HydroCoils Reduce Recurrence Rates in Recently Ruptured Medium-Sized Intracranial Aneurysms: A Subgroup Analysis of the HELPS Trial

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Crobeddu E,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. Kallmes DF, et al

   . Review of 2 decades of aneurysm-recurrence literature. Part 2. Managing recurrence after endovascular coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:481–85

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Ringer AJ,
   3. Rodriguez-Mercado R,
   4. Veznedaroglu E, et al

   . Defining the risk of retreatment for aneurysm recurrence or residual after initial treatment by endovascular coiling: a multicenter study. Neurosurgery 2009;65:311–15; discussion 315

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Fujiwara NH

   . New expandable hydrogel-platinum coil hybrid device for aneurysm embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1580–88

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Cloft HJ,
   3. Kallmes DF

   . Aneurysm packing with HydroCoil embolic system versus platinum coils: initial clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:60–62

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. White PM,
   3. Lewis SC,
   4. Gholkar A, et al

   . Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1655–62

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Kallmes DF

   . Back to the tower of Babel: comparing outcomes from aneurysm trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:995–98

   FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. Cloft HJ, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of very small (3 mm or smaller) intracranial aneurysms: report of a consecutive series and a meta-analysis. Stroke 2010;41:116–21

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Tjoumakaris S,
   4. Gonzalez LF, et al

   . Coiling of large and giant aneurysms: complications and long-term results of 334 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:546–52

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Ferns SP,
   3. Sprengers ME,
   4. van Rooij WJ, et al

   . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Crobeddu E,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Kallmes DF, et al

    . Review of 2 decades of aneurysm-recurrence literature. Part 1. Reducing recurrence after endovascular coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:266–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. White PM,
    3. Lewis SC,
    4. Nahser H, et al

    . HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS trial): procedural safety and operator-assessed efficacy results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:217–23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Guilbert F,
    4. Weill A, et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Molyneux AJ,
    3. Kerr RS,
    4. Yu LM, et al

    . International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Gaba RC,
    3. Ansari SA,
    4. Roy SS, et al

    . Embolization of intracranial aneurysms with hydrogel-coated coils versus inert platinum coils: effects on packing density, coil length and quantity, procedure performance, cost, length of hospital stay, and durability of therapy. Stroke 2006;37:1443–50

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Watanabe K,
    3. Sugiu K,
    4. Tokunaga K, et al

    . Packing efficacy of HydroCoil embolic system: in vitro study using ruptured aneurysm model. Neurosurg Rev 2007;30:127–30; discussion 130

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Killer M,
    3. Arthur AS,
    4. Barr JD, et al

    . Histomorphology of thrombus organization, neointima formation, and foreign body response in retrieved human aneurysms treated with HydroCoil devices. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010;94:486–92

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. Lewis DA, et al

    . Angiographic and histologic analysis of experimental aneurysms embolized with platinum coils, Matrix, and HydroCoil. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1757–63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Killer M,
    3. Hauser T,
    4. Wenger A, et al

    . Comparison of experimental aneurysms embolized with second-generation embolic devices and platinum coils. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:497–505; discussion 505

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Rezek I,
    3. Mousan G,
    4. Wang Z, et al

    . Coil type does not affect angiographic follow-up outcomes of cerebral aneurysm coiling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1769–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Wei D,
    3. Wei C,
    4. Huang S, et al

    . Comparison between effects of HydroCoil embolic system and ordinary coil on large- and medium-sized intracranial aneurysms. Pak J Med Sci 2013;29:1334–37

    PubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Lee JY,
    3. Seo JH,
    4. Lee SJ, et al

    . Mid-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with HydroSoft coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:1687–94

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Arthur AS,
    3. Wilson SA,
    4. Dixit S, et al

    . Hydrogel-coated coils for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus 2005;18:E1

    PubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Berenstein A,
    3. Song JK,
    4. Niimi Y, et al

    . Treatment of cerebral aneurysms with hydrogel-coated platinum coils (HydroCoil): early single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1834–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Fanning NF,
    3. Berentei Z,
    4. Brennan PR, et al

    . HydroCoil as an adjuvant to bare platinum coil treatment of 100 cerebral aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2007;49:139–48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Cloft HJ

    . HydroCoil for Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion (HEAL) study: periprocedural results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:289–92

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Cloft HJ

    . HydroCoil for Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion (HEAL) study: 3–6 month angiographic follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:152–54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Assmann SF,
    3. Pocock SJ,
    4. Enos LE, et al

    . Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet 2000;355:1064–69

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Motulsky HJ

    . Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2014;351:200–05

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Rezek I,
    3. Lingineni RK,
    4. Sneade M, et al

    . Differences in the angiographic evaluation of coiled cerebral aneurysms between a core laboratory reader and operators: results of the Cerecyte Coil Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:124–27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Rezek I,
    3. Mousan G,
    4. Wang Z, et al

    . Effect of core laboratory and multiple-reader interpretation of angiographic images on follow-up outcomes of coiled cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1380–84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text