Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Editorial

Counterpoint: Appropriately Ambiguous—The Disc Osteophyte Complex

J.S. Ross
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2016, 37 (12) 2181; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4928
J.S. Ross
Roles: AJNR Editor-in-Chief
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.S. Ross
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The nomenclature for lumbar spine degenerative disc disease has been painstakingly conceived, revised, and condoned by numerous societies.1 Not so for the cervical spine. I would like to promote the term “disc osteophyte complex” (DOC) for standard usage in the cervical spine lexicon, with certain caveats.

Why DOC?

Cervical spondylosis is unique to the cervical spine because of the anatomy and presence of the uncovertebral joints and spinal cord. This is often manifest over several segments with mass effect on the ventral thecal sac and cord from ventral disease (DOC) and posterior ligamentous hypertrophy. On MR imaging, we are often faced with a low-signal, posterior extension of the disc margin, which compresses or effaces the dura and neural structures. This low-signal-intensity lesion may be composed of various aspects of disc degeneration, including a bulging annulus, disc herniation, osteophyte, cartilage, and calcification, which are not easily separated by routine MR imaging. Differences in image quality due to section thickness, magnet strength, and patient cooperation make more specific parsing of the images impossible. It is reasonable and prudent to use a term that is morphologically accurate, but also purposefully nonspecific for the large number of cases in which we just cannot tell the precise underlying (and microscopic) pathology.

Surgeons

Ideally, we would craft our reports about cervical spondylosis on the basis of an intimate knowledge of the practice patterns and training of the surgeons with whom we work. The reality is that we often dictate with limited clinical information and little knowledge of the physicians the individual patient might end up consulting, be it family practice, pain management, or neuro- and orthopedic surgery. Opinions among surgeons vary widely regarding whether surgery should be performed for specific clinical indications, and if it should be performed, which approach (anterior or posterior) should be used (Figure).2 Given the vagaries involved, it seems reasonable to use nomenclature that is simple, easy, and widely understandable while also focusing on the important descriptors such as alignment, the degree of cord compression, and cord signal intensity. In the end, if the referring physicians are concerned about the presence of calcifications or osteophytes before surgery, they can always get a CT and correlate that data with the MR imaging study.

Figure.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure.

A 65-year-old patient with upper extremity numbness and paresthesias. An MR imaging study performed first (A and B) shows a low-signal DOC effacing the cord, with a long segment of cord myelomalacia. Nonenhanced CT study (C and D) obtained preoperatively shows that the bulk of the anterior disease is not ossified. Nevertheless, the patient went on to undergo posterior decompression (E).

Caveats

  1. Disc osteophyte complex should not be used in the lumbar spine. The pathophysiology is different, so stick to using the standard nomenclature of bulge, osteophyte, and disc herniation.

  2. DOC should not be used to the exclusion of the terms “osteophyte” and “disc herniation” (protrusion, extrusion) when they are obvious in the cervical spine. Some patients will have a plump herniation showing high signal on gradient-echo, and these should be called “herniations.” Some patients will have obvious osteophytes with fatty marrow signal, so go ahead and call them “osteophytes.” Many, many patients, however, will end up having DOC!

  3. DOC should be part of the analysis for central canal stenosis and separate from the analysis of uncovertebral joint and foraminal narrowing.

  4. DOC is an abbreviation for this editorial only. If you use this term in your reports, please expand and use “disc osteophyte complex.”

It is time to embrace the ambiguity of the DOC and use it guilt-free as standard nomenclature in cervical spondylosis.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fardon DF,
    2. Williams AL,
    3. Dohring EJ, et al
    . Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0—recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:E1448–65 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8866d pmid:23970106
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lee JY,
    2. Hohl JB,
    3. Fedorka CJ, et al
    . Surgeons agree to disagree on surgical options for degenerative conditions of the cervical and lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:E203–12 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df8063 pmid:21192301
    CrossRefPubMed
  • © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (12)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 12
1 Dec 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Counterpoint: Appropriately Ambiguous—The Disc Osteophyte Complex
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2016, 37 (12) 2181; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4928

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Counterpoint: Appropriately Ambiguous—The Disc Osteophyte Complex
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2016, 37 (12) 2181; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4928
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (3)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • The imaging of cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy
    Susan Hesni, David Baxter, Asif Saifuddin
    Skeletal Radiology 2023 52 12
  • MRI of difficult discs
    F. Waindim, J. Crim
    Clinical Radiology 2023 78 3
  • Radiopaedia.org
    Frank Gaillard, Tariq Walizai, Hoe Guan
    2016

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire