Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Effect of Structural Remodeling (Retraction and Recoil) of the Pipeline Embolization Device on Aneurysm Occlusion Rate

L.-D. Jou, B.D. Mitchell, H.M. Shaltoni and M.E. Mawad
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2014, 35 (9) 1772-1778; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3920
L.-D. Jou
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (L.-D.J., H.M.S., M.E.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.D. Mitchell
bNeurosurgery (B.D.M.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.M. Shaltoni
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (L.-D.J., H.M.S., M.E.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.E. Mawad
aFrom the Departments of Radiology (L.-D.J., H.M.S., M.E.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Demonstration of measurement of the PED length. Only 1 of the 6 material lines is shown.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    A PED covered the ophthalmic artery initially after treatment, but the PED retracted distally and uncovered the ophthalmic artery at 6 months (patient 7 in group 2).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Minor PED retraction is shown in 2 cases in group 1. The PEDs in white are seen immediately after deployment, and the PEDs in red are from the follow-up, (left) case 2 and (right) case 1.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    A change of vessel curvature is observed in 2 cases in group 2. A, Case 6 (white is for the posttreatment, and red for 6-month follow-up). B, Case 1 (white indicates posttreatment, and red shows the 6-month follow-up). C, Further PED movement in case 1 is observed between 6 (in white) and 24 (in red) months.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Acute and subacute changes of a 4 × 18 mm PED. The PED in white is immediately after deployment, yellow is the 1-month follow-up, and red is the 7-month follow-up. Left: Acute change in the first month after deployment. Right: Subacute change of the PED between the 1- and 6-month follow-ups.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    A, A linear relationship between the deployment length and the length at 6-month follow-up. B, The PED elongation is independent of the initial PED oversize.

  • Fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7.

    The relationship between device oversize and shortening (A) and recoil (B).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Dimensions and measurements of the PEDa

    Occlusion (n = 7)Incomplete (n = 7)P Value
    Nominal PED diameter (mm), D04.04 (0.45)4.46 (0.51)
    Nominal PED length (mm), L017.43 (2.32)19.43 (4.98)
    Proximal diameter post-Tx (mm), D13.77 (0.37)4.13 (0.36)
    Distal diameter post-Tx (mm), D23.12 (0.45)3.23 (0.52)
    Deployed length (mm), L124.27 (5.42)32.57 (8.89)
    D1 at 6 months (mm)3.93 (0.33)4.39 (0.28)
    D2 at 6 months (mm)3.32 (0.65)3.51 (0.55)
    Length at 6 months (mm), L222.31 (5.73)28.77 (7.81)
    Oversize post-Tx (mm), D0 − (D1 + D2)/20.59 (0.25)0.78 (0.33)
    Recoil at 6 months (mm), Δ(D1 + D2)/20.18 (0.19)0.28 (0.18)
    Elongation (mm), L1 − L06.84 (4.28)13.14 (4.30).026
    Elongation in %, (L1 − L0)/L039.29 (22.42)66.68 (13.67).025
    Shortening in 6 months (mm), L1−L21.96 (1.86)3.80 (2.14)
    • Note:—Tx indicates treatment.

    • ↵a SDs are given in parentheses.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 9
1 Sep 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of Structural Remodeling (Retraction and Recoil) of the Pipeline Embolization Device on Aneurysm Occlusion Rate
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
L.-D. Jou, B.D. Mitchell, H.M. Shaltoni, M.E. Mawad
Effect of Structural Remodeling (Retraction and Recoil) of the Pipeline Embolization Device on Aneurysm Occlusion Rate
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2014, 35 (9) 1772-1778; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3920

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Effect of Structural Remodeling (Retraction and Recoil) of the Pipeline Embolization Device on Aneurysm Occlusion Rate
L.-D. Jou, B.D. Mitchell, H.M. Shaltoni, M.E. Mawad
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2014, 35 (9) 1772-1778; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3920
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Braid stability after flow diverter treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Braids and beyond: a comprehensive study on pipeline device braid stability from PREMIER data
  • Wall Apposition Is a Key Factor for Aneurysm Occlusion after Flow Diversion: A Histologic Evaluation in 41 Rabbits
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Connectivity for remote neurovascular procedures
  • Cavernous dural AVF treated by transfacial route
  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire