How to Reduce Head CT Orders in Children with Hydrocephalus Using the Lean Six Sigma Methodology: Experience at a Major Quaternary Care Academic Children's Center

References

1. 1.↵
   2. DelliFraine JL,
   3. Langabeer JR 2nd.,
   4. Nembhard IM

   . Assessing the evidence of Six Sigma and Lean in the health care industry. Qual Manag Health Care 2010;19:211–25 doi:10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181eb140e pmid:20588140

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Vest JR,
   3. Gamm LD

   . A critical review of the research literature on Six Sigma, Lean and StuderGroup's Hardwiring Excellence in the United States: the need to demonstrate and communicate the effectiveness of transformation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci 2009;4:35 doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-35 pmid:19570218

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Simon TD,
   3. Riva-Cambrin J,
   4. Srivastava R, et al

   ; Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network. Hospital care for children with hydrocephalus in the United States: utilization, charges, comorbidities, and deaths. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008;1:131–37 doi:10.3171/PED/2008/1/2/131 pmid:18352782

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Stein SC,
   3. Guo W

   . The prevalence of shunt-treated hydrocephalus: a mathematical model. Surg Neurol 2009;72:131–37 doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2008.07.012 pmid:19608005

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Brenner D,
   3. Elliston C,
   4. Hall E, et al

   . Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289–96 doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 pmid:11159059

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Brenner DJ,
   3. Hall EJ

   . Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277–84 doi:10.1056/NEJMra072149 pmid:18046031

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Koral K,
   3. Blackburn T,
   4. Bailey AA, et al

   . Strengthening the argument for rapid brain MR imaging: estimation of reduction in lifetime attributable risk of developing fatal cancer in children with shunted hydrocephalus by instituting a rapid brain MR imaging protocol in lieu of head CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1851–54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3076 pmid:22555583

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Durand DJ

   . A rational approach to the clinical use of cumulative effective dose estimates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:160–62 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.6195 pmid:21701025

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Pearce MS,
   3. Salotti JA,
   4. Little MP, et al

   . Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012;380:499–505 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0 pmid:22681860

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Mathews JD,
    3. Forsythe AV,
    4. Brady Z, et al

    . Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 2013;346:f2360 doi:10.1136/bmj.f2360 pmid:23694687

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Ashley WW Jr.,
    3. McKinstry RC,
    4. Leonard JR, et al

    . Use of rapid-sequence magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hydrocephalus in children. J Neurosurg 2005;103(2 suppl):124–30 pmid:16370277

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Iskandar BJ,
    3. Sansone JM,
    4. Medow J, et al

    . The use of quick-brain magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of shunt-treated hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2004;101:147–51 pmid:15835101

    PubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Niederhauser BD,
    3. McDonald RJ,
    4. Eckel LJ, et al

    . Retrospective review of rapid pediatric brain MR imaging at an academic institution including practice trends and factors affecting scan times. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1836–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3510 pmid:23557956

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. O'Neill BR,
    3. Pruthi S,
    4. Bains H, et al

    . Rapid sequence magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of children with hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg 2013;80:e307–312 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.10.066 pmid:23111234

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Rozovsky K,
    3. Ventureyra EC,
    4. Miller E

    . Fast-brain MRI in children is quick, without sedation, and radiation-free, but beware of limitations. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:400–05 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.02.048 pmid:23266077

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Pindrik J,
    3. Huisman TA,
    4. Mahesh M, et al

    . Analysis of limited-sequence head computed tomography for children with shunted hydrocephalus: potential to reduce diagnostic radiation exposure. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013;12:491–500 doi:10.3171/2013.8.PEDS1322 pmid:24053675

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Yue EL,
    3. Meckler GD,
    4. Fleischman RJ, et al

    . Test characteristics of quick brain MRI for shunt evaluation in children: an alternative modality to avoid radiation. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015;15:420–26 doi:10.3171/2014.9.PEDS14207 pmid:25634816

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Mater A,
    3. Shroff M,
    4. Al-Farsi S, et al

    . Test characteristics of neuroimaging in the emergency department evaluation of children for cerebrospinal fluid shunt malfunction. CJEM 2008;10:131–35 pmid:18371251

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Lehnert BE,
    3. Rahbar H,
    4. Relyea-Chew A, et al

    . Detection of ventricular shunt malfunction in the ED: relative utility of radiography, CT, and nuclear imaging. Emerg Radiol 2011;18:299–305 doi:10.1007/s10140-011-0955-6 pmid:21523469

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Durand DJ,
    3. Kohli MD

    . Advanced practice quality improvement project: how to influence physician radiologic imaging ordering behavior. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:1155–59 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.08.034 pmid:25467728

    CrossRefPubMed