Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

EditorialEditorial Perspectives

Screening for Self-Plagiarism in a Subspecialty-versus-General Imaging Journal Using iThenticate

A.U. Kalnins, K. Halm and M. Castillo
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2015, 36 (6) 1034-1038; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4234
A.U. Kalnins
aFrom the Department of Radiology (A.U.K.), Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Halm
bAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology (K.H., M.C.), Oak Brook, Illinois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Castillo
bAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology (K.H., M.C.), Oak Brook, Illinois
cDepartment of Radiology (M.C.), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Castillo
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Roig M
    . Plagiarism in the sciences: conference highlights. Science Editor 2006;29:48–49
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mervis J
    . NSF audit of successful proposals finds numerous cases of alleged plagiarism. Science Insider. March 8, 2013. http://news.sciencemag.org/2013/03/nsf-audit-successful-proposals-finds-numerous-cases-alleged-plagiarism. Accessed November 23, 2013.
  3. 3.↵
    Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct: Final Rule. CFR Parts 50 and 93. Federal Register. Vol 70. No. 94. May 17, 2005:28386. Washington: Department of Health and Human Services
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bird SJ
    . Self-plagiarism and dual and redundant publications: what is the problem? Commentary on ‘seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct.’ Science and Engineering Ethics 2002;8:543–44
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hirsch JE
    . An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:16569–72
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Marnet A
    . H-index: what it is and how to find yours. 2010. http://www.benchfly.com/blog/h-index-what-it-is-and-how-to-find-yours/. Accessed November 23, 2013.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Berquist TH
    . Scientific integrity: has CrossCheck made a difference? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:703
    CrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Roig M
    . Recycling portions of text from the same author's previously published papers in psychology: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the Second Office of Research Integrity. Bethesda, Maryland. November, 16–18, 2002
  9. 9.↵
    1. Roig M
    . Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: a guide to ethical writing. August 2006. http://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/plagiarism.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2013.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Scanlon PM
    . Song From Myself: An Anatomy of Self-Plagiarism. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Library; 2007:57–66
  11. 11.↵
    iParadigms. http://www.iparadigms.com/. Accessed November 10, 2013.
  12. 12.↵
    Crosscheck. http://www.crossref.org/crosscheck/index.html. Accessed November 10, 2013.
  13. 13.↵
    Turnitin. Reduce plagiarism. http://turnitin.com/en_us/features/originalitycheck. Accessed November 10, 2013.
  14. 14.↵
    iThenticate. http://www.ithenticate.com/content. Accessed November 13, 2013.
  15. 15.↵
    iThenticate. Prevent plagiarism in published works. http://www.ithenticate.com/. Accessed November 3, 2013.
  16. 16.↵
    Turnitin. Instructor training about OriginalityCheck. http://turnitin.com/en_us/training/instructor-training/about-originalitycheck. Accessed November 10, 2013.
  17. 17.↵
    iThenticate. Text-only reports. http://www.ithenticate.com/training/text-only. Accessed November 10, 2013.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Jocoy CL,
    2. DiBiase D
    . Plagiarism by adult learners online: a case study in detection and remediation. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 2006;7:1–15
  19. 19.↵
    The University of the West Indies. Guidelines for staff and students on plagiarism. October 2010. http://sta.uwi.edu/resources/documents/postgrad/guidelines_staff_students_plagarism.pdf. Accessed November 3, 2013.
  20. 20.↵
    University of Stellenbosch Business School. Contract conditions for ad hoc Faculty teaching on USB-ED programmes, December 2013. Policy Annexure B: Interpreting Turnitin Results. 2013. http://www.usb-ed.com/content/Downloadable%20documents/Faculty%20Contract%20Conditions%20USB%20ED%202014.pdf. Accessed November 17, 2013.
  21. 21.↵
    Syracuse University answers. Turnitin and Blackboard. Interpreting Turnitin originality reports. August 28, 2013. http://answers.syr.edu/display/blackboard01/Interpreting+Turnitin+Originality+Report. Accessed November 17, 2013.
  22. 22.↵
    Tennessee University E-learning @ Tees Staff. Interpreting Turnitin originality reports. November 2013. http://eat.scm.tees.ac.uk/bb8content/resources/recipes/interpretTurnitin.pdf. Accessed November 17, 2013.
  23. 23.↵
    Committee on Publication Ethics. Serial plagiarism by an experienced author. 2012. http://publicationethics.org/case/serial-plagiarism-experienced-author. Accessed November 10, 2013.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Meddings K
    . CrossCheck plagiarism screening: what's the magic number. Editorial Office News. August 2011. http://www.ismte.org/File/Aug11CrossCheck.pdf. Accessed November 10, 2013.
  25. 25.↵
    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. December 2013. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2013.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Wager E
    . Committee on Publication Ethics. What to do if you suspect redundant (duplicate) publication. 2008. http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/01A_Redundant_Submitted.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2014.
  27. 27.↵
    Editors at BioMed Central. Committee on Publication Ethics. Text recycling guidelines. http://publicationethics.org/text-recycling-guidelines. Accessed August 24, 2014.
  28. 28.↵
    1. Bankier AA,
    2. Levine D,
    3. Sheiman RG, et al
    . Redundant publications in Radiology: shades of gray in a seemingly black-and-white issue. Radiology 2008;247:605–07
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Committee on Publication Ethics. What to do if you suspect plagiarism: (a) suspected plagiarism in a submitted manuscript. http://publicationethics.org/files/u7140/plagiarism%20A.pdf. Accessed November 10, 2013.
  30. 30.↵
    iThenticate. White paper. True costs of research misconduct. http://www.ithenticate.com/resources/papers/research-misconduct. Accessed August 17, 2012.
  31. 31.↵
    1. Michalek AM,
    2. Hutson AD,
    3. Wicher CP, et al
    . The costs and underappreciated consequences of research misconduct: a case study. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000318
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hoover GA
    . A game-theoretic model of plagiarism. Atlantic Economic Journal 2006;34:449–54
    CrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 36 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 36, Issue 6
1 Jun 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Screening for Self-Plagiarism in a Subspecialty-versus-General Imaging Journal Using iThenticate
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.U. Kalnins, K. Halm, M. Castillo
Screening for Self-Plagiarism in a Subspecialty-versus-General Imaging Journal Using iThenticate
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2015, 36 (6) 1034-1038; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4234

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Screening for Self-Plagiarism in a Subspecialty-versus-General Imaging Journal Using iThenticate
A.U. Kalnins, K. Halm, M. Castillo
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2015, 36 (6) 1034-1038; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4234
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Subspecialty Virtual Impact Factors within a Dedicated Neuroimaging Journal
Show more EDITORIAL PERSPECTIVES

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire