This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Graphical Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The guided angiography system, an integrated angiography system, enables continuous guidance and flushing during diagnostic procedures. A guidewire provides guidance by remaining inside the catheter during contrast injection into tortuous vessels. While its feasibility was demonstrated in a retrospective study, this randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate its safety and effectiveness.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from September 2021 to June 2022. Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the guided or the conventional group. Primary outcomes were procedural time and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included catheterization success, adverse events, fluoroscopy time, fluoroscopy dose, and image quality.
RESULTS: A total of 200 participants (mean age, 59 [SD, 10 years], 71% women) were randomized into the guided (n = 100) and the conventional (n = 100) groups. The guided group demonstrated shorter procedural times compared with the conventional group (18.3 [SD, 9.2] versus 21.3 [SD, 8.1] minutes, P < .001). There were no serious adverse events in either group, and adverse events were similar. Catheterization success rates were similar between the guided and conventional groups (93.9% versus 96.8%, P = .226). However, the guided angiography system backed up more catheterization failures from the conventional angiography system, but not vice versa (57.1% versus 11.1%, P = .003). Among catheterization successes, the guided group achieved shorter fluoroscopy time (7.0 versus 7.7 minutes, P = .033) and lower fluoroscopy dose (466.8 versus 566.5 μGy·m2, P = .015). Regarding imaging quality, clinical acceptability was comparable between the guided and conventional groups (95.3% versus 95.5%, P = .781).
CONCLUSIONS: The guided angiography system offers a simple and effective alternative for diagnostic cerebral conventional angiography, with reduced radiation exposure and a favorable safety profile.
ABBREVIATION:
- AE
- adverse event
Footnotes
Boseong Kwon and Jong-Tae Yoon contributed equally to the study as first authors.
This work was supported by the “Supporting Project to Evaluation New Domestic Medical Devices in Hospitals” funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, which had no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or publication of this study.
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.
- © 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology