Computer-Aided Diagnosis Improves Detection of Small Intracranial Aneurysms on MRA in a Clinical Setting

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Jeon TY,
   3. Jeon P,
   4. Kim KH

   . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysm on MR angiography. Korean J Radiol 2011;12:547–53

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Wiebers DO,
   3. Whisnant JP,
   4. Huston J 3rd., et al

   . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Juvela S,
   3. Porras M,
   4. Poussa K

   . Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: probability and risk factors for aneurysm rupture. Neurosurg Focus 2000;8:Preview 1
4. 4.↵
   2. Rinkel GJ

   . Natural history, epidemiology and screening of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neuroradiol 2008;35:99–103

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. White PM,
   3. Wardlaw J

   . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: prospective data have arrived. Lancet 2003;362:90–91

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Seibert B,
   3. Tummala RP,
   4. Chow R, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: review of current treatment options and outcomes. Front Neurol 2011;2:45

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Horikoshi T,
   3. Akiyama I,
   4. Yamagata Z, et al

   . Retrospective analysis of the prevalence of asymptomatic cerebral aneurysm in 4518 patients undergoing magnetic resonance angiography: when does cerebral aneurysm develop? Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2002;42:105–12, discussion 113

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Ross JS,
   3. Masaryk TJ,
   4. Modic MT, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155:159–65

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. White PM,
   3. Teasdale EM,
   4. Wardlaw JM, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort. Radiology 2001;219:739–49

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Korogi Y,
    3. Takahashi M,
    4. Mabuchi N, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: diagnostic accuracy of MR angiography with evaluation of maximum intensity projection and source images. Radiology 1996;199:199–207

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Okahara M,
    3. Kiyosue H,
    4. Yamashita M, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms in correlation with 3D-digital subtraction angiographic images: a study of 133 aneurysms. Stroke 2002;33:1803–08

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Shahzad R,
    3. Younas F

    . Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: magnetic resonance angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2011;21:325–29

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Wrede KH,
    3. Dammann P,
    4. Monninghoff C, et al

    . Non-enhanced MR imaging of cerebral aneurysms: 7 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla. PLoS One 2014;9:e84562

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Cirillo M,
    3. Scomazzoni F,
    4. Cirillo L, et al

    . Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e853–59

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Kashiwazaki D,
    3. Kuroda S

    . Size ratio can highly predict rupture risk in intracranial small (<5 mm) aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:2169–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Chien A,
    3. Liang F,
    4. Sayre J, et al

    . Enlargement of small, asymptomatic, unruptured intracranial aneurysms in patients with no history of subarachnoid hemorrhage: the different factors related to the growth of single and multiple aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2013;119:190–97

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Jagadeesan BD,
    3. Delgado Almandoz JE,
    4. Kadkhodayan Y, et al

    . Size and anatomic location of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in patients with single and multiple aneurysms: a retrospective study from a single center. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;1;6:169–74
18. 18.↵
    2. Yang X,
    3. Blezek DJ,
    4. Cheng LT, et al

    . Computer-aided detection of intracranial aneurysms in MR angiography. J Digit Imaging 2011;24:86–95

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Arimura H,
    3. Li Q,
    4. Korogi Y, et al

    . Automated computerized scheme for detection of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. Acad Radiol 2004;11:1093–104

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Hirai T,
    3. Korogi Y,
    4. Arimura H, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms at MR angiography: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. Radiology 2005;237:605–10

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Kobashi S,
    3. Kondo K,
    4. Hata Y

    . Computer-aided diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms in MRA images with case-based reasoning. IEICE T Inf Syst 2006;E89d:340–50
22. 22.↵
    2. Uchiyama Y,
    3. Ando H,
    4. Yokoyama R, et al

    . Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in MR angiography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2005;3:3031–34

    PubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Arimura H,
    3. Li Q,
    4. Korogi Y, et al

    . Computerized detection of intracranial aneurysms for three-dimensional MR angiography: feature extraction of small protrusions based on a shape-based difference image technique. Med Phys 2006;33:394–401

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Kakeda S,
    3. Korogi Y,
    4. Arimura H, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy and reading time to detect intracranial aneurysms on MR angiography using a computer-aided diagnosis system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:459–65

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Chakraborty DP,
    3. Berbaum KS

    . Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Med Phys 2004;31:2313–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Chakraborty DP

    . Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data. Med Phys 1989;16:561–68

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Chakraborty DP

    . A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis. Acad Radiol 2013;20:915–19

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Dorfman DD,
    3. Berbaum KS,
    4. Metz CE

    . Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27:723–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Doi K

    . Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2007;31:198–211

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Chabi ML,
    3. Borget I,
    4. Ardiles R, et al

    . Evaluation of the accuracy of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system in breast ultrasound according to the radiologist's experience. Acad Radiol 2012;19:311–19

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Sahiner B,
    3. Chan HP,
    4. Roubidoux MA, et al

    . Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 2007;242:716–24

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Wagner RF,
    3. Metz CE,
    4. Campbell G

    . Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review. Acad Radiol 2007;14:723–48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Chakraborty DP

    . Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies. Acad Radiol 2008;15:1554–66

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science