Diagnostic Accuracy of 4 Commercially Available Semiautomatic Packages for Carotid Artery Stenosis Measurement on CTA

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Rothwell PM,
   3. Eliasziw M,
   4. Gutnikov SA, et al

   . Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107–16

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Barnett HJ,
   3. Taylor DW,
   4. Eliasziw M, et al

   . Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415–25

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Willinsky RA,
   3. Taylor SM,
   4. TerBrugge K, et al

   . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Koelemay MJW,
   3. Nederkoorn PJ,
   4. Reitsma JB, et al

   . Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke 2004;35:2306–12

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Wardlaw JM,
   3. Stevenson MD,
   4. Chappell F, et al

   . Carotid artery imaging for secondary stroke prevention: both imaging modality and rapid access to imaging are important. Stroke 2009;40:3511–17

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Bucek RA,
   3. Puchner S,
   4. Haumer M, et al

   . Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: can CTA overcome the confusion? J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:443–50

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Howard P,
   3. Bartlett ES,
   4. Symons SP, et al

   . Measurement of carotid stenosis on computed tomographic angiography: reliability depends on postprocessing technique. Can Assoc Radiol J 2010;61:127–32

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Marquering HA,
   3. Nederkoorn PJ,
   4. Smagge L, et al

   . Performance of semiautomatic assessment of carotid artery stenosis on CT angiography: clarification of differences with manual assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:747–54

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. White JH,
   3. Bartlett ES,
   4. Bharatha A, et al

   . Reproducibility of semi-automated measurement of carotid stenosis on CTA. Can J Neurol Sci 2010;37:498–503

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Biermann C,
    3. Tsiflikas I,
    4. Thomas C, et al

    . Evaluation of computer-assisted quantification of carotid artery stenosis. J Digit Imaging 2012;25:250–57

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Hameeteman K,
    3. Zuluaga MA,
    4. Freiman M, et al

    . Evaluation framework for carotid bifurcation lumen segmentation and stenosis grading. Med Image Anal 2011;15:477–88

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Marquering HA,
    3. Majoie CB,
    4. Smagge L, et al

    . The relation of carotid calcium volume with carotid artery stenosis in symptomatic patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1182–87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Marquering HA,
    3. Nederkoorn PJ,
    4. Bleeker L, et al

    . Intracranial carotid artery disease in patients with recent neurological symptoms: high prevalence on CTA. Neuroradiology 2013;55:179–85

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Bleeker L,
    3. Marquering HA,
    4. van den Berg R, et al

    . Semi-automatic quantitative measurements of intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis and calcification using CT angiography. Neuroradiology 2012;54:919–27

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Derricks S

    2. Steen Van Der WE,
    3. Vermeij J,
    4. Marquering HA, et al

    . Intracranial carotid artery stenosis diagnosed with CTA in a western population: predictor for poor outcome. In: Derricks S ed., Carotid Artery Disease: Risk Factors, Prognosis and Management. Cardiology Research and Clinical Developments. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers; 2014:33–48
16. 16.↵
    2. Van Dijk AC,
    3. Fonville S,
    4. Zadi T, et al

    . Association between arterial calcifications and nonlacunar and lacunar ischemic strokes. Stroke 2014;45:728–33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Bartlett ES,
    3. Walters TD,
    4. Symons SP, et al

    . Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:13–19

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Bucek RA,
    3. Puchner S,
    4. Kanitsar A, et al

    . Automated CTA quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis: a pilot trial. J Endovasc Ther 2007;14:70–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Berg MH,
    4. Ikonen AEJ, et al

    . Carotid artery stenosis: reproducibility of automated 3D CT angiography analysis method. Eur Radiol 2004;14:665–72

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Maddox WT

    . On the dangers of averaging across observers when comparing decision bound models and generalized context models of categorization. Percept Psychophys 1999;61:354–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science