Localizing the L5 Vertebra Using Nerve Morphology on MRI: An Accurate and Reliable Technique

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Paik NC,
   3. Lim CS,
   4. Jang HS

   . Numeric and morphological verification of lumbosacral segments in 8280 consecutive patients. Spine 2013;38:E573–78 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828b7195 pmid:23392421

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
2. 2.↵
   2. Hughes RJ,
   3. Saifuddin A

   . Imaging of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Clin Radiol 2004;59:984–91 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2004.02.019 pmid:15488846

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
3. 3.↵
   2. Mahato NK

   . Relationship of sacral articular surfaces and gender with occurrence of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Spine J 2011;11:961–65 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.007 pmid:21924685

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
4. 4.↵
   2. Konin GP,
   3. Walz DM

   . Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: classification, imaging findings, and clinical relevance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1778–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2036 pmid:20203111

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
5. 5.↵
   2. Apazidis A,
   3. Ricart PA,
   4. Diefenbach CM, et al

   . The prevalence of transitional vertebrae in the lumbar spine. Spine J 2011;11:858–62 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.005 pmid:21951610

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
6. 6.↵
   2. Tang M,
   3. Yang XF,
   4. Yang SW, et al

   . Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in a population-based study of 5860 individuals: prevalence and relationship to low back pain. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1679–82 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.036 pmid:24935139

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
7. 7.↵
   2. Carrino JA,
   3. Campbell PD Jr.,
   4. Lin DC, et al

   . Effect of spinal segment variants on numbering vertebral levels at lumbar MR imaging. Radiology 2011;259:196–202 doi:10.1148/radiol.11081511 pmid:21436097

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
8. 8.↵
   2. Bressler EL

   . Numbering of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:W210; author reply W211 doi:10.2214/AJR.07.5201 pmid:17242232

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
9. 9.↵
   2. Tureli D,
   3. Ekinci G,
   4. Baltacioglu F

   . Is any landmark reliable in vertebral enumeration? A study of 3.0-Tesla lumbar MRI comparing skeletal, neural, and vascular markers. Clin Imaging 2014;38:792–96 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.05.001 pmid:24928822

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
10. 10.↵
    2. Farshad-Amacker NA,
    3. Lurie B,
    4. Herzog RJ, et al

    . Is the iliolumbar ligament a reliable identifier of the L5 vertebra in lumbosacral transitional anomalies? Eur Radiol 2014;24:2623–30 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3277-8 pmid:24962830

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
11. 11.↵
    2. Hughes RJ,
    3. Saifuddin A

    . Numbering of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on MRI: role of the iliolumbar ligaments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W59–65 doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0415 pmid:16794140

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
12. 12.↵
    2. Farshad-Amacker NA,
    3. Aichmair A,
    4. Herzog RJ, et al

    . Merits of different anatomical landmarks for correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae in lumbosacral transitional anomalies. Eur Spine J 2015;24:600–08 doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3573-7 pmid:25223429

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
13. 13.↵
    2. Tokgoz N,
    3. Ucar M,
    4. Erdogan AB, et al

    . Are spinal or paraspinal anatomic markers helpful for vertebral numbering and diagnosing lumbosacral transitional vertebrae? Korean J Radiol 2014;15:258–66 doi:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.258 pmid:24644411

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
14. 14.↵
    2. Lee CH,
    3. Seo BK,
    4. Choi YC, et al

    . Using MRI to evaluate anatomic significance of aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris when locating lumbar vertebral segments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1295–300 doi:10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821295 pmid:15100135

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
15. 15.↵
    2. Crawford CH 3rd.,
    3. Glassman SD,
    4. Gum JL, et al

    . Conflicting calculations of pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt secondary to transitional lumbosacral anatomy (lumbarization of S-1): case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2017;26:45–49 doi:10.3171/2016.5.SPINE16196 pmid:27494783

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
16. 16.↵
    2. Jhawar BS,
    3. Mitsis D,
    4. Duggal N

    . Wrong-sided and wrong-level neurosurgery: a national survey. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7:467–72 doi:10.3171/SPI-07/11/467 pmid:17977186

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
17. 17.↵
    2. Josiah DT,
    3. Boo S,
    4. Tarabishy A, et al

    . Anatomical differences in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and implications for minimally invasive spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2017;26:137–43 doi:10.3171/2016.6.SPINE1691 pmid:27661564

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
18. 18.↵
    2. Farshad-Amacker NA,
    3. Lurie B,
    4. Herzog RJ, et al

    . Interreader and intermodality reliability of standard anteroposterior radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging in detection and classification of lumbosacral transitional vertebra. Spine J 2014;14:1470–75 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.048 pmid:24210581

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
19. 19.↵
    2. Paik NC,
    3. Lim CS,
    4. Jang HS

    . Numbering of vertebrae on MRI using a PACS cross-referencing tool. Acta Radiol 2012;53:785–89 doi:10.1258/ar.2012.120173 pmid:22764198

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
20. 20.↵
    2. Shabshin N,
    3. Schweitzer ME,
    4. Carrino JA

    . Anatomical landmarks and skin markers are not reliable for accurate labeling of thoracic vertebrae on MRI. Acta Radiol 2010;51:1038–42 doi:10.3109/02841851.2010.508174 pmid:20942735

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
21. 21.↵
    2. Prat D,
    3. Gagnard G,
    4. Cousineau J

    . Numbering of the dorsal spinal nerve roots in man from the 12th thoracic nerve to the coccygeal nerve [Article in French]. Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy) 1983;67:331–36 pmid:6675746

    PubMedGoogle Scholar
22. 22.↵
    2. O'Driscoll CM,
    3. Irwin A,
    4. Saifuddin A

    . Variations in morphology of the lumbosacral junction on sagittal MRI: correlation with plain radiography. Skeletal Radiol 1996;25:225–30 doi:10.1007/s002560050069 pmid:8741056

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
23. 23.↵
    2. Castellvi AE,
    3. Goldstein LA,
    4. Chan DP

    . Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9:493–95 doi:10.1097/00007632-198407000-00014

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. 24.↵
    2. Byrt T,
    3. Bishop J,
    4. Carlin JB

    . Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:423–29 doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-V pmid:8501467

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
25. 25.↵
    2. Scaal M

    . Early development of the vertebral column. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2016;49:83–91 doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.11.003 pmid:26564689

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
26. 26.↵
    2. Thawait GK,
    3. Chhabra A,
    4. Carrino JA

    . Spine segmentation and enumeration and normal variants. Radiol Clin North Am 2012;50:587–98 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2012.04.003 pmid:22643386

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
27. 27.↵
    2. Galis F

    . Why do almost all mammals have seven cervical vertebrae? Developmental constraints, Hox genes, and cancer. J Exp Zool 1999;285:19–26 pii:10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19990415)285:1<19::AID-JEZ3>3.0.CO;2-Z pmid:10327647

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
28. 28.↵
    2. Narita Y,
    3. Kuratani S

    . Evolution of the vertebral formulae in mammals: a perspective on developmental constraints. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 2005;304:91–106 doi:10.1002/jez.b.21029 pmid:15660398

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
29. 29.↵
    2. Wigh RE

    . Classification of the human vertebral column: phylogenetic departures and junctional anomalies. Med Radiogr Photogr 1980;56:2–11 pmid:7392844

    PubMedGoogle Scholar
30. 30.↵
    2. Postacchini F,
    3. Urso S,
    4. Ferro L

    . Lumbosacral nerve-root anomalies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:721–29 doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.30040 pmid:7085697

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
31. 31.↵
    2. Chang HS,
    3. Nakagawa H

    . Altered function of lumbar nerve roots in patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:1632–35; discussion 1635 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000132319.43140.d3 pmid:15284507

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
32. 32.↵
    2. Hinterdorfer P,
    3. Parsaei B,
    4. Stieglbauer K, et al

    . Segmental innervation in lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV): a comparative clinical and intraoperative EMG study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010;81:734–41 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.187633 pmid:20581139

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
33. 33.↵
    2. Seyfert S

    . Dermatome variations in patients with transitional vertebrae. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;63:801–03 doi:10.1136/jnnp.63.6.801

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
34. 34.↵
    2. Kim YH,
    3. Lee PB,
    4. Lee CJ, et al

    . Dermatome variation of lumbosacral nerve roots in patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1279–83 doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181605635 pmid:18349206

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar