In Vitro Evaluation of Intra-Aneurysmal, Flow-Diverter-Induced Thrombus Formation: A Feasibility Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Byrne JV,
   3. Beltechi R,
   4. Yarnold JA, et al

   . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5:e12492 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012492 pmid:20824070

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Mut F,
   4. Raschi M, et al

   . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2398 pmid:21071533

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Kulcsár Z,
   3. Houdart E,
   4. Bonafé A, et al

   . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2370 pmid:21071538

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Pereira VM,
   3. Brina O,
   4. Delattre BMA, et al

   . Assessment of intra-aneurysmal flow modification after flow diverter stent placement with four-dimensional flow MRI: a feasibility study. J Neurointerv Surg 2014 Oct 3. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011348 pmid:25280571

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Hampton T,
   3. Walsh D,
   4. Tolias C, et al

   . Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;3:167–71 doi:10.1136/jnis.2010.002873 pmid:21990812

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Augsburger L,
   3. Farhat M,
   4. Reymond P, et al

   . Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klin Neuroradiol 2009;19:204–14 doi:10.1007/s00062-009-9005-0 pmid:19705075

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Roszelle BN,
   3. Gonzalez LF,
   4. Babiker MH, et al

   . Flow diverter effect on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: an in vitro comparison of telescoping stents and the Pipeline. Neuroradiology 2013;55:751–58 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1169-2 pmid:23515661

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Seong J,
   3. Wakhloo AK,
   4. Lieber BB

   . In vitro evaluation of flow diverters in an elastase-induced saccular aneurysm model in rabbit. J Biomech Eng 2007;129:863–72 doi:10.1115/1.2800787 pmid:18067390

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Yu CH,
    3. Matsumoto K,
    4. Shida S, et al

    . A steady flow analysis on a cerebral aneurysm model with several stents for new stent design using PIV. J Mechanical Science and Technology 2012;26:1333–40 doi:10.1007/s12206-012-0322-x

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    2. Bouillot P,
    3. Brina O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . Particle imaging velocimetry evaluation of intracranial stents in sidewall aneurysm: hemodynamic transition related to the stent design. PLoS One 2014;9:e113762 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113762 pmid:25470724

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Bouillot P,
    3. Brina O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . Hemodynamic transition driven by stent porosity in sidewall aneurysms. J Biomech 2015;48:1300–09 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.020 pmid:25798761

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Dorn F,
    3. Niedermeyer F,
    4. Balasso A, et al

    . The effect of stents on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics: in vitro evaluation of a pulsatile sidewall aneurysm using laser Doppler anemometry. Neuroradiology 2011;53:267–72 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0723-4 pmid:20563572

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Starke RM,
    4. Yang S, et al

    . Extending the indications of flow diversion to small, unruptured, saccular aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Stroke 2014;45:54–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003038 pmid:24253543

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Hoi Y,
    3. Wasserman BA,
    4. Xie YJ, et al

    . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms at the carotid bifurcations of older adults. Physiol Meas 2010;31:291–302 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/31/3/002 pmid:20086276

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Zhao M,
    3. Amin-Hanjani S,
    4. Ruland S, et al

    . Regional cerebral blood flow using quantitative MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1470–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0582 pmid:17846193

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. van Raamt AF,
    4. van der Graaf Y, et al

    . Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the circle of Willis. Radiology 2005;235:184–89 doi:10.1148/radiol.2351031799 pmid:15749975

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Brown RI

    . The physics of continuous flow centrifugal cell separation. Artif Organs 1989;13:4–20 doi:10.1111/j.1525-1594.1989.tb02827.x pmid:2712735

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Ahlhelm F,
    3. Roth C,
    4. Kaufmann R, et al

    . Treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a novel self-expanding two-zonal endovascular stent device. Neuroradiology 2007;49:1023–28 doi:10.1007/s00234-007-0281-6 pmid:17703295

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576 pmid:17615366

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Simgen A,
    3. Ley D,
    4. Roth C, et al

    . Evaluation of a newly designed flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in an elastase-induced aneurysm model, in New Zealand white rabbits. Neuroradiology 2014;56:129–37 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1296-9 pmid:24496551

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Wang K,
    3. Huang Q,
    4. Hong B, et al

    . Correlation of aneurysm occlusion with actual metal coverage at neck after implantation of flow-diverting stent in rabbit models. Neuroradiology 2012;54:607–13 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0922-7 pmid:21874284

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Wagner A,
    3. Cortsen M,
    4. Hauerberg J, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms: reconstruction of the parent artery with flow-diverting (Silk) stent. Neuroradiology 2012;54:709–18 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0949-9 pmid:21894512

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Fischer S,
    3. Vajda Z,
    4. Perez MA, et al

    . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0948-x pmid:21881914

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Collignon L,
    4. Raphaeli G, et al

    . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:2247–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589911 pmid:20798369

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Piano M,
    3. Valvassori L,
    4. Quilici L, et al

    . Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 2013;118:408–16 doi:10.3171/2012.10.JNS112222 pmid:23176329

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Saatci I,
    3. Yavuz K,
    4. Ozer C, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Ringelstein A,
    3. Schlamann M,
    4. Goericke SL, et al

    . 3-year follow-up after endovascular aneurysm treatment with Silk® flow diverter [in German]. Rofo 2013;185:328–32 doi:10.1055/s-0032-1330353 pmid:23420312

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Cinar C,
    3. Bozkaya H,
    4. Oran I

    . Endovascular treatment of cranial aneurysms with the Pipeline flow-diverting stent: preliminary mid-term results. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013;19:154–64 doi:10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.6111-12.1 pmid:23233405

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. De Vries J,
    3. Boogaarts J,
    4. Van Norden A, et al

    . New generation of flow diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000434 pmid:23686973

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Maimon S,
    3. Gonen L,
    4. Nossek E, et al

    . Treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms with the SILK flow diverter: 2 years' experience with 28 patients at a single center. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:979–87 doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1316-2 pmid:22402875

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Kadirvel R,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology 2014;270:394–99 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130796 pmid:24086073

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Boussel L,
    3. Rayz V,
    4. McCulloch C, et al

    . Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 2008;39:2997–3002 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521617 pmid:18688012

    Abstract/FREE Full Text