Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

S.R. Satti, L. Leishangthem and M.I. Chaudry
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2015, 36 (10) 1899-1904; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4377
S.R. Satti
aFrom the Department of Neurointerventional Surgery (S.R.S., L.L.), Christiana Care Health Center, Wilmington, Delaware
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Leishangthem
aFrom the Department of Neurointerventional Surgery (S.R.S., L.L.), Christiana Care Health Center, Wilmington, Delaware
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.I. Chaudry
bDepartment of Neuroradiology (M.I.C.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Friedman DI,
    2. Jacobson DM
    . Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 2002;59:1492–95
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Durcan FJ,
    2. Corbett JJ,
    3. Wall M
    . The incidence of pseudotumor cerebri: population studies in Iowa and Louisiana. Arch Neurol 1988;45:875–77
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Puffer RC,
    2. Mustafa W,
    3. Lanzino G
    . Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of the literature. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:483–86
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Francis CE,
    2. Quiros PA
    . Headache management in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2014;54:103–14
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wall M
    . The headache profile of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Cephalalgia 1990;10:331–35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fields JD,
    2. Javedani PP,
    3. Falardeau J, et al
    . Dural venous sinus angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:62–68
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Donnet A,
    2. Metellus P,
    3. Levrier O, et al
    . Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: clinical and radiologic outcome of 10 consecutive patients. Neurology 2008;70:641–47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Eggenberger ER,
    2. Miller NR,
    3. Vitale S
    . Lumboperitoneal shunt for the treatment of pseudotumor cerebri. Neurology 1996;46:1524–30
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Biousse V,
    2. Bruce BB,
    3. Newman NJ
    . Update on the pathophysiology and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012;83:488–94
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ball AK,
    2. Clarke CE
    . Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:433–42
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Friedman DI,
    2. Jacobson DM
    . Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 2004;24:138–45
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Galgano MA,
    2. Deshaies EM
    . An update on the management of pseudotumor cerebri. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:252–59
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Vander Ark GD,
    2. Kempe LG,
    3. Smith DR
    . Pseudotumor cerebri treated with lumbar-peritoneal shunt. JAMA 1971;217:1832–34
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Jackson IJ,
    2. Snodgrass SR
    . Peritoneal shunts in the treatment of hydrocephalus and increased intracranial pressure: a 4-year survey of 62 patients. J Neurosurg 1955;12:216–22
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Higgins JN,
    2. Owler BK,
    3. Cousins C, et al
    . Venous sinus stenting for refractory benign intracranial hypertension. Lancet 2002;359:228–30
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Owler BK,
    2. Parker G,
    3. Halmagyi GM, et al
    . Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome: venous sinus obstruction and its treatment with stent placement. J Neurosurg 2003;98:1045–55
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Higgins JN,
    2. Cousins C,
    3. Owler BK, et al
    . Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: 12 cases treated by venous sinus stenting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:1662–66
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bussière M,
    2. Falero R,
    3. Nicolle D, et al
    . Unilateral transverse sinus stenting of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:645–50
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ahmed RM,
    2. Wilkinson M,
    3. Parker GD, et al
    . Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1408–14
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Albuquerque FC,
    2. Dashti SR,
    3. Hu YC, et al
    . Intracranial venous sinus stenting for benign intracranial hypertension: clinical indications, technique, and preliminary results. World Neurosurg 2011;75:648–52; discussion 592–95
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kumpe DA,
    2. Bennett JL,
    3. Seinfeld J, et al
    . Dural sinus stent placement for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg 2012;116:538–48
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Alsuhaibani AH,
    2. Carter KD,
    3. Nerad JA, et al
    . Effect of optic nerve sheath fenestration on papilledema of the operated and the contralateral nonoperated eyes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Ophthalmology 2011;118:412–14
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Brourman ND,
    2. Spoor TC,
    3. Ramocki JM
    . Optic nerve sheath decompression for pseudotumor cerebri. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1378–83
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Corbett JJ,
    2. Nerad JA,
    3. Tse DT, et al
    . Results of optic nerve sheath fenestration for pseudotumor cerebri: the lateral orbitotomy approach. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1391–97
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Sergott RC,
    2. Savino PJ,
    3. Bosley TM
    . Modified optic nerve sheath decompression provides long-term visual improvement for pseudotumor cerebri. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1384–90
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Spoor TC,
    2. Ramocki JM,
    3. Madion MP, et al
    . Treatment of pseudotumor cerebri by primary and secondary optic nerve sheath decompression. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;112:177–85
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kelman SE,
    2. Sergott RC,
    3. Cioffi GA, et al
    . Modified optic nerve decompression in patients with functioning lumboperitoneal shunts and progressive visual loss. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1449–53
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kelman SE,
    2. Heaps R,
    3. Wolf A, et al
    . Optic nerve decompression surgery improves visual function in patients with pseudotumor cerebri. Neurosurgery 1992;30:391–95
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Acheson JF,
    2. Green WT,
    3. Sanders MD
    . Optic nerve sheath decompression for the treatment of visual failure in chronic raised intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:1426–29
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Goh KY,
    2. Schatz NJ,
    3. Glaser JS
    . Optic nerve sheath fenestration for pseudotumor cerebri. J Neuroophthalmol 1997;17:86–91
    PubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Banta JT,
    2. Farris BK
    . Pseudotumor cerebri and optic nerve sheath decompression. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1907–12
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Thuente DD,
    2. Buckley EG
    . Pediatric optic nerve sheath decompression. Ophthalmology 2005;112:724–27
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Knapp CM,
    2. Sampath R
    . Optic nerve sheath fenestration: a five year audit. Neuro-Ophthalmology 2005;29:173–77
    CrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Chandrasekaran S,
    2. McCluskey P,
    3. Minassian D, et al
    . Visual outcomes for optic nerve sheath fenestration in pseudotumour cerebri and related conditions. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:661–65
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Gupta AK,
    2. Gupta A,
    3. Kumar S, et al
    . Endoscopic endonasal management of pseudotumor cerebri: is it effective? Laryngoscope 2007;117:1138–42
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Nithyanandam S,
    2. Manayath GJ,
    3. Battu RR
    . Optic nerve sheath decompression for visual loss in intracranial hypertension: report from a tertiary care center in South India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:115–20
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Moreau A,
    2. Lao KC,
    3. Farris BK
    . Optic nerve sheath decompression: a surgical technique with minimal operative complications. J Neuroophthalmol 2014;34:34–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Pineles SL,
    2. Volpe NJ
    . Long-term results of optic nerve sheath fenestration for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: earlier intervention favours improved outcomes. Neuro-Ophthalmology 2013;37:12–19
    CrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. Sencer A,
    2. Akcakaya MO,
    3. Basaran B, et al
    . Unilateral endoscopic optic nerve decompression for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a series of 10 patients. World Neurosurg 2014;82:745–50
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Johnston I,
    2. Besser M,
    3. Morgan MK
    . Cerebrospinal fluid diversion in the treatment of benign intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg 1988;69:195–202
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Rosenberg ML,
    2. Corbett JJ,
    3. Smith C, et al
    . Cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures in pseudotumor cerebri. Neurology 1993;43:1071–72
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Burgett RA,
    2. Purvin VA,
    3. Kawasaki A
    . Lumboperitoneal shunting for pseudotumor cerebri. Neurology 1997;49:734–39
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Tulipan N,
    2. Lavin PJ,
    3. Copeland M
    . Stereotactic ventriculoperitoneal shunt for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: technical note. Neurosurgery 1998;43:175–76; discussion 176–77
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Maher CO,
    2. Garrity JA,
    3. Meyer FB
    . Refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension treated with stereotactically planned ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Neurosurg Focus 2001;10:E1
    PubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. McGirt MJ,
    2. Woodworth G,
    3. Thomas G, et al
    . Cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement for pseudotumor cerebri-associated intractable headache: predictors of treatment response and an analysis of long-term outcomes. J Neurosurg 2004;101:627–32
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Abubaker K,
    2. Ali Z,
    3. Raza K, et al
    . Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: lumboperitoneal shunts versus ventriculoperitoneal shunts—case series and literature review. Br J Neurosurg 2011;25:94–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Thambisetty M,
    2. Lavin PJ,
    3. Newman NJ, et al
    . Fulminant idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 2007;68:229–32
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Tarnaris A,
    2. Toma AK,
    3. Watkins LD, et al
    . Is there a difference in outcomes of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension with the choice of cerebrospinal fluid diversion site: a single centre experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011;113:477–79
    CrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Pearce JM
    . From pseudotumour cerebri to idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Pract Neurol 2009;9:353–56
    FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Degnan AJ,
    2. Levy LM
    . Pseudotumor cerebri: brief review of clinical syndrome and imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1986–93
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Buchheit WA,
    2. Burton C,
    3. Haag B, et al
    . Papilledema and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med 1969;280:938–42
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Bandyopadhyay S
    . Pseudotumor cerebri. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1699–701
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Ahmed RM,
    2. Zmudzki F,
    3. Parker GD, et al
    . Transverse sinus stenting for pseudotumor cerebri: a cost comparison with CSF shunting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:952–58
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Bynke G,
    2. Zemack G,
    3. Bynke H, et al
    . Ventriculoperitoneal shunting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 2004;63:1314–16
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Abu-Serieh B,
    2. Ghassempour K,
    3. Duprez T, et al
    . Stereotactic ventriculoperitoneal shunting for refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurosurgery 2007;60:1039–43; discussion 1043–44
    PubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    1. Yadav YR,
    2. Parihar V,
    3. Agarwal M, et al
    . Lumbar peritoneal shunt in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Turk Neurosurg 2012;22:21–26
    PubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. El-Saadany WF,
    2. Farhoud A,
    3. Zidan I
    . Lumboperitoneal shunt for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: patients' selection and outcome. Neurosurg Rev 2012;35:239–43; discussion 243–44
    CrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Woodworth GF,
    2. McGirt MJ,
    3. Elfert P, et al
    . Frameless stereotactic ventricular shunt placement for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2005;83:12–16
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. Sinclair AJ,
    2. Kuruvath S,
    3. Sen D, et al
    . Is cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension worthwhile? A 10-year review. Cephalalgia 2011;31:1627–33
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    1. Huang LC,
    2. Winter TW,
    3. Herro AM, et al
    . Ventriculoperitoneal shunt as a treatment of visual loss in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 2014;34:223–28
    CrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 36 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 36, Issue 10
1 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S.R. Satti, L. Leishangthem, M.I. Chaudry
Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2015, 36 (10) 1899-1904; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4377

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
S.R. Satti, L. Leishangthem, M.I. Chaudry
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2015, 36 (10) 1899-1904; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4377
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Transverse venous sinus stenting versus cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a multi-institutional and multinational database study
  • Redefining treatment expectations: exploring mid- and long-term outcomes of venous sinus stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Safety of intracranial venous stenting in patients with nickel allergy
  • Venous sinus stenting under conscious sedation
  • Consensus recommendations for the assessment and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in children and young people
  • Intensive care unit admission is not necessary after venous sinus stenting
  • Visual and pharmacotherapy outcomes after transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Stenting versus medical treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a matched-control study
  • Intensive care unit admission is not necessary after venous sinus stenting
  • Optic atrophy secondary to minocycline-induced idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Management of vascular causes of pulsatile tinnitus
  • Cerebrospinal fluid disorders and shunts: its time to move forward. Invited commentary on 'First-in-human endovascular treatment of hydrocephalus with a miniature biomimetic trans-dural shunt'
  • Major complications of dural venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: case series and management considerations
  • Correlation between intracranial pressure and venous sinus pressures in patients undergoing cerebral venography and manometry
  • A unifying theory explaining venous sinus stenosis and recurrent stenosis following venous sinus stenting in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Dural venous sinus stenting for treatment of pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Quality of life, need for retreatment, and the re-equilibration phenomenon after venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Changes in mean arterial pressure and end-tidal carbon dioxide content affect venous sinus pressures in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a randomized study
  • A descriptive study of venous sinus pressures and gradients in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Clinical Reasoning: A 55-year-old obese woman with headache and rhinorrhea
  • Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Efficacy of stenting in patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis-related cerebral venous sinus stenosis
  • Recommendations for the selection and treatment of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension for venous sinus stenting
  • MR Venous Flow in Sigmoid Sinus Diverticulum
  • Venous waveform morphological changes associated with treatment of symptomatic venous sinus stenosis
  • Indications for the Performance of Intracranial Endovascular Neurointerventional Procedures: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • A pilot study and novel angiographic classification for superior sagittal sinus stenting in patients with non-thrombotic intracranial venous occlusive disease
  • Comparison of venous sinus manometry gradients obtained while awake and under general anesthesia before venous sinus stenting
  • Increased Curvature of the Tentorium Cerebelli in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
  • Dural sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: factors associated with hemodynamic failure and management with extended stenting
  • Patency of the vein of Labbe after venous stenting of the transverse and sigmoid sinuses
  • Venous sinus stenting in patients without idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Evolving evidence in adult idiopathic intracranial hypertension: pathophysiology and management
  • Time to re-assess the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Reply:
  • Stents for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Meta-Analyzed, Hypo-Analyzed, and In Need of a Trial
  • Crossref (191)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Evolving evidence in adult idiopathic intracranial hypertension: pathophysiology and management
    Susan P Mollan, Fizzah Ali, Ghaniah Hassan-Smith, Hannah Botfield, Deborah I Friedman, Alexandra J Sinclair
    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2016 87 9
  • Neurological and spinal manifestations of the Ehlers–Danlos syndromes
    Fraser C. Henderson, Claudiu Austin, Edward Benzel, Paolo Bolognese, Richard Ellenbogen, Clair A. Francomano, Candace Ireton, Petra Klinge, Myles Koby, Donlin Long, Sunil Patel, Eric L. Singman, Nicol C. Voermans
    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics 2017 175 1
  • Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Patrick Nicholson, Waleed Brinjikji, Ivan Radovanovic, Christopher Alan Hilditch, Anderson Chun On Tsang, Timo Krings, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Stéphanie Lenck
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2019 11 4
  • A systematic review of surgical treatments of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)
    Aristotelis Kalyvas, Eleftherios Neromyliotis, Christos Koutsarnakis, Spyridon Komaitis, Evangelos Drosos, Georgios P. Skandalakis, Mantha Pantazi, Y. Pierre Gobin, George Stranjalis, A. Patsalides
    Neurosurgical Review 2021 44 2
  • Recommendations for the selection and treatment of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension for venous sinus stenting
    Kyle M Fargen, Kenneth Liu, Rebecca M Garner, Garret P Greeneway, Stacey Q Wolfe, R Webster Crowley
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2018 10 12
  • Indications for the Performance of Intracranial Endovascular Neurointerventional Procedures: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
    Clifford J. Eskey, Philip M. Meyers, Thanh N. Nguyen, Sameer A. Ansari, Mahesh Jayaraman, Cameron G. McDougall, J. Kevin DeMarco, William A. Gray, David C. Hess, Randall T. Higashida, Dilip K. Pandey, Constantino Peña, Hermann C. Schumacher
    Circulation 2018 137 21
  • Meta‐analysis and systematic review of population‐based epidemiological studies in idiopathic intracranial hypertension
    G. McCluskey, R. Doherty‐Allan, P. McCarron, A. M. Loftus, L. V. McCarron, D. Mulholland, F. McVerry, M. O. McCarron
    European Journal of Neurology 2018 25 10
  • An Up to Date Review of Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome
    John Glenn Burkett, Jessica Ailani
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 2018 18 6
  • Papilledema: A review of etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management
    Jim Shenchu Xie, Laura Donaldson, Edward Margolin
    Survey of Ophthalmology 2022 67 4
  • Dural venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: An updated review
    Lakshmi Leishangthem, Pooja SirDeshpande, Dharti Dua, Sudhakar R. Satti
    Journal of Neuroradiology 2019 46 2

More in this TOC Section

  • Guided vs Conventional Angiography Systems
  • Rescue Reentry in Carotid Near-Occlusion
  • Contour Neurovascular System: Five Year Follow Up
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire