21:607–11 doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729756

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    2. Higgins JP,
    3. Thompson SG,
    4. Deeks JJ, et al

    . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 pmid:12958120

    FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Kang DH,
    3. Hwang YH,
    4. Kim YS, et al

    . Cognitive outcome and clinically silent thromboembolic events after coiling of asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2013;72:638–45; discussion 645 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182846f74 pmid:23277379

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Biondi A,
    3. Oppenheim C,
    4. Vivas E, et al

    . Cerebral aneurysms treated by Guglielmi detachable coils: evaluation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:957–63 pmid:10815677

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Soeda A,
    3. Sakai N,
    4. Sakai H, et al

    . Thromboembolic events associated with Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of asymptomatic cerebral aneurysms: evaluation of 66 consecutive cases with use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:127–32 pmid:12533341

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Kim MS,
    3. Jo KI,
    4. Yeon JY, et al

    . Association between postprocedural infarction and antiplatelet drug resistance after coiling for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1099–105 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4777 pmid:27056423

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Pelz DM,
    3. Lownie SP,
    4. Fox AJ

    . Thromboembolic events associated with the treatment of cerebral aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1541–47 pmid:9763391

    Abstract
29. 29.↵
    2. Derdeyn CP,
    3. Cross DT 3rd.,
    4. Moran CJ, et al

    . Postprocedure ischemic events after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg 2002;96:837–43 doi:10.3171/jns.2002.96.5.0837 pmid:12008697

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Lund C,
    3. Nes RB,
    4. Ugelstad TP, et al

    . Cerebral emboli during left heart catheterization may cause acute brain injury. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1269–75 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi148 pmid:15716287

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Restrepo L,
    3. Wityk RJ,
    4. Grega MA, et al

    . Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before and after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Stroke 2002;33:2909–15 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000040408.75704.15 pmid:12468790

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.
    2. Cronqvist M,
    3. Wirestam R,
    4. Ramgren B, et al

    . Diffusion and perfusion MRI in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular coiling: complications, procedural results, MR findings and clinical outcome. Neuroradiology 2005;47:855–73 doi:10.1007/s00234-005-1408-2 pmid:16235046

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.
    2. McGuinness BJ,
    3. Memon S,
    4. Hope JK

    . Prospective study of early MRI appearances following flow-diverting stent placement for intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:943–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4335 pmid:25767184

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.
    2. Nagahata M,
    3. Kondo R,
    4. Saito S, et al

    . Which factors increase procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization? Neuroradiol J 2011;24:712–14 doi:10.1177/197140091102400507 pmid:24059765

    Abstract/FREE Full Text